Literature DB >> 34091739

Quality Assessment of Health-apps using a Public Agency Quality and Safety Seal. The Appsaludable Case.

Ana Gessa1, Pilar Sancha2, Amor Jiménez1.   

Abstract

Standards and validation practices regarding mobile health apps need to be established to ensure their proper use and integration into medical practice. This paper proposes an innovative and integrative approach to examine and compare the quality of a certified health mobile applications set. A double classification framework (verified and perceived quality) is proposed and validated to evaluate the quality of 22 verified health mobile apps, particularly to understand whether these apps provide the service demanded by its users. Evaluation of verified quality was based on a certification public program. To analysis user satisfaction, we used content analysis to examine and extract words and expressions contained in online reviews (1,574 reviews were analyzed). The R language was used to scrape data and to perform all statistical analyses. The results did not confirm a significant relationship between both classifications (p > .05). However, the requirements with the highest degree of compliance ("design and relevance" and "quality and safety") of the app accreditation program were the best rated by the users of the apps in their comments. Reflections derived from this paper represent an important contribution to the knowledge base in the expanding research area of mobile health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accredited quality; Data mining; Mobile applications; Online user reviews; Perceived quality; Web-scrapping

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34091739     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-021-01748-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  16 in total

Review 1.  Privacy and security in mobile health apps: a review and recommendations.

Authors:  Borja Martínez-Pérez; Isabel de la Torre-Díez; Miguel López-Coronado
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  The Limited Extent of Accreditation Mechanisms for Websites and Mobile Applications in Europe.

Authors:  Shalmali Deshpande; Michael Rigby; Mitch Blair
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2019-07-04

3.  In search of a few good apps.

Authors:  Adam C Powell; Adam B Landman; David W Bates
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Challenges in Assessing Mobile Health App Quality: A Systematic Review of Prevalent and Innovative Methods.

Authors:  Quinn H Grundy; Zhicheng Wang; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Design and Testing of the Safety Agenda Mobile App for Managing Health Care Managers' Patient Safety Responsibilities.

Authors:  José Joaquín Mira; Irene Carrillo; Cesar Fernandez; Maria Asuncion Vicente; Mercedes Guilabert
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Insights From Google Play Store User Reviews for the Development of Weight Loss Apps: Mixed-Method Analysis.

Authors:  Kerstin Frie; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Susan Jebb; Charlotte Albury; Rebecca Nourse; Paul Aveyard
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.773

7.  Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps.

Authors:  Stoyan R Stoyanov; Leanne Hides; David J Kavanagh; Oksana Zelenko; Dian Tjondronegoro; Madhavan Mani
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: a cross-sectional systematic assessment.

Authors:  Kit Huckvale; José Tomás Prieto; Myra Tilney; Pierre-Jean Benghozi; Josip Car
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 9.  Medication Adherence Apps: Review and Content Analysis.

Authors:  Imran Ahmed; Niall Safir Ahmad; Shahnaz Ali; Shair Ali; Anju George; Hiba Saleem Danish; Encarl Uppal; James Soo; Mohammad H Mobasheri; Dominic King; Benita Cox; Ara Darzi
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  Users' Perspectives on mHealth Self-Management of Bipolar Disorder: Qualitative Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Lise Switsers; Arthur Dauwe; Anneleen Vanhoudt; Hilde Van Dyck; Koen Lombaerts; Jfe Oldenburg
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.