Literature DB >> 34094503

Experimental design of the Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone in Pulmonary Hypertension (EDIPHY) trial.

Thomas P Walsh1, Grayson L Baird1,2, Michael K Atalay2, Saurabh Agarwal2, Daniel Arcuri2, James R Klinger3, Christopher J Mullin3, Heather Morreo1, Brynn Normandin1, Sruti Shiva4, Mary Whittenhall3, Corey E Ventetuolo3,5.   

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains life-limiting despite numerous approved vasodilator therapies. Right ventricular (RV) function determines outcome in PAH but no treatments directly target RV adaptation. PAH is more common in women, yet women have better RV function and survival as compared to men with PAH. Lower levels of the adrenal steroid dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfate ester are associated with more severe pulmonary vascular disease, worse RV function, and mortality independent of other sex hormones in men and women with PAH. DHEA has direct effects on nitric oxide (NO) and endothelin-1 (ET-1) synthesis and signaling, direct antihypertrophic effects on cardiomyocytes, and mitigates oxidative stress. Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone in Pulmonary Hypertension (EDIPHY) is an on-going randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial of DHEA in men (n = 13) and pre- and post-menopausal women (n = 13) with Group 1 PAH funded by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. We will determine whether orally administered DHEA 50 mg daily for 18 weeks affects RV longitudinal strain measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, markers of RV remodeling and oxidative stress, NO and ET-1 signaling, sex hormone levels, other PAH intermediate end points, side effects, and safety. The crossover design will elucidate sex-based phenotypes in PAH and whether active treatment with DHEA impacts NO and ET-1 biosynthesis. EDIPHY is the first clinical trial of an endogenous sex hormone in PAH. Herein we present the study's rationale and experimental design.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trial; dehydroepiandrosterone; pulmonary arterial hypertension; right ventricle; sex

Year:  2021        PMID: 34094503      PMCID: PMC8142004          DOI: 10.1177/2045894021989554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pulm Circ        ISSN: 2045-8932            Impact factor:   3.017


Introduction

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has poor long-term survival despite numerous treatments that target the pulmonary vasculature. Right ventricular (RV) adaptation determines outcome in PAH but there are no approved treatments for RV failure. Women are more likely to have PAH and extensive experimental and human data support a role for sex and sex hormones in PAH and RV failure pathogenesis and outcomes.[1] Sex influences nitric oxide (NO) and endothelin (ET)-1 signaling and PAH treatments directed towards these pathways have differential effects on RV remodeling that depend on the hormonal milieu.[2-7] Response to treatment with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and ET receptor antagonists varies by sex, perhaps due to sex hormone-mediated dimorphic effects on the RV.[8,9] We and others have shown that PAH is characterized by lower circulating levels of dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEA-S) and that lower DHEA-S levels are associated with worse RV function and mortality in men and women with PAH independent of other sex hormones.[10-13] These human data complement experimental models demonstrating that DHEA reverses pulmonary hypertension (PH) and rescues the RV by reducing oxidative stress.[1,14-17] DHEA binds directly to vascular endothelium to activate NO synthase, promotes pulmonary artery relaxation via protein kinase G1α, suppresses ET-1 expression, and inhibits ET-1-induced brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) expression and cardiac remodeling.[18,19] In a randomized clinical trial (RCT) of healthy older adults, DHEA 50 mg daily improved systemic vascular stiffness and reduced levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α, two cytokines implicated in PAH pathogenesis and associated with symptoms and survival in PAH.[20-22] DHEA improves metabolic changes in adrenal insufficiency and symptom control in patients with connective tissue disease.[23-33] Although the results of RCTs of DHEA for these indications have been mixed, no serious side effects were reported in RCTs including >1200 patients; reversible mild androgenic side effects (oily skin, hirsutism, acne) were noted in some studies.[28,34,35] While DHEA is included in some dietary supplements, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved intravaginal DHEA (also known as prasterone or Intrarosa) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe dyspareunia in post-menopausal women.[36] In an uncontrolled study of eight patients with PH related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, treatment with three months of DHEA 200 mg daily was associated with a significant increase in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and improvements in hemodynamics without adverse effects.[37] The Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone in Pulmonary Hypertension (EDIPHY) study is an on-going randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial of DHEA in men and pre- and post-menopausal women with PAH funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01-HL141268; NCT03648385). EDIPHY will test the impact of DHEA on RV phenotype and provide mechanistic insights into sexual dimorphism in PAH and RV adaptation and in the context of major treatment targets (NO and ET-1) in PAH.

Materials and methods

Study design

EDIPHY is a single center, prospective, randomized, double-blind crossover study comparing oral DHEA 50 mg daily with placebo over two 18-week treatment periods (Periods 1 and 2) to assess changes in RV longitudinal strain measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with well-characterized World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension (WSPH) Group 1 PAH.[38] Participants are randomized 1:1 and stratified by sex. The study protocol calls for five study visits with three MRIs and a four-week washout period (Fig. 1 and Table 1). The central hypothesis is that DHEA will improve RV contractility and maladaptive remodeling via changes in NO and ET-1 synthesis and signaling in a sex-dependent manner. This research protocol has been approved by our Hospital Institutional Review Board as meeting the standards for human research protection under 45CFR46/21CFR56 and has been assigned project reference #001218. Study conduct and participant safety is being monitored by a Data Safety and Monitoring Board.
Fig. 1.

Study schematic for Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone in Pulmonary Hypertension (EDIPHY) trial.

Table 1.

Study schedule of end points and assessments.

Timeline, week−4021819–22244042
VisitScreening123Washout45Follow-up
 Informed consentX
 Phone callXXXX
 Medical historyXX
 MedicationsXXXXXX
 History, physical examXXXXXX
Safety
 LaboratoryXXXXXX
 Serum pregnancy testXX
End points
 Cardiac MRIXXX
 BiomarkersXXXXX
 Hormone levelsXXXXX
 HRQoLXXXXX
 6MWTXXXXX
 Functional classXXXXX
Study procedures
 Dispense study drugXX
 Medication adherenceXXXX
 Adverse eventsXXXXXXX
 Participant satisfactionXX
 Participant preferenceX

MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; HRQoL: health-related quality of life; 6MWT: 6-min walk test.

Study schematic for Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone in Pulmonary Hypertension (EDIPHY) trial. Study schedule of end points and assessments. MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; HRQoL: health-related quality of life; 6MWT: 6-min walk test.

Study drug

This study received an Investigational New Drug exemption (IND#129285) from the FDA. DHEA 50 mg tablets are purchased from Green Mountain Pharmaceuticals (Lakewood, CO). Green Mountain is an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient registered manufacturer with the FDA. A highly pure compound (100% DHEA) is verified by an independent laboratory with each batch. Study drug and placebo are over-encapsulated by the Investigational Services Pharmacy. Participants, study investigators, study staff and statistician are blinded.

Primary objective

The primary objective of this study is to assess the effects of DHEA vs. placebo on RV longitudinal strain as measured by cardiac MRI at 18 weeks.

Secondary objectives

To assess the effect of DHEA vs. placebo on RV function at 18 weeks To assess the effect of DHEA vs. placebo on markers of maladaptive RV hypertrophy including N-terminal pro hormone of BNP (NT-proBNP) at 18 weeks To assess the effect of DHEA vs. placebo on sex hormone levels at 18 weeks To assess the effect of DHEA vs. placebo on 6MWD at 18 weeks To assess the effect of DHEA vs. placebo on health-related quality of life (Short Form (SF) Survey-36, emPHasis-10, participant preference) at 18 weeks To determine whether DHEA affects NO biosynthesis and ET-1 production as assessed by measurement of NO metabolites and ET-1 at 18 weeks To assess the safety and side effects associated with DHEA administration in participants with PAH.

Participant screening, recruitment, and retention

Patients with well-defined WSPH Group 1 PAH and a history of classical hemodynamic criteria documented by right heart catheterization are approached for inclusion. All WSPH Group 1 patients are eligible for enrollment with the exception of PAH associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), as DHEA has also been studied in chronic HIV infection.[39] Treated PAH patients are eligible provided they have had no new PAH therapies introduced for 12 weeks. At least 12 weeks of clinical stability (no up-titration of PAH therapies) is required between screening and randomization. A detailed list of inclusion and exclusion criteria is included in Table 2. Pre-menopausal women are eligible as physiologic variations over the menstrual cycle should be balanced by the cross-over design with four to five cycles occurring consistently per 18-week treatment period. Patients on active hormonal therapy, contraceptives or supplements (or considering their use) are excluded. Given that cross-over trials are particularly sensitive to dropout and missing data, patients with an established history of non-adherence or other circumstances which could threaten adherence with the crossover design and visit schedule are not approached.
Table 2.

Participant inclusion and exclusion criteria for the EDIPHY trial.

Inclusion criteria
1. Diagnosis of PAH that is either:
 a. Idiopathic
 b. Heritable
 c. Associated with connective tissue disease
 d. Associated with congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunt
 e. Porto-pulmonary hypertension
 f. Associated with drug or toxin use
2. All of the following documented at any time prior to study enrollment:
 a. Mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mmHg at rest
 b. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure or left ventricular end-diastolic pressure ≤15 mmHg
 c. Pulmonary vascular resistance > 3 Wood units
3. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio ≥0.70
4. Total lung capacity (TLC) ≥70% predicted
 a. If TLC is mildly reduced (60% < TLC < 70%), computerized tomography with no significant interstitial lung disease may be used to fulfill this requirement
5. Chest computed tomography documenting no more than moderate parenchymal lung disease with clinical designation of Group I PAH and meeting both TLC (Inclusion 4) and FEV1/FVC (Inclusion 3) criteria
6. Normal or low probability ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan

 a. If no V/Q scan is available, a CT angiogram may be used, provided the participant meets diagnostic PAH criteria (Inclusion 1 above)

Exclusion criteria
1. Age <18 years old
2. PAH associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection
3. New background PAH therapy within 12 weeks
4. Significant dose change in background PAH therapy within 12 weeks
5. Untreated severe obstructive sleep apnea diagnosed by polysomnography
6 Evidence of left-sided valvular disease or systolic dysfunction on echocardiogram (≥ moderate mitral or aortic disease or left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50%)
7. Glomerular filtration rate <40 mL/min/1.73 m2
8. Child-Pugh Class C cirrhosis
9. Untreated hypo- or hyper-thyroidism
10. Pregnant or breastfeeding
11. Active or planned use of hormone supplements, oral contraceptive pills, or hormonal therapies
12. History of breast, ovarian, uterine, testicular or prostate cancer
13. Current use of another investigational PAH therapy
14. Contraindication to MRI (e.g., metal device or fragment)
15. History of significant non-adherence or circumstance which would threaten ability to comply with cross-over design and study visit schedule
Participant inclusion and exclusion criteria for the EDIPHY trial. Following screening and informed consent, a maximum of four weeks may lapse before randomization at the baseline visit and eligibility in order to confirm clinical stability. New or recent changes to PAH medications and any emergent conditions are reassessed at the baseline visit and all other enrollment criteria verified. Study drug adherence is assessed at each visit with study logs and pill counts. Study staff make frequent reminder calls three to five days prior to study visits. Emphasis is placed on maintaining a rapport with study participants through clear and consistent communication. Study staff include participants in visit scheduling decisions and demonstrate a willingness to be flexible around participant schedules but within the confines of the study protocol. This operational strategy acts as an additional measure against missing data and other threats to attrition.

Recruitment and power

A total of 26 patients will be recruited with the anticipation that drop-out will be one participant per period (n = 24). Power calculations were based on mean RV longitudinal systolic strain effect size and standard deviation estimates reported in Hardegree et al.[40] (Table 3). Power calculations were generated using SAS 9.4 PROC POWER using both paired means (both periods) two sample means (one period) routines. Alpha was established at 0.05. As a conservative effort, several levels of correlation were assumed and placebo and carry-over effects were also estimated. Power was calculated for mean differences (2 periods) and differences in delta for Period 1. Power was also calculated by sex (2 periods), where it was assumed females would have a mean difference in RV longitudinal strain of 8.0% and males 3.0%, respectively.
Table 3.

Sample size and power calculations.


Between Group Design (Period 1 comparison)
Estimate
Treatment

Placebo
PowerAlpha
n
DeltaDeltaDHEAPlacebo
Delta (SD) Period 1 only−5.3 (5.3)−0.0 (5.3)0.770.051212
^Delta (SD) Period 1 only−5.3 (5.3)−0.1 (5.3)0.750.051212

^Delta (SD) Period 1 only

−5.3 (5.3)

−0.5 (5.3)

0.70

0.05

12

12

Crossover Design (Periods 1 and 2)


Mean

Mean

Power

r

Alpha

n

n
Mean (SD)−19.3 (4.6)−14.0 (5.2)0.990.100.052424
*Mean (SD)−19.3 (4.6)−16.0 (5.2)0.770.100.052424
Mean (SD)−19.3 (4.6)−14.0 (5.2)0.990.200.052424
*Mean (SD)−19.3 (4.6)−16.0 (5.2)0.810.200.052424
Mean (SD)−19.3 (4.6)−14.0 (5.2)0.990.300.052424

*Mean (SD)

−19.3 (4.6)

−16.0 (5.2)

0.85

0.30

0.05

24

24

By sex

Females

Mean

Mean

Power

r

Alpha

n

n
Mean (SD)−22.0 (4.6)−14.0 (5.2)0.990.100.051212

Males

Mean

Mean

Power

r

Alpha

n

n
Mean (SD)−17.0 (4.6)−14.0 (5.2)0.430.100.051212
Mean (SD)−17.0 (4.6)−14.0 (5.2)0.470.200.051212
Mean (SD)−17.0 (4.6)−14.0 (5.2)0.510.300.051212

Between Group Design: Power analyses were conducted for Period 1 only for the difference in the delta change between participants receiving treatment and placebo prior to crossover. The effect of the treatment can be assessed between groups without the threat of carry-over contamination because of randomization. The limitation of this analysis is there are only 12 participants in each arm. These analyses incorporated increasing amounts of placebo and regression towards the mean effects (^). Crossover Design: Power analyses were conducted for the crossover design assuming washout will be sufficient. These analyses assumed different combinations of within-participants correlation along with different assumed effects of placebo and regression towards the mean effects (*). Because there is an assumed effect of treatment by sex, power analyses were conducted by sex.

Sample size and power calculations. Between Group Design: Power analyses were conducted for Period 1 only for the difference in the delta change between participants receiving treatment and placebo prior to crossover. The effect of the treatment can be assessed between groups without the threat of carry-over contamination because of randomization. The limitation of this analysis is there are only 12 participants in each arm. These analyses incorporated increasing amounts of placebo and regression towards the mean effects (^). Crossover Design: Power analyses were conducted for the crossover design assuming washout will be sufficient. These analyses assumed different combinations of within-participants correlation along with different assumed effects of placebo and regression towards the mean effects (*). Because there is an assumed effect of treatment by sex, power analyses were conducted by sex.

Visit components and study measurements

Study visit components and measurements are listed in Table 1.

Cardiac MRI measurements

All study MRIs are performed at a core MRI facility on a single Siemens 1.5T Aera with full Advanced Cardiac Package and XQ Gradients (45 mT/m @ 200 T/m/s) regularly used for research grade imaging. All MRI measurements are made using commercially available cardiac MRI software (CVI42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging). Longitudinal and circumferential strain will be determined using standard cine imaging and Tissue Tracking (Strain) software (Tissue Tracking plugin—CVI42, circle cardiovascular imaging) at study completion to avoid batch effects. In addition to RV longitudinal strain, we will measure RV fibrosis with T1 mapping as well as standard measures of RV function including RV ejection fraction (RVEF), RV end-diastolic mass, and volumes (stroke volume, end-systolic volume, end-diastolic volume). After study visits with MRI, a single expert reader performs quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) on image acquisition. The same single expert reader blinded to participant and study visits will read studies for the primary end point (RV longitudinal strain) and fibrosis (on T1 images) in randomly sequenced batches at the study’s conclusion. Ten percent of the MRI studies will be reassessed by a second expert reader for intra-reader and inter-reader reliability estimates of all measured parameters.

Markers of RV adaptation, sex hormones, and other biomarkers

Phlebotomy is performed at every study visit during both treatment periods and blood is banked for biomarker measurement at the study’s conclusion. Serum NT-proBNP levels will be measured using a FDA approved commercially available immunoassay (Roche Diagnostic Elecsys proBNP Assay, Indianapolis, IN) with excellent precision (intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) of <6.1%) and a track record in PAH.[41,42] Serum galectin-3 levels, a marker of myocardial extracellular matrix metabolism and fibrosis known to be elevated in the plasma of PAH patients[43] and inversely correlated with RVEF measured by MRI,[44] will be measured by an ELISA with an intra-assay CV of 3.4% (BG Medicine, Waltham, MA). Soluble RAGE, which inhibits myocardial apoptosis via STAT3 activation and is tied mechanistically to DHEA’s benefit in experimental PH,[45,46] will be measured in plasma by an ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) with excellent precision (intra-assay CVs 4.8–6.2%; inter-assay CVs 6.7–8.2%). Serum DHEA-S (more stable than DHEA) will be measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). The DHEA-S assay has a detection limit between 0.1 and 1000 µg/dL and a CV of < 8.3%. Plasma nitrite and nitrate levels will be quantified using tri-iodide-based reductive chemiluminescence.[47-49] S-nitrosohemoglobin (SNO-Hb), a major regulator of NO’s interaction with vascular endothelium,[50-53] will be measured using reductive chemiluminescence for nitrite and nitrate; these methods have been well-validated by the University of Pittsburgh NO Metabolomics core facility.[49] Serum ET-1 will be measured via immunoassay (QuantiGlo, R&D Systems, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) with intra-assay CVs of 2.6–3.4% and inter-assay CVs of 4.6–8.9%. Additional assays of interest will include comprehensive sex hormone levels, their metabolites, isoprostanes and isofurans, and IL-6 levels.[54]

Additional PAH intermediate end points

Health-related quality of life is assessed by the SF-36 and emPHasis-10 scales, which have been validated in PAH.[55,56] Participants are asked if they have a personal preference for Period 1 or Period 2 at study completion. A satisfaction rating collected at the end of each period is used to check this preference for plausibility.[57] Clinicians assess functional class at each study visit as part of the required physical exam. Six-minute walk tests are performed by blinded and trained personnel according to standardized procedures.[58] Variability is minimized by administering the test in the same corridor for all participants, avoiding a “warm-up” period, and using standard phrases of encouragement; intra-class correlation coefficients were 0.95–0.98 from a completed RCT in our center.[59] Side effects and safety are also assessed (Table 1).

Data management

Research staff use paper source documents in conjunction with direct entry surveys for patient-reported measures when appropriate. Many end points can be collected remotely and contingency plans exist for end points that must be collected on-site. Source documents are entered into the study electronic case report forms (eCRF) within 48 hours of collection. A centralized REDCap project serves as the study eCRF and encompasses all participant-level data and end point variables. Cardiac MRI data files are stored in triple-redundancy to prevent critical data loss. Data QA/QC procedures leverage the native features of REDCap and a well-defined project management plan. The principal investigator, statistician, and project manager meet regularly, with greater frequency as needed, to discuss issues relating to rigor, QA/QC and protocol execution.

Statistical methods

The intent-to-treat analysis will include all randomized participants. Hypothesis testing will use α = 0.05 without correction for multiplicity. We will characterize participants with regard to baseline and follow-up RV longitudinal strain and other end points using descriptive statistics. The primary analysis will compare the change in RV longitudinal strain at the end of each treatment period from baseline between (1) treatments and (2) between treatment and sex using generalized linear mixed models, nesting repeated measures within participant. Distribution of the models will be chosen based on inspection of model residuals. Classical sandwich estimation will be used to adjust for model misspecification after maximizing the appropriateness of distribution selected. Because it is unknown if our washout period is sufficient to control for carry-over effects and as study end points are not collected at a second baseline (week 22), change in end points will be examined between (1) treatment, (2) treatment and period, (3) treatment and sex, and (4) treatment, sex, and period. We will also examine the change in primary and secondary outcomes between baseline and at the end of each 18-week treatment period. For participants lost to follow-up, we will use all of the information available until the end of follow-up. If a participant wishes to drop-out or has a serious adverse event (whether related to study drug or not), we will continue to follow the participant for study assessments to assist with safety monitoring and to avoid the problems introduced by missing data. The participant will be strongly encouraged to continue to follow-up with the study personnel for all scheduled study procedures (including MRI), even if they are no longer taking study drug, so that missing data (and assumptions regarding these data) will be minimized. The inclusion of such follow-up data will allow for analysis by intention-to-treat. Per-protocol analysis will also be performed.

Data sharing

We are supportive of data sharing and will adhere to a data sharing timeline and approach that is consistent with the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The final statistical analysis plan and study dataset will be made available 12 months after publication of the results and provided appropriate protections (e.g., data use agreements, deidentified data) are in place. Final trial results will also be publically available on clinicaltrials.gov within 12 months of trial completion.

Discussion

This is the first trial to assess the use of DHEA as a putative treatment for PAH and to our knowledge the first to use RV strain assessed by cardiac MRI as a primary end point in PAH. This mechanistic crossover study is designed to examine the impact of DHEA on RV phenotype but also to provide insight into the intersections of sex, sex hormones, and key treatment targets in human PAH (NO, ET-1) in an effort to understand differential treatment response with available PAH therapies. Innovative aspects of EDIPHY include a sensitive, non-invasive primary end point to assess RV function, minimalist visit design, and tightly integrated project management plan. The RV as compared to the left ventricle has complex rotational motion from a unique myocardial fiber arrangement that requires highly sensitive methods to detect conformational changes. RV metrics obtained by cardiac MRI are highly accurate and MRI is the gold standard for RV assessment in PAH and other cardiomyopathies.[60] Longitudinal strain, an angle-independent method of assessing RV systolic function measured by echocardiography, is associated with survival in PAH and tracks with PAH therapy.[40] Echocardiography is inferior to MRI for assessment of the RV, however, and pixel-based multimodality tissue tracking using MRI cine images is available to quantify strain. This method has been described in PAH and is reproducible.[61-64] Assessment of strain by MRI appears highly sensitive for the detection of pre-clinical changes in RV contractility which is an ideal primary end point for a potential efficacy signal in this early Phase II trial. The measurement of fibrosis by T1 mapping will provide additional insight into subtle changes in treated participants who may have “stable” disease by traditional PAH metrics. The selection of a crossover design eliminates between-participant variability when comparing DHEA to placebo and allows for a much smaller sample size than would ordinarily be necessary in a parallel arm trial to maintain the same power. This structure suits a “proof of concept” study such as this one and strikes a balance between feasibility and rigor. The crossover design also limits the imbalance of factors particularly relevant to sexual dimorphism in pulmonary vascular disease, including sex, age, body mass index, and race/ethnicity. In the case of a significant interaction by sex, we will technically be underpowered to detect differences in men alone; however, evidence of the interaction is compelling in and of itself and has biologic relevance. A washout period of four weeks was designated to minimize possible carry-over effects, which is conservative relative to prior studies. While assessment for carry-over effects would have been assured with the incorporation of two baseline MRIs and two MRIs after the active treatment periods (four MRIs total), this would have increased burden and threatened feasibility and enrollment. The limitation of not having a baseline for the second period (week 22) is if the washout period is not long enough, carry-over effects from the previous treatment period may contaminate the effects in the second period and introduce an order effect. We have used conservative estimates for power (Table 3) and the designated washout period in order to mitigate this possibility. A lower dose of DHEA (50 mg) was selected than given in the prior open-label trial of PH in eight participants (200 mg). Trials outside of pulmonary vascular disease have used the 50 mg dose with no serious adverse events.[23,65,66] The 50 mg dose has been shown to increase DHEA-S levels to the normal range for younger individuals and to levels that far surpass the deficiencies we have shown in men and post-menopausal women with PAH.[10,11,66] We are assuring a highly pure compound with independent testing during the trial.

Conclusion

This pilot double-blind cross-over trial will test the efficacy and safety of DHEA in men and women with PAH and will characterize the interaction of sex- and sex-hormones with pathologic drivers of pulmonary vascular and RV dysfunction.

Author’s contributions

T.P.W.: study coordinator, database design and data quality control, assurance and management, trial protocol, drafting and revisions of the manuscript; G.L.B.: randomization scheme, analysis plan, data quality control and assurance, revision of the manuscript; M.K.A.: MRI protocol, MRI quality control and assurance, revision of the manuscript; S.A.: MRI quality control and assurance, revision of the manuscript; D.A.: MRI protocol, quality control and assurance, revision of the manuscript; J.R.K., C.J.M., H.M., B.N., M.W.: subject recruitment and enrollment, study visits, revision of the manuscript; S.S.: nitric oxide metabolite measurement, revision of the manuscript; C.E.V.: study inception and design, trial protocol, revision of the manuscript.
  66 in total

1.  Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) improves pulmonary hypertension in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a pilot study.

Authors:  Eric Dumas de La Roque; Jean-Pierre Savineau; Anne-Cécile Metivier; Marc-Alain Billes; Jean-Philippe Kraemer; Stéphane Doutreleau; Jacques Jougon; Roger Marthan; Nicholas Moore; Michael Fayon; Etienne-Émile Baulieu; Claire Dromer
Journal:  Ann Endocrinol (Paris)       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.478

2.  Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone replacement therapy on bone mineral density in older adults: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Catherine M Jankowski; Wendolyn S Gozansky; Robert S Schwartz; Daniel J Dahl; John M Kittelson; Stephen M Scott; Rachael E Van Pelt; Wendy M Kohrt
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Dehydroepiandrosterone replacement in women with adrenal insufficiency.

Authors:  W Arlt; F Callies; J C van Vlijmen; I Koehler; M Reincke; M Bidlingmaier; D Huebler; M Oettel; M Ernst; H M Schulte; B Allolio
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Asymmetrical dimethylarginine in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Jan T Kielstein; Stefanie M Bode-Böger; Gerrit Hesse; Jens Martens-Lobenhoffer; Attila Takacs; Danilo Fliser; Marius M Hoeper
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 8.311

5.  Galectin-3 and aldosterone as potential tandem biomarkers in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Laurent Calvier; Ekaterina Legchenko; Lena Grimm; Hannes Sallmon; Adam Hatch; Brian D Plouffe; Christoph Schroeder; Johann Bauersachs; Shashi K Murthy; Georg Hansmann
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Dehydroepiandrosterone treatment of women with mild-to-moderate systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Deh-Ming Chang; Joung-Liang Lan; Hsiao-Yi Lin; Shue-Fen Luo
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-11

7.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Right Ventricular Strain Analysis for Assessment of Coupling and Diastolic Function in Pulmonary Hypertension.

Authors:  Khodr Tello; Antonia Dalmer; Rebecca Vanderpool; Hossein A Ghofrani; Robert Naeije; Fritz Roller; Werner Seeger; Jochen Wilhelm; Henning Gall; Manuel J Richter
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-03-13

8.  Measurement of F2- isoprostanes and isofurans using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ginger L Milne; Benlian Gao; Erin S Terry; William E Zackert; Stephanie C Sanchez
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 7.376

9.  Assessment of Right Ventricular Function in the Research Setting: Knowledge Gaps and Pathways Forward. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.

Authors:  Tim Lahm; Ivor S Douglas; Stephen L Archer; Harm J Bogaard; Naomi C Chesler; Francois Haddad; Anna R Hemnes; Steven M Kawut; Jeffrey A Kline; Todd M Kolb; Stephen C Mathai; Olaf Mercier; Evangelos D Michelakis; Robert Naeije; Rubin M Tuder; Corey E Ventetuolo; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Norbert F Voelkel; Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf; Paul M Hassoun
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Gérald Simonneau; David Montani; David S Celermajer; Christopher P Denton; Michael A Gatzoulis; Michael Krowka; Paul G Williams; Rogerio Souza
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 16.671

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Oxidative Stress and Antioxidative Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Dan Xu; Ya-Hui Hu; Xue Gou; Feng-Yang Li; Xi-Yu-Chen Yang; Yun-Man Li; Feng Chen
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.927

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.