Literature DB >> 34153955

Static and dynamic proprioceptive recognition through vibrotactile stimulation.

Luis Vargas1, He Helen Huang1, Yong Zhu2, Xiaogang Hu1.   

Abstract

Objective.Proprioceptive information provides individuals with a sense of our limb's static position and dynamic movement. Impaired or a lack of such feedback can diminish our ability to perform dexterous motions with our biological limbs or assistive devices. Here we seek to determine whether both static and dynamic components of proprioception can be recognized using variation of the spatial and temporal components of vibrotactile feedback.Approach.An array of five vibrotactors was placed on the forearm of each subject. Each tactor was encoded to represent one of the five forearm postures. Vibratory stimulus was elicited to convey the static position and movement of the forearm. Four experimental blocks were performed to test each subject's recognition of a forearm's simulated static position, rotational amplitude, rotational amplitude and direction, and rotational speed.Main results.Our results showed that the subjects were able to perform proprioceptive recognition based on the delivered vibrotactile information. Specifically, rotational amplitude recognition resulted in the highest level of accuracy (99.0%), while the recognition accuracy of the static position and the rotational amplitude-direction was the lowest (91.7% and 90.8%, respectively). Nevertheless, all proprioceptive properties were perceived with >90% accuracy, indicating that the implemented vibrotactile encoding scheme could effectively provide proprioceptive information to the users.Significance.The outcomes suggest that information pertaining to static and dynamic aspects of proprioception can be accurately delivered using an array of vibrotactors. This feedback approach could be used to potentially evaluate the sensorimotor integration processes during human-machine interactions, and to improve sensory feedback in clinical populations with somatosensory impairments.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arm function; proprioception; sensory substitution; somatosensory feedback; vibrotactile stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34153955      PMCID: PMC8715509          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac0d43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  48 in total

1.  Sensory feedback by peripheral nerve stimulation improves task performance in individuals with upper limb loss using a myoelectric prosthesis.

Authors:  Matthew Schiefer; Daniel Tan; Steven M Sidek; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Vibrotactile detection thresholds for chest skin of amputees following targeted reinnervation surgery.

Authors:  Aimee E Schultz; Paul D Marasco; Todd A Kuiken
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology.

Authors:  David I Warton; Francis K C Hui
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Vibrotactile sensory substitution for electromyographic control of object manipulation.

Authors:  Eric Rombokas; Cara E Stepp; Chelsey Chang; Mark Malhotra; Yoky Matsuoka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Vibrotactile stimulation promotes embodiment of an alien hand in amputees with phantom sensations.

Authors:  Marco D'Alonzo; Francesco Clemente; Christian Cipriani
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Multichannel electrotactile feedback for simultaneous and proportional myoelectric control.

Authors:  Gauravkumar K Patel; Strahinja Dosen; Claudio Castellini; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  A closed-loop hand prosthesis with simultaneous intraneural tactile and position feedback.

Authors:  Edoardo D'Anna; Giacomo Valle; Alberto Mazzoni; Ivo Strauss; Francesco Iberite; Jérémy Patton; Francesco M Petrini; Stanisa Raspopovic; Giuseppe Granata; Riccardo Di Iorio; Marco Controzzi; Christian Cipriani; Thomas Stieglitz; Paolo M Rossini; Silvestro Micera
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2019-02-20

8.  Evoked haptic sensations in the hand via non-invasive proximal nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Henry Shin; Zach Watkins; He Helen Huang; Yong Zhu; Xiaogang Hu
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Changes in sensation after nerve injury or amputation: the role of central factors.

Authors:  S Braune; W Schady
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Supplemental vibrotactile feedback control of stabilization and reaching actions of the arm using limb state and position error encodings.

Authors:  Alexis R Krueger; Psiche Giannoni; Valay Shah; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  2 in total

1.  Closed-loop control of a prosthetic finger via evoked proprioceptive information.

Authors:  Luis Vargas; He Helen Huang; Yong Zhu; Xiaogang Hu
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Object Recognition via Evoked Sensory Feedback during Control of a Prosthetic Hand.

Authors:  Luis Vargas; He Huang; Yong Zhu; Xiaogang Hu
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2021-10-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.