Literature DB >> 33465850

Polymeric Biomaterials for Medical Implants and Devices.

Adrian J T Teo1, Abhinay Mishra1, Inkyu Park2, Young-Jin Kim1, Woo-Tae Park3, Yong-Jin Yoon1.   

Abstract

In this review article, we focus on the various types of materials used in biomedical implantable devices, including the polymeric materials used as substrates and for the packaging of such devices. Polymeric materials are used because of the ease of fabrication, flexibility, and their biocompatible nature as well as their wide range of mechanical, electrical, chemical, and thermal behaviors when combined with different materials as composites. Biocompatible and biostable polymers are extensively used to package implanted devices, with the main criteria that include gas permeability and water permeability of the packaging polymer to protect the electronic circuit of the device from moisture and ions inside the human body. Polymeric materials must also have considerable tensile strength and should be able to contain the device over the envisioned lifetime of the implant. For substrates, structural properties and, at times, electrical properties would be of greater concern. Section 1 gives an introduction of some medical devices and implants along with the material requirements and properties needed. Different synthetic polymeric materials such as polyvinylidene fluoride, polyethylene, polypropylene, polydimethylsiloxane, parylene, polyamide, polytetrafluoroethylene, poly(methyl methacrylate), polyimide, and polyurethane have been examined, and liquid crystalline polymers and nanocomposites have been evaluated as biomaterials that are suitable for biomedical packaging (section 2). A summary and glimpse of the future trend in this area has also been given (section 3). Materials and information used in this manuscript are adapted from papers published between 2010 and 2015 representing the most updated information available on each material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biocompatible; biomedical; medical devices; medical implants; packaging; polymer

Year:  2016        PMID: 33465850     DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng        ISSN: 2373-9878


  21 in total

1.  Biocompatible chitosan/polyethylene glycol/multi-walled carbon nanotube composite scaffolds for neural tissue engineering.

Authors:  Shengbo Sang; Rong Cheng; Yanyan Cao; Yayun Yan; Zhizhong Shen; Yajing Zhao; Yanqing Han
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 2.  Biodegradable Bone Implants as a New Hope to Reduce Device-Associated Infections-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  José C C Paiva; Luís Oliveira; Maria Fátima Vaz; Sofia Costa-de-Oliveira
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-22

Review 3.  Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications.

Authors:  Kacper Kroczek; Paweł Turek; Damian Mazur; Jacek Szczygielski; Damian Filip; Robert Brodowski; Krzysztof Balawender; Łukasz Przeszłowski; Bogumił Lewandowski; Stanisław Orkisz; Artur Mazur; Grzegorz Budzik; Józef Cebulski; Mariusz Oleksy
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 4.  Flexible Electronics and Devices as Human-Machine Interfaces for Medical Robotics.

Authors:  Wenzheng Heng; Samuel Solomon; Wei Gao
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 32.086

5.  An electrochemical study of acrylate bone adhesive permeability and selectivity change during in vitro ageing: A model approach to the study of biomaterials and membrane barriers.

Authors:  M Raja; J C Shelton; F Salamat-Zadeh; M Tavakoli; S Donell; G Watts; P Vadgama
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta X       Date:  2019-03-04

Review 6.  Bioinspired multifunctional adhesive system for next generation bio-additively designed dental restorations.

Authors:  Rizacan Sarikaya; Linyong Song; Esra Yuca; Sheng-Xue Xie; Kyle Boone; Anil Misra; Paulette Spencer; Candan Tamerler
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-10-10

7.  Macrophage immunomodulation through new polymers that recapitulate functional effects of itaconate as a power house of innate immunity.

Authors:  L Davenport Huyer; S Mandla; Y Wang; S Campbell; B Yee; C Euler; B F Lai; D Bannerman; D S Y Lin; M Montgomery; K Nemr; T Bender; S Epelman; R Mahadevan; M Radisic
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 18.808

Review 8.  Micro/Nano Technologies for High-Density Retinal Implant.

Authors:  Qi Zeng; Saisai Zhao; Hangao Yang; Yi Zhang; Tianzhun Wu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  The surface topography of silicone breast implants mediates the foreign body response in mice, rabbits and humans.

Authors:  Joshua C Doloff; Omid Veiseh; Roberto de Mezerville; Marcos Sforza; Tracy Ann Perry; Jennifer Haupt; Morgan Jamiel; Courtney Chambers; Amanda Nash; Samira Aghlara-Fotovat; Jessica L Stelzel; Stuart J Bauer; Sarah Y Neshat; John Hancock; Natalia Araujo Romero; Yessica Elizondo Hidalgo; Isaac Mora Leiva; Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Ardeshir Bayat; Brian M Kinney; H Courtney Hodges; Roberto N Miranda; Mark W Clemens; Robert Langer
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 10.  Gels, jets, mosquitoes, and magnets: a review of implantation strategies for soft neural probes.

Authors:  Nicholas V Apollo; Brendan Murphy; Kayla Prezelski; Nicolette Driscoll; Andrew G Richardson; Timothy H Lucas; Flavia Vitale
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.