| Literature DB >> 34103629 |
Yuan-Hung Pong1,2,3, Yi-Kai Chang3, Ching-En Hsu1, Po-Cheng Chen1, Yu-Chuan Lu3, Vincent F S Tsai1,2, Hong-Chiang Chang3, Men-Tzung Lo1, Chen Lin4.
Abstract
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is mostly due to the lack of blood flow into the penis. In the past 20 years, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was used in measuring the concentrations and temporal dynamics of different hemoglobin types. However, the dynamics of the light absorption (photoplethysmography; PPG) have not been applied to survey penile hemodynamics and erection quality. This paper compared the use of photoplethysmography (PPG) to study vascular ED with standard penile Doppler ultrasonography. Men diagnosed with vascular ED for at least 6 months and nominated for penile ultrasonography were included. PPG signals were collected during the ultrasound examination. All beat-to-beat PPG waveforms were aligned with the peak and averaged to one representative template waveform for feature analysis, including amplitude differences (APD) index, reflection time index (RTI), augmentation index (AI), and perfusion index (PI). An inverse correlation was found between end-erection amplitude and both erection hardness score (EHS) and resistive index (RI). APD index and EHS as well as the international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF) and RI were positively correlated. RTI and AI were inversely correlated to IIEF and RI. PI was positively correlated to RI. PPG may therefore be useful as a noninvasive, convenient, technique for sexual function evaluation.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34103629 PMCID: PMC8187730 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91582-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Basic demographics of all patients.
| Basic demographics of all patients | All patients (N = 68) |
|---|---|
| Age | 57.14 ± 13.05 |
| Height | 167.79 ± 4.94 |
| Weight | 76.75 ± 11.43 |
| BMI | 27.28 ± 4.21 |
| IIEF | 11.89 ± 4.52 |
| 1 | 9 (13.23%) |
| 1.5 | 6 (8.82%) |
| 2 | 20 (29.41%) |
| 2.5 | 6 (8.82%) |
| 3 | 6 (8.82%) |
| 3.5 | 10 (14.70%) |
| 4 | 11 (16.17%) |
| Mild | 9 (13.23%) |
| Mild to moderate | 28 (41.17%) |
| Moderate | 19 (27.94%) |
| Severe | 12 (17.64%) |
| Hypertension | 22 (32.35%) |
| Dyslipidemia | 22 (32.35%) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 21 (30.88%) |
| Prostate cancer | 14 (20.58%) |
| Cardiac disease | 6 (8.82%) |
| Hyperthyroidism | 4 (5.88%) |
| Others | 2 (2.94%) |
BMI Body mass index, IIEF International index of erectile function, EHS Erection hardness score.
The comparison of BMI, PSV, APD, and penile waveform series in ED severity.
| Parameters | BMI | PSV | APD index | Reflection time ratio (RTI) | Augmentation index (AI) | Perfusion index (PI) | Resistive index (RI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild ED (n = 9) | 27.36 ± 4.36 | 43.90 ± 21.59 | 0.118 ± 1.579d | 0.234 ± 0.102c | 0.297 ± 0.200c | 0.463 ± 0.655 | 0.903 ± 0.056 |
| Mild to moderate ED (n = 28) | 27.42 ± 4.24 | 43.64 ± 20.82 | − 0.083 ± 1.734d | 0.243 ± 0.098 | 0.319 ± 0.204 | 0.457 ± 0.641 | 0.886 ± 0.082c,d |
| Moderate ED (n = 19) | 27.27 ± 4.21 | 43.71 ± 20.39 | − 0.094 ± 1.730d | 0.244 ± 0.098a | 0.320 ± 0.210a | 0.444 ± 0.306 | 0.883 ± 0.081b |
| Severe ED (n = 12) | 27.18 ± 3.99 | 43.63 ± 21.72 | − 0.149 ± 1.771a,b,c | 0.240 ± 0.096 | 0.304 ± 0.193 | 0.345 ± 0.545 | 0.880 ± 0.080b |
| 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.037 | 0.619 | 0.009 |
BMI Body mass index, PSV Peak systolic velocity of cavernous artery.
aPost-hoc test p < 0.05 compared with mild ED.
bPost-hoc test p < 0.05 compared with mild to moderate ED.
cPost-hoc test p < 0.05 compared with moderate ED.
dPost-hoc test p < 0.05 compared with severe ED.
The correlation among PPG signals and clinically observed parameters.
| R value | BMI | IIEF | EHS | PSV | EDV | RI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| End-erection amplitude | 0.135 | − 0.151 | − 0.405* | − 0.002 | 0.119 | − 0.151# |
| APD index | − 0.114 | 0.289* | 0.522* | − 0.149 | − 0.553* | 0.417* |
| RTI | 0.198* | − 0.362* | − 0.181# | − 0.029 | 0.207 | − 0.265* |
| AI | 0.233* | − 0.305* | − 0.095 | − 0.007 | 0.086 | − 0.148 |
| PI | 0.023 | 0.026 | 0.136 | − 0.077 | − 0.437* | 0.338* |
EDV End-diastolic velocity in “end-erection” status.
*p < 0.05; #p = 0.09.
Figure 1The amplitude correlative series and sexual function. A: Amplitude in the end-erection period is negatively correlated with EHS (R = − 0.405, p < 0.05); B: APD index is positively correlated with EHS (R = 0.522, p < 0.05); C: RI is positively correlated with EHS (R = 0.670, P < 0.001); D: APD index is positively correlated with RI (R = 0.417, p < 0.05).
Figure 2The waveform series and sexual function. A: Negative trends among RTI, EHS, IIEF, and RI; B: negative trends among AI, EHS, IIEF, and RI.
Figure 3The experimental setup: The patients simultaneously receive penile Doppler ultrasound and transmittance-type PPG examination (700 and 840 nm, sampling 32 Hz) in the supine position. Penile Doppler ultrasonography is performed using high-frequency linear probes. The light-emitting diode (LED) and photodetector are included each in a separate sensor. They are both fixed to the penile root by stickers, leaving enough space for penile inflation. The LED and photodetector sensors are located on the skin of the front and back of the cavernous artery. The correct placement was guided by ultrasonography and confirmed by urologists.
Figure 4The calculation formula of reflection time index (RTI), augmentation index (AI), and perfusion index (PI). A: Template PPG waveform interpretation, A1 amplitude of systolic peak, A2 amplitude of diastolic peak, T1 time to reach the systolic peak, and T2 time to reach the diastolic peak B: Second derivative waveform transformed by the first-order differential of the template waveform for calculating PI.