BACKGROUND: Breast cancer tissues are heterogeneous and show diverse somatic mutations and somatic copy number alterations (CNAs). We used a novel targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) panel to examine cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to detect somatic mutations and gene amplification in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: cfDNA from pretreated patients (n = 42) and 9 healthy controls were compared with matched lymphocyte DNA by NGS, using a custom 158 amplicon panel covering hot-spot mutations and CNAs in 16 genes, with further validation of results by droplet digital PCR. RESULTS: No mutations were identified in cfDNA of healthy controls, whereas exactly half the patients with metastatic breast cancer had at least one mutation or amplification in cfDNA (mean 2, range 1-6) across a total of 13 genes. Longitudinal follow up showed dynamic changes to mutations and gene amplification in cfDNA indicating clonal and subclonal response to treatment that was more dynamic than cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3). Interestingly, at the time of blood sampling disease progression was occurring in 7 patients with erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) gene amplification in their cfDNA and 3 of these patients were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative at diagnosis, suggesting clonal evolution to a more aggressive phenotype. Lastly, 6 patients harbored estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations in cfDNA, suggesting resistance to endocrine therapy. Overall 9 of 42 patients (21%) had alterations in cfDNA that could herald a change in treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted NGS of cfDNA has potential for monitoring response to targeted therapies through both mutations and gene amplification, for analysis of dynamic tumor heterogeneity and stratification to targeted therapy.
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer tissues are heterogeneous and show diverse somatic mutations and somatic copy number alterations (CNAs). We used a novel targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) panel to examine cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to detect somatic mutations and gene amplification in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: cfDNA from pretreated patients (n = 42) and 9 healthy controls were compared with matched lymphocyte DNA by NGS, using a custom 158 amplicon panel covering hot-spot mutations and CNAs in 16 genes, with further validation of results by droplet digital PCR. RESULTS: No mutations were identified in cfDNA of healthy controls, whereas exactly half the patients with metastatic breast cancer had at least one mutation or amplification in cfDNA (mean 2, range 1-6) across a total of 13 genes. Longitudinal follow up showed dynamic changes to mutations and gene amplification in cfDNA indicating clonal and subclonal response to treatment that was more dynamic than cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3). Interestingly, at the time of blood sampling disease progression was occurring in 7 patients with erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) gene amplification in their cfDNA and 3 of these patients were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative at diagnosis, suggesting clonal evolution to a more aggressive phenotype. Lastly, 6 patients harbored estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations in cfDNA, suggesting resistance to endocrine therapy. Overall 9 of 42 patients (21%) had alterations in cfDNA that could herald a change in treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted NGS of cfDNA has potential for monitoring response to targeted therapies through both mutations and gene amplification, for analysis of dynamic tumor heterogeneity and stratification to targeted therapy.
Authors: Jacqueline A Shaw; Karen Page; Kevin Blighe; Natasha Hava; David Guttery; Becky Ward; James Brown; Chetana Ruangpratheep; Justin Stebbing; Rachel Payne; Carlo Palmieri; Suzy Cleator; Rosemary A Walker; R Charles Coombes Journal: Genome Res Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Rebecca J Leary; Jimmy C Lin; Jordan Cummins; Simina Boca; Laura D Wood; D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Tobias Sjöblom; Ben-Ho Park; Ramon Parsons; Joseph Willis; Dawn Dawson; James K V Willson; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Levy Kopelovich; Nick Papadopoulos; Len A Pennacchio; Tian-Li Wang; Sanford D Markowitz; Giovanni Parmigiani; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-10-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ivan A Adzhubei; Steffen Schmidt; Leonid Peshkin; Vasily E Ramensky; Anna Gerasimova; Peer Bork; Alexey S Kondrashov; Shamil R Sunyaev Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Giovanni Ciriello; Michael L Gatza; Andrew H Beck; Matthew D Wilkerson; Suhn K Rhie; Alessandro Pastore; Hailei Zhang; Michael McLellan; Christina Yau; Cyriac Kandoth; Reanne Bowlby; Hui Shen; Sikander Hayat; Robert Fieldhouse; Susan C Lester; Gary M K Tse; Rachel E Factor; Laura C Collins; Kimberly H Allison; Yunn-Yi Chen; Kristin Jensen; Nicole B Johnson; Steffi Oesterreich; Gordon B Mills; Andrew D Cherniack; Gordon Robertson; Christopher Benz; Chris Sander; Peter W Laird; Katherine A Hoadley; Tari A King; Charles M Perou Journal: Cell Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: David S Guttery; Karen Page; Allison Hills; Laura Woodley; Stephanie D Marchese; Basma Rghebi; Robert K Hastings; Jinli Luo; J Howard Pringle; Justin Stebbing; R Charles Coombes; Simak Ali; Jacqueline A Shaw Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Valentina Boeva; Tatiana Popova; Maxime Lienard; Sebastien Toffoli; Maud Kamal; Christophe Le Tourneau; David Gentien; Nicolas Servant; Pierre Gestraud; Thomas Rio Frio; Philippe Hupé; Emmanuel Barillot; Jean-François Laes Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2014-07-12 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Eser Kirkizlar; Bernhard Zimmermann; Tudor Constantin; Ryan Swenerton; Bin Hoang; Nicholas Wayham; Joshua E Babiarz; Zachary Demko; Robert J Pelham; Stephanie Kareht; Alexander L Simon; Kristine N Jinnett; Matthew Rabinowitz; Styrmir Sigurjonsson; Matthew Hill Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Shanhang Jia; Mark T Miedel; Marilyn Ngo; Ryan Hessenius; Ning Chen; Peilu Wang; Amir Bahreini; Zheqi Li; Zhijie Ding; Tong Ying Shun; Daniel M Zuckerman; D Lansing Taylor; Shannon L Puhalla; Adrian V Lee; Steffi Oesterreich; Andrew M Stern Journal: Oncology Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Barbara Ottolini; Nadia Nawaz; Christopher S Trethewey; Sami Mamand; Rebecca L Allchin; Richard Dillon; Paul A Fields; Matthew J Ahearne; Simon D Wagner Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-06-09
Authors: K L Jhaveri; X V Wang; V Makker; S-W Luoh; E P Mitchell; J A Zwiebel; E Sharon; R J Gray; S Li; L M McShane; L V Rubinstein; D Patton; P M Williams; S R Hamilton; B A Conley; C L Arteaga; L N Harris; P J O'Dwyer; A P Chen; K T Flaherty Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 32.976