Literature DB >> 34091714

The impact of capitalized German words on lexical access.

Melanie Labusch1,2, Sonja A Kotz1, Manuel Perea3,4.   

Abstract

Leading models of visual word recognition assume that the process of word identification is driven by abstract, case-invariant units (e.g., table and TABLE activate the same abstract representation). But do these models need to be modified to meet nuances of orthography as in German, where the first letter of common nouns is capitalized (e.g., Buch [book] and Hund [dog], but blau [blue])? To examine the role of initial capitalization of German words in lexical access, we chose a semantic categorization task ("is the word an animal name?"). In Experiment 1, we compared German words in all-lowercase vs. initial capitalization (hund, buch, blau vs. Hund, Buch, Blau). Results showed faster responses for animal nouns with initial capitalization (Hund < hund) and faster responses for lowercase non-nouns (blau < Blau). Surprisingly, we found faster responses for lowercase non-animal nouns (buch < Buch). As the latter difference could derive from task demands (i.e., buch does not follow German orthographic rules and requires a "no" response), we replaced the all-lowercase format with an orthographically legal all-uppercase format in Experiment 2. Results showed an advantage for all nouns with initial capitalization (Hund < HUND and Buch < BUCH). These findings clearly show that initial capitalization in German words constitutes an essential part of the words' representations and is used during lexical access. Thus, models of visual word recognition, primarily focused on English orthography, should be expanded to the idiosyncrasies of other Latin-based orthographies.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34091714     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01540-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  19 in total

1.  Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming.

Authors:  S Dehaene; L Naccache; L Cohen; D L Bihan; J F Mangin; J B Poline; D Rivière
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  How brand names are special: brands, words, and hemispheres.

Authors:  Possidonia F D Gontijo; Janice Rayman; Shi Zhang; Eran Zaidel
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 3.  The neural code for written words: a proposal.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Laurent Cohen; Mariano Sigman; Fabien Vinckier
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  How to say "no" to a nonword: a leaky competing accumulator model of lexical decision.

Authors:  Stéphane Dufau; Jonathan Grainger; Johannes C Ziegler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Letter perception: from pixels to pandemonium.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Arnaud Rey; Stéphane Dufau
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The initial capitalization superiority effect in German: evidence for a perceptual frequency variant of the orthographic cue hypothesis of visual word recognition.

Authors:  Arthur M Jacobs; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Ralf Graf; Mario Braun; Tatjana A Nazir
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-08

Review 7.  The word frequency effect: a review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Matthias Buchmeier; Markus Conrad; Arthur M Jacobs; Jens Bölte; Andrea Böhl
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2011

8.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model.

Authors:  J Grainger; A M Jacobs
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Neural Representation in Visual Word Form Area during Word Reading.

Authors:  Chengrou Lu; Huiling Li; Ruilin Fu; Jing Qu; Qingxin Yue; Leilei Mei
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing.

Authors:  Eva Gutierrez-Sigut; Marta Vergara-Martínez; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Are brand names special words? Letter visual-similarity affects the identification of brand names, but not common words.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Ana Baciero; Melanie Labusch; María Fernández-López; Ana Marcet
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2022-02-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.