Literature DB >> 34159529

That's me in the spotlight: Self-relevance modulates attentional breadth.

Marius Golubickis1, C Neil Macrae2.   

Abstract

A core prediction of models of social-cognitive functioning is that attention is preferentially tuned to self-relevant material. Surprisingly, however, evidence in support of this viewpoint is scant. Remedying this situation, here we demonstrated that self-relevance influences the distribution of attentional resources during decisional processing. In a flanker task (N = 60), participants reported if to-be-judged stimuli either denoted, or were owned by, the self or a friend. A consistent pattern of results emerged across both judgment tasks. Whereas the identification of friend-related targets was speeded when the items were flanked by compatible compared with incompatible flankers, responses to self-related targets were resistant to flanker interference. Probing the origin of these effects, a further computational analysis (i.e., Shrinking Spotlight Diffusion Model analysis) confirmed that self-relevance impacted the focusing of attention during decision-making. These findings highlight how self-relevance modulates attentional processing.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional breadth; Flanker task; Self; Spotlight; Visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34159529     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01964-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  6 in total

1.  Testing the idea of privileged awareness of self-relevant information.

Authors:  Timo Stein; Alisha Siebold; Wieske van Zoest
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Self-relevance prioritizes access to visual awareness.

Authors:  C Neil Macrae; Aleksandar Visokomogilski; Marius Golubickis; William A Cunningham; Arash Sahraie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Self-priorization processes in action and perception.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual "cocktail party" effect.

Authors:  K L Shapiro; J Caldwell; R E Sorensen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.

Authors:  D LaBerge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Perceptual effects of social salience: evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching.

Authors:  Jie Sui; Xun He; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.332

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.