Literature DB >> 34109478

Comparison of keratometry data using handheld and table-mounted instruments in healthy adults.

Hagar Olshaker1,2, Ortal Buhbut3, Asaf Achiron1,2, Gad Dotan1,2, Issac Levy1,2, Raimo Tuuminen4, Assaf Gershoni1,2, Irit Bahar1,2, Uri Elbaz5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare keratometry data between the handheld Retinomax K-plus 3 and the table-mounted IOLMaster 700.
METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers were prospectively recruited to the study. All participants underwent 3 consecutive keratometry measurements using the Retinomax K-plus 3 and a single biometry assessment using the IOLMaster 700. Differences between the Retinomax K-plus 3 and the IOLMaster 700 were assessed using Wilcoxon test for paired samples, Spearman correlation, Bland-Altman and mountain plots. RESULT: Twenty-eight healthy subjects with a median age of 37 years (interquartile range (IQR) 28-44 years) were included in the study. The median mean keratometry (mean K) reading was higher using the Retinomax K-plus 3 (44.04D; IQR 42.96-45.61D) compared to the IOLMaster 700 (43.78D; IQR 43.22-44.90D, p < 0.01), with a mean difference of 0.18D (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11-0.23D). Mean K readings were highly correlated between the 2 devices (r = 0.995, p < 0.01). Bland-Altman plots showed 95% limits of agreement between -0.14D and 0.49D. Frequency histogram of mean K reading differences between the Retinomax K-plus 3 and the IOLMaster 700 showed that 56% of cases were between ± 0.2D, 93% of cases were between ± 0.4D and all cases were between ± 0.5D. Mean corneal astigmatism measurement was higher using the Retinomax K-plus 3 (1.01 ± 0.40D) compared to the IOLMaster 700 (0.77 ± 0.36D), with a mean difference of 0.23 ± 0.37D (p < 0.01) between the devices.
CONCLUSIONS: A good agreement exists between the Retinomax K-plus 3 and the IOLMaster 700 regarding keratometry readings. This enables cataract surgeons to safely use the Retinomax K-plus 3 device when indicated.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34109478     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-01909-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  3 in total

Review 1.  Screening for refractive errors in children.

Authors:  Monique Cordonnier
Journal:  Compr Ophthalmol Update       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr

2.  Comparison of IOL--master and ultrasound biometry in preoperative intra ocular lens (IOL) power calculation.

Authors:  Marija Škara Kolega; Suzana Kovačević; Samir Čanović; Ana Didović Pavičić; Jadranka Katušić Bašić
Journal:  Coll Antropol       Date:  2015-03

3.  Repeatability of Ophtha Top topography and comparison with IOL-Master and LenstarLS900 in cataract patients.

Authors:  Sha-Sha Yu; Hui Song; Xin Tang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.