Dennis T Villareal1, John O Holloszy. 1. Division of Geriatrics and Nutritional Science, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo 63110, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) administration has been shown to reduce accumulation of abdominal visceral fat and protect against insulin resistance in laboratory animals, but it is not known whether DHEA decreases abdominal obesity in humans. DHEA is widely available as a dietary supplement without a prescription. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether DHEA replacement therapy decreases abdominal fat and improves insulin action in elderly persons. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in a US university-based research center from June 2001 to February 2004. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six elderly persons (28 women and 28 men aged 71 [range, 65-78] years) with age-related decrease in DHEA level. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg/d of DHEA or matching placebo for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were 6-month change in visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat measured by magnetic resonance imaging and glucose and insulin responses to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). RESULTS: Of the 56 men and women enrolled, 52 underwent follow-up evaluations. Compliance with the intervention was 97% in the DHEA group and 95% in the placebo group. Based on intention-to-treat analyses, DHEA therapy compared with placebo induced significant decreases in visceral fat area (-13 cm2 vs +3 cm2, respectively; P = .001) and subcutaneous fat (-13 cm2 vs +2 cm2, P = .003). The insulin area under the curve (AUC) during the OGTT was significantly reduced after 6 months of DHEA therapy compared with placebo (-1119 muU/mL per 2 hours vs +818 muU/mL per 2 hours, P = .007). Despite the lower insulin levels, the glucose AUC was unchanged, resulting in a significant increase in an insulin sensitivity index in response to DHEA compared with placebo (+1.4 vs -0.7, P = .005). CONCLUSION:DHEA replacement could play a role in prevention and treatment of the metabolic syndrome associated with abdominal obesity.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) administration has been shown to reduce accumulation of abdominal visceral fat and protect against insulin resistance in laboratory animals, but it is not known whether DHEAdecreases abdominal obesity in humans. DHEA is widely available as a dietary supplement without a prescription. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether DHEA replacement therapy decreases abdominal fat and improves insulin action in elderly persons. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in a US university-based research center from June 2001 to February 2004. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six elderly persons (28 women and 28 men aged 71 [range, 65-78] years) with age-related decrease in DHEA level. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg/d of DHEA or matching placebo for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were 6-month change in visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat measured by magnetic resonance imaging and glucose and insulin responses to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). RESULTS: Of the 56 men and women enrolled, 52 underwent follow-up evaluations. Compliance with the intervention was 97% in the DHEA group and 95% in the placebo group. Based on intention-to-treat analyses, DHEA therapy compared with placebo induced significant decreases in visceral fat area (-13 cm2 vs +3 cm2, respectively; P = .001) and subcutaneous fat (-13 cm2 vs +2 cm2, P = .003). The insulin area under the curve (AUC) during the OGTT was significantly reduced after 6 months of DHEA therapy compared with placebo (-1119 muU/mL per 2 hours vs +818 muU/mL per 2 hours, P = .007). Despite the lower insulin levels, the glucose AUC was unchanged, resulting in a significant increase in an insulin sensitivity index in response to DHEA compared with placebo (+1.4 vs -0.7, P = .005). CONCLUSION:DHEA replacement could play a role in prevention and treatment of the metabolic syndrome associated with abdominal obesity.
Authors: Valerie B O'Leary; Christine M Marchetti; Raj K Krishnan; Bradley P Stetzer; Frank Gonzalez; John P Kirwan Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2005-12-22
Authors: Nicole Vogelzangs; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Aartjan T F Beekman; Anne B Newman; Suzanne Satterfield; Eleanor M Simonsick; Kristine Yaffe; Tamara B Harris; Brenda W J H Penninx Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2008-12
Authors: Christina Koutsari; Asem H Ali; K Sreekumaran Nair; Robert A Rizza; Peter O'Brien; Sundeep Khosla; Michael D Jensen Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Min Lu; David Patsouris; Pingping Li; Jaime Flores-Riveros; James M Frincke; Steve Watkins; Simon Schenk; Jerrold M Olefsky Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-02-16 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: John H Page; Jing Ma; Kathryn M Rexrode; Nader Rifai; Joann E Manson; Susan E Hankinson Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: L Poretsky; L Song; D J Brillon; S Ferrando; J Chiu; M McElhiney; A Ferenczi; C Sison; I Haller; J Rabkin Journal: Horm Metab Res Date: 2008-09-22 Impact factor: 2.936