Charlotte Scheerens1,2, Joni Gilissen2,3, Aiesha M Volow1, Jana L Powell1, Clarissa M Ferguson1, David Farrell4, Brookelle Li1, Corinne Berry5, Rebecca L Sudore1,6,7. 1. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. 2. Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 3. Atlantic Fellow for Equity in Brain Health, Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. 4. People Designs, Inc., Durham, North Carolina, USA. 5. Communicate Health, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA. 6. San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA. 7. Innovation and Implementation Center on Aging and Palliative Care, Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Electronic Health (eHealth) tools offer opportunities for people to access health information online; yet, most tools are not designed to meet the unique needs of diverse older adults, leading to health disparities. Our goal was to provide guidance for the development of eHealth tools for diverse older populations for use in geriatric care models. DESIGN: Guidance for eHealth tools was compiled from user design resources and eHealth design literature. Pragmatic examples were provided from an evidenced-based eHealth tool called PREPAREforYourCare.org (PREPARE). We used quantitative feasibility data from PREPARE research studies and qualitative analysis of PREPARE focus groups, cognitive interviews, and feedback from randomized trials to further inform our recommendations. RESULTS: Guidance and lessons learned include: (1) define clear objectives and a conceptual framework; (2) co-create with the target population; (3) optimize the design and layout for accessibility and ease of use, such as text at the 5th grade reading level, closed captioning, etc.; (4) use simple, standardized navigation design; (5) use actionable information to enhance behavior change, such as modeling of behaviors; (6) align accompanying written materials with the eHealth tool; and (7) create tracking mechanisms for ongoing user feedback. PREPARE is used as a case example to provide pragmatic illustrations for how the guidance may be operationalized. CONCLUSION: eHealth tools can be tailored to the unique characteristics, preferences, and needs of diverse older populations. Following the "lessons learned" may help decrease health disparities among diverse older adults and ensure eHealth tools are readily accessible and culturally appropriate.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Electronic Health (eHealth) tools offer opportunities for people to access health information online; yet, most tools are not designed to meet the unique needs of diverse older adults, leading to health disparities. Our goal was to provide guidance for the development of eHealth tools for diverse older populations for use in geriatric care models. DESIGN: Guidance for eHealth tools was compiled from user design resources and eHealth design literature. Pragmatic examples were provided from an evidenced-based eHealth tool called PREPAREforYourCare.org (PREPARE). We used quantitative feasibility data from PREPARE research studies and qualitative analysis of PREPARE focus groups, cognitive interviews, and feedback from randomized trials to further inform our recommendations. RESULTS: Guidance and lessons learned include: (1) define clear objectives and a conceptual framework; (2) co-create with the target population; (3) optimize the design and layout for accessibility and ease of use, such as text at the 5th grade reading level, closed captioning, etc.; (4) use simple, standardized navigation design; (5) use actionable information to enhance behavior change, such as modeling of behaviors; (6) align accompanying written materials with the eHealth tool; and (7) create tracking mechanisms for ongoing user feedback. PREPARE is used as a case example to provide pragmatic illustrations for how the guidance may be operationalized. CONCLUSION: eHealth tools can be tailored to the unique characteristics, preferences, and needs of diverse older populations. Following the "lessons learned" may help decrease health disparities among diverse older adults and ensure eHealth tools are readily accessible and culturally appropriate.
Authors: Rebecca L Sudore; Hillary D Lum; John J You; Laura C Hanson; Diane E Meier; Steven Z Pantilat; Daniel D Matlock; Judith A C Rietjens; Ida J Korfage; Christine S Ritchie; Jean S Kutner; Joan M Teno; Judy Thomas; Ryan D McMahan; Daren K Heyland Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Kate MacGregor; Margaret Handley; Sharon Wong; Claire Sharifi; Ken Gjeltema; Dean Schillinger; Thomas Bodenheimer Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Jennifer Freytag; Richard L Street; Deborah E Barnes; Ying Shi; Aiesha M Volow; Janet K Shim; Stewart C Alexander; Rebecca L Sudore Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Rebecca L Sudore; C Seth Landefeld; Deborah E Barnes; Karla Lindquist; Brie A Williams; Robert Brody; Dean Schillinger Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2007-10-17
Authors: Brian M Bakke; Mariko A Feuz; Ryan D McMahan; Deborah E Barnes; Brookelle Li; Aiesha M Volow; Jana Powell; Rebecca L Sudore Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 2.947