Chanenath Sriaporn1, Kathleen A Campbell2, Martin J Van Kranendonk3, Kim M Handley4. 1. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 2. School of Environment & Te Ao Mārama - Centre for Fundamental Inquiry, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 3. Australian Centre for Astrobiology & School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 4. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. kim.handley@auckland.ac.nz.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Terrestrial hot spring settings span a broad spectrum of physicochemistries. Physicochemical parameters, such as pH and temperature, are key factors influencing differences in microbial composition across diverse geothermal areas. Nonetheless, analysis of hot spring pools from the Taupo Volcanic Zone (TVZ), New Zealand, revealed that some members of the bacterial genus, Acidithiobacillus, are prevalent across wide ranges of hot spring pHs and temperatures. To determine the genomic attributes of Acidithiobacillus that inhabit such diverse conditions, we assembled the genomes of 19 uncultivated hot spring Acidithiobacillus strains from six geothermal areas and compared these to 37 publicly available Acidithiobacillus genomes from various habitats. RESULTS: Analysis of 16S rRNA gene amplicons from 138 samples revealed that Acidithiobacillus comprised on average 11.4 ± 16.8% of hot spring prokaryotic communities, with three Acidithiobacillus amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) (TVZ_G1, TVZ_G2, TVZ_G3) accounting for > 90% of Acidithiobacillus in terms of relative abundance, and occurring in 126 out of 138 samples across wide ranges of temperature (17.5-92.9 °C) and pH (1.0-7.5). We recovered 19 environmental genomes belonging to each of these three ASVs, as well as a fourth related group (TVZ_G4). Based on genome average nucleotide identities, the four groups (TVZ_G1-TVZ_G4) constitute distinct species (ANI < 96.5%) of which three are novel Acidithiobacillus species (TVZ_G2-TVZ_G4) and one belongs to Acidithiobacillus caldus (TVZ_G1). All four TVZ Acidithiobacillus groups were found in hot springs with temperatures above the previously known limit for the genus (up to 40 °C higher), likely due to significantly higher proline and GC contents than other Acidithiobacillus species, which are known to increase thermostability. Results also indicate hot spring-associated Acidithiobacillus have undergone genome streamlining, likely due to thermal adaptation. Moreover, our data suggest that Acidithiobacillus prevalence across varied hot spring pHs is supported by distinct strategies, whereby TVZ_G2-TVZ_G4 regulate pH homeostasis mostly through Na+/H+ antiporters and proton-efflux ATPases, whereas TVZ_G1 mainly relies on amino acid decarboxylases. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into the distribution of Acidithiobacillus species across diverse hot spring physichochemistries and determines genomic features and adaptations that potentially enable Acidithiobacillus species to colonize a broad range of temperatures and pHs in geothermal environments. Video Abstract.
BACKGROUND: Terrestrial hot spring settings span a broad spectrum of physicochemistries. Physicochemical parameters, such as pH and temperature, are key factors influencing differences in microbial composition across diverse geothermal areas. Nonetheless, analysis of hot spring pools from the Taupo Volcanic Zone (TVZ), New Zealand, revealed that some members of the bacterial genus, Acidithiobacillus, are prevalent across wide ranges of hot spring pHs and temperatures. To determine the genomic attributes of Acidithiobacillus that inhabit such diverse conditions, we assembled the genomes of 19 uncultivated hot spring Acidithiobacillus strains from six geothermal areas and compared these to 37 publicly available Acidithiobacillus genomes from various habitats. RESULTS: Analysis of 16S rRNA gene amplicons from 138 samples revealed that Acidithiobacillus comprised on average 11.4 ± 16.8% of hot spring prokaryotic communities, with three Acidithiobacillus amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) (TVZ_G1, TVZ_G2, TVZ_G3) accounting for > 90% of Acidithiobacillus in terms of relative abundance, and occurring in 126 out of 138 samples across wide ranges of temperature (17.5-92.9 °C) and pH (1.0-7.5). We recovered 19 environmental genomes belonging to each of these three ASVs, as well as a fourth related group (TVZ_G4). Based on genome average nucleotide identities, the four groups (TVZ_G1-TVZ_G4) constitute distinct species (ANI < 96.5%) of which three are novel Acidithiobacillus species (TVZ_G2-TVZ_G4) and one belongs to Acidithiobacillus caldus (TVZ_G1). All four TVZAcidithiobacillus groups were found in hot springs with temperatures above the previously known limit for the genus (up to 40 °C higher), likely due to significantly higher proline and GC contents than other Acidithiobacillus species, which are known to increase thermostability. Results also indicate hot spring-associated Acidithiobacillus have undergone genome streamlining, likely due to thermal adaptation. Moreover, our data suggest that Acidithiobacillus prevalence across varied hot spring pHs is supported by distinct strategies, whereby TVZ_G2-TVZ_G4 regulate pH homeostasis mostly through Na+/H+ antiporters and proton-efflux ATPases, whereas TVZ_G1 mainly relies on amino acid decarboxylases. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into the distribution of Acidithiobacillus species across diverse hot spring physichochemistries and determines genomic features and adaptations that potentially enable Acidithiobacillus species to colonize a broad range of temperatures and pHs in geothermal environments. Video Abstract.
Entities:
Keywords:
Acidithiobacillus; Adaptation; Genome streamlining; Hot spring; Temperature; pH
Authors: Jorge Valdes; Raquel Quatrini; Kevin Hallberg; Mark Dopson; Pablo D T Valenzuela; David S Holmes Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: Chanenath Sriaporn; Kathleen A Campbell; Maeva Millan; Steven W Ruff; Martin J Van Kranendonk; Kim M Handley Journal: Geobiology Date: 2020-04-26 Impact factor: 4.407
Authors: Matías Castro; Ana Moya-Beltrán; Paulo C Covarrubias; Mónica Gonzalez; Juan Pablo Cardenas; Francisco Issotta; Harold Nuñez; Lillian G Acuña; Gonzalo Encina; David S Holmes; D Barrie Johnson; Raquel Quatrini Journal: Stand Genomic Sci Date: 2017-12-15
Authors: Jorge Valdés; Inti Pedroso; Raquel Quatrini; Robert J Dodson; Herve Tettelin; Robert Blake; Jonathan A Eisen; David S Holmes Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2008-12-11 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Jean F Power; Carlo R Carere; Charles K Lee; Georgia L J Wakerley; David W Evans; Mathew Button; Duncan White; Melissa D Climo; Annika M Hinze; Xochitl C Morgan; Ian R McDonald; S Craig Cary; Matthew B Stott Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Olivia E Mosley; Emilie Gios; Louise Weaver; Murray Close; Chris Daughney; Rob van der Raaij; Heather Martindale; Kim M Handley Journal: mSystems Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 6.496
Authors: Carolina González-Rosales; Eva Vergara; Mark Dopson; Jorge H Valdés; David S Holmes Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 5.640