PURPOSE: There is growing interest in the application of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) as a sensitive tool for monitoring tumour evolution and guiding targeted therapy in patients with cancer. However, robust comparisons of different platform technologies are still required. Here we compared the InVisionSeq™ ctDNA Assay with the Oncomine™ Breast cfDNA Assay to assess their concordance and feasibility for the detection of mutations in plasma at low (< 0.5%) variant allele fraction (VAF). METHODS: Ninety-six plasma samples from 50 patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) were profiled using the InVision Assay. Results were compared to the Oncomine assay in 30 samples from 26 patients, where there was sufficient material and variants were covered by both assays. Longitudinal samples were analysed for 8 patients with endocrine resistance. RESULTS: We detected alterations in 59/96 samples from 34/50 patients analysed with the InVision assay, most frequently affecting ESR1, PIK3CA and TP53. Complete or partial concordance was found in 28/30 samples analysed by both assays, and VAF values were highly correlated. Excellent concordance was found for most genes, and most discordant calls occurred at VAF < 1%. In longitudinal samples from progressing patients with endocrine resistance, we detected consistent alterations in sequential samples, most commonly in ESR1 and PIK3CA. CONCLUSION: This study shows that both ultra-deep next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies can detect genomic alternations even at low VAFs in plasma samples of mBC patients. The strong agreement of the technologies indicates sufficient reproducibility for clinical use as prognosic and predictive biomarker.
PURPOSE: There is growing interest in the application of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) as a sensitive tool for monitoring tumour evolution and guiding targeted therapy in patients with cancer. However, robust comparisons of different platform technologies are still required. Here we compared the InVisionSeq™ ctDNA Assay with the Oncomine™ Breast cfDNA Assay to assess their concordance and feasibility for the detection of mutations in plasma at low (< 0.5%) variant allele fraction (VAF). METHODS: Ninety-six plasma samples from 50 patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) were profiled using the InVision Assay. Results were compared to the Oncomine assay in 30 samples from 26 patients, where there was sufficient material and variants were covered by both assays. Longitudinal samples were analysed for 8 patients with endocrine resistance. RESULTS: We detected alterations in 59/96 samples from 34/50 patients analysed with the InVision assay, most frequently affecting ESR1, PIK3CA and TP53. Complete or partial concordance was found in 28/30 samples analysed by both assays, and VAF values were highly correlated. Excellent concordance was found for most genes, and most discordant calls occurred at VAF < 1%. In longitudinal samples from progressing patients with endocrine resistance, we detected consistent alterations in sequential samples, most commonly in ESR1 and PIK3CA. CONCLUSION: This study shows that both ultra-deep next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies can detect genomic alternations even at low VAFs in plasma samples of mBCpatients. The strong agreement of the technologies indicates sufficient reproducibility for clinical use as prognosic and predictive biomarker.
Entities:
Keywords:
Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA); Endocrine therapy resistance; Metastatic breast cancer; Next-generation sequencing
Authors: Jason D Merker; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Carolyn Compton; Maximilian Diehn; Patricia Hurley; Alexander J Lazar; Neal Lindeman; Christina M Lockwood; Alex J Rai; Richard L Schilsky; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Patricia Vasalos; Brooke L Billman; Thomas K Oliver; Suanna S Bruinooge; Daniel F Hayes; Nicholas C Turner Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Raoul Charles Coombes; Karen Page; Raheleh Salari; Robert K Hastings; Jaqueline A Shaw; Anne Armstrong; Samreen Ahmed; Simak Ali; Susan Cleator; Laura Kenny; Justin Stebbing; Mark Rutherford; Himanshu Sethi; Anna Boydell; Ryan Swenerton; Daniel Fernandez-Garcia; Kelly L T Gleason; Katie Goddard; David S Guttery; Zoe J Assaf; Hsin-Ta Wu; Prashanthi Natarajan; David A Moore; Lindsay Primrose; Scott Dashner; Antony S Tin; Mustafa Balcioglu; Ramya Srinivasan; Svetlana V Shchegrova; Alexander Olson; Dina Hafez; Paul Billings; Alexey Aleshin; Farah Rehman; Bradley J Toghill; Allison Hills; Maggie C Louie; Cheng-Ho Jimmy Lin; Bernhard G Zimmermann Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David S Guttery; Karen Page; Allison Hills; Laura Woodley; Stephanie D Marchese; Basma Rghebi; Robert K Hastings; Jinli Luo; J Howard Pringle; Justin Stebbing; R Charles Coombes; Simak Ali; Jacqueline A Shaw Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Karen Page; David S Guttery; Daniel Fernandez-Garcia; Allison Hills; Robert K Hastings; Jinli Luo; Kate Goddard; Vedia Shahin; Laura Woodley-Barker; Brenda M Rosales; R Charles Coombes; Justin Stebbing; Jacqueline A Shaw Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Kenneth S Thress; Roz Brant; T Hedley Carr; Simon Dearden; Suzanne Jenkins; Helen Brown; Tracey Hammett; Mireille Cantarini; J Carl Barrett Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Vincent Plagnol; Samuel Woodhouse; Karen Howarth; Stefanie Lensing; Matt Smith; Michael Epstein; Mikidache Madi; Sarah Smalley; Catherine Leroy; Jonathan Hinton; Frank de Kievit; Esther Musgrave-Brown; Colin Herd; Katherine Baker-Neblett; Will Brennan; Peter Dimitrov; Nathan Campbell; Clive Morris; Nitzan Rosenfeld; James Clark; Davina Gale; Jamie Platt; John Calaway; Greg Jones; Tim Forshew Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Davina Gale; Andrew R J Lawson; Karen Howarth; Mikidache Madi; Bradley Durham; Sarah Smalley; John Calaway; Shannon Blais; Greg Jones; James Clark; Peter Dimitrov; Michelle Pugh; Samuel Woodhouse; Michael Epstein; Ana Fernandez-Gonzalez; Alexandra S Whale; Jim F Huggett; Carole A Foy; Gerwyn M Jones; Hadas Raveh-Amit; Karin Schmitt; Alison Devonshire; Emma Green; Tim Forshew; Vincent Plagnol; Nitzan Rosenfeld Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-16 Impact factor: 3.240