Jennifer Freytag1,2,3, Richard L Street1,2,3,4, Deborah E Barnes5,6,7,8, Ying Shi8,9, Aiesha M Volow9, Janet K Shim10, Stewart C Alexander11, Rebecca L Sudore7,8,9. 1. Center for Innovations in Quality Effectiveness, and Safety, Houston, Texas. 2. Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas. 3. Department of Medicine, Health Services Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 4. Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 7. Innovation and Implementation Center for Aging and Palliative Care, Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 8. San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California. 9. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 10. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 11. Department of Consumer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: A patient-directed, online program (PREPARE for Your Care [PREPARE]; prepareforyourcare.org) has been shown to increase advance care planning (ACP) documentation. However, the mechanisms underlying PREPARE are unknown. Our objectives were to compare the efficacy of PREPARE plus an easy-to-read advance directive (AD) vs an AD alone to increase active patient participation in ACP discussions during clinic visits and to examine effects of active patient participation on ACP documentation. DESIGN: Audio recordings of postintervention primary care visits from two randomized trials (2013-2016). SETTING:Seven primary care clinics at a veterans affair and safety-net hospital in San Francisco, CA. PARTICIPANTS: English- and Spanish-speaking adults, aged 55 years and older, with two or more chronic/serious conditions. INTERVENTION: PREPARE plus an easy-to-read AD or an AD alone. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the number of active patient participation utterances about ACP (eg, asking questions, stating preferences) measured by the validated Active Patient Participation Coding Scheme. We examined differences in utterances by study arm using mixed effects negative binomial models and utterances as a mediator of PREPARE's effect on documentation using adjusted logistic regression. Models were adjusted for health literacy, prior care planning, and clinician. RESULTS: Among 393 participants, the mean (SD) age was 66 (8.1) years, 120 (30.5%) had limited health literacy, and 99 (25.2%) were Spanish speaking. PREPARE plus the AD resulted in 41% more active patient participation in ACP discussions compared with the AD alone (mean [SD] = 10.1 [16.8] vs 6.6 [13.4] utterances; incidence rate ratio = 1.41; 95% confidence interval = 1.00-1.98). For every additional utterance, participants had 15% higher odds of ACP documentation, and active patient participation accounted for 16% of PREPARE's effect on documentation. CONCLUSIONS: The PREPARE program and easy-to-read AD empowered patients to actively participate in ACP discussions during clinical visits more than the AD alone. Increased activation was associated with increased ACP documentation. Therefore, PREPARE may mitigate barriers to ACP among English- and Spanish-speaking older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: "Improving Advance Care Planning by Preparing Diverse Seniors for Decision Making (PREPARE)" NCT01990235 and "Preparing Spanish-Speaking Older Adults for Advance Care Planning and Medical Decision Making (PREPARE)" NCT02072941. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1210-1217, 2020. Published 2020. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: A patient-directed, online program (PREPARE for Your Care [PREPARE]; prepareforyourcare.org) has been shown to increase advance care planning (ACP) documentation. However, the mechanisms underlying PREPARE are unknown. Our objectives were to compare the efficacy of PREPARE plus an easy-to-read advance directive (AD) vs an AD alone to increase active patient participation in ACP discussions during clinic visits and to examine effects of active patient participation on ACP documentation. DESIGN: Audio recordings of postintervention primary care visits from two randomized trials (2013-2016). SETTING: Seven primary care clinics at a veterans affair and safety-net hospital in San Francisco, CA. PARTICIPANTS: English- and Spanish-speaking adults, aged 55 years and older, with two or more chronic/serious conditions. INTERVENTION: PREPARE plus an easy-to-read AD or an AD alone. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the number of active patient participation utterances about ACP (eg, asking questions, stating preferences) measured by the validated Active Patient Participation Coding Scheme. We examined differences in utterances by study arm using mixed effects negative binomial models and utterances as a mediator of PREPARE's effect on documentation using adjusted logistic regression. Models were adjusted for health literacy, prior care planning, and clinician. RESULTS: Among 393 participants, the mean (SD) age was 66 (8.1) years, 120 (30.5%) had limited health literacy, and 99 (25.2%) were Spanish speaking. PREPARE plus the AD resulted in 41% more active patient participation in ACP discussions compared with the AD alone (mean [SD] = 10.1 [16.8] vs 6.6 [13.4] utterances; incidence rate ratio = 1.41; 95% confidence interval = 1.00-1.98). For every additional utterance, participants had 15% higher odds of ACP documentation, and active patient participation accounted for 16% of PREPARE's effect on documentation. CONCLUSIONS: The PREPARE program and easy-to-read AD empowered patients to actively participate in ACP discussions during clinical visits more than the AD alone. Increased activation was associated with increased ACP documentation. Therefore, PREPARE may mitigate barriers to ACP among English- and Spanish-speaking older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: "Improving Advance Care Planning by Preparing Diverse Seniors for Decision Making (PREPARE)" NCT01990235 and "Preparing Spanish-Speaking Older Adults for Advance Care Planning and Medical Decision Making (PREPARE)" NCT02072941. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1210-1217, 2020. Published 2020. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Entities:
Keywords:
advance care planning; aging; patient participation; patient-physician communication
Authors: J Randall Curtis; Lois Downey; Anthony L Back; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Sudiptho Paul; Alexandria Z Lahdya; Patsy D Treece; Priscilla Armstrong; Ronald Peck; Ruth A Engelberg Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Susan L Mitchell; Michele L Shaffer; Simon Cohen; Laura C Hanson; Daniel Habtemariam; Angelo E Volandes Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Rebecca L Sudore; Deborah E Barnes; Gem M Le; Roberto Ramos; Stacy J Osua; Sarah A Richardson; John Boscardin; Dean Schillinger Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Rebecca Sudore; Gem M Le; Ryan McMahan; Ryan McMahon; Mariko Feuz; Mary Katen; Deborah E Barnes Journal: Trials Date: 2015-12-12 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Sarah Nouri; Richard L Street; Deborah E Barnes; Ying Shi; Aiesha M Volow; Brookelle Li; Stewart C Alexander; Rebecca L Sudore Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Charlotte Scheerens; Joni Gilissen; Aiesha M Volow; Jana L Powell; Clarissa M Ferguson; David Farrell; Brookelle Li; Corinne Berry; Rebecca L Sudore Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Daniel Kobewka; Daren K Heyland; Peter Dodek; Aman Nijjar; Nick Bansback; Michelle Howard; Peter Munene; Elizabeth Kunkel; Alan Forster; Jamie Brehaut; John J You Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Susan E Hickman; Alexia M Torke; Greg A Sachs; Rebecca L Sudore; Qing Tang; Giorgos Bakoyannis; Nicholette Heim Smith; Anne L Myers; Bernard J Hammes Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Charlèss Dupont; Tinne Smets; Fanny Monnet; Lara Pivodic; Aline De Vleminck; Chantal Van Audenhove; Lieve Van den Block Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Sarah S Nouri; Deborah E Barnes; Ying Shi; Aiesha M Volow; Nikita Shirsat; Anne L Kinderman; Heather A Harris; Rebecca L Sudore Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Charlotta Lindvall; Chih-Ying Deng; Edward Moseley; Nicole Agaronnik; Areej El-Jawahri; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Joshua R Lakin; Angelo Volandes; The Acp-Peace Investigators James A Tulsky Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 5.576