Literature DB >> 20889831

Evolution of supercontraction in spider silk: structure-function relationship from tarantulas to orb-weavers.

Cecilia Boutry1, Todd Alan Blackledge.   

Abstract

Spider silk is a promising biomaterial with impressive performance. However, some spider silks also 'supercontract' when exposed to water, shrinking by up to ∼50% in length. Supercontraction may provide a critical mechanism to tailor silk properties, both for future synthetic silk production and by the spiders themselves. Several hypotheses are proposed for the mechanism and function of supercontraction, but they remain largely untested. In particular, supercontraction may result from a rearrangement of the GPGXX motif within the silk proteins, where G represents glycine, P proline and X is one of a small subset of amino acids. Supercontraction may prevent sagging in wet orb-webs or allow spiders to tailor silk properties for different ecological functions. Because both the molecular structures of silk proteins and how dragline is used in webs differ among species, we can test these hypotheses by comparing supercontraction of silk across diverse spider taxa. In this study we measured supercontraction in 28 spider taxa, ranging from tarantulas to orb-weaving spiders. We found that silk from all species supercontracted, except that of most tarantulas. This suggests that supercontraction evolved at least with the origin of the Araneomorphae, over 200 million years ago. We found differences in the pattern of evolution for two components of supercontraction. Stress generated during supercontraction of a restrained fiber is not associated with changes in silk structure and web architecture. By contrast, the shrink of unrestrained supercontracting fibers is higher for Orbiculariae spiders, whose silk contains high ratios of GPGXX motifs. These results support the hypothesis that supercontraction is caused by a rearrangement of GPGXX motifs in silk, and that it functions to tailor silk material properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20889831     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.046110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  28 in total

1.  Punctuated evolution of viscid silk in spider orb webs supported by mechanical behavior of wet cribellate silk.

Authors:  Dakota Piorkowski; Todd A Blackledge
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-07-27

2.  Non-invasive determination of the complete elastic moduli of spider silks.

Authors:  Kristie J Koski; Paul Akhenblit; Keri McKiernan; Jeffery L Yarger
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  Increasing silk fibre strength through heterogeneity of bundled fibrils.

Authors:  Steven W Cranford
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Post-secretion processing influences spider silk performance.

Authors:  Sean J Blamires; Chung-Lin Wu; Todd A Blackledge; I-Min Tso
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Compliant threads maximize spider silk connection strength and toughness.

Authors:  Avery Meyer; Nicola M Pugno; Steven W Cranford
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Tuning the instrument: sonic properties in the spider's web.

Authors:  B Mortimer; A Soler; C R Siviour; R Zaera; F Vollrath
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Structural hysteresis in dragline spider silks induced by supercontraction: An x-ray fiber micro-diffraction study.

Authors:  Sujatha Sampath; Jeffery L Yarger
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.361

8.  Healable thermoset polymer composite embedded with stimuli-responsive fibres.

Authors:  Guoqiang Li; Harper Meng; Jinlian Hu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Protein secondary structure of Green Lynx spider dragline silk investigated by solid-state NMR and X-ray diffraction.

Authors:  Dian Xu; Xiangyan Shi; Forrest Thompson; Warner S Weber; Qiushi Mou; Jeffery L Yarger
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 6.953

10.  Development of a Process for the Spinning of Synthetic Spider Silk.

Authors:  Cameron G Copeland; Brianne E Bell; Chad D Christensen; Randolph V Lewis
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2015-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.