| Literature DB >> 34157988 |
Lei Zhu1, Hui Yan2, Gui-Sheng Zhou1, Chun-Hao Jiang3, Pei Liu1, Guang Yu1, Sheng Guo1, Qi-Nan Wu1, Jin-Ao Duan4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels (A. sinensis) is a Chinese herb grown in different geographical locations. It contains numerous active components with therapeutic value. Rhizosphere microbiomes affect various aspects of plant performance, such as nutrient acquisition, growth and development and plant diseases resistance. So far, few studies have investigated how the microbiome effects level of active components of A. sinensis. This study investigated whether changes in rhizosphere microbial communities and metabolites of A. sinensis vary with the soil microenvironment. Soils from the two main A. sinensis-producing areas, Gansu and Yunnan Province, were used to conduct pot experiments. The soil samples were divided into two parts, one part was sterilized and the other was unsterilized planting with the seedling variety of Gansu danggui 90-01. All seedlings were allowed to grow for 180 days. At the end of the experiment, radix A. sinensis were collected and used to characterize growth targets and chemical compositions. Rhizosphere soils were subjected to microbial analyses.Entities:
Keywords: Angelica sinensis; Correlation; Metabolomics; Rhizosphere microorganism; quality
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34157988 PMCID: PMC8220839 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-03047-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Photographs of A. sinensis grown in different soil microenvironments. A: GN (below) and YN (above) sample ; B: GS (below) and YS(above) sample; C: GN (below) and GS (above) sample; D: YN (below) and YS (above) sample. (Notice: GN represent Gansu non-sterilized group; YN represent Yunnan non-sterilized group; GS represent Gansu sterilized group; YS represent Yunnan sterilized group)
Root system growth of A. sinensis from different soil microenvironments
| Group | Average surviving rate /% | Average dry weight /g | Average root diameter /mm | Average rootlet number | Average root length /cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GN | 0.77 ± 0.09 a | 2.94 ± 0.85 a | 7.86 ± 1.66 a | 6.94 ± 1.64 a | 11.14 ± 2.34 a |
| YN | 0.63 ± 0.18 a | 0.88 ± 0.25 b | 5.12 ± 0.88 b | 1.72 ± 0.80 b | 7.65 ± 0.70 bc |
| GS | 0.48 ± 0.15 b | 1.30 ± 0.62 b | 6.14 ± 1.13 b | 5.98 ± 2.01 ab | 10.36 ± 1.13 c |
| YS | 0.46 ± 0.19 b | 0.36 ± 0.05 b | 3.01 ± 0.74 c | 1.00 ± 0.00 b | 9.01 ± 0.79 b |
Values are mean ± standard error (n = 6). Values with the same letter are not statistically signifificantly different, ANOVA, p < 0.05
Comparison of the analytes in different groups of A. sinensis samples (mg/g)
| Group | Chlorogenic acid | Ferulic acid | Senkyunolide I | Senkyunolide H | Coniferyl ferulate | Senkyunolide A | Butylphthalide | Z-ligustilide | butylidenephthalide |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GN | 1.89 ± 0.15 c | 0.48 ± 0.15 c | 0.22 ± 0.09 a | 0.08 ± 0.04 a | 0.51 ± 0.42 a | 0.02 ± 0.03 b | 6.25 ± 1.34 b | 0.35 ± 0.08 a | |
| YN | 3.62 ± 0.35 a | 0.72 ± 0.11 b | 0.18 ± 0.05 a | 0.07 ± 0.02 a | 0.08 ± 0.04 b | 0.96 ± 0.33 a | 0.35 ± 0.26 a | 9.68 ± 1.49 a | 0.23 ± 0.06 b |
| GS | 2.05 ± 0.23 c | 0.87 ± 0.07ab | 0.23 ± 0.09 a | 0.10 ± 0.04 a | 0.04 ± 0.03 b | 0.07 ± 0.09 b | 6.96 ± 1.52 b | 0.26 ± 0.09 b | |
| YS | 2.88 ± 0.43 b | 0.97 ± 0.24 a | 0.04 ± 0.00 b | 0.01 ± 0.00 b | 0.10 ± 0.07 b | 0.32 ± 0.25 b | 0.03 ± 0.04 b | 11.01 ± 2.78a | 0.07 ± 0.02 c |
Values are mean ± standard error (n = 6). Values with the same letter are not statistically signifificantly different, ANOVA, p < 0.05
- Not detected
Fig. 2The structure of metabolites and microbial communities of A. sinensis samples. PCA scores for the comparison of metabolomic profiles between GN, GS, YN, YS group (A); principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on unweighted UniFrac (UUF) distance metric (B); and unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) clustering analyses at phylum level of samples from GN, GS, YN, YS, GNck, GSck, YNck, YSck group (n = 6) (C)
Fig. 3Potentially mechanistic associations between rhizosphere microbes and metabolites. Hierarchical clustering heatmap shows a consistent clustering pattern within individual groups and a diverse clustering pattern between different groups (A); covariation between microbes and small molecules in A. sinensis, specifically those of differentially abundant microbes and metabolites matched against standards between GS and YS group (Spearman’s rank correlation with two-tailed nominal p values) (n = 6) (B)
Fig. 4The composition of bacteria rhizosphere microbial communities. Shannon index (A); simpson index (B); Phylum distribution (C); heatmap distribution and hierarchical clustering at the genus level (D) of samples from GN, GS, YN, YS, GNck, GSck, YNck, YSck group (n = 6)