Erika Meza1, Rachel Peterson2, Paola Gilsanz3, Kristen M George2, Sunita J Miles3, Chloe W Eng1,3, Dan M Mungas4, Elizabeth Rose Mayeda5, M Maria Glymour1, Rachel A Whitmer2,3. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, USA. 3. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, USA. 5. Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite growing research on the association between discrimination and disparities in cognitive aging, an evidence gap remains on how the association varies by racial/ethnic group. This study evaluates the associations of experiences of discrimination with cognitive function and whether these associations varied by race/ethnicity and nativity. METHOD: Using the Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences (KHANDLE) cohort (N = 1 712) with approximately equal groups of Black, White, Latino, and Asian community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years and older, we evaluated the associations between self-reported experiences of everyday and major lifetime discrimination with overall cognitive performance and domain-specific cognition (verbal episodic memory, semantic memory, and executive functioning) across race/ethnicity and nativity. Linear regression models examined the cross-sectional association between self-reported experiences of everyday and major lifetime discrimination with z-standardized coefficients for cognition. We tested for effect modification by race and nativity. All models controlled for age, sex, and education. RESULTS: Among KHANDLE participants (mean age: 76 years; SD: 6.8), everyday discrimination was not associated with cognitive scores. Major lifetime discrimination was associated with better average cognitive scores among Black participants but not among other racial/ethnic groups. Major lifetime discrimination was associated with better average cognitive scores among U.S.-born but not among non-U.S.-born individuals. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not imply that discrimination improves cognition, but rather suggest that future research should include more detailed measures on discrimination and unfair treatment that could help disentangle the extent to which relationships are causal or reflect some other underlying factor.
BACKGROUND: Despite growing research on the association between discrimination and disparities in cognitive aging, an evidence gap remains on how the association varies by racial/ethnic group. This study evaluates the associations of experiences of discrimination with cognitive function and whether these associations varied by race/ethnicity and nativity. METHOD: Using the Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences (KHANDLE) cohort (N = 1 712) with approximately equal groups of Black, White, Latino, and Asian community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years and older, we evaluated the associations between self-reported experiences of everyday and major lifetime discrimination with overall cognitive performance and domain-specific cognition (verbal episodic memory, semantic memory, and executive functioning) across race/ethnicity and nativity. Linear regression models examined the cross-sectional association between self-reported experiences of everyday and major lifetime discrimination with z-standardized coefficients for cognition. We tested for effect modification by race and nativity. All models controlled for age, sex, and education. RESULTS: Among KHANDLE participants (mean age: 76 years; SD: 6.8), everyday discrimination was not associated with cognitive scores. Major lifetime discrimination was associated with better average cognitive scores among Black participants but not among other racial/ethnic groups. Major lifetime discrimination was associated with better average cognitive scores among U.S.-born but not among non-U.S.-born individuals. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not imply that discrimination improves cognition, but rather suggest that future research should include more detailed measures on discrimination and unfair treatment that could help disentangle the extent to which relationships are causal or reflect some other underlying factor.
Authors: Amy J Schulz; Clarence C Gravlee; David R Williams; Barbara A Israel; Graciela Mentz; Zachary Rowe Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Dawne M Mouzon; Robert Joseph Taylor; Ann W Nguyen; Mosi Adesina Ifatunji; Linda M Chatters Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Tené T Lewis; Lisa L Barnes; Julia L Bienias; Daniel T Lackland; Denis A Evans; Carlos F Mendes de Leon Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-05-08 Impact factor: 6.053