Literature DB >> 9104007

Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual "cocktail party" effect.

K L Shapiro1, J Caldwell, R E Sorensen.   

Abstract

Four experiments were carried out to investigate an early- versus late-selection explanation for the attentional blink (AB). In both Experiments 1 and 2, 3 groups of participants were required to identify a noun (Experiment 1) or a name (Experiment 2) target (experimental conditions) and then to identify the presence or absence of a 2nd target (probe), which was their own name, another name, or a specified noun from among a noun distractor stream (Experiment 1) or a name distractor stream (Experiment 2). The conclusions drawn are that individuals do not experience an AB for their own names but do for either other names or nouns. In Experiments 3 and 4, either the participant's own name or another name was presented, as the target and as the item that immediately followed the target, respectively. An AB effect was revealed in both experimental conditions. The results of these experiments are interpreted as support for a late-selection interference account of the AB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9104007     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.2.504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  66 in total

1.  Selective influence of second target exposure duration and task-1 load effects in the attentional blink phenomenon.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur; R Dell'Acqua
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

2.  Relations between emotion, memory, and attention: evidence from taboo stroop, lexical decision, and immediate memory tasks.

Authors:  Donald G MacKay; Meredith Shafto; Jennifer K Taylor; Diane E Marian; Lise Abrams; Jennifer R Dyer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04

3.  Consciousness of the first order in blindsight.

Authors:  Arash Sahraie; Paul B Hibbard; Ceri T Trevethan; Kay L Ritchie; Lawrence Weiskrantz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Relevant distractors do not cause negative priming.

Authors:  Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

5.  Task-irrelevant visual motion and flicker attenuate the attentional blink.

Authors:  Isabel Arend; Stephen Johnston; Kimron Shapiro
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

6.  When similarity leads to sparing: probing mechanisms underlying the attentional blink.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser; Corinne Davis; Jeneva L Ohan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-08-12

7.  The duration of the attentional blink in natural scenes depends on stimulus category.

Authors:  Wolfgang Einhäuser; Christof Koch; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Personal names do not always survive the attentional blink: Behavioral evidence for a flexible locus of selection.

Authors:  Barry Giesbrecht; Jocelyn L Sy; Megan K Lewis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Attentional and perceptual factors affecting the attentional blink for faces and objects.

Authors:  Ayelet N Landau; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Attention increases the temporal precision of conscious perception: verifying the Neural-ST Model.

Authors:  Srivas Chennu; Patrick Craston; Brad Wyble; Howard Bowman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.