Literature DB >> 25419824

No evidence for a fixed object limit in working memory: Spatial ensemble representations inflate estimates of working memory capacity for complex objects.

Timothy F Brady1, George A Alvarez1.   

Abstract

A central question for models of visual working memory is whether the number of objects people can remember depends on object complexity. Some influential "slot" models of working memory capacity suggest that people always represent 3-4 objects and that only the fidelity with which these objects are represented is affected by object complexity. The primary evidence supporting this claim is the finding that people can detect large changes to complex objects (consistent with remembering at least 4 individual objects), but that small changes cannot be detected (consistent with low-resolution representations). Here we show that change detection with large changes greatly overestimates individual item capacity when people can use global representations of the display to detect such changes. When the ability to use such global ensemble or texture representations is reduced, people remember individual information about only 1-2 complex objects. This finding challenges models that propose people always remember a fixed number of objects, regardless of complexity, and supports a more flexible model with an important role for spatial ensemble representations. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25419824     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  17 in total

1.  Working memory is not fixed-capacity: More active storage capacity for real-world objects than for simple stimuli.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Viola S Störmer; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Benefits and pitfalls of data compression in visual working memory.

Authors:  Laura Lazartigues; Frédéric Lavigne; Carlos Aguilar; Nelson Cowan; Fabien Mathy
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte; Young Eun Park; Rosanne L Rademaker; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Differential hemispheric and visual stream contributions to ensemble coding of crowd emotion.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Daniel N Albohn; Troy G Steiner; Cody A Cushing; Reginald B Adams; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-10-09

5.  Similarity effects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Hyejin J Lee; Anthony Asaad; Roger Remington
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

6.  Modeling mean estimation tasks in within-trial and across-trial contexts.

Authors:  Ke Tong; Chad Dubé
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.157

7.  Working memory development: A 50-year assessment of research and underlying theories.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2022-03-02

8.  Severity of Topiramate-Related Working Memory Impairment Is Modulated by Plasma Concentration and Working Memory Capacity.

Authors:  Samuel P Callisto; Sílvia M Illamola; Angela K Birnbaum; Christopher M Barkley; Sai Praneeth R Bathena; Ilo E Leppik; Susan E Marino
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 9.  The what, where and how of delay activity.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Memory and Proactive Interference for spatially distributed items.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.