Literature DB >> 23508245

Vibrotactile sensory substitution for electromyographic control of object manipulation.

Eric Rombokas1, Cara E Stepp, Chelsey Chang, Mark Malhotra, Yoky Matsuoka.   

Abstract

It has been shown that incorporating augmentative vibrotactile feedback can improve performance of a virtual object manipulation task using finger movement. Vibrotactile sensory substitution for prosthetic applications, however, will necessarily not involve actual finger movement for control. Here we study the utility of such feedback when using myoelectric (EMG) signals for control, and demonstrate task improvement and learning for a force-motion task in a virtual environment. Using vibrotactile feedback, a group of unimpaired participants ( N = 10) were able to increase performance in a single session. We go on to study the feasibility of this method for two prosthetic hand users, one of whom had targeted muscle reinnervation allowing the augmentative feedback to be perceived as if it were on the absent hand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23508245     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2252174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  17 in total

Review 1.  Neural interfaces for somatosensory feedback: bringing life to a prosthesis.

Authors:  Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.710

2.  Sensory feedback by peripheral nerve stimulation improves task performance in individuals with upper limb loss using a myoelectric prosthesis.

Authors:  Matthew Schiefer; Daniel Tan; Steven M Sidek; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Internal models of upper limb prosthesis users when grasping and lifting a fragile object with their prosthetic limb.

Authors:  Peter S Lum; Iian Black; Rahsaan J Holley; Jessica Barth; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Assessing vibrotactile feedback strategies by controlling a cursor with unstable dynamics.

Authors:  Kristin M Quick; Nicholas S Card; Stephen M Whaite; Jessica Mischel; Patrick Loughlin; Aaron P Batista
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

5.  Static and dynamic proprioceptive recognition through vibrotactile stimulation.

Authors:  Luis Vargas; He Helen Huang; Yong Zhu; Xiaogang Hu
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Effects of kinematic vibrotactile feedback on learning to control a virtual prosthetic arm.

Authors:  Christopher J Hasson; Julia Manczurowsky
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Somatotopical feedback versus non-somatotopical feedback for phantom digit sensation on amputees using electrotactile stimulation.

Authors:  Dingguo Zhang; Heng Xu; Peter B Shull; Jianrong Liu; Xiangyang Zhu
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 8.  Haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer - a review.

Authors:  Peter B Shull; Dana D Damian
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Sonomyography Combined with Vibrotactile Feedback Enables Precise Target Acquisition Without Visual Feedback.

Authors:  Shriniwas Patwardhan; Biswarup Mukherjee; Ananya Dhawan; Meena Alzamani; Abdul Noor; Susannah Engdahl; Wilsaan M Joiner; Siddhartha Sikdar
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2020-07

10.  An exploration of grip force regulation with a low-impedance myoelectric prosthesis featuring referred haptic feedback.

Authors:  Jeremy D Brown; Andrew Paek; Mashaal Syed; Marcia K O'Malley; Patricia A Shewokis; Jose L Contreras-Vidal; Alicia J Davis; R Brent Gillespie
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.