Literature DB >> 34107137

Impact of intermediate to high doses of methylprednisolone on mortality rate in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia-induced severe systemic inflammation.

Mónica Climente-Martí1, Oreto Ruiz-Millo1, Ian López-Cruz2, Ángel Atienza-García2, Eva Martínez-Moragón3, Emilio Garijo-Gómez4, María Luisa López-Grima5, Rafael Zaragoza-Crespo6, Juan Vicente Llau-Pitarch7, Daniel Bautista-Rentero8, José Miguel Nogueira-Coito9, Tomás Ripollés-González10, María Antonia Marco-Artal11, Ramón Romero-Serrano12, Francisco Dolz-Sinisterra13, Rosario López-Estudillo14.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In addition to respiratory support needs, patients' characteristics to guide indication or timing of corticosteroid treatment in COVID-19 patients are not completely established. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of methylprednisolone on mortality rate in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia-induced severe systemic inflammation (PI-SSI).
METHODS: Between 9 March and 5 May 2020 (final follow-up on 2 July 2020), a retrospective cohort study was conducted in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 PI-SSI (≥2 inflammatory biomarkers [IBs]: temperature ≥38℃, lymphocyte ≤800 cell/µL, C-reactive protein ≥100 mg/L, lactate dehydrogenase ≥300 units/L, ferritin ≥1000 mcg/L, D-dimer ≥500 ng/mL). Patients received 0.5-1.0 mg/kg of methylprednisolone for 5-10 days or standard of care. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included ≥2 points improvement on a 7-item WHO-scale (Day 14), transfer to intensive care unit (ICU) (Day 28) and adverse effects. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression were implemented to analyse the time to event outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 142 patients (corticosteroid group n = 72, control group n = 70) were included. A significant reduction in 28-day all-cause mortality was shown with methylprednisolone in patients with respiratory support (HR: 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.71), with ≥3 (HR: 0.17; 95% CI 0.05-0.61) or ≥4 altered IB (HR: 0.15; 95% CI 0.04-0.54) and in patients with both respiratory support and ≥3 (HR: 0.11; 95% CI 0.02-0.53] or ≥4 altered IB (HR: 0.14; 95% CI 0.04-0.51). No significant differences were found in secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Intermediate to high doses of methylprednisolone, initiated between 5 and 12 days after symptom onset, was associated with a significant reduction in 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and ≥3 o ≥ 4 altered IB, independently of the need of respiratory support.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34107137      PMCID: PMC8237058          DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract        ISSN: 1368-5031            Impact factor:   3.149


What’s known

Systemic corticosteroids are one of the few interventions that have succeeded in demonstrating its effect in mortality risk reduction in critical and severe COVID‐19 patients who require respiratory support. WHO and scientific societies recommend the use of dexamethasone, at a dose of 6 mg orally or intravenously once daily, or 50 mg of hydrocortisone intravenously every 8 hours, for 7–10 days, in patients with severe and critical COVID‐19 and in patients who require respiratory support, and it is now recognised as standard of care for these patients. Nevertheless, some uncertainties still remain about their optimal use in COVID‐19 patients.

What’s new

This study shows that intermediate to high‐doses of methylprednisolone, initiated between 5–12 days after symptoms onset, decreases mortality risk in hospitalised patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia‐induced severe systemic inflammation. It suggests that the corticosteroid treatment effect in mortality risk reduction may be a function of hyperinflammation’s degree, independently of the needs of respiratory support. Identify the profile of patients who might benefit most from corticosteroid therapy, defining inflammatory biomarkers and cut‐off values that will allow clinicians to tailor treatment strategies in hospitalised COVID‐19 patients, to reduce mortality.

INTRODUCTION

Clinical manifestations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2)‐associated disease, COVID‐19, range from asymptomatic, mild pneumonia to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and death. , It is clear that the host immune response plays a key role in the pathophysiological effects of organ injury. In severe COVID‐19 pneumonia, patients' symptoms worsen and become more hypoxic 4‐7 days after the onset of symptoms and can progress to ARDS between 8 and 12 days. , A macrophage activation syndrome with hyperinflammation and cytokine storm appear to be the ultimate cause of tissue damage and organ failure in these patients. , , The similarity of SARS‐CoV‐2‐induced hyperinflammation to hyperferritinemic syndromes supported the use of anti‐inflammatory and immunomodulatory agents such as corticosteroids. , Initially, corticosteroids were restricted to patients with SARS‐COV‐2 pneumonia and ARDS by the World Health Organization (WHO) due to their potential effects on delayed viral clearance and the increased risk of secondary infections or death. , Later, the RECOVERY clinical trial has demonstrated the benefit of low dose of dexamethasone in reducing 28‐day mortality risk among patients hospitalised with SARS‐CoV‐2 pneumonia. This evidence has led the WHO and scientific societies to recommend the use of dexamethasone, at a dose of 6 mg orally or intravenously once daily, or 50 mg of hydrocortisone intravenously every 8 hours, for 7‐10 days, in patients with severe and critical COVID‐19 and in patients who require oxygen therapy with and without invasive mechanical ventilation, advising against the routine use of corticosteroids for mild clinical conditions. , , Data on the efficacy of other corticosteroids are limited to smaller trials, and not all of them have reproduced similar results. While some failed to demonstrate efficacy, , others showed beneficial effects over the course of the disease regarding the duration of the need of mechanical ventilation and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). , , Therefore, other corticosteroids such as methylprednisolone or prednisone are reserved in case of not having dexamethasone, using them at equivalent doses. , , Despite the growing evidence supporting the corticosteroid use, some uncertainties still remain regarding their optimal use in SARS‐CoV‐2 pneumonia. It is known that, in addition to developing respiratory failure, a subgroup of patients will progress into a severe systemic inflammation (SSI) syndrome and several inflammatory biomarkers (IBs) have been associated with severity and a worse prognosis. , , , Hence, in order to better define the profile of patients who might benefit most from corticosteroid therapy, we conducted this study with the aim of assessing the impact of intermediate to high doses of methylprednisolone on mortality rate in patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia‐induced SSI.

METHODS

Study design and participants

A single‐centre, observational, longitudinal, retrospective study was conducted at a 539‐bed general teaching hospital in Valencia (Spain), between 9 March 2020 and 5 May 2020. The recruitment period extended from 9 March to 17 April 2020 and final follow‐up was completed on 2 July 2020. Patients eligible were aged 18 years or older with severe COVID‐19 pneumonia, confirmed by the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) test, and had progressed into SSI, defined as at least two out of six IB raised over the predefined cut‐off points , , , : fever (body temperature ≥38℃), absolute lymphocyte count ≤800 cell/µL, C‐reactive protein (CRP) ≥100 mg/L, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥300 units/L, ferritin ≥1000 mcg/L and D‐dimer ≥500 ng/mL. Exclusion criteria were: previous long‐term systemic corticosteroid therapy (more than 6 months), methylprednisolone or equivalent treatment at doses out of range 0.5‐1.0 mg/kg or duration less than 5 days and sepsis or ARDS according to Berlin criteria at the beginning of corticosteroid use or progression into SSI. Pregnant or breast‐feeding women, patients transferred to an ICU or who died within the first 48 hours of admission were also excluded. A sample‐size calculation was performed to detect a 20% difference in 28‐day all‐cause mortality assuming a test power of 0.80, a 95% confidence level and no drop‐out rate. Seventy patients in each group were required. Every patient was fully informed about the off‐label character of the treatment strategy and the potential side effects, and informed consent was obtained before initiating any treatment following the national protocol for treating hospitalised patients with COVID‐19 developed by the Ministry of Health, Consumer Affairs and Social Welfare. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the local Clinical Research Ethics Committee (code 64/20) and classified by the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (HDP‐GLU‐2020‐05).

Procedures

Electronic health records, including laboratory results, prescribed medication, respiratory support received (oxygen with or without non‐invasive or invasive ventilation) and information on vital status were reviewed for all admitted patients with laboratory‐confirmed COVID‐19 pneumonia at different time points containing the time of corticosteroid treatment beginning and progression into SSI, as appropriate. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on whether they received systemic corticosteroids (corticosteroid group), initiated between 5 and 12 days after symptom onset at intermediate to high doses of methylprednisolone (or equivalent) 0.5‐1.0 mg/kg through intravenous perfusion daily for 5‐10 days, plus standard care or standard care alone (control group). Decision to prescribe corticosteroids was at the discretion of the treating physician (based on time since symptom onset, respiratory compromise and the following IBs: fever, absolute lymphocyte count, CRP, LDH, ferritin and D‐dimer) in accordance with the institutional protocol developed on 9 March 2020. This was approved by the Doctor Peset COVID‐19 working group consensus and based on the available literature, experience from other centres around the world affected by COVID‐19 and the clinical rationale based on immunology to explain the torpid course of the disease in some patients. Standard care included treatment with antivirals (lopinavir–ritonavir), antibiotics (azithromycin, ceftriaxone or others if needed), anti‐malarials (hydroxychloroquine) and tocilizumab (if raised interleukin‐6 [IL‐6], when available) according to the national protocol approved for treating hospitalised patients with COVID‐19.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was 28‐day all‐cause mortality in overall population (≥2 IB altered) and subgroups of patients classified according to respiratory support needs at the progression into SSI and/or the number of altered IB (≥3 or ≥4). For a clearer understanding of risk, the outcomes were also modelled separately. A secondary outcome was ≥2 stages of improvement at Day 14 on a 7‐item WHO‐endorsed ordinal scale (ranging from 1 to 2, not hospitalised to 7, death). The two outpatient strata (points 1 and 2) were combined into one, due to was not possible to know whether discharged patients were able to resume or not their normal activities. Other secondary outcomes were transfer to ICU, progression into ARDS and severe adverse effects (hyperglycaemia defined as glycaemia >200 mg/dL for two consecutive tests, nosocomial infection and sepsis).

Statistical analysis

The demographic and clinical variables were described using univariate analysis. Distribution normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Categorical variables were reported as frequencies (%); normally distributed quantitative variables, as mean and standard deviation (SD); and non‐normally distributed, as median and interquartile range (IQR). Chi‐square or Fisher's exact tests and t test for two independent samples or Mann–Whitney U test were used for descriptive statistics, as appropriate. For the primary outcome of 28‐day all‐cause mortality, Kaplan–Meier survival plots were constructed, and survival curves for both groups were compared by use of log‐rank test. Survival data were censored when the patient died or on Day 28 for survived patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained from Cox proportional hazard univariate and multivariate models to assess the relationship of corticosteroid treatment and 28‐day mortality in overall population and subgroups of patients classified as previously stated. Adjusted multivariate Cox models incorporated covariates including number of comorbidities, previous neurological antecedents, oxygen supplementation needed at the beginning of corticosteroid or progression to SSI, azithromycin therapy, lopinavir/ritonavir therapy, tocilizumab therapy and low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) therapeutic dosage use. Statistical analysis was performed using PASW version 19.0 for Windows (SPSS™, Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). All statistical tests were two sided, and a P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patient's characteristics

During the recruitment period, a total of 327 possible candidates were admitted to the hospital (Figure 1). Of the 142 patients included, the mean (SD) age was 67.6 (13.8) years, 79 (55.6%) were men, and 63 (44.4%) were women. Distribution of age, sex, comorbidities and symptoms on admission was similar between groups, other than neurological history (13 [18.1%] vs 4 [5.7%]; P = .045), two or more comorbidities (50 [69.4%] vs 34 [48.6%]; P = .018) and median time since symptom onset (6 vs 7 days; P = .045). The main characteristics of patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia‐induced SSI are presented in Table 1.
FIGURE 1

Study flow chart. ICU, intensive care unit

TABLE 1

Baseline demographic, clinical characteristics and previous treatments of included patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia‐induced severe systemic inflammation

Patient characteristicsAll patients (n = 142)Corticosteroid group (n = 72)Control group (n = 70) P value
Age, years
≥7067.6 (13.8)68.6 (14.2)66.6 (13.4).406
Sex
Male79 (55.6)46 (63.9)33 (47.1).066
Female63 (44.4)26 (36.1)37 (52.9)
Comorbidities
Two or more84 (59.2)50 (69.4)34 (48.6).018
Hypertension70 (49.3)40 (55.6)30 (42.9).179
Diabetes mellitus26 (18.3)14 (19.4)12 (17.1).891
Dyslipidaemia63 (44.4)31 (43.1)32 (45.7).881
Obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2)37/139 (26.6)21/71 (29.6)16/68 (23.5).539
Chronic pulmonary/Respiratory disease26 (18.3)14 (19.4)12 (17.1).891
Cardiovascular disease17 (12.0)9 (12.5)8 (11.4)1.000
Neurological history17 (12.0)13 (18.1)4 (5.7).045
Malignancy15 (10.6)11 (15.3)4 (5.7).114
Chronic kidney disease11 (7.7)8 (11.1)3 (4.3).227
Liver cirrhosis or HIV000
Symptoms on admission
Time since symptom onset, median (IQR), days7 (6)6 (5.8)7 (5).043
Three or more107 (75.4)56 (77.8)51 (72.9).627
Fever (≥38℃)104 (73.2)51 (70.8)53 (75.7).640
Cough103 (72.6)54 (75.0)49 (70.0).632
Dyspnoea82 (57.7)46 (63.9)36 (51.4).183
Asthenia64 (45.1)37 (51.4)27 (38.6).172
Muscular pain47 (33.1)25 (34.7)22 (31.4).811
Diarrhoea27 (19.0)16 (22.5)11 (15.7).415
Headache17 (12.0)11 (15.3)6 (8.6).331
Vomiting17 (12.0)7 (9.7)10 (14.3).563
Ageusia13 (9.2)7 (9.7)6 (8.6)1.000
Anosmia9 (6.3)4 (5.6)5 (7.1).743
Syncope5 (3.5)1 (1.4)4 (5.7).206
Sore throat4 (2.8)3 (4.2)1 (1.4).620
CURB‐65 score (0‐5), median (IQR)1 (2)1 (2)1 (2).435
≥251/140 (36.4)28/71 (39.4)23/69 (33.3).566
Previous treatments
ACEi/ARB48 (33.8)28 (38.9)20 (28.6).262
NSAID7 (4.9)3 (4.2)4 (5.7).717

Data are mean (SD) or n (%), unless otherwise indicated.

Abbreviations: ACEi, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs.

Study flow chart. ICU, intensive care unit Baseline demographic, clinical characteristics and previous treatments of included patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia‐induced severe systemic inflammation Data are mean (SD) or n (%), unless otherwise indicated. Abbreviations: ACEi, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs. On admission, there was no significant differences between groups in the proportion of patients with a pneumonia severity score CURB‐65 ≥ 2 (39.4% vs 33.3%, P = .566). Oxygen saturation of 90% or less and/or respiratory rate of 30 per minute or more was observed in 36.1% of patients in the corticosteroid group and 25.7% in the control group (P = .247). Statistical differences were not observed in CRP, LDH, D‐dimer, ferritin or fever, except a lower absolute lymphocyte count (896 cell/mL [95% CI 787‐1005] vs 1069 [95% CI 940‐1199]; P = .042) in the corticosteroid group. At the progression into SSI, in the corticosteroid group, significantly more patients were receiving supplemental oxygen with or without non‐invasive ventilation (59 [81.9%] vs 41 [58.6%]; P = .004), presented ≥3 altered IB (62 [86.1%] vs 42 [60.0%]; P = .001) or ≥4 altered IB (43 [59.7%] vs 23 [32.9%]; P = .002). In the corticosteroid group, the proportion of patients with respiratory support needs and ≥3 (54 [75.0%] vs 30 [42.9%]; P > .001) or ≥4 altered IB (40 [55.6%] vs 19 [27.1%]; P = .001) were also higher than in the control group.

Survival outcomes

Mortality analyses are reported in Table 2 and Figure 2. In the overall population, 28‐day all‐cause mortality was non‐significantly lower in the corticosteroid group (5.6%), as compared with the control group (12.9%) (HR: 0.41; 95% CI 0.13‐1.32; P = .134). Nevertheless, a significant reduction in 28‐day all‐cause mortality was shown in the corticosteroid group in patients with respiratory support needs (6.8% vs 22.0%; P = .032), with ≥3 altered IB (6.5% vs 19.0%; P = .046), with ≥4 altered IB (9.3% vs 30.4%; P = .018), and in patients showing both respiratory support needs and ≥3 altered IB (7.4% vs 26.7%; P = .016) or ≥4 altered IB (10.0% vs 36.8%; P = .009).
TABLE 2

Effect of corticosteroids (vs control) on mortality at 28 days: Univariate and multivariate analysis

28‐day mortalityNo. of deaths/total no. of patients (%)Univariate analysis HR (95% CI) P valueMultivariate analysis a HR (95% CI) P value
Corticosteroids groupControl group
Subgroups
Respiratory support needed4/59 (6.8)9/41 (22.0)0.28 (0.08‐0.89).0320.15 (0.03‐0.71).016
Three or more altered IB4/62 (6.5)8/42 (19.0)0.30 (0.09‐0.98).0460.17 (0.05‐0.61).007
Four or more altered IB4/43 (9.3)7/23 (30.4)0.24 (0.07‐0.78).0180.15 (0.04‐0.54).004
Respiratory support and ≥3 altered IB4/54 (7.4)8/30 (26.7)0.23 (0.07‐0.77).0160.11 (0.02‐0.53).006
Respiratory support and ≥4 altered IB4/40 (10.0)7/19 (36.8)0.20 (0.06‐0.67).0090.14 (0.04‐0.51).002

Results from Cox proportional hazards univariate and multivariate models.

Abbreviation: IB, inflammatory biomarker.

Adjusted for number of comorbidities, previous neurological antecedents, oxygen supplementation needed at the beginning of corticosteroid or progression to SSI, azithromycin therapy, lopinavir/ritonavir therapy, tocilizumab therapy and LMWH therapeutic dosage use.

FIGURE 2

Kaplan–Meier survival curves for 28‐day all‐cause mortality in patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia‐induced severe systemic inflammation stratified for treatment (corticosteroids vs control group). Panels (A)‐(E) show 28‐day all‐cause mortality by subgroups: patients with respiratory support needs (A), ≥3 (B) or ≥4 (C) altered inflammatory biomarkers and patients with both respiratory support and ≥3 (D) or ≥4 (E) altered inflammatory biomarkers. Survival curves were compared by use of log‐rank test. Estimates of hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained from adjusted multivariate Cox models

Effect of corticosteroids (vs control) on mortality at 28 days: Univariate and multivariate analysis Results from Cox proportional hazards univariate and multivariate models. Abbreviation: IB, inflammatory biomarker. Adjusted for number of comorbidities, previous neurological antecedents, oxygen supplementation needed at the beginning of corticosteroid or progression to SSI, azithromycin therapy, lopinavir/ritonavir therapy, tocilizumab therapy and LMWH therapeutic dosage use. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for 28‐day all‐cause mortality in patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia‐induced severe systemic inflammation stratified for treatment (corticosteroids vs control group). Panels (A)‐(E) show 28‐day all‐cause mortality by subgroups: patients with respiratory support needs (A), ≥3 (B) or ≥4 (C) altered inflammatory biomarkers and patients with both respiratory support and ≥3 (D) or ≥4 (E) altered inflammatory biomarkers. Survival curves were compared by use of log‐rank test. Estimates of hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained from adjusted multivariate Cox models In both the unadjusted and the adjusted multivariate Cox models, treatment effect of corticosteroids showed a significant reduction in 28‐day all‐cause mortality in all the subgroups of patients analysed, being lower in patients with ≥3 altered IB (HR: 0.17; 95% CI 0.05‐0.61; P = .007) and higher in patients with respiratory support needs and ≥3 altered IB (HR: 0.11; 95% CI 0.02‐0.53; P = .006). Treatment effect of corticosteroids in reduction of 28‐day all‐cause mortality was independent of the number of comorbidities, previous neurological antecedents, oxygen supplementation needs at the beginning of corticosteroid or progression to SSI, azithromycin therapy, lopinavir/ritonavir therapy, tocilizumab therapy and LMWH therapeutic dosage use.

Treatment received during hospitalisation

Methylprednisolone (98.6%) or prednisone (1.4%) were initiated in the corticosteroid group at a mean (CI 95%) of 10.5 (9.4‐11.6) days from symptom onset or at Day 3 (IQR: 1‐6) from admission. The median dose was 1 mg/kg/day (IQR: 1‐1) and the median duration of treatment 6.5 days (IQR: 5‐8). Only one patient received two intravenous boluses of 250 and 500 mg of methylprednisolone. The corticosteroid group had more patients treated with azithromycin (P = .017), lopinavir/ritonavir (P = .029), tocilizumab (P = .013) and LMWH as therapeutic dosage use (P = .002). Table 3 shows therapy received during hospitalisation.
TABLE 3

Therapy received during hospitalisation

Therapy received during hospitalisationAll patients (n = 142)Corticosteroid group (n = 72)Control group (n = 70) P value
Corticosteroids
Time since symptom onset, mean (95% CI), daysNA10.5 (9.4‐11.6)NA
Drug: Intravenous methylprednisolone71 (50.0)71 (98.6)0 (0)
Daily dose, mg/kgNA1 (1‐1)NA
Duration, daysNA6.5 (5‐8)NA
De‐escalation regimen23 (16.2)23 (31.9)NA
Second treatment with corticosteroids5 (3.5)5 (6.9)0 (0)
Concomitant therapy
Hydroxychloroquine139 (97.9)71 (98.6)68 (97.1).617
Azithromycin133 (93.7)71 (98.6)62 (88.6).017
Ceftriaxone127 (89.4)63 (87.5)64 (91.4).625
Lopinavir/ritonavir71 (50.0)29 (40.3)42 (60.0).029
Tocilizumab7 (4.9)7 (9.7)0 (0).013
Interferon beta‐1b3 (2.1)1 (1.4)3 (4.3).363
Anakinra2 (1,4)2 (2.8)0 (0).066
Human immunoglobulin1 (0.7)1 (1.4)0 (0)1.000
Remdesivir0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Vasopressors0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
LMWH126 (88.7)71 (98.6)55 (78.6)<.001
LMWH therapeutic dosage use33 (23.2)25 (34.7)8 (11.4).002

Data are median (IQR) or n (%), unless otherwise indicated.

Abbreviation: LMWH, low‐molecular weight heparin.

Therapy received during hospitalisation Data are median (IQR) or n (%), unless otherwise indicated. Abbreviation: LMWH, low‐molecular weight heparin.

Secondary clinical outcomes

Despite the median (IQR) WHO scale scores at the progression into SSI were similar in both groups (4 [4‐4] vs 4 [3‐4]; P = .006), scores 4 (hospitalised, requiring additional oxygen therapy) and 5 (hospitalised, requiring high‐flow nasal oxygen therapy, non‐invasive mechanical ventilation or both) were significantly higher in the corticosteroid group (59 [81.9%] vs 41 [58.6%]; P = .004). Improvement in two or more points in the 7‐point WHO scale at Day 14 was statistically non‐significant higher in the corticosteroid group than in the control group in overall population (36 [50.0%] vs 31 [44.3%]; P = .607). No differences in the proportion of patients with progression in respiratory support (4 [5.6%] vs 8 [11.4%]; P = .339) or in patients transferred to the ICU at Day 28 from admission were found (4 [5.6%] vs 1 [1.4%]; P = .366). Despite not significant, more patients progressed into ARDS in the corticosteroid group (19 [26.4%] vs 9 [12.9%]; P = .069). Both groups had a similar proportion of severe adverse events such as hyperglycaemia (8 [11.1%] vs 4 [4.3%]; P = .208), nosocomial infections (3 [4.2%] vs 2 [2.9%]; P = 1.000) and sepsis (0 [0.0%] vs 1 [1.4%]; P = .493).

DISCUSSION

In this study, including 142 patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia‐induced SSI, we found that intermediate to high‐dose (0.5‐1.0 mg/kg/day) methylprednisolone therapy, initiated between 5 and 12 days after symptom onset, was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of 28‐day all‐cause mortality in patients with ≥3 o ≥ 4 altered IB, independently of the need of respiratory support. A lower non‐significant 28‐day mortality was also observed in the overall population with ≥2 IB. Despite higher comorbidity and more SSI observed in the corticosteroid group, the effect of methylprednisolone in reduction of 28‐day all‐cause mortality was demonstrated. In fact, significantly more patients were receiving respiratory support or presented ≥3 or ≥4 altered IB in this group. Improvement on ≥2 points in the 7‐point WHO scale at Day 14 was non‐significantly higher in the corticosteroid group, and no differences in the proportion of patients with progression in respiratory support or transferred to ICU at Day 28 from admission were found, showing that corticosteroid treatment not only reduced the risk of death but also may attenuate progression to the hyperinflammation phase that requires escalation of care in patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia. Also, there was no evidence of an increased risk of severe adverse events, like hyperglycaemia, nosocomial infections and sepsis in patients treated with methylprednisolone as previously reported. Although seven patients in the corticosteroid group received tocilizumab and none in the control group (P = .013), a recent systematic review, including COVID‐19 patients with similar characteristics of our study population, has shown inconsistent results regarding the efficacy of tocilizumab from retrospective studies with low‐moderate methodological biases. Even so, REMAP‐CAP study has reported IL‐6 receptor antagonists such as tocilizumab seem to improve survival outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID‐19. In our study population, 28‐day all‐cause mortality was up to four times lower than previous published studies. , However, mortality in the control group for patients with ≥3 o ≥ 4 altered IB, alone or combined with respiratory support, was similar (between 20% and 30%) to other studies. , Also, as can be seen in Table 2, the mortality rate in each subgroup of patients increases according to the number of IB altered (≥2, ≥3 or ≥4). In the control group, mortality rate increases around 10% by each altered IB added (from 12.9% to 30.4%), while in the corticosteroid group, only an absolute increase from 5.6% to 9.3% is shown between groups, demonstrating that the treatment effect of corticosteroids in our population may be until three times higher than previously reported in patients with severe and critical COVID‐19. , , The clinical benefit of dexamethasone, , , hydrocortisone , or methylprednisolone , has been evaluated in previous studies. In different trials, the corticosteroid dosing extended from low to high doses , , , , , , and total duration of treatment varied between 3 and 14 days. , , , , , , Studies comparing the efficacy of methylprednisolone and dexamethasone have obtained heterogeneous results. , , Clinical outcomes have also been very unequal between studies, and it is uncertain whether these apparent differences are related to the corticosteroid formulation and dose, the severity of illness or issues related to statistical power. , , , , , , , Trials evaluating methylprednisolone have not demonstrated a clear benefit. In a randomised trial that included 393 patients with severe COVID‐19, similar 28‐day mortality rates with 1 mg/kg/day methylprednisolone for 5 days compared to placebo were obtained (37.1% vs 38.2%, P = .629). In another trial conducted in 85 patients with moderate to severe disease with abnormal gas exchange and laboratory parameters suggesting a hyperinflammatory state, methylprednisolone (40 mg/12 hour for 3 days, then 20 mg/12 hour for 3 days) reduced the risk of the composite endpoint of admission to ICU, non‐invasive ventilation or death, without showing significant differences in mortality (20% vs 18%, P > .05). Nevertheless, in a quasi‐experimental study which used an early short course of methylprednisolone 0.5‐1 mg/kg/day for 3 days in patients with moderate to severe COVID‐19 reported a significantly lower rate of the primary composite endpoint of death, ICU transfer and, mechanical ventilation, as well as a significantly lower mortality rate (21.7% vs 26.3%, P = .024). It was advocated by corticosteroid timing as key factor and corticosteroid therapy at dyspnoea onset. These measures seemed to prevent from disease progression associated with the proinflammatory host response. On the contrary, in a retrospective cohort study including 205 patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia‐induced acute hypoxemic respiratory failure treated with methylprednisolone at a median or equivalent dose of 80 mg/day (IQR: 60‐107), a lower but non‐significant difference in mortality was found (14.5% vs 25.0%, P = .114), despite demonstrating a significantly lower risk of the primary composite outcome of ICU transfer, intubation or in‐hospital death. Although data from observational and randomised trials overall support the role of corticosteroids for severe COVID‐19, , most of the studies associate this benefit with the need for respiratory support. In addition, the variability in the clinical course of the disease, the evidence from different observational studies suggesting association of some IB with worse outcomes , , , and the different clinical response to corticosteroids confirmed by clinical observation in daily practice led us to hypothesise that the benefits of corticosteroid therapy could also depend on the degree of hyperinflammation. Hence, in order to identify which patients benefit the most from corticosteroid therapy, we conducted this study focusing on a subgroup of patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia‐induced SSI and analysed the effect of methylprednisolone depending on respiratory support needs and the number of altered IB. , , , Interestingly, we found significant benefit in 28‐day all‐cause mortality among patients receiving methylprednisolone who had ≥3 and ≥4 altered IB, suggesting that the magnitude of the benefit seems to be closely related to the degree of hyperinflammation (see Table 2, Figure 2). In these patients, benefit was even higher if, in addition to the elevation in IB, they also needed respiratory support. Nevertheless, the results of this post hoc subgroup analysis should be confirmed in a randomised clinical trial with risk stratification based on the level of hyperinflammation. Our study has other limitations as it is a single‐centre study with an observational and retrospective nature. Prognostic similarity at baseline cannot be assumed. Despite being included in the institutional protocol from 29 March 2020, the prescription of corticosteroids was at the discretion of the treating physician and variability cannot be completely ruled out. Lastly, the selection of the IB to determine the progression into SSI was based on the outcomes from different observational studies, but the prognostic value and optimal clinical use of some of them are still uncertain. , , , This study is unique in terms of the subset of patients included, since it focuses on a subgroup of patients progressing into a severe inflammatory syndrome. To our knowledge, there are no studies comparing the effect of corticosteroid therapy according to the inflammation degree, and our findings suggest that in this subgroup of patients, corticosteroids may be even more beneficial than shown in the RECOVERY trial.

CONCLUSION

Intermediate or high dose (0.5‐1.0 mg/kg/day) of methylprednisolone was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of 28‐day all‐cause mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia‐induced SSI, independently of the need of respiratory support. Benefits in mortality were higher in patients with both respiratory support and ≥3 or ≥4 altered IB.

DISCLOSURES

None.
  31 in total

1.  Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Dawei Wang; Bo Hu; Chang Hu; Fangfang Zhu; Xing Liu; Jing Zhang; Binbin Wang; Hui Xiang; Zhenshun Cheng; Yong Xiong; Yan Zhao; Yirong Li; Xinghuan Wang; Zhiyong Peng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Comparison of efficacy of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone in moderate to severe covid 19 disease.

Authors:  Syeda Arzinda Fatima; Mohsin Asif; Khurshid A Khan; Nasir Siddique; Aijaz Zeeshan Khan
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-10

3.  Effect of Hydrocortisone on 21-Day Mortality or Respiratory Support Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Pierre-François Dequin; Nicholas Heming; Ferhat Meziani; Gaëtan Plantefève; Guillaume Voiriot; Julio Badié; Bruno François; Cécile Aubron; Jean-Damien Ricard; Stephan Ehrmann; Youenn Jouan; Antoine Guillon; Marie Leclerc; Carine Coffre; Hélène Bourgoin; Céline Lengellé; Caroline Caille-Fénérol; Elsa Tavernier; Sarah Zohar; Bruno Giraudeau; Djillali Annane; Amélie Le Gouge
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Hemophagocytic syndrome: an unusual manifestation of acute human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Authors:  Te-Li Chen; Wing-Wai Wong; Tzeon-Jye Chiou
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.490

5.  A Comparison of Methylprednisolone and Dexamethasone in Intensive Care Patients With COVID-19.

Authors:  Justine J Ko; Clay Wu; Neha Mehta; Noah Wald-Dickler; Wei Yang; Renli Qiao
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.510

6.  Impact of intermediate to high doses of methylprednisolone on mortality rate in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia-induced severe systemic inflammation.

Authors:  Mónica Climente-Martí; Oreto Ruiz-Millo; Ian López-Cruz; Ángel Atienza-García; Eva Martínez-Moragón; Emilio Garijo-Gómez; María Luisa López-Grima; Rafael Zaragoza-Crespo; Juan Vicente Llau-Pitarch; Daniel Bautista-Rentero; José Miguel Nogueira-Coito; Tomás Ripollés-González; María Antonia Marco-Artal; Ramón Romero-Serrano; Francisco Dolz-Sinisterra; Rosario López-Estudillo
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.149

7.  Methylprednisolone in adults hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia : An open-label randomized trial (GLUCOCOVID).

Authors:  Luis Corral-Gudino; Alberto Bahamonde; Francisco Arnaiz-Revillas; Julia Gómez-Barquero; Jesica Abadía-Otero; Carmen García-Ibarbia; Víctor Mora; Ana Cerezo-Hernández; José L Hernández; Graciela López-Muñíz; Fernando Hernández-Blanco; Jose M Cifrián; Jose M Olmos; Miguel Carrascosa; Luis Nieto; María Carmen Fariñas; José A Riancho
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 8.  Therapeutic role of corticosteroids in COVID-19: a systematic review of registered clinical trials.

Authors:  Reshma Raju; Prajith V; Pratheeksha Sojan Biatris; Sam Johnson Udaya Chander J
Journal:  Futur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2021-03-17

9.  Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19.

Authors:  Peter Horby; Wei Shen Lim; Jonathan R Emberson; Marion Mafham; Jennifer L Bell; Louise Linsell; Natalie Staplin; Christopher Brightling; Andrew Ustianowski; Einas Elmahi; Benjamin Prudon; Christopher Green; Timothy Felton; David Chadwick; Kanchan Rege; Christopher Fegan; Lucy C Chappell; Saul N Faust; Thomas Jaki; Katie Jeffery; Alan Montgomery; Kathryn Rowan; Edmund Juszczak; J Kenneth Baillie; Richard Haynes; Martin J Landray
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Cytokine storm syndrome in coronavirus disease 2019: A narrative review.

Authors:  Y-M Gao; G Xu; B Wang; B-C Liu
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 13.068

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of intermediate to high doses of methylprednisolone on mortality rate in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia-induced severe systemic inflammation.

Authors:  Mónica Climente-Martí; Oreto Ruiz-Millo; Ian López-Cruz; Ángel Atienza-García; Eva Martínez-Moragón; Emilio Garijo-Gómez; María Luisa López-Grima; Rafael Zaragoza-Crespo; Juan Vicente Llau-Pitarch; Daniel Bautista-Rentero; José Miguel Nogueira-Coito; Tomás Ripollés-González; María Antonia Marco-Artal; Ramón Romero-Serrano; Francisco Dolz-Sinisterra; Rosario López-Estudillo
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.149

2.  Comparing efficacy and safety of different doses of dexamethasone in the treatment of COVID-19: a three-arm randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Negar Toroghi; Ladan Abbasian; Anahid Nourian; Effat Davoudi-Monfared; Hossein Khalili; Malihe Hasannezhad; Fereshteh Ghiasvand; Sirous Jafari; Hamid Emadi-Kouchak; Mir Saeed Yekaninejad
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 3.  Effect of corticosteroid therapy on mortality in COVID-19 patients-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chirag Patel; Krupanshu Parmar; Dipanshi Patel; Sandip Patel; Devang Sheth; Jayesh V Beladiya
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 11.043

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.