Literature DB >> 34080624

Exploring gender differences in trajectories of clinical markers and symptoms after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Quin E Denfeld1, Kenneth M Faulkner2, Mary Roberts Davis1, Beth A Habecker3,4, Christopher V Chien5, Jill M Gelow6, James O Mudd7, Shirin O Hiatt1, Kathleen L Grady8, Christopher S Lee2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Despite well-known gender differences in heart failure, it is unknown if clinical markers and symptoms differ between women and men after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Our aim was to examine gender differences in trajectories of clinical markers (echocardiographic markers and plasma biomarkers) and symptoms from pre- to post-LVAD implantation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This was a secondary analysis of data collected from a study of patients from pre- to 1, 3, and 6 months post-LVAD implantation. Data were collected on left ventricular internal end-diastolic diameter (LVIDd) and ejection fraction (LVEF), plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and soluble suppressor of tumorigenicity (sST2). Physical and depressive symptoms were measured using the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9, respectively. Latent growth curve modelling was used to compare trajectories between women and men. The average age of the sample (n = 98) was 53.3 ± 13.8 years, and most were male (80.6%) and had non-ischaemic aetiology (65.3%). Pre-implantation, women had significantly narrower LVIDd (P < 0.001) and worse physical symptoms (P = 0.041) compared with men. Between pre- and 6 months post-implantation, women had an increase in plasma sST2 followed by a decrease, whereas men had an overall decrease (slope: P = 0.014; quadratic: P = 0.011). Between 1 and 6 months post-implantation, women had a significantly greater increase in LVEF (P = 0.045) but lesser decline in plasmoa NT-proBNP compared with men (P = 0.025).
CONCLUSION: Trajectories of clinical markers differed somewhat between women and men, but trajectories of symptoms were similar, indicating some physiologic but not symptomatic gender differences in response to LVAD. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Gender; Symptoms; Ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34080624      PMCID: PMC8557355          DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs        ISSN: 1474-5151            Impact factor:   3.593


  39 in total

1.  Readmission Patterns During Long-Term Follow-Up After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Himabindu Vidula; Valentina Kutyifa; Brent A Johnson; Robert L Strawderman; Donald Harrington; Bronislava Polonsky; Anna Papernov; Jeffrey D Alexis
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Depression and heart failure: an overview of what we know and don't know.

Authors:  Marc A Silver
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.321

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 4.  Sex Differences in Advanced Heart Failure Therapies.

Authors:  Eileen M Hsich
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in chronic heart failure: The impact of sex across the ejection fraction spectrum.

Authors:  Ulrika Ljung Faxén; Lars H Lund; Nicola Orsini; Anna Strömberg; Daniel C Andersson; Cecilia Linde; Ulf Dahlström; Gianluigi Savarese
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Sex-Associated Differences in Cardiac Reverse Remodeling in Patients Supported by Contemporary Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Benjamin B Kenigsberg; David T Majure; Farooq H Sheikh; Nana Afari-Armah; Maria Rodrigo; Mark Hofmeyer; Ezequiel J Molina; Zuyue Wang; Steven Boyce; Samer S Najjar; Selma F Mohammed
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 5.712

7.  Neurohormonal and clinical sex differences in heart failure.

Authors:  Sven Meyer; Peter van der Meer; Vincent M van Deursen; Tiny Jaarsma; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Martje H L van der Wal; Hans L Hillege; Adriaan A Voors
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Gender differences in the risk of stroke during support with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Alanna A Morris; Ann Pekarek; Kris Wittersheim; Robert T Cole; Divya Gupta; Duc Nguyen; S Raja Laskar; Javed Butler; Andrew Smith; J David Vega
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Gender makes a difference in the description of dyspnoea in patients with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Inger Ekman; Kurt Boman; Mona Olofsson; Nibia Aires; Karl Swedberg
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.908

10.  Psychometrics of the PHQ-9 as a measure of depressive symptoms in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Muna H Hammash; Lynne A Hall; Terry A Lennie; Seongkum Heo; Misook L Chung; Kyoung Suk Lee; Debra K Moser
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.908

View more
  1 in total

1.  A primer on incorporating sex as a biological variable into the conduct and reporting of basic and clinical research studies.

Authors:  Quin E Denfeld; Christopher S Lee; Beth A Habecker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.733

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.