Literature DB >> 34083642

Quantitative analysis of in-vivo microbubble distribution in the human brain.

Francesco Prada1,2,3,4, Antonio G Gennari5,6, Ian M Linville7, Michael E Mutersbaugh7, Zhihang Chen8, Natasha Sheybani7, Francesco DiMeco9,10,11, Frederic Padilla8,12, John A Hossack7.   

Abstract

Microbubbles (MB) are widely used as contrast agents to perform contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging and as acoustic amplifiers of mechanical bioeffects incited by therapeutic-level ultrasound. The distribution of MBs in the brain is not yet fully understood, thereby limiting intra-operative CEUS guidance or MB-based FUS treatments. In this paper we describe a robust platform for quantification of MB distribution in the human brain, allowing to quantitatively discriminate between tumoral and normal brain tissues and we provide new information regarding real-time cerebral MBs distribution. Intraoperative CEUS imaging was performed during surgical tumor resection using an ultrasound machine (MyLab Twice, Esaote, Italy) equipped with a multifrequency (3-11 MHz) linear array probe (LA332) and a specific low mechanical index (MI < 0.4) CEUS algorithm (CnTi, Esaote, Italy; section thickness, 0.245 cm) for non-destructive continuous MBs imaging. CEUS acquisition is started by enabling the CnTI PEN-M algorithm automatically setting the MI at 0.4 with a center frequency of 2.94 MHz-10 Hz frame rate at 80 mm-allowing for continuous non-destructive MBs imaging. 19 ultrasound image sets of adequate length were selected and retrospectively analyzed using a custom image processing software for quantitative analysis of echo power. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on key structures (artery-tumor-white matter) by a blinded neurosurgeon, following which peak enhancement and time intensity curves (TICs) were quantified. CEUS images revealed clear qualitative differences in MB distribution: arteries showed the earliest and highest enhancement among all structures, followed by tumor and white matter regions, respectively. The custom software built for quantitative analysis effectively captured these differences. Quantified peak intensities showed regions containing artery, tumor or white matter structures having an average MB intensity of 0.584, 0.436 and 0.175 units, respectively. Moreover, the normalized area under TICs revealed the time of flight for MB to be significantly lower in brain tissue as compared with tumor tissue. Significant heterogeneities in TICs were also observed within different regions of the same brain lesion. In this study, we provide the most comprehensive strategy for accurate quantitative analysis of MBs distribution in the human brain by means of CEUS intraoperative imaging. Furthermore our results demonstrate that CEUS imaging quantitative analysis enables discernment between different types of brain tumors as well as regions and structures within the brain. Similar considerations will be important for the planning and implementation of MB-based imaging or treatments in the future.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34083642     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91252-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  45 in total

Review 1.  Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions.

Authors:  Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Identification of residual tumor with intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound during glioblastoma resection.

Authors:  Francesco Prada; Massimiliano Del Bene; Riccardo Fornaro; Ignazio G Vetrano; Alberto Martegani; Luca Aiani; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Giovanni Mauri; Luigi Solbiati; Bianca Pollo; Francesco DiMeco
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Safety and Feasibility of Repeated and Transient Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption by Pulsed Ultrasound in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ahmed Idbaih; Michael Canney; Lisa Belin; Carole Desseaux; Alexandre Vignot; Guillaume Bouchoux; Nicolas Asquier; Bruno Law-Ye; Delphine Leclercq; Anne Bissery; Yann De Rycke; Clementine Trosch; Laurent Capelle; Marc Sanson; Khe Hoang-Xuan; Caroline Dehais; Caroline Houillier; Florence Laigle-Donadey; Bertrand Mathon; Arthur André; Cyril Lafon; Jean-Yves Chapelon; Jean-Yves Delattre; Alexandre Carpentier
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging versus Contrast-enhanced US: A Comparison in Glioblastoma Surgery by Using Intraoperative Fusion Imaging.

Authors:  Francesco Prada; Valerio Vitale; Massimiliano Del Bene; Carlo Boffano; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Valentina Pinzi; Giovanni Mauri; Luigi Solbiati; Georgios Sakas; Velizar Kolev; Ludovico D'Incerti; Francesco DiMeco
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound for brain tumor surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Prada; Alessandro Perin; Alberto Martegani; Luca Aiani; Luigi Solbiati; Massimo Lamperti; Cecilia Casali; Federico Legnani; Luca Mattei; Andrea Saladino; Marco Saini; Francesco DiMeco
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 6.  Contrast-enhanced US Approach to the Diagnosis of Focal Liver Masses.

Authors:  David P Burrowes; Alexandra Medellin; Allison C Harris; Laurent Milot; Stephanie R Wilson
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Intraoperative ultrasound using phase inversion harmonic imaging: first experiences.

Authors:  Thilo Hölscher; Burak Ozgur; Soren Singel; Wilko G Wilkening; Robert F Mattrey; Hoi Sang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Intraoperative cerebral glioma characterization with contrast enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Francesco Prada; Luca Mattei; Massimiliano Del Bene; Luca Aiani; Marco Saini; Cecilia Casali; Assunta Filippini; Federico Giuseppe Legnani; Alessandro Perin; Andrea Saladino; Ignazio Gaspare Vetrano; Luigi Solbiati; Alberto Martegani; Francesco DiMeco
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Ultrasound-mediated delivery and distribution of polymeric nanoparticles in the normal brain parenchyma of a metastatic brain tumour model.

Authors:  Habib Baghirov; Sofie Snipstad; Einar Sulheim; Sigrid Berg; Rune Hansen; Frits Thorsen; Yrr Mørch; Catharina de Lange Davies; Andreas K O Åslund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Three-dimensional transcranial microbubble imaging for guiding volumetric ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening.

Authors:  Ryan M Jones; Lulu Deng; Kogee Leung; Dallan McMahon; Meaghan A O'Reilly; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 11.556

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Towards controlled drug delivery in brain tumors with microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Scott Schoen; M Sait Kilinc; Hohyun Lee; Yutong Guo; F Levent Degertekin; Graeme F Woodworth; Costas Arvanitis
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 2.  Involvement of Ceramide Signalling in Radiation-Induced Tumour Vascular Effects and Vascular-Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Deepa Sharma; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Ultrasounds induce blood-brain barrier opening across a sonolucent polyolefin plate in an in vitro isolated brain preparation.

Authors:  Laura Librizzi; Laura Uva; Luca Raspagliesi; Matteo Gionso; Maria Cristina Regondi; Giovanni Durando; Francesco DiMeco; Marco de Curtis; Francesco Prada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Multiparametric Intraoperative Ultrasound in Oncological Neurosurgery: A Pictorial Essay.

Authors:  Francesco Prada; Riccardo Ciocca; Nicoletta Corradino; Matteo Gionso; Luca Raspagliesi; Ignazio Gaspare Vetrano; Fabio Doniselli; Massimiliano Del Bene; Francesco DiMeco
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.