| Literature DB >> 34093706 |
Shorouq Khalid Hamid1, Lujain Ali Alghamdi1, Faris A Alshahrani2, Soban Q Khan3, Asif Matin4, Mohammed M Gad2.
Abstract
The antifungal effect of zirconium dioxide nanoparticles (ZrO2NPs) incorporated into denture base material has been inadequately investigated; additionally, to the authors' knowledge, no studies have assessed the influence of artificial aging on the antifungal activity of these particles. Methodology. Heat-polymerized acrylic resin disks were fabricated and divided into four groups (0%, 1%, 2.5%, and 5% ZrO2NPs by weight). Antifungal activity was assessed using the direct culture and disk diffusion methods. Surface roughness and contact angles were measured using a profilometer and a goniometer, respectively. The artificial aging procedure was performed by repeating all tests at 7, 14, and 30 days following 2 rounds of thermocycling. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (p < 0.05). Results. The addition of ZrO2NPs significantly decreased the adhesion of Candida albicans with and without artificial aging procedures (p < 0.001), while the disk diffusion methods did not reveal inhibition zones. ZrO2NP-modified specimens displayed significantly higher surface roughness compared to specimens in the control group (p < 0.05) and showed the same behaviors with artificial aging procedures. The contact angle was significantly decreased in all modified groups in comparison to the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion. The addition of ZrO2NPs to polymethylmethacrylate denture base material reduced the adhesion of Candida albicans with a long-term antifungal effect. With the addition of ZrO2NPs, contact angles were decreased and surface roughness was increased; 1% was the most appropriate concentration. Clinical significance. The addition of ZrO2NPs to denture base material confers a long-term antifungal effect and could be used as a possible method for preventing and treating denture stomatitis.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34093706 PMCID: PMC8137292 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5560443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Dent ISSN: 1687-8728
Figure 1Flow diagram to illustrate study design. (CA) Candida adhesion; (Ra) surface roughness; (CA) contact angle; (T0, T1, T2) time intervals of 7, 14, and 30 days, respectively.
Means, standard deviations, and p-values for heat-polymerized specimens modified with different concentrations of ZrO2NPs according to time.
| Time | Concentration of ZrO2NPs (%) | Candida count (CFU) | Surface roughness ( | Contact angle (°) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) |
| Mean (SD) |
| Mean (SD) |
| ||
|
| 0 | 2069.4 (60.9) | 0.000 | 0.15 (0.01) | 0.000 | 92.98 (1.1) | 0.000 |
| 1 | 1085.6 (42.6) | 0.19 (0.01) | 80.74 (1.3)a | ||||
| 2.5 | 781.8 (13.6) | 0.23 (0.01) | 79.39 (1.2)a | ||||
| 5 | 384.1 (13.0) | 0.25 (0.01) | 77.39 (1.4) | ||||
|
| |||||||
|
| 0 | 1971.5 (17.6) | 0.000 | 0.16 (0.01) | 0.000 | 91.27 (1.2) | 0.000 |
| 1 | 1429.1 (36.9) | 0.19 (0.01) | 80.15 (1.5) | ||||
| 2.5 | 655.2 (31.5)a | 0.23 (0.01) | 78.41 (1.4)a | ||||
| 5 | 379.3 (20.0)a | 0.26 (0.01) | 78.47 (1.4)a | ||||
|
| |||||||
|
| 0 | 1953.9 (30.2) | 0.000 | 0.17 (0.01) | 0.000 | 91.29 (1.1) | 0.000 |
| 1 | 1051.7 (28.8) | 0.19 (0.01) | 79.43 (1.2)a | ||||
| 2.5 | 584.1 (18.4) | 0.23 (0.01) | 77.62 (1.7) | ||||
| 5 | 317.2 (10.5) | 0.27 (0.01) | 77.87 (1.5)a | ||||
Variation in concentration was studied at different time intervals vertically: (T0, T1, T2) of 7, 14, and 30 days, respectively. Same alphabets showed insignificant results in pairwise comparison. (p > 0.05) was considered statistically insignificant.
Figure 2Direct culture method based on different ZrO2NP concentrations of heat-polymerized acrylic resin. (a) Control; (b) 1% ZrO2NPs; (c) 2.5% ZrO2NPs; (d) 5% ZrO2NPs.
Means, standard deviations, and p-values for heat-polymerized specimens modified with different concentrations of ZrO2NPs according to concentration.
| Concentration of ZrO2NPs (%) | Time | Candida count (CFU) | Surface roughness ( | Contact angle (°) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) |
| Mean (SD) |
| Mean (SD) |
| ||
| 0 | T0 | 2069.4 (60.9) | 0.000 | 0.15 (0.01)a | 0.031 | 92.98 (1.1) | 0.003 |
| T1 | 1971.5 (17.6)a | 0.16 (0.01)a,b | 91.27 (1.2)a | ||||
| T2 | 1953.9 (30.2)a | 0.17 (0.01)b | 91.29 (1.1)a | ||||
|
| |||||||
| 1 | T0 | 1085.6 (42.6)a | 0.002 | 0.19 (0.01) | 0.648 | 80.74 (1.3) | 0.103 |
| T1 | 1429.1 (36.9) | 0.19 (0.01) | 80.15 (1.5) | ||||
| T2 | 1051.7 (28.8)a | 0.19 (0.01) | 79.43 (1.2) | ||||
|
| |||||||
| 2.5 | T0 | 781.8 (13.6) | 0.000 | 0.23 (0.01) | 0.258 | 79.39 (1.2)a | 0.042 |
| T1 | 655.2 (31.5) | 0.23 (0.01) | 78.41 (1.4)a,b | ||||
| T2 | 584.1 (18.4) | 0.23 (0.01) | 77.62 (1.7)b | ||||
|
| |||||||
| 5 | T0 | 384.1 (13.0)a | 0.000 | 0.25 (0.01)a | 0.004 | 77.39 (1.4) | 0.255 |
| T1 | 379.3 (20.0)a | 0.26 (0.01)a,b | 78.47 (1.4) | ||||
| T2 | 317.2 (10.5) | 0.27 (0.01)b | 77.87 (1.5) | ||||
Variation in time was studied at different concentrations intervals vertically: (T0, T1, T2) of 7, 14, and 30 days, respectively. Same alphabets showed insignificant results in pairwise comparison. (p > 0.05) was considered statistically insignificant.
Figure 3Representative surface roughness images of tested specimens based on different ZrO2NP concentrations of heat-polymerized acrylic resin. (a) Control; (b) 1% ZrO2NPs; (c) 2.5% ZrO2NPs; (d) 5% ZrO2NPs.
Figure 4Contact angle measurements of tested specimen surfaces based on different ZrO2NP concentrations of heat-polymerized acrylic resin. (a) Control; (b) 1% ZrO2NPs; (c) 2.5% ZrO2NPs; (d) 5% ZrO2NPs.