| Literature DB >> 34080316 |
Stefania Lauzi1, Camilla Luzzago1, Paola Chiani2, Valeria Michelacci2, Arnold Knijn2, Luca Pedrotti3, Luca Corlatti3, Clelia Buccheri Pederzoli1, Gaia Scavia2, Stefano Morabito2, Rosangela Tozzoli2.
Abstract
Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) are zoonotic foodborne pathogens of outmost importance and interest has been raised in recent years to define the potential zoonotic role of wildlife in STEC infection. This study aimed to estimate prevalence of STEC in free-ranging red deer (Cervus elaphus) living in areas with different anthropisation levels and describe the characteristics of strains in order to evaluate the potential risk posed to humans. Two-hundred one deer faecal samples collected in 2016-2018 from animals of Central Italian Alps were examined by bacteriological analysis and PCR screening of E. coli colonies for stx1, stx2 and eae genes. STEC strains were detected in 40 (19.9%) deer, with significantly higher prevalence in offspring than in yearlings. Whole genome analysis was performed to characterise a subset of 31 STEC strains. The most frequently detected serotype was O146:H28 (n = 10, 32.3%). Virulotyping showed different stx subtypes combinations, with stx2b-only (n = 15, 48.4%) being the most prevalent. All STEC lacked the eae gene but harbored additional virulence genes, particularly adhesins, toxins and/or other colonisation factors also described in STEC isolated from disease in humans. The most frequently detected genes were astA (n = 22, 71%), subAB (n = 21, 68%), iha (n = 26, 83.9%) and lpfA (n = 24, 77%). Four hybrid STEC/Enterotoxigenic E. coli strains were also identified. According to the most recent paradigm for pathogenicity assessment of STEC issued by the European Food Safety Authority, our results suggest that red deer are carriers of STEC strains that may have zoonotic potential, regardless of the anthropisation levels. Particular attention should be drawn to these findings while handling and preparing game meat. Furthermore, deer may release STEC in the environment, possibly leading to the contamination of soil and water sources.Entities:
Keywords: STEC; virulence features; wild ruminants; wild ungulates; zoonoses
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34080316 PMCID: PMC9540879 DOI: 10.1111/tbed.14178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transbound Emerg Dis ISSN: 1865-1674 Impact factor: 4.521
FIGURE 1Macroareas and areas of the Stelvio Natural Park, Italy according to human and domestic animals density level
Characterisation of the red deer analyzed in this study
| Age | Sex | Season | STEC | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNP area (macroarea) | No. | Calf | Yearling | Adult | Female | Male | 2016–2017 | 2017–2018 | No. |
| A (low) | 12 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 10 | 3 |
| B (low) | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 4 |
| C (high) | 15 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 13 | 2 |
| D (high) | 54 | 24 | 6 | 24 | 30 | 24 | 15 | 39 | 15 |
| E (high) | 26 | 5 | 3 | 18 | 13 | 13 | 10 | 16 | 3 |
| F (high) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| G (low) | 25 | 5 | 7 | 13 | 15 | 10 | 6 | 19 | 5 |
| H (medium) | 26 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 14 | 3 |
| I (medium) | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| L (medium) | 17 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 2 |
| M (medium) | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| Total | 201 | 63 | 31 | 107 | 123 | 78 | 65 | 136 | 40 |
Serotype, sequence type and number of isolates harbouring virulence genes among the 31 STEC strains from red deer analyzed by whole genome sequencing
| O146:H28 ST738 ( | O113:H4 ST10 ( | O187:H28 ST200 ( | O91:H14 ST33 ( | O91:H21 ST442 ( | O27:H30 ST53 ( | O104:H7 ST1817 ( | O174:H8 ST13 ( | O178:H19 ST443 ( | ONT:H49 ST5418 ( | Total (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shiga‐toxin pattern |
| 2 | 3 | 5 (16.1) | ||||||||
|
| 2 | 1 | 3 (9.7) | |||||||||
|
| 10 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 15 (48.4) | |||||||
|
| 4 | 4 (12.9) | ||||||||||
|
| 1 | 1 (3.2) | ||||||||||
|
| 1 | 1 (3.2) | ||||||||||
|
| 2 | 2 (6.5) | ||||||||||
| Genes involved in colonisation |
| 0 | ||||||||||
|
| 10 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 26 (83.9) | |||
|
| 3 | 1 | 4 (12.9) | |||||||||
|
| 10 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 24 (77) | |||
|
| 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 (41.9) | |||||
|
| 0 | |||||||||||
|
| 1 | 3 | 4 (12.9) | |||||||||
|
| 0 | |||||||||||
| Genes encoding toxins |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 (32.3) | |||||
|
| 4 | 4 (12.9) | ||||||||||
|
| 10 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 22 (71) | ||||||
|
| 10 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 21 (67.7) | ||||||
|
| 4 | 4 (12.9) | ||||||||||
|
| 0 |
stx, Shiga toxin subtype.
eae, intimin; iha, encoding the adherence‐conferring protein Iha, a homologue of Vibrio cholera IrgAiron‐regulated gene A homolog adhesion similar to V. cholerae; saa, STEC agglutinating adhesin; lpfA, long polar fimbriae closely related to LPF of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimuriuman; tia, invasion determinant of the subtilase‐encoding pathogenicity island of LEE‐negative STEC; aggR, transcriptional activator of aggregative adherence fimbria I expression of EAEC; aaiC, EAEC aggR‐activated island C; aat, EAEC‐associated anti‐aggregation transporter.
ehxA A, enterohemolysin‐encoding gene subtype A; ehxA D, enterohemolysin‐encoding gene subtype D; astA, EAEC heat‐stable toxin; subAB, subtilase cytotoxin locus; sta1, ETEC heat‐stable enterotoxin 1; ltcA, ETEC heat‐labile enterotoxin.
FIGURE 2Distribution of 31 STEC serotypes and sequence types from red deer of Stelvio National Park according to sex (a), age (b), winter season of collection (c) and human and domestic animals density level macroareas (d)
Number and percentage of red deer with STEC according to age, sex, anthropisation level of the SNP (macroarea) and winter season of collection
| Variable | Category | No. tested | No. with STEC (% STEC prevalence; 95% C.I.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Calves | 63 | 19 (30.2; 18.8–41.5) |
| Yearling | 31 | 2 (6.5; 0.1–15.1) | |
| Adult | 107 | 19 (17.8; 10.5–25.0) | |
| Sex | Female | 123 | 25 (20.3; 13.2–27.4) |
| Male | 78 | 15 (19.2; 10.5–28.0) | |
| Anthropsation level SNP | Low | 47 | 12 (25.5; 13.1–38.0) |
| Medium | 58 | 8 (13.8; 4.9–22.7) | |
| High | 96 | 20 (20.8; 12.7–29.0) | |
| Winter season of collection | 2016–2017 | 65 | 12 (18.5; 9.0–27.9) |
| 2017–2018 | 136 | 28 (20.6; 13.8–27.3) |
Significant difference between categories of the same variable (p < 0.05).