| Literature DB >> 34123080 |
Kaiye Wang1, Yanan Xiang1, Wei Pan1, Hongyu Wang1, Na Li1, Bo Tang1.
Abstract
Photothermal therapy, in which light is converted into heat and triggers local hyperthermia to ablate tumors, presents an inherently specific and noninvasive treatment for tumor tissues. In this area, the development of efficient photothermal agents (PTAs) has always been a central topic. Although many efforts have been made on the investigation of novel molecular architectures and photothermal materials over the past decades, PTAs can cause severe damage to normal tissues because of the poor tumor aggregate ability and high irradiation density. Recently, dual-targeted photothermal agents (DTPTAs) provide an attractive strategy to overcome these problems and enhance cancer therapy. DTPTAs are functionalized with two classes of targeting units, including tumor environment targeting sites, tumor targeting sites and organelle targeting sites. In this perspective, typical targeted ligands and representative examples of photothermal therapeutic agents with dual-targeted properties are systematically summarized and recent advances using DTPTAs in tumor therapy are highlighted. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 34123080 PMCID: PMC8163445 DOI: 10.1039/d0sc03173a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Scheme 1Overview of dual-targeted PTT.
Specific sites or stimulation and targeting moieties
| Typical targets | Specific sites or stimulation | Targeted moieties |
|---|---|---|
| Extracellular targets | Hypoxia | Modified anaerobions[ |
| Anti-CCL-28 | ||
| Anti-LDLR | ||
| Tirapazamine[ | ||
| Acidity | Hydrolysis[ | |
| Protonation[ | ||
| Hydrophilic transformation[ | ||
| pHLIP[ | ||
| VEGF | Anti-VEGFmAb[ | |
| Bevacizumab[ | ||
| VEGFR | VEGFR-2 antibody[ | |
| MMP | GPLGVRGC[ | |
| PG-6 ( | ||
| Magnetic field | Fe3O4 ( | |
| Intracellular targets | Integrin αvβ3 | RGD[ |
| Integrin αvβ3 mAb[ | ||
| EGFR | CET[ | |
| Gefitinib[ | ||
| Erlotinib[ | ||
| FR | FA[ | |
| MTX[ | ||
| BR | Biotin[ | |
| TfR | Tf[ | |
| CD44 | HA[ | |
| Subcellular targets | Nucleus | NLS[ |
| TAT[ | ||
| AS1411 DNA aptamer[ | ||
| Mitochondria | TPP[ | |
| Cyanine cation[ | ||
| MLS[ | ||
| Lysosomes | Morpholine[ | |
| ER | Sulfamides[ | |
| Pardaxin (FAL) peptides[ |
Anti-CCL-28: a ligand that targets hypoxia of the overexpressed CCL-28 chemokine.
Anti-LDLR: a ligand that targets hypoxia of the marked low-density lipoprotein receptor.
PTAs for cancer therapy
| PTAs | Irradiation | Photothermal effect | Targeted moieties | Specific sites or stimulation | Animal models | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Au nanoprisms | 808 nm, 500 mW cm−2, 20 min | Δ | TPE@Zn and AS1411 DNA aptamers | Cell membrane and nucleus | SGC-7901 human gastric carcinoma tumor model (significant inhibition) |
|
| AuNS | 808 nm, 1 W cm−2, 5 min | Δ | HA and TPP | CD44 and mitochondrion | SCC-7 mouse squamous cell carcinoma tumor model (significant inhibition) |
|
| MCF-7/ADR drug resistant tumor model (significant inhibition) | ||||||
| GNS | 808 nm, 1.74 W cm−2, 4 min | Δ | HA and NLS | CD44 and nucleus | 4T1 mouse breast cancer tumor model (significant inhibition) |
|
| 4T1 metastatic tumor model (reduced tumor metastasis) | ||||||
| AuNRs | 808 nm, 4 W cm−2, 10 min | Increased to ∼55 °C (2 nM) | NLS and RGD | Nucleus and integrin αvβ3 | — |
|
| MLS and RGD | Mitochondrion and integrin αvβ3 | |||||
| RGD | Integrin αvβ3 | |||||
| GNR | 808 nm, 2 W cm−2, 4 min | Increased to 43.5 °C (40 μg mL−1) | HA and RGD | CD44 and integrin αvβ3 | — |
|
| GNR | 808 nm, 2 W cm−2, 10 min | Δ | HA and FA | CD44 and FR | MCF-7 human breast cancer tumor model (complete elimination) |
|
| GNR | 808 nm, 4 W cm−2, 10 min | Increased to ∼51.6 °C | cRGD | Integrin αvβ3 and FR | B16-F10 mouse melanoma tumor model (significant inhibition) |
|
| GNR | 808 nm, 2 W cm−2, 10 min | Increased to ∼55 °C (20 μg mL−1 of Au) | Anti-HER2 antibody and HA | HER2 and CD44 | MCF-7 human breast cancer tumor model (complete elimination without reoccurrence) |
|
| Au shell | 808 nm, 1 W cm−2, 5 min | Δ | Fe3O4 and FA | Magnetic field and FR | — |
|
| Au shell | 808 nm, 1 W cm−2, 10 min | Δ | Fe3O4 and MTX | Magnetic field and FR | 4T1 mouse breast cancer tumor model (complete elimination) |
|
| AuNRs | 808 nm, 2 W cm−2, 4 min | Δ | HA and SM | CD44 and acidity | MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer tumor model (almost complete suppression) |
|
| Au@Pt NPs | 808 nm, 1.2 W cm−2, 10 min | Δ | FA and TPP | FR and mitochondrion | — |
|
| CuS NPs | 980 nm, 1.5 W cm−2, 10 min | Increased to 53 °C | RGD and TAT | Integrin αvβ3 and nucleus | HeLa human cervical cancer tumor model (intratumoral/intravenous injection, complete obliteration) |
|
| HeLa recurrent tumor model (no recurrence) | ||||||
| WSSe | 808 nm, 0.8 W cm−2, 10 min | Δ | TPP and MCF-7 cell membrane | Mitochondrion and MCF-7 cell | MCF-7 human breast cancer tumor model (complete obliteration without recurrence) |
|
| Fe3O4 | 808 nm, 3 W cm−2, 500 s | Increased to ∼63 °C (100 μg mL−1 of IONP-20 | Tf and TAT | TfR and nucleus | A549 human lung cancer tumor model (significant inhibition with a slow tumor growth) |
|
| SCDs | 808 nm, 4 W cm−2, 10 min | Δ | RGD and MLS | Integrin αvβ3 and mitochondrion | — |
|
| MG | 808 nm, 6 W cm−2, 5 min | Increased to 50 °C (30 mg L−1) | Fe3O4 and IP | Magnetic field and glioma | — |
|
| MGO | 808 nm, 2.5 W cm−2, 3 min | Increased to ∼50 °C (1 mg mL−1) | Fe3O4 and CET | Magnetic field and EGFR | CT-26 murine colonic carcinoma cancer tumor model (significant inhibition) |
|
| ICG | 808 nm, 1.54 W cm−2, 5 min | Increased to ∼61.5 °C (50 μg mL−1) | cRGD | Integrin αvβ3 and FR | — |
|
| ICG | 808 nm, 2 W cm−2, 5 min | Increased to 55.2 °C (6.53 μg mL−1 of ICG) | Fe3O4 and HA | Magnetic field and CD44 | U87MG human primary glioblastoma cancer tumor model (significant inhibition) |
|
| ICG | 808 nm, 3 W cm−2, 100 s | Increased to 78.2 °C (40 μM) | RC-12 and PG-6 | Integrin αvβ3 and MMP-2 and MMP-9 | — |
|
| ICG | 808 nm, 1 W cm−2, 5 min | Δ | FA and TPP | FR and mitochondrion | — |
|
| IR825 and carbon-derivatized FNPs | 808 nm, 2 W cm−2, 5 min | Increased to 65 °C (1 mg mL−1) | FA and TPP | FR and mitochondrion | — |
|
| IR825 | 808 nm, 0.8 W cm−2, 10 min | Δ | Bevacizumab and IR825 | VEGF and mitochondrion | C643 human anaplastic thyroid carcinoma tumor model (complete obliteration without recurrence) |
|
|
| 635 nm, 0.5 W cm−2, 10 min | Δ | Biotin and TPP | BR and mitochondrion | 4T1 mouse breast cancer tumor model (excellent inhibition) |
|
| ETP | 650 nm, 0.5 W cm−2, 5 min | Δ | Pi | ALP and mitochondrion | PC-3 human prostate cancer tumor mode (almost complete suppression) |
|
| PDA | 808 nm, 0.8 W cm−2, 6 min | Δ | Fe3O4 and TPP | Magnetic field and mitochondrion | B16-F10 mouse melanoma tumor model (significant inhibition with a slow tumor growth) |
|
| PDA and ICG | 785 nm, 0.5 W cm−2, 500 s | Δ | Tf and TPP | TfR and mitochondrion | A549 human lung cancer tumor model (complete obliteration) |
|
| FNPs-PDA | 808 nm, 2 W cm−2, 5 min | Δ | HA and TPP | CD44 and mitochondrion | — |
|
| MPDA | 808 nm, 1 W cm−2, 5 min | Δ | HA and MTX | CD44 and FR | 4T1 mouse breast cancer tumor model (complete obliteration) |
|
| SP | 808 nm, 0.8 W, 10 min | Δ | FA and cRGD | FR and integrin αvβ3 | U87MG human primary glioblastoma cancer tumor model (promising suppression) |
|
| PB | 808 nm, 2 W cm−2, 5 min | Δ | Fe3O4 and HA | Magnetic field and CD44 | S180 mouse sarcome tumor model (almost complete suppression) |
|
| V2C | 1064 nm, 0.96 W cm−2, 10 min | Increased to 59.6 °C (400 μg mL−1) | RGD and TAT | Integrin αvβ3 and nucleus | MCF-7 human breast cancer tumor model (significant inhibition without recurrence) |
|
| Aza-BODIPY | 730 nm, 1 W cm−2, 12 min | Δ | FA and TPP | FR and mitochondrion | HeLa human cervical cancer tumor model (complete suppression) |
|
| Melanin | 808 nm, 1.5 W, 10 min | Δ | RGD and PM | Integrin αvβ3 and tumor vasculature | MDA-MB-231/ADR human breast cancer drug resistant tumor model (significant inhibition without metastasis) |
|
Photothermal performance in vitro.
AuNS: gold nanostars.
Au NRs: gold nanorods.
cRGD: cyclic RGD.
INOP-20: 20 nm INOPs.
MG: magnetic graphene.
IP: interleukin-13-based peptide.
FNPs: fluorescence NPs.
Bio: biotin.
Pi: phosphate ester group.
PM: platelet membrane.
Fig. 1(a) Schematic diagram of Au-Apt-TPE@Zn for dual-model imaging and dual-targeted cancer PTT. Reproduced from ref. 63 with permission from Zhang et al. (b) Schematic diagram of the preparation and targeting principles of AuNS-pep/DOX@HA. Reproduced from ref. 78 with permission from Elsevier Ltd, copyright 2016. (c) Schematic diagram of the preparation and targeting principles of the cellular/intranuclear dual-targeting nanoplatform GNS-NLS@HA. Reproduced from ref. 79 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2018. (d) Schematic diagram of the preparation and application of AuNR-based nanoprobes. (e) The effect of AuNR-based nanoprobes on cell viability. Adapted from ref. 80 with permission from the American Chemical Society, copyright 2018.
Fig. 2(a) Schematic diagram of DOX-GNRs@mSiO2-HA-RGD for targeted therapy and cell uptake studies of DOX-GNRs@mSiO2-HA-RGD with different inhibitors (HA, RGD and HA-RGD). Adapted from ref. 81 with permission from Elsevier B.V., copyright 2017. (b) Schematic diagram of the preparation and targeting principles of GNRs-HA-FA-DOX. Adapted from ref. 82 with permission from the American Chemical Society, copyright 2017. (c) Schematic diagram of the preparation method of MFNPs. Reproduced from ref. 85 with permission from Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, copyright 2011. (d) Schematic diagram of the synthesis of SM/LA-LMWHA. (e) The effects of different pH on (1) LMWHA, (2) SD/LA-LMWHA, and (3) SM/LA-LMWHA. Reproduced from ref. 87 with permission from Elsevier Ltd, copyright 2019.
Fig. 3(a) Schematic diagram of the preparation and targeting principles of CuS@MSN-TAT-RGD NPs. (b) The effect of different treatment conditions on cell viability. Reproduced from ref. 89 with permission from the American Chemical Society, copyright 2018. (c) Schematic diagram of the preparation and treatment principles of WSSe/MnO2-INH-TPP@CM. Reproduced from ref. 90 with permission from Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, copyright 2019. (d) Schematic diagram of the preparation and targeting principles of IONP-TAT-Tf. (e) Nuclear iron elemental quantification of IONP-20 and IONP-20-TAT-Tf by A549 cells. Reproduced from ref. 91 with permission from Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, copyright 2017.
Fig. 4TEM images of (a) CDs and (b) SCDs. Cell viabilities of L02 cells and HepG2 cells treated with (c) SCDs-MT and (d) SCDs-RGD and irradiated for 7 min. Adapted from ref. 67 with permission from Elsevier Ltd, copyright 2019. (e) Schematic diagram of the preparation and application of MGMSPID. Reproduced from ref. 92 with permission from Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, copyright 2013.
Fig. 5(a) Preparation and delivery mechanisms of SeNPs-DOX-ICG-RP with NIR laser irradiation. (b) Temperature changes of SeNPs-DOX-ICG-RP under different irradiation powers. (c) Photothermal stability experiment. Adapted from ref. 37 with permission from Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, copyright 2018. (d) Synthesis and (e) sequential targeting process of IR825@B-PPNs with monitoring and diagnosis. (f) CLSM images of mitochondrial localization in C643 cells. The scale bar is 20 μm. (g) Tumor growth curves after treatment with different therapies. Adapted from ref. 34 with permission from Acta Materialia Inc, published by Elsevier Ltd, copyright 2019.
Fig. 6(a) Dual-targeted molecules Bio-PPh-PT and ETP. (b) Therapeutic effect under different treatments. Adapted from ref. 55 with permission from Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, copyright 2019. (c) Temperature change curves of ETP treated with different concentrations of ALP under NIR laser irradiation. (d) Tumor photographs of mice. (e) Thermal imaging and (f) quantitative curves of PC-3 tumor-bearing mice. Adapted from ref. 98 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2019.
Fig. 7(a) Schematic illustration of the preparation of magnetic/mitochondria-targeting composite NPs. (b) The photothermal response curves of different NP solutions with an NIR laser. (c) Tumor photograph (middle) and quantitative weights (right) of the different treatment groups; reproduced from ref. 100 with permission from Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, copyright 2016. (d) Schematic diagram of NP preparation. (e) Chemical structures of the compositions. (f) CLSM localization images in NIH/3T3 normal cells and U87MG GBM cells incubated with different proportions of targeting ligand modified NPs. Scale bars: 50 μm. Adapted from ref. 103 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2019.