| Literature DB >> 34123083 |
Erin J Viere1, Wei Qi1, Ian N Stanton1, Peng Zhang1, Michael J Therien1.
Abstract
High quantum yield NIR fluorophores are rare. Factors that drive low emission quantum yields at long wavelength include the facts that radiative rate constants increase proportional to the cube of the emission energy, while nonradiative rate constants increase in an approximately exponentially with decreasing S0-S1 energy gaps (in accordance with the energy gap law). This work demonstrates how the proquinoidal BTD building blocks can be utilized to minimize the extent of excited-state structural relaxation relative to the ground-state conformation in highly conjugated porphyrin oligomers, and shows that 4-ethynylbenzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole (E-BTD) units that terminate meso-to-meso ethyne-bridged (porphinato)zinc (PZnn) arrays, and 4,7-diethynylbenzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole (E-BTD-E) spacers that are integrated into the backbone of these compositions, elucidate new classes of impressive NIR fluorophores. We report the syntheses, electronic structural properties, and emissive characteristics of neoteric PZn-(BTD-PZn)n, PZn2-(BTD-PZn2)n, and BTD-PZnn-BTD fluorophores. Absolute fluorescence quantum yield (ϕ f) measurements, acquired using a calibrated integrating-sphere-based measurement system, demonstrate that these supermolecules display extraordinary ϕ f values that range from 10-25% in THF solvent, and between 28-36% in toluene solvent over the 700-900 nm window of the NIR. These studies underscore how the regulation of proquinoidal conjugation motifs can be exploited to drive excited-state dynamical properties important for high quantum yield long-wavelength fluorescence emission. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 34123083 PMCID: PMC8163388 DOI: 10.1039/d0sc03446k
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Chart 1Chemical structures for (A) benchmark PZn, (B) BTD-PZn-BTD and (C) PZn2-(BTD-PZn2) and PZn-(BTD-PZn) fluorophores. R = [2,6-bis(3,3-dimethyl-1-butyloxy)phenyl].
Fig. 1Electronic absorption and emission spectra (figure panel insets) recorded for: (A) benchmark PZn chromophores (see ref. 30 and 41), and (B) PZn-(BTD-PZn), (C) PZn2-(BTD-PZn2), and (D) BTD-PZn-BTD compositions. Experimental conditions: T = 298 K, THF solvent.
Electronic absorption and emission data in THF solvent for BTD-PZn-BTD, PZn-(BTD-PZn), and PZn2-(BTD-PZn2) chromophores relative to corresponding PZn benchmarks
|
|
|
| FWHM (S1 → S0) [cm−1] | Stokes shift |
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PZn-BTD-PZn | 689 (1194) | 64 600 | 741 | 1605 | 1018 | 0.25 (0.31) | 1.6 | 1.6 | 4.7 |
| PZn-(BTD-PZn)2 | 745 (1178) | 132 700 | 784 | 977 | 543 | 0.22 (0.36) | 1.1 | 2.0 | 7.1 |
| PZn-(BTD-PZn)4 | 777 (1558) | 184 000 | 811 | 846 | 490 | 0.16 (0.29) | 0.8 | 2.0 | 11 |
| BTD-PZn-BTD | 674 (672) | 84 000 | 687 | 727 | 281 | 0.13 (0.13) | 1.3 | 1.0 | 6.7 |
| BTD-PZn2-BTD | 765 (1243) | 101 600 | 787 | 802 | 365 | 0.23 (0.30) | 1.4 | 1.6 | 5.5 |
| BTD-PZn3-BTD | 809 (1663) | 157 500 | 846 | 872 | 510 | 0.16 (0.29) | 0.8 | 2.0 | 11 |
| BTD-PZn5-BTD | 847 (1675) | 238 300 | 888 | 1008 | 587 | 0.10 (0.28) | 0.6 | 1.7 | 15 |
| PZn2-BTD-PZn2 | 780 (1822) | 145 400 | 822 | 926 | 688 | 0.14 (0.34) | 0.6 | 2.3 | 14 |
| PZn2-(BTD-PZn2)2 | 816 (1582) | 340 000 | 857 | 1154 | 586 | 0.12 (0.36) | 0.5 | 2.4 | 18 |
| PZn2 | 695 (1082) | 51 400 | 711 | 810 | 324 | 0.14 (0.16) | 1.09 | 1.3 | 7.9 |
| PZn3 | 770 (1386) | 116 000 | 806 | 875 | 580 | 0.19 (0.27) | 1.13 | 1.7 | 7.1 |
| PZn5 | 842 (1562) | 230 000 | 883 | 955 | 551 | 0.09 (0.11) | 0.45 | 2.0 | 20 |
Numbers in parentheses are spectral breadths (full-widths at half-maximum, FWHM) of the respective transitions in units of cm−1.
Stokes shifts values correspond to the difference in energy between the low energy (Qx) absorption (S0 → S1) and fluorescence (S1 → S0) band maxima.
Fluorescence quantum yields (ϕf values) were determined using an integrating sphere-based absolute emission quantum yield measurement system (see ESI).
Values in parentheses represent those determined in toluene solvent.
These values were determined using S0 → S2 excitation (483 nm). Fluorescence lifetimes were measured via time-correlated single-photon-counting using a picosecond fluorescence lifetime measurement system.
Excited-state relaxation constants were calculated based on the following equations: τS1 = 1/(kr + knr), ϕf = kr × τS1.
Comparative integrated oscillator strengths of the B- and Q-band spectral regions of BTD-PZn-BTD, PZn-(BTD-PZn), and PZn2-(BTD-PZn2) chromophores relative to corresponding PZn benchmarksa
| Oscillator strength B-band region | Oscillator strength Q-band region | Total oscillator strength | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PZn-BTD-PZn | 2.11 | 0.72 | 3.52 |
| PZn-(BTD-PZn)2 | 4.65 | 1.03 | 5.67 |
| PZn-(BTD-PZn)4 | 5.98 | 1.58 | 7.57 |
| BTD-PZn-BTD | 2.24 | 0.37 | 2.63 |
| BTD-PZn2-BTD | 3.54 | 0.89 | 4.42 |
| BTD-PZn3-BTD | 5.23 | 1.53 | 6.76 |
| BTD-PZn5-BTD | 7.64 | 2.10 | 9.74 |
| PZn2-BTD-PZn2 | 6.04 | 1.30 | 7.35 |
| PZn2-(BTD-PZn2)2 | 10.49 | 2.84 | 13.32 |
| PZn2 | 2.134 | 0.303 | 2.438 |
| PZn3 | 3.240 | 0.716 | 3.956 |
| PZn5 | 5.986 | 1.622 | 7.608 |
Integrated oscillator strengths (f) were calculated based on the following expression: , where ε is the experimental extinction coefficient, and ν is the energy (in wave numbers) of the absorption. Values noted derive from electronic absorption spectra recorded in THF solvent.
Oscillator strengths calculated over the following wavelength domains: PZn-BTD-PZn (∼360 to 600 nm); PZn-(BTD-PZn)2 (∼360 to 600 nm); PZn-(BTD-PZn)4 (∼360 to 605 nm); BTD-PZn-BTD (∼360 to 560 nm); BTD-PZn2-BTD (∼360 to 560 nm); BTD-PZn3-BTD (∼360 to 560 nm); BTD-PZn5-BTD (∼360 to 560 nm); PZn2-BTD-PZn2 (∼360 to 610 nm); PZn2-(BTD-PZn2)2 (∼360 to 610 nm).
Oscillator strengths calculated over the following wavelength domains: PZn-BTD-PZn (∼600 to 760 nm); PZn-(BTD-PZn)2 (∼600 to 820 nm); PZn-(BTD-PZn)4 (∼600 to 900 nm); BTD-PZn-BTD (∼560 to 720 nm); BTD-PZn2-BTD (∼560 to 850 nm); BTD-PZn3-BTD (∼560 to 910 nm); BTD-PZn5-BTD (∼560 to 1050 nm); PZn2-BTD-PZn2 (∼610 to 860 nm); PZn2-(BTD-PZn2)2 (∼610 to 920 nm).
Ref. 41.
Fig. 2Calculated frontier molecular orbitals, energy levels, and relative one-electron configurations that contribute to the lowest energy (Qx) transition for the PZn3 benchmark. Calculations were performed at the M11/6-311g(d) theory level.