Literature DB >> 3411050

Ear canal acoustic distortion at 2f1-f2 from human ears: relation to other emissions and perceived combination tones.

M Furst1, W M Rabinowitz, P M Zurek.   

Abstract

Two aspects of the intermodulation distortion product at 2f1-f2 generated by normal human ears and measured acoustically in the ear canal were studied: (1) its relation to tone-evoked and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, and (2) its relation to the perceived combination tone at the same frequency. With regard to (1), substantial differences among ears in the detectability of emissions were observed; ears tended to exhibit all or none of the emission types that were sought. Within ears possessing emissions, the magnitudes of tone-evoked emissions and acoustic distortion showed a similar dependence on frequency. With regard to (2), a three-primary-tone stimulus was employed to ask whether the ear canal acoustic distortion tone is canceled under the same stimulus conditions that produce perceptual cancellation. Simultaneous cancellation of perceptual and acoustic distortion was produced rarely. Results are interpreted qualitatively with a model in which primary tones produce distortion at their interaction region within the cochlea; this distortion propagates to the distortion-frequency place where it mediates perception. This same distortion wave produces emission components at additional locations, including the primary-tone interaction region, which sum vectorially to mediate the emitted acoustic distortion product.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3411050     DOI: 10.1121/1.396968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): parameter optimization.

Authors:  M D Valero; E G Pasanen; D McFadden; R Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Differences between psychoacoustic and frequency following response measures of distortion tone level and masking.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Redwan Farooq; Louwai Muhammed; Christopher J Plack; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.