| Literature DB >> 34155355 |
Joshua C Doloff1,2,3,4,5, Omid Veiseh6,7,8,9, Roberto de Mezerville10, Marcos Sforza11, Tracy Ann Perry12, Jennifer Haupt13, Morgan Jamiel13, Courtney Chambers14, Amanda Nash15, Samira Aghlara-Fotovat15, Jessica L Stelzel16, Stuart J Bauer16, Sarah Y Neshat16, John Hancock12, Natalia Araujo Romero12, Yessica Elizondo Hidalgo12, Isaac Mora Leiva12, Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz17,18, Ardeshir Bayat19, Brian M Kinney20, H Courtney Hodges15,21,22,23, Roberto N Miranda24, Mark W Clemens25, Robert Langer26,27,28,29,30.
Abstract
Silicone is widely used in chronic implants and is generally perceived to be safe. However, textured breast implants have been associated with immune-related complications, including malignancies. Here, by examining for up to one year the foreign body response and capsular fibrosis triggered by miniaturized or full-scale clinically approved breast implants with different surface topography (average roughness, 0-90 μm) placed in the mammary fat pads of mice or rabbits, respectively, we show that surface topography mediates immune responses to the implants. We also show that the surface surrounding human breast implants collected during revision surgeries also differentially alters the individual's immune responses to the implant. Moreover, miniaturized implants with an average roughness of 4 μm can largely suppress the foreign body response and fibrosis (but not in T-cell-deficient mice), and that tissue surrounding these implants displayed higher levels of immunosuppressive FOXP3+ regulatory T cells. Our findings suggest that, amongst the topographies investigated, implants with an average roughness of 4 μm provoke the least amount of inflammation and foreign body response.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34155355 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-021-00739-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Biomed Eng ISSN: 2157-846X Impact factor: 25.671