| Literature DB >> 30288240 |
Ji-Chun Yang1, Yue Shang2, Yu-Hao Li2, Yu Cui1, Xue-Bo Yin1,3.
Abstract
Drug-loading often suffers from tedious procedures, limited loading efficiency, slow release, and therefore a low class="Chemical">curative effect.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30288240 PMCID: PMC6148201 DOI: 10.1039/c8sc02305k
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Scheme 1(A) Preparation of the “all-in-one” nanocomposite. CuS nanoparticles, protoporphyrin IX, and doxorubicin were added to the precursors of ZIF-8 during its preparation to realize multi-drug co-loading, while negative CpG was adsorbed on the positive surface of ZIF-8. (B) Theranostic strategy using the nanocomposite for elimination of primary solid tumors with the synergic effect of PTT, PDT, and chemotherapy. CpG inhibited the recurrence and metastasis of tumors by the long term immune memory.
Fig. 1TEM images of (A) CuS, (B) CuZ, (C) CuZP, and (D) CuZPMn (inset: the enlarged TEM images). (E) XRD patterns and (F) TGA of (a) CuS, (b) CuZ, (c) CuZP, and (d) CuZPMn. (G) XPS spectrum of CuZPMn and (H) high-resolution Mn 2p XPS spectrum (Cu, Z, P, and Mn in CuZPMn represent CuS, ZIF-8, polydopamine, and MnO2, respectively. The abbreviations are also listed in ESI Table S1†).
Fig. 2(A) The release profiles of DOX from CuZPMn@DOX at pH 7.4, 6.5 and 5.0 with and without 808 nm laser irradiation (2 W cm–2). TEM images of CuZPMn@DOX at (B) pH 5.0 from 30 min to 8 h and (C) different NIR irradiation time periods from 20 to 80 min at pH 5.0.
Fig. 3UV absorbance spectra of 100 μM ABDA in the (A) presence and (B) absence of 50 μg mL–1 CuZPMn@PpIX under irradiation at 655 nm at different time periods. (C) UV-Vis-NIR absorbance spectra of CuZPMn NPs. (D) Photothermal heating curves of CuZPMn under 808 nm laser irradiation at 2 W cm–2 for 10 min. (E) In vitro and (F) in vivo infrared thermal photographs of PBS and CuZPMn recorded at different time intervals when exposed to 808 nm laser irradiation.
Fig. 4(A) Confocal fluorescence images of RAW264.7 cells treated with free CpG, CuZPMn@CpG, and CuZPMn@CpG after NIR irradiation. (B) The secretion of TNF-α from RAW264.7 cells stimulated with different treatments. (C) Cell viabilities of 4T1 cells treated with different treatments. (D) Schematic illustration for immunotherapy. RAW264.7 cell (upper) and 4T1 tumor cell (bottom) co-cultured Transwell system for mimicking the in vivo tumor model. RAW264.7 cells incubated with CuZPMn@CpG were subjected to NIR for 3 min to trigger the release of CpG. (E) In vitro GSH-responsive T1-weighted MRI of CuZPMn (inset: T1-weighted images of CuZPMn at different Mn concentrations with and without GSH). (F) T1-weighted MR images of tumor-bearing mice before and after intravenous injection of CuZPMn.
Fig. 5(A) Tumor size and (B) photographs of excised tumors after different treatments with PBS as a negative control and CuZPMn as a positive control. (C) Body weight trend of the mice after different treatments.
Fig. 6(A) Schematic illustration of the anti-recurrence and anti-lung metastasis study with CuZPMn@PpIX/DOX/CpG as the probe. (B) Volumes and (C) photographs of the tumors for induced tumor recurrence of the mice after initial treatments with PBS, PDT–chemotherapy–PTT, and PDT–chemotherapy–PTT–immunotherapy. (D) Body weights, (E) photographs of the India ink-treated lungs and (F) H&E staining of lung tissues of the mice after 4T1 tumor cells were intravenously injected into the PBS, PDT–chemotherapy–PTT and PDT–chemotherapy–PTT–immunotherapy treated groups.