Literature DB >> 34105019

Electrophysiological aftereffects of high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (hf-tRNS): an EEG investigation.

Filippo Ghin1,2, Louise O'Hare3,4, Andrea Pavan3,5.   

Abstract

There is evidence that high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (hf-tRNS) is effective in improving behavioural performance in several visual tasks. However, so far there has been limited research into the spatial and temporal characteristics of hf-tRNS-induced facilitatory effects. In the present study, electroencephalogram (EEG) was used to investigate the spatial and temporal dynamics of cortical activity modulated by offline hf-tRNS on performance on a motion direction discrimination task. We used EEG to measure the amplitude of motion-related VEPs over the parieto-occipital cortex, as well as oscillatory power spectral density (PSD) at rest. A time-frequency decomposition analysis was also performed to investigate the shift in event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) in response to the motion stimuli between the pre- and post-stimulation period. The results showed that the accuracy of the motion direction discrimination task was not modulated by offline hf-tRNS. Although the motion task was able to elicit motion-dependent VEP components (P1, N2, and P2), none of them showed any significant change between pre- and post-stimulation. We also found a time-dependent increase of the PSD in alpha and beta bands regardless of the stimulation protocol. Finally, time-frequency analysis showed a modulation of ERSP power in the hf-tRNS condition for gamma activity when compared to pre-stimulation periods and Sham stimulation. Overall, these results show that offline hf-tRNS may induce moderate aftereffects in brain oscillatory activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Global motion; High-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (hf-tRNS); Resting state; Time–frequency analysis; Transcranial electrical stimulation; Visual evoked potentials

Year:  2021        PMID: 34105019     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06142-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  55 in total

1.  Brain areas sensitive to coherent visual motion.

Authors:  O J Braddick; J M O'Brien; J Wattam-Bell; J Atkinson; T Hartley; R Turner
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Diurnal variation in the quantitative EEG in healthy adult volunteers.

Authors:  L Cummings; A Dane; J Rhodes; P Lynch; A M Hughes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Fourier-, Hilbert- and wavelet-based signal analysis: are they really different approaches?

Authors:  Andreas Bruns
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Short-duration transcranial random noise stimulation induces blood oxygenation level dependent response attenuation in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Leila Chaieb; Gyula Kovacs; Csaba Cziraki; Mark Greenlee; Walter Paulus; Andrea Antal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Short- and long-term forms of neural adaptation: An ERP investigation of dynamic motion aftereffects.

Authors:  Sibel Akyuz; Andrea Pavan; Utku Kaya; Hulusi Kafaligonul
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Diurnal variations of EEG power in healthy adults.

Authors:  P Cacot; B Tesolin; C Sebban
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-05

Review 8.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Pnina Grossman; Chris Thomas; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Jimmy Jiang; Tatheer Adnan; Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Greg Kronberg; Dennis Truong; Paulo Boggio; André R Brunoni; Leigh Charvet; Felipe Fregni; Brita Fritsch; Bernadette Gillick; Roy H Hamilton; Benjamin M Hampstead; Ryan Jankord; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; David Liebetanz; Anli Liu; Colleen Loo; Michael A Nitsche; Janine Reis; Jessica D Richardson; Alexander Rotenberg; Peter E Turkeltaub; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Evaluating aftereffects of short-duration transcranial random noise stimulation on cortical excitability.

Authors:  Leila Chaieb; Walter Paulus; Andrea Antal
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Transcranial random noise stimulation-induced plasticity is NMDA-receptor independent but sodium-channel blocker and benzodiazepines sensitive.

Authors:  Leila Chaieb; Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Julius Kricheldorff; Katharina Göke; Maximilian Kiebs; Florian H Kasten; Christoph S Herrmann; Karsten Witt; Rene Hurlemann
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 2.  Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation Modulates Neural Processing of Sensory and Motor Circuits, from Potential Cellular Mechanisms to Behavior: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Weronika Potok; Onno van der Groen; Marc Bächinger; Dylan Edwards; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-01-07

Review 3.  Entrainment and Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity - A Review of Proposed Mechanisms of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Sreekari Vogeti; Cindy Boetzel; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.