Literature DB >> 3411626

Thyroid cancer after diagnostic doses of iodine-131: a retrospective cohort study.

L E Holm1, K E Wiklund, G E Lundell, N A Bergman, G Bjelkengren, E S Cederquist, U B Ericsson, L G Larsson, M E Lidberg, R S Lindberg.   

Abstract

The incidence of thyroid cancer was evaluated in 35,074 patients examined for suspected thyroid disorders between 1951 and 1969 with an average of 1.92 megabecquerel [(MBq) 52 microCi] of 131I. The radiation dose to the thyroid gland was, on the average, approximately 0.5 Gy. The mean age at the time of examination was 44 years; 5% were under age 20. Patients were followed for an average of 20 years. Record linkage with the Swedish Cancer Register identified 50 thyroid cancers occurring 5 years or more after the initial 131I examination, in contrast to 39.4 expected based on general population rates [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval = 0.94-1.67]. Risk was highest among males (SIR = 2.70, n = 10), patients followed 5-9 years (SIR = 2.22, n = 23), and patients receiving more than 74 microCi or 2.74 MBq of 131I (SIR = 2.04, n = 17). However, these observations were confounded by the fact that patients examined for a suspected thyroid tumor received the highest 131I exposures and were at highest overall risk (SIR = 2.77, n = 34). Patients given 131I for reasons other than a suspected tumor were not at increased risk (SIR = 0.62, n = 16). Patients anticipated to be at highest risk, i.e., women (SIR = 1.12, n = 40) and those observed for 10 years or more (SIR = 0.93, n = 27), showed no evidence of a dose response. Overall, these data provide little proof that 131I is carcinogenic in humans and support the notion that the carcinogenic potential of internal 131I beta particles might be as low as four times less than external x rays or gamma rays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3411626     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/80.14.1132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  16 in total

1.  Is it really this simple?

Authors:  Martin Charron; Brian C Lentle
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-09-16

2.  Nuclear energy and health: and the benefits of low-dose radiation hormesis.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler; Myron Pollycove
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 3.  Thyroid consequences of Chernobyl accident in the countries of the European Community.

Authors:  J Malone; J Unger; F Delange; R Lagasse; J E Dumont
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 4.  Thyroid cancer following Chernobyl.

Authors:  E D Williams; F Pacini; A Pinchera
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Cancer in iodine-131 exposed patients.

Authors:  P Hall; L E Holm
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 6.  Carcinogenic risk in diagnostic nuclear medicine: biological and epidemiological considerations.

Authors:  F Overbeek; E K Pauwels; J J Broerse
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-09

7.  Observations on the Chernobyl Disaster and LNT.

Authors:  Zbigniew Jaworowski
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 8.  Minimizing radiation injury and neoplastic effects during pediatric fluoroscopy: what should we know?

Authors:  Louis Kenneth Wagner
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09

Review 9.  Radiation-induced thyroid neoplasia.

Authors:  L E Holm
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1991

Review 10.  Radiation-induced thyroid cancer.

Authors:  P Hall
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1992
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.