Jennifer C Morgan1, Kathryn E Moracco2, Jennifer R Mendel3, Dannielle E Kelley4, Seth M Noar5, Noel T Brewer2. 1. Health Communication, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 2. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, NC. 3. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, NC. 4. NIH, NCI, Bethesda, MD. 5. School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, NC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Federal law requires informing the public on toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke. We sought the public's advice about communicating information about these chemicals. METHODS: Adolescents, young adults, and adults (N = 59), including smokers and non-smokers, participated in 9 focus groups that discussed inclusion of messages about toxic chemicals on cigarette packs, in media campaigns, and on a website. We transcribed, coded, and analyzed focus group audio-recordings. RESULTS: Participants had 3 suggestions for message content to increase the impact of messages about cigarette smoke chemicals. First, they wanted to see messages rotated more frequently to increase message novelty. Second, they recommended using stories and pictures to help connect people to the abstract idea of chemicals in smoke. Third, they cautioned against making messages that might seem overblown and could appeal to the rebellious nature of adolescents. Some participants mentioned that chemical information on a website might discourage people from smoking; others mentioned that people might use it to choose which brand to smoke. CONCLUSIONS: Legislation provides the impetus to design new chemical disclosure messages for cigarette packs and other media. Our findings can help increase the impact of these messages.
OBJECTIVES: Federal law requires informing the public on toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke. We sought the public's advice about communicating information about these chemicals. METHODS: Adolescents, young adults, and adults (N = 59), including smokers and non-smokers, participated in 9 focus groups that discussed inclusion of messages about toxic chemicals on cigarette packs, in media campaigns, and on a website. We transcribed, coded, and analyzed focus group audio-recordings. RESULTS: Participants had 3 suggestions for message content to increase the impact of messages about cigarette smoke chemicals. First, they wanted to see messages rotated more frequently to increase message novelty. Second, they recommended using stories and pictures to help connect people to the abstract idea of chemicals in smoke. Third, they cautioned against making messages that might seem overblown and could appeal to the rebellious nature of adolescents. Some participants mentioned that chemical information on a website might discourage people from smoking; others mentioned that people might use it to choose which brand to smoke. CONCLUSIONS: Legislation provides the impetus to design new chemical disclosure messages for cigarette packs and other media. Our findings can help increase the impact of these messages.
Entities:
Keywords:
chemicals; constituents; health communication; health messages; tobacco
Authors: Kathryn E Moracco; Jennifer C Morgan; Jennifer Mendel; Randall Teal; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl; Marissa G Hall; Noel T Brewer Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Lydia F Emery; Daniel Romer; Kaitlin M Sheerin; Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Ellen Peters Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jennifer C Morgan; Brian G Southwell; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl; Shelley D Golden; Noel T Brewer Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Seth M Noar; Dannielle E Kelley; Marcella H Boynton; Jennifer C Morgan; Marissa G Hall; Jennifer R Mendel; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer Journal: Prev Med Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 4.018