Literature DB >> 30318264

Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study.

Sasank Chilamkurthy1, Rohit Ghosh2, Swetha Tanamala2, Mustafa Biviji3, Norbert G Campeau4, Vasantha Kumar Venugopal5, Vidur Mahajan5, Pooja Rao2, Prashant Warier2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-contrast head CT scan is the current standard for initial imaging of patients with head trauma or stroke symptoms. We aimed to develop and validate a set of deep learning algorithms for automated detection of the following key findings from these scans: intracranial haemorrhage and its types (ie, intraparenchymal, intraventricular, subdural, extradural, and subarachnoid); calvarial fractures; midline shift; and mass effect.
METHODS: We retrospectively collected a dataset containing 313 318 head CT scans together with their clinical reports from around 20 centres in India between Jan 1, 2011, and June 1, 2017. A randomly selected part of this dataset (Qure25k dataset) was used for validation and the rest was used to develop algorithms. An additional validation dataset (CQ500 dataset) was collected in two batches from centres that were different from those used for the development and Qure25k datasets. We excluded postoperative scans and scans of patients younger than 7 years. The original clinical radiology report and consensus of three independent radiologists were considered as gold standard for the Qure25k and CQ500 datasets, respectively. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were primarily used to assess the algorithms.
FINDINGS: The Qure25k dataset contained 21 095 scans (mean age 43 years; 9030 [43%] female patients), and the CQ500 dataset consisted of 214 scans in the first batch (mean age 43 years; 94 [44%] female patients) and 277 scans in the second batch (mean age 52 years; 84 [30%] female patients). On the Qure25k dataset, the algorithms achieved an AUC of 0·92 (95% CI 0·91-0·93) for detecting intracranial haemorrhage (0·90 [0·89-0·91] for intraparenchymal, 0·96 [0·94-0·97] for intraventricular, 0·92 [0·90-0·93] for subdural, 0·93 [0·91-0·95] for extradural, and 0·90 [0·89-0·92] for subarachnoid). On the CQ500 dataset, AUC was 0·94 (0·92-0·97) for intracranial haemorrhage (0·95 [0·93-0·98], 0·93 [0·87-1·00], 0·95 [0·91-0·99], 0·97 [0·91-1·00], and 0·96 [0·92-0·99], respectively). AUCs on the Qure25k dataset were 0·92 (0·91-0·94) for calvarial fractures, 0·93 (0·91-0·94) for midline shift, and 0·86 (0·85-0·87) for mass effect, while AUCs on the CQ500 dataset were 0·96 (0·92-1·00), 0·97 (0·94-1·00), and 0·92 (0·89-0·95), respectively.
INTERPRETATION: Our results show that deep learning algorithms can accurately identify head CT scan abnormalities requiring urgent attention, opening up the possibility to use these algorithms to automate the triage process. FUNDING: Qure.ai.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30318264     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31645-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  135 in total

1.  One-Shot Generative Adversarial Learning for MRI Segmentation of Craniomaxillofacial Bony Structures.

Authors:  Xu Chen; Chunfeng Lian; Li Wang; Hannah Deng; Steve H Fung; Dong Nie; Kim-Han Thung; Pew-Thian Yap; Jaime Gateno; James J Xia; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Construction of a Machine Learning Dataset through Collaboration: The RSNA 2019 Brain CT Hemorrhage Challenge.

Authors:  Adam E Flanders; Luciano M Prevedello; George Shih; Safwan S Halabi; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Robyn Ball; John T Mongan; Anouk Stein; Felipe C Kitamura; Matthew P Lungren; Gagandeep Choudhary; Lesley Cala; Luiz Coelho; Monique Mogensen; Fanny Morón; Elka Miller; Ichiro Ikuta; Vahe Zohrabian; Olivia McDonnell; Christie Lincoln; Lubdha Shah; David Joyner; Amit Agarwal; Ryan K Lee; Jaya Nath
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-04-29

3.  Preparing Radiologists to Lead in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Designing and Implementing a Focused Data Science Pathway for Senior Radiology Residents.

Authors:  Walter F Wiggins; M Travis Caton; Kirti Magudia; Sha-Har A Glomski; Elizabeth George; Michael H Rosenthal; Glenn C Gaviola; Katherine P Andriole
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-11-04

4.  Deep convolutional neural network applied to the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2014 category classification: a pilot study.

Authors:  Rikiya Yamashita; Amber Mittendorf; Zhe Zhu; Kathryn J Fowler; Cynthia S Santillan; Claude B Sirlin; Mustafa R Bashir; Richard K G Do
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-01

5.  Generalizable Inter-Institutional Classification of Abnormal Chest Radiographs Using Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Ian Pan; Saurabh Agarwal; Derek Merck
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  The Rebirth of CAD: How Is Modern AI Different from the CAD We Know?

Authors:  Luke Oakden-Rayner
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-05-29

7.  Putting the Pieces Together: Deep Learning for Knee MRI Multitissue Abnormality Detection and Severity Grading.

Authors:  Matthew D Li; Connie Y Chang
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-04-14

8.  Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Y W Lui; P D Chang; G Zaharchuk; D P Barboriak; A E Flanders; M Wintermark; C P Hess; C G Filippi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  AI in the treatment of fertility: key considerations.

Authors:  Jason Swain; Matthew Tex VerMilyea; Marcos Meseguer; Diego Ezcurra
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Luke Oakden-Rayner; Jared Dunnmon; Gustavo Carneiro; Christopher Ré
Journal:  Proc ACM Conf Health Inference Learn (2020)       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.