Literature DB >> 29504847

Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review.

Jason D Merker1, Geoffrey R Oxnard1, Carolyn Compton1, Maximilian Diehn1, Patricia Hurley1, Alexander J Lazar1, Neal Lindeman1, Christina M Lockwood1, Alex J Rai1, Richard L Schilsky1, Apostolia M Tsimberidou1, Patricia Vasalos1, Brooke L Billman1, Thomas K Oliver1, Suanna S Bruinooge1, Daniel F Hayes1, Nicholas C Turner1.   

Abstract

Purpose Clinical use of analytical tests to assess genomic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasing. This joint review from ASCO and the College of American Pathologists summarizes current information about clinical ctDNA assays and provides a framework for future research. Methods An Expert Panel conducted a literature review on the use of ctDNA assays for solid tumors, including pre-analytical variables, analytical validity, interpretation and reporting, and clinical validity and utility. Results The literature search identified 1,338 references. Of those, 390, plus 31 references supplied by the Expert Panel, were selected for full-text review. There were 77 articles selected for inclusion. Conclusion The evidence indicates that testing for ctDNA is optimally performed on plasma collected in cell stabilization or EDTA tubes, with EDTA tubes processed within 6 hours of collection. Some ctDNA assays have demonstrated clinical validity and utility with certain types of advanced cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence of clinical validity and utility for the majority of ctDNA assays in advanced cancer. Evidence shows discordance between the results of ctDNA assays and genotyping tumor specimens and supports tumor tissue genotyping to confirm undetected results from ctDNA tests. There is no evidence of clinical utility and little evidence of clinical validity of ctDNA assays in early-stage cancer, treatment monitoring, or residual disease detection. There is no evidence of clinical validity and clinical utility to suggest that ctDNA assays are useful for cancer screening, outside of a clinical trial. Given the rapid pace of research, re-evaluation of the literature will shortly be required, along with the development of tools and guidance for clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29504847     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.8671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  232 in total

1.  Effective Cancer Genotyping-Many Means to One End.

Authors:  Catherine B Meador; Geoffrey R Oxnard
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Liquid Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor DNA.

Authors:  Tae-Kyung Yoo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Assessment of Molecular Relapse Detection in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Isaac Garcia-Murillas; Neha Chopra; Iñaki Comino-Méndez; Matthew Beaney; Holly Tovey; Rosalind J Cutts; Claire Swift; Divya Kriplani; Maria Afentakis; Sarah Hrebien; Giselle Walsh-Crestani; Peter Barry; Stephen R D Johnston; Alistair Ring; Judith Bliss; Simon Russell; Abigail Evans; Anthony Skene; Duncan Wheatley; Mitch Dowsett; Ian E Smith; Nicholas C Turner
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 4.  Liver metastases.

Authors:  Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Pnina Brodt; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Ruth J Muschel; Michael I D'Angelica; Itaru Endo; Rowan W Parks; Majella Doyle; Eduardo de Santibañes; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 5.  Lung and Abdominal Biopsies in the Age of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Leonard Dalag; Jonathan K Fergus; Steven M Zangan
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 6.  Emerging Role of Genomics and Cell-Free DNA in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lorenzo Gerratana; Andrew A Davis; Ami N Shah; Chenyu Lin; Carla Corvaja; Massimo Cristofanilli
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-06-29

Review 7.  Applications of liquid biopsy in the Pharmacological Audit Trail for anticancer drug development.

Authors:  Abhijit Pal; Rajiv Shinde; Manuel Selvi Miralles; Paul Workman; Johann de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Liquid biopsy mutation panel for non-small cell lung cancer: analytical validation and clinical concordance.

Authors:  Lee S Schwartzberg; Hidehito Horinouchi; David Chan; Sara Chernilo; Michaela L Tsai; Dolores Isla; Carles Escriu; John P Bennett; Kim Clark-Langone; Christer Svedman; Pascale Tomasini
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-06-24

Review 9.  TRK Inhibition: A New Tumor-Agnostic Treatment Strategy.

Authors:  Shivaani Kummar; Ulrik N Lassen
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.493

10.  Multiparametric liquid biopsy analysis in metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Hodara; Gareth Morrison; Alexander Cunha; Daniel Zainfeld; Tong Xu; Yucheng Xu; Paul W Dempsey; Paul C Pagano; Farideh Bischoff; Aditi Khurana; Samuel Koo; Marc Ting; Philip D Cotter; Mathew W Moore; Shelly Gunn; Joshua Usher; Shahrooz Rabizadeh; Peter Danenberg; Kathleen Danenberg; John Carpten; Tanya Dorff; David Quinn; Amir Goldkorn
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.