Literature DB >> 34111368

Distortion or magnification? An in vitro cone-beam CT study of dimensional changes of objects with different compositions.

Fernanda Coelho-Silva1, Hugo Gaêta-Araujo2, Lucas P Lopes Rosado1, Deborah Queiroz Freitas1, Francisco Haiter-Neto1, Sergio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether dimensional changes occur as shape distortion (unevenly), contraction or magnification (evenly) in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) considering materials, anatomical regions and metal artefact reduction algorithms.
METHODS: Four cylinders of amalgam (Am), cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr), gutta-percha (Gu), titanium (Ti) and zirconium (Zi) were inserted inside a polymethylmethacrylate phantom in anterior and posterior regions for acquisitions in Picasso Trio and OP300 with MAR enabled and disabled. Two observers measured the dimensions of each cylinder in three axes: Y (height), Z (antero posterior diameter) and X (latero-lateral diameter). Repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test compared the data (α = 5%).
RESULTS: Shape distortion occurred for all materials in anterior region of Picasso Trio without MAR (p < 0.05). With MAR enabled, Gu and Ti contracted (p ≥ 0.05), while the others showed distortion (p < 0.05). In posterior region, all materials distorted in both MAR conditions (p < 0.05), except Gu, which magnified without MAR (p ≥ 0.05) and contracted unevenly with MAR (p < 0.05). In anterior region of OP300, all materials magnified without MAR, (p ≥ 0.05) and had shape distortion with MAR (p < 0.05). In posterior region, only Am showed magnification without MAR (p ≥ 0.05), while all materials presented shape distortion with MAR (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Dimensional changes of high-density materials in CBCT can be either a magnification, a contraction or a distortion; the last condition is the most prevalent. Furthermore, changes differ considering material, anatomical region and MAR condition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artefacts; Cone-beam computed tomography; Dental materials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34111368      PMCID: PMC8611276          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20210063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  22 in total

1.  What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?

Authors:  William C Scarfe; Allan G Farman
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2008-10

Review 2.  Artefacts in CBCT: a review.

Authors:  R Schulze; U Heil; D Gross; D D Bruellmann; E Dranischnikow; U Schwanecke; E Schoemer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Assessment of linear measurements of bone for implant sites in the presence of metallic artefacts using cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  C C Cremonini; M Dumas; C M Pannuti; J B C Neto; M G P Cavalcanti; L A Lima
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study.

Authors:  Tony Vanderstuyft; Mihai Tarce; Bahoz Sanaan; Reinhilde Jacobs; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Marc Quirynen
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 8.728

5.  Quantitative evaluation of metal artifacts using different CBCT devices, high-density materials and field of views.

Authors:  Marina Codari; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Laura Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo; Francisco Haiter Neto; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Accuracy of High-resolution Small-volume Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Detecting Complex Anatomy of the Apical Isthmi: Ex Vivo Analysis.

Authors:  Elen de Souza Tolentino; Pablo Andrés Amoroso-Silva; Murilo Priori Alcalde; Heitor Marques Honório; Lilian Cristina Vessoni Iwaki; Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen; Marco Antônio Húngaro-Duarte
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Metal artefact reduction with cone beam CT: an in vitro study.

Authors:  B B Bechara; W S Moore; C A McMahan; M Noujeim
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Effect of anatomical region on the formation of metal artefacts produced by dental implants in cone beam computed tomographic images.

Authors:  Alessiana Helena Machado; Karolina Aparecida Castilho Fardim; Camila Furtado de Souza; Bruno Salles Sotto-Maior; Neuza Maria Souza Picorelli Assis; Karina Lopes Devito
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Influence of windowing and metal artefact reduction algorithms on the volumetric dimensions of five different high-density materials: a cone-beam CT study.

Authors:  Fernanda Coelho-Silva; Luciano Augusto Cano Martins; Daniela Azeredo Braga; Eliana Zandonade; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Sergio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Magnitude of beam-hardening artifacts produced by gutta-percha and metal posts on cone-beam computed tomography with varying tube current.

Authors:  Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento; Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele; Arthur Xavier Maseti Mancini; Deborah Queiroz Freitas; Christiano Oliveira-Santos
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2020-03-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Influence of Exposure Parameters and Implant Position in Peri-Implant Bone Assessment in CBCT Images: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Paweł Sawicki; Piotr Regulski; Artur Winiarski; Paweł J Zawadzki
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.