Literature DB >> 34091733

Long-term survival of CLS Spotorno femoral stem: a systematic review of literature.

Mandeep Singh Dhillon1, Karan Jindal1, Prasoon Kumar2, Rajesh Kumar Rajnish3, Deepak Neradi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: CLS Spotorno is a time-tested femoral stem design with excellent early results; the present review was designed to assess the published evidence on CLS Spotorno stem in the literature to evaluate its long-term outcomes and compare it to two other popular stem designs the uncemented Corail™ and the cemented Exeter™ stems. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do CLS Spotorno stems provide adequate long-term rates of survival in terms of revisions and functional outcomes?
METHODOLOGY: Medline, EMBASE and SCOPUS databases were searched for relevant articles and a total number of 670 hits were obtained, out of which 14 relevant studies were included in this review. Pooled analysis of revisions rates, subsidence and Harris Hip scores (HHS) were done.
RESULTS: All the 14 studies were retrospective in design but had sufficiently large follow-up periods (12.3-27 years, mean 17.1 years). Of the 2459 hips reviewed, the documented revision rate was only 6.2%, with aseptic loosening reported in 3.1% and subsidence > 2 mm in 2.6% cases. The overall survival was similar to reported smaller cohorts of Corail (95% at 12 years) and Exeter stems (100% at 17 years). Varus malposition was seen in 10.6% cases, but it did not show any influence on implant survival or revision rates. Distal pedestal formation was seen in 172 of 805 hips across seven studies, while distal cortical hypertrophy was seen in 70 cases out of 398 hips; these were not related with stem malposition. The overall functional outcome was good, with mean HHS of 88.65 (95% CI = 86.08-91.23, p < 0.01). The improvement in scores from preoperative values (of 43.9 points) were comparable to Corail (43.8) and Exeter (45) stems. Thigh pain was seen in only 41 cases out of 1097 hips.
CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations due to high heterogeneity of the cumulative data, the review suggests that CLS Spotorno femoral stems provides excellent long-term survival and good hip function. These outcomes are comparable to other commonly utilized femoral stems like the Corail and Exeter. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CLS Spotorno; Hip arthroplasty; Long-term outcome; Subsidence; Uncemented THR

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34091733     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03975-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  31 in total

1.  Long-term survivorship of the Corail™ standard stem.

Authors:  L Louboutin; A Viste; R Desmarchelier; M-H Fessy
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.256

2.  A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C A Engh; T F McGovern; J D Bobyn; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Comparative outcomes between collared versus collarless and short versus long stem of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis.

Authors:  Phonthakorn Panichkul; Suthorn Bavonratanavech; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-30

4.  Does a collar improve the immediate stability of uncemented femoral hip stems in total hip arthroplasty? A bilateral comparative cadaver study.

Authors:  Guillaume Demey; Camdon Fary; Sébastien Lustig; Philippe Neyret; Tarik Aït si Selmi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Twenty-year results of the cementless Corail stem.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Vidalain
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Clinical outcome of design modifications to the CLS Spotorno Stem in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Angelo Graceffa; Pier Francesco Indelli; Leonardo Latella; Paolo Poli; Alexander Fulco; Massimiliano Marcucci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-09-21

7.  Femoral stem subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective single-centre study.

Authors:  Christian Ries; Christoph Kolja Boese; Florian Dietrich; Wolfgang Miehlke; Christian Heisel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Comparison of collared and collarless femoral components in primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J B Meding; M A Ritter; E M Keating; P M Faris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Reliability of Modified Harris Hip Score as a tool for outcome evaluation of Total Hip Replacements in Indian population.

Authors:  Prasoon Kumar; Ramesh Sen; Sameer Aggarwal; Saurabh Agarwal; Rajesh Kumar Rajnish
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-12-06

10.  More complications with uncemented than cemented femoral stems in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Ghazi Chammout; Olle Muren; Evaldas Laurencikas; Henrik Bodén; Paula Kelly-Pettersson; Helene Sjöö; André Stark; Olof Sköldenberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.