Literature DB >> 34129144

Understanding Willingness to Participate in HIV Biomedical Research: A Mixed Methods Investigation.

Ji-Young Lee1, Sara M St George1, Torsten B Neilands2, Allan Rodriguez3, Daniel J Feaster1, Adam W Carrico4.   

Abstract

Biomedical research often enrolls people living with HIV (PLWH) receiving effective treatment to complete invasive procedures. This mixed methods study characterized determinants of willingness to undergo specific biomedical procedures among PLWH. In 2017, 61 participants (77% Black) from Miami completed a quantitative assessment examining willingness to participate. A subset of 19 participants completed an in-depth qualitative interview. Across all procedures, there was greater willingness to participate if asked by a primary care provider and if experimental results were shared. However, half of participants reported that they would experience undue influence (i.e., excessive persuasion) to participate from their primary care provider. In thematic analyses, altruism and personal benefit were identified as facilitators while medication changes, confidentiality, and perceived stigma were identified as barriers to participation in HIV biomedical research. Addressing participants' expectations and mitigating potential undue influence from primary care providers could optimize the ethical conduct of HIV biomedical studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consent; Ethics.; Physician–Patient Relations; Therapeutic Misconception; Undue Influence

Year:  2021        PMID: 34129144     DOI: 10.1007/s10461-021-03257-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Behav        ISSN: 1090-7165


  34 in total

Review 1.  Defining and describing benefit appropriately in clinical trials.

Authors:  N M King
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Research participation as work: comparing the perspectives of researchers and economically marginalized populations.

Authors:  Peter Davidson; Kimberly Page
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Barriers of enrolment in HIV vaccine trials: a review of HIV vaccine preparedness studies.

Authors:  Shayesta Dhalla; Gary Poole
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Relative contribution of free-virus and synaptic transmission to the spread of HIV-1 through target cell populations.

Authors:  Natalia L Komarova; Daniela Anghelina; Igor Voznesensky; Benjamin Trinité; David N Levy; Dominik Wodarz
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  Cell-to-cell transfer of HIV infection: implications for HIV viral persistence.

Authors:  Cecilia T Costiniuk; Mohammad-Ali Jenabian
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.891

6.  The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; L H Roth; C Lidz
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  1982

7.  Presuming patient autonomy in the face of therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  Pat McConville
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 8.  Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wanda Montalvo; Elaine Larson
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.176

9.  Framing expectations in early HIV cure research.

Authors:  Karine Dubé; Gail E Henderson; David M Margolis
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 17.079

10.  HIV-infected T cells are migratory vehicles for viral dissemination.

Authors:  Thomas T Murooka; Maud Deruaz; Francesco Marangoni; Vladimir D Vrbanac; Edward Seung; Ulrich H von Andrian; Andrew M Tager; Andrew D Luster; Thorsten R Mempel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.