Literature DB >> 21037070

Prey type, vibrations and handling interactively influence spider silk expression.

S J Blamires1, I-C Chao, I-M Tso.   

Abstract

The chemical and mechanical properties of spider major ampullate (MA) silks vary in response to different prey, mostly via differential expression of two genes - MaSp1 and MaSp2 - although the spinning process exerts additional influence over the mechanical properties of silk. The prey cues that initiate differential gene expression are unknown. Prey nutrients, vibratory stimuli and handling have been suggested to be influential. We performed experiments to decouple the vibratory stimuli and handling associated with high and low kinetic energy prey (crickets vs flies) from their prey nutrients to test the relative influence of each as inducers of silk protein expression in the orb web spider Nephila pilipes. We found that the MA silks from spiders feeding on live crickets had greater percentages of glutamine, serine, alanine and glycine than those from spiders feeding on live flies. Proline composition of the silks was unaffected by feeding treatment. Increases in alanine and glycine in the MA silks of the live-cricket-feeding spiders indicate a probable increase in MaSp1 gene expression. The amino acid compositions of N. pilipes feeding on crickets with fly stimuli and N. pilipes feeding on flies with cricket stimuli did not differ from each other or from pre-treatment responses, so these feeding treatments did not induce differential MaSp expression. Our results indicate that cricket vibratory stimuli and handling interact with nutrients to induce N. pilipes to adjust their gene expression to produce webs with mechanical properties appropriate for the retention of this prey. This shows that spiders can genetically alter their silk chemical compositions and, presumably, mechanical properties upon exposure to different prey types. The lack of any change in proline composition with feeding treatment in N. pilipes suggests that the MaSp model determined for Nephila clavipes is not universally applicable to all Nephila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21037070     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.046730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  12 in total

1.  Post-secretion processing influences spider silk performance.

Authors:  Sean J Blamires; Chung-Lin Wu; Todd A Blackledge; I-Min Tso
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Plasticity in major ampullate silk production in relation to spider phylogeny and ecology.

Authors:  Cecilia Boutry; Milan Řezáč; Todd Alan Blackledge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Variation in protein intake induces variation in spider silk expression.

Authors:  Sean J Blamires; Chun-Lin Wu; I-Min Tso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Correlation between protein secondary structure and mechanical performance for the ultra-tough dragline silk of Darwin's bark spider.

Authors:  K Zin Htut; Angela M Alicea-Serrano; Saranshu Singla; Ingi Agnarsson; Jessica E Garb; Matjaž Kuntner; Matjaž Gregorič; Robert A Haney; Mohammad Marhabaie; Todd A Blackledge; Ali Dhinojwala
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.293

5.  Can differential nutrient extraction explain property variations in a predatory trap?

Authors:  Sean J Blamires; Dakota Piorkowski; Angela Chuang; Yi-Hsuan Tseng; Søren Toft; I-Min Tso
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Evolutionary shifts in gene expression decoupled from gene duplication across functionally distinct spider silk glands.

Authors:  Thomas H Clarke; Jessica E Garb; Robert A Haney; R Crystal Chaw; Cheryl Y Hayashi; Nadia A Ayoub
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Duplication and concerted evolution of MiSp-encoding genes underlie the material properties of minor ampullate silks of cobweb weaving spiders.

Authors:  Jannelle M Vienneau-Hathaway; Elizabeth R Brassfield; Amanda Kelly Lane; Matthew A Collin; Sandra M Correa-Garhwal; Thomas H Clarke; Evelyn E Schwager; Jessica E Garb; Cheryl Y Hayashi; Nadia A Ayoub
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Mechanical properties of silk of the Australian golden orb weavers Nephila pilipes and Nephilaplumipes.

Authors:  Genevieve G Kerr; Helen F Nahrung; Aaron Wiegand; Joanna Kristoffersen; Peter Killen; Cameron Brown; Joanne Macdonald
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.422

9.  Spider web and silk performance landscapes across nutrient space.

Authors:  Sean J Blamires; Yi-Hsuan Tseng; Chung-Lin Wu; Søren Toft; David Raubenheimer; I-Min Tso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Multiscale mechanisms of nutritionally induced property variation in spider silks.

Authors:  Sean J Blamires; Madeleine Nobbs; Penny J Martens; I-Min Tso; Wei-Tsung Chuang; Chung-Kai Chang; Hwo-Shuenn Sheu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.