Jennifer C Morgan1, Brian G Southwell1,2,3, Seth M Noar2,4, Kurt M Ribisl1,4, Shelley D Golden1, Noel T Brewer1,4. 1. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 2. School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 3. RTI International, Research Triangle Park North Carolina, NC. 4. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
Introduction: Social interactions are a key mechanism through which health communication efforts, including pictorial cigarette pack warnings, may exert their effects. We sought to better understand social interactions elicited by pictorial cigarette pack warnings. Methods: A controlled trial randomly assigned US adult smokers (n = 2149) to have their cigarette packs labeled with pictorial or text-only warnings for 4 weeks. Smokers completed surveys during the baseline visit and each of the subsequent 4 weekly visits. Results:Smokers with pictorial warnings on their packs had more conversations throughout the trial compared to those with text-only warnings (8.2 conversations vs 5.0, p<.01). The highest number of conversations occurred during the first week. Smokers with pictorial warnings were more likely than those with text-only warnings to discuss the health effects of smoking, whether the warnings would make them want to quit and whether the warnings would make others want to quit (all p < .05). Smokers were more likely to describe pictorial warnings as scary, gross, or depressing and gloomy during conversations than text-only warnings (all p < .05). Conclusions: Pictorial warnings sparked more conversations about the warnings, the health effects of smoking, and quitting smoking than text-only warnings. These social interactions may extend the reach of pictorial warnings beyond the targeted smoker and may be one of the processes by which pictorial warnings have impact. Implications: Health communication can influence behavior by changing social interactions. Our trial characterized social interactions about pictorial cigarette pack warnings with a large longitudinal sample in a real-world setting. Understanding these conversations can inform the United States and other countries as they improve existing warnings and help tobacco control policy makers and health communication theorists understand how social interactions triggered by warnings affect smoking.
RCT Entities:
Introduction: Social interactions are a key mechanism through which health communication efforts, including pictorial cigarette pack warnings, may exert their effects. We sought to better understand social interactions elicited by pictorial cigarette pack warnings. Methods: A controlled trial randomly assigned US adult smokers (n = 2149) to have their cigarette packs labeled with pictorial or text-only warnings for 4 weeks. Smokers completed surveys during the baseline visit and each of the subsequent 4 weekly visits. Results: Smokers with pictorial warnings on their packs had more conversations throughout the trial compared to those with text-only warnings (8.2 conversations vs 5.0, p<.01). The highest number of conversations occurred during the first week. Smokers with pictorial warnings were more likely than those with text-only warnings to discuss the health effects of smoking, whether the warnings would make them want to quit and whether the warnings would make others want to quit (all p < .05). Smokers were more likely to describe pictorial warnings as scary, gross, or depressing and gloomy during conversations than text-only warnings (all p < .05). Conclusions: Pictorial warnings sparked more conversations about the warnings, the health effects of smoking, and quitting smoking than text-only warnings. These social interactions may extend the reach of pictorial warnings beyond the targeted smoker and may be one of the processes by which pictorial warnings have impact. Implications: Health communication can influence behavior by changing social interactions. Our trial characterized social interactions about pictorial cigarette pack warnings with a large longitudinal sample in a real-world setting. Understanding these conversations can inform the United States and other countries as they improve existing warnings and help tobacco control policy makers and health communication theorists understand how social interactions triggered by warnings affect smoking.
Authors: David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; Pete Driezen Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Kaitlyn E Brodar; Marissa G Hall; Eboneé N Butler; Humberto Parada; Al Stein-Seroussi; Sean Hanley; Noel T Brewer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jennifer C Morgan; Shelley D Golden; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl; Brian G Southwell; Michelle Jeong; Marissa G Hall; Noel T Brewer Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Marissa G Hall; Theresa M Marteau; Cass R Sunstein; Kurt M Ribisl; Seth M Noar; Elizabeth N Orlan; Noel T Brewer Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2018-02-06
Authors: Kaitlyn E Brodar; M Justin Byron; Kathryn Peebles; Marissa G Hall; Jessica K Pepper; Noel T Brewer Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-09-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Noel T Brewer; Michelle Jeong; Jennifer R Mendel; Marissa G Hall; Dongyu Zhang; Humberto Parada; Marcella H Boynton; Seth M Noar; Sabeeh A Baig; Jennifer C Morgan; Kurt M Ribisl Journal: Tob Control Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Jennifer R Mendel; Marissa G Hall; Sabeeh A Baig; Michelle Jeong; Noel T Brewer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-07-25 Impact factor: 3.390