AIMS: Despite disparities in pathophysiology and disease manifestation between male and female patients with heart failure, studies focusing on sex differences in biomarkers are scarce. The purpose of this study was to assess sex-specific variation in clinical characteristics and biomarker levels to gain more understanding of the potential pathophysiological mechanisms underlying sex differences in heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, multiple biomarkers, and outcomes were compared between men and women in 567 patients. The mean age of the study group was 71 ± 11 years and 38% were female. Women were older, had a higher body mass index and left ventricular ejection fraction, more hypertension, and received more diuretic and antidepressant therapy, but less ACE-inhibitor therapy compared with men. After 3 years, all-cause mortality was lower in women than men (37.0 vs. 43.9%, multivariable hazard ratio = 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.92, P = 0.016). Levels of biomarkers related to inflammation [C-reactive protein, pentraxin 3, growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), and interleukin 6] and extracellular matrix remodelling (syndecan-1 and periostin) were significantly lower in women compared with men. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, TNF-αR1a, and GDF-15 showed the strongest interaction between sex and mortality. CONCLUSION:Female heart failure patients have a distinct clinical presentation and better outcomes compared with male patients. The lower mortality was independent of differences in clinical characteristics, but differential sex associations between several biomarkers and mortality might partly explain the survival difference.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Despite disparities in pathophysiology and disease manifestation between male and female patients with heart failure, studies focusing on sex differences in biomarkers are scarce. The purpose of this study was to assess sex-specific variation in clinical characteristics and biomarker levels to gain more understanding of the potential pathophysiological mechanisms underlying sex differences in heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, multiple biomarkers, and outcomes were compared between men and women in 567 patients. The mean age of the study group was 71 ± 11 years and 38% were female. Women were older, had a higher body mass index and left ventricular ejection fraction, more hypertension, and received more diuretic and antidepressant therapy, but less ACE-inhibitor therapy compared with men. After 3 years, all-cause mortality was lower in women than men (37.0 vs. 43.9%, multivariable hazard ratio = 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.92, P = 0.016). Levels of biomarkers related to inflammation [C-reactive protein, pentraxin 3, growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), and interleukin 6] and extracellular matrix remodelling (syndecan-1 and periostin) were significantly lower in women compared with men. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, TNF-αR1a, and GDF-15 showed the strongest interaction between sex and mortality. CONCLUSION: Female heart failurepatients have a distinct clinical presentation and better outcomes compared with male patients. The lower mortality was independent of differences in clinical characteristics, but differential sex associations between several biomarkers and mortality might partly explain the survival difference.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aetiology; Biomarkers; Heart failure; Mortality; Sex
Authors: Sven Meyer; Frank P Brouwers; Adriaan A Voors; Hans L Hillege; Rudolf A de Boer; Ron T Gansevoort; Pim van der Harst; Michiel Rienstra; Isabelle C van Gelder; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Wiek H van Gilst; Peter van der Meer Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Emily S Lau; Samantha M Paniagua; James Sawalla Guseh; Vijeta Bhambhani; Markella V Zanni; Paul Courchesne; Asya Lyass; Martin G Larson; Daniel Levy; Jennifer E Ho Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Nirav Patel; Orlando M Gutiérrez; Garima Arora; George Howard; Virginia J Howard; Suzanne E Judd; Sumanth D Prabhu; Emily B Levitan; Mary Cushman; Pankaj Arora Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Kimberly B Bjugstad; Jeffrey Lalama; Leonard T Rael; Kristin Salottolo; Ira Dauber; David Bar-Or Journal: Redox Rep Date: 2017-08-28 Impact factor: 4.412