BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a dynamic and continuous modality that offers a real-time, direct view of vascularization patterns and tissue resistance for many organs. Thanks to newer ultrasound contrast agents, CEUS has become a well-established, live-imaging technique in many contexts, but it has never been used extensively for brain imaging. The use of intraoperative CEUS (iCEUS) imaging in neurosurgery is limited. OBJECTIVE: To provide the first dynamic and continuous iCEUS evaluation of a variety of brain lesions. METHODS: We evaluated 71 patients undergoing iCEUS imaging in an off-label setting while being operated on for different brain lesions; iCEUS imaging was obtained before resecting each lesion, after intravenous injection of ultrasound contrast agent. A semiquantitative, offline interobserver analysis was performed to visualize each brain lesion and to characterize its perfusion features, correlated with histopathology. RESULTS: In all cases, the brain lesion was visualized intraoperatively with iCEUS. The afferent and efferent blood vessels were identified, allowing evaluation of the time and features of the arterial and venous phases and facilitating the surgical strategy. iCEUS also proved to be useful in highlighting the lesion compared with standard B-mode imaging and showing its perfusion patterns. No adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first large-scale implementation of iCEUS in neurosurgery as a dynamic and continuous real-time imaging tool for brain surgery and provides the first iCEUS characterization of different brain neoplasms. The ability of CEUS to highlight and characterize brain tumor will possibly provide the neurosurgeon with important information anytime during a surgical procedure.
BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a dynamic and continuous modality that offers a real-time, direct view of vascularization patterns and tissue resistance for many organs. Thanks to newer ultrasound contrast agents, CEUS has become a well-established, live-imaging technique in many contexts, but it has never been used extensively for brain imaging. The use of intraoperative CEUS (iCEUS) imaging in neurosurgery is limited. OBJECTIVE: To provide the first dynamic and continuous iCEUS evaluation of a variety of brain lesions. METHODS: We evaluated 71 patients undergoing iCEUS imaging in an off-label setting while being operated on for different brain lesions; iCEUS imaging was obtained before resecting each lesion, after intravenous injection of ultrasound contrast agent. A semiquantitative, offline interobserver analysis was performed to visualize each brain lesion and to characterize its perfusion features, correlated with histopathology. RESULTS: In all cases, the brain lesion was visualized intraoperatively with iCEUS. The afferent and efferent blood vessels were identified, allowing evaluation of the time and features of the arterial and venous phases and facilitating the surgical strategy. iCEUS also proved to be useful in highlighting the lesion compared with standard B-mode imaging and showing its perfusion patterns. No adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first large-scale implementation of iCEUS in neurosurgery as a dynamic and continuous real-time imaging tool for brain surgery and provides the first iCEUS characterization of different brain neoplasms. The ability of CEUS to highlight and characterize brain tumor will possibly provide the neurosurgeon with important information anytime during a surgical procedure.
Authors: Francesco Prada; M Yashar S Kalani; Kaan Yagmurlu; Pedro Norat; Massimiliano Del Bene; Francesco DiMeco; Neal F Kassell Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: Ilya Lekht; Noah Brauner; Joshua Bakhsheshian; Ki-Eun Chang; Mittul Gulati; Mark S Shiroishi; Edward G Grant; Eisha Christian; Gabriel Zada Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Bassel Zebian; Francesco Vergani; José Pedro Lavrador; Soumya Mukherjee; William John Kitchen; Vita Stagno; Christos Chamilos; Benedetta Pettorini; Conor Mallucci Journal: CNS Oncol Date: 2016-12-21
Authors: Giuseppe Maria Della Pepa; Pier Paolo Mattogno; Giuseppe La Rocca; Giovanni Sabatino; Alessandro Olivi; Luca Ricciardi; Filippo Maria Polli Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Ryne A Didier; David M Biko; Misun Hwang; Sunil Unnikrishnan; Magdalena M Woźniak; Gibran T Yusuf; Anush Sridharan Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2021-04-01
Authors: Rahul Sastry; Wenya Linda Bi; Steve Pieper; Sarah Frisken; Tina Kapur; William Wells; Alexandra J Golby Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 2.486