Literature DB >> 34129788

Correlation between protein secondary structure and mechanical performance for the ultra-tough dragline silk of Darwin's bark spider.

K Zin Htut1, Angela M Alicea-Serrano2, Saranshu Singla1, Ingi Agnarsson3, Jessica E Garb4, Matjaž Kuntner5,6, Matjaž Gregorič5, Robert A Haney7, Mohammad Marhabaie8, Todd A Blackledge2, Ali Dhinojwala1.   

Abstract

The spider major ampullate (MA) silk exhibits high tensile strength and extensibility and is typically a blend of MaSp1 and MaSp2 proteins with the latter comprising glycine-proline-glycine-glycine-X repeating motifs that promote extensibility and supercontraction. The MA silk from Darwin's bark spider (Caerostris darwini) is estimated to be two to three times tougher than the MA silk from other spider species. Previous research suggests that a unique MaSp4 protein incorporates proline into a novel glycine-proline-glycine-proline motif and may explain C. darwini MA silk's extraordinary toughness. However, no direct correlation has been made between the silk's molecular structure and its mechanical properties for C. darwini. Here, we correlate the relative protein secondary structure composition of MA silk from C. darwini and four other spider species with mechanical properties before and after supercontraction to understand the effect of the additional MaSp4 protein. Our results demonstrate that C. darwini MA silk possesses a unique protein composition with a lower ratio of helices (31%) and β-sheets (20%) than other species. Before supercontraction, toughness, modulus and tensile strength correlate with percentages of β-sheets, unordered or random coiled regions and β-turns. However, after supercontraction, only modulus and strain at break correlate with percentages of β-sheets and β-turns. Our study highlights that additional information including crystal size and crystal and chain orientation is necessary to build a complete structure-property correlation model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Raman spectroscopy; mechanical properties; protein secondary structure; spider silk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34129788      PMCID: PMC8205537          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.293


  61 in total

1.  Solid-state NMR evidence for elastin-like beta-turn structure in spider dragline silk.

Authors:  Janelle E Jenkins; Melinda S Creager; Emily B Butler; Randolph V Lewis; Jeffery L Yarger; Gregory P Holland
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Evolution of supercontraction in spider silk: structure-function relationship from tarantulas to orb-weavers.

Authors:  Cecilia Boutry; Todd Alan Blackledge
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Prey type, vibrations and handling interactively influence spider silk expression.

Authors:  S J Blamires; I-C Chao; I-M Tso
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  The elaborate structure of spider silk: structure and function of a natural high performance fiber.

Authors:  Lin Römer; Thomas Scheibel
Journal:  Prion       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 5.  The hidden link between supercontraction and mechanical behavior of spider silks.

Authors:  Manuel Elices; Gustavo R Plaza; José Pérez-Rigueiro; Gustavo V Guinea
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2010-09-25

6.  The influence of metal ions on native silk rheology.

Authors:  Andreas Koeppel; Peter R Laity; Chris Holland
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Effect of stress on the molecular structure and mechanical properties of supercontracted spider dragline silks.

Authors:  Qinglin Dong; Guangqiang Fang; Yufang Huang; Linli Hu; Jinrong Yao; Zhengzhong Shao; Shengjie Ling; Xin Chen
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.331

8.  A Cuboid Spider Silk: Structure-Function Relationship and Polypeptide Signature.

Authors:  Na Kong; Fengju Wan; Wentao Dai; Ping Wu; Chen Su; Chao Peng; Ke Zheng; Xuexin Chen; Shengjie Ling; Jinkang Gong; Yuan Yao
Journal:  Macromol Rapid Commun       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 5.734

9.  Proline and processing of spider silks.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Alexander Sponner; David Porter; Fritz Vollrath
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 10.  The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function.

Authors:  J M Gosline; P A Guerette; C S Ortlepp; K N Savage
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  4 in total

1.  Characterization of the genome and silk-gland transcriptomes of Darwin's bark spider (Caerostris darwini).

Authors:  Paul L Babb; Matjaž Gregorič; Nicholas F Lahens; David N Nicholson; Cheryl Y Hayashi; Linden Higgins; Matjaž Kuntner; Ingi Agnarsson; Benjamin F Voight
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Darwin's bark spider shares a spidroin repertoire with Caerostris extrusa but achieves extraordinary silk toughness through gene expression.

Authors:  Nobuaki Kono; Rintaro Ohtoshi; Ali D Malay; Masaru Mori; Hiroyasu Masunaga; Yuki Yoshida; Hiroyuki Nakamura; Keiji Numata; Kazuharu Arakawa
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 6.411

3.  An Image-Analysis-Based Method for the Prediction of Recombinant Protein Fiber Tensile Strength.

Authors:  Fredrik G Bäcklund; Benjamin Schmuck; Gisele H B Miranda; Gabriele Greco; Nicola M Pugno; Jesper Rydén; Anna Rising
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 4.  Recombinant Spider Silk: Promises and Bottlenecks.

Authors:  Maryam Ramezaniaghdam; Nadia D Nahdi; Ralf Reski
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.