Virulence Genes of Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Wild Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes).

Different pathotypes of Escherichia coli can cause severe diseases in animals and humans. Wildlife may contribute to the circulation of pathogenic pathotypes, including enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC). This study analyzed 109 DNA samples previously extracted from fecal specimens collected from red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) to detect E. coli virulence genes eaeA, hlyA, stx1, and stx2, that characterize the EPEC, STEC, and EHEC strains. Thirty-one (28.4%) samples were positive for at least one investigated virulence gene: eaeA gene was detected in 21 (19.2%) samples, hlyA in 10 (9.1%), stx1 in 6 (5.5%), and stx2 in 4 (3.6%). Nine DNA samples resulted positive for two or three virulence genes: five (4.6%) samples were positive for eaeA and hlyA genes, two (1.8%) for eaeA and stx1, one (0.9%) for hlyA and stx1, one (0.9%) for eaeA, hlyA and stx2. Red foxes seem to be involved in the epidemiology of these infections and their role could be relevant because they may be source of pathogenic E. coli for other wild animals, as well as domestic animals and humans.

1. Introduction

Escherichia coli, family Enterobacteriaceae, is an opportunistic gram-negative bacterium commensal of the human and animal intestinal tract. Extra-intestinal infections, mainly urinary tract infection, meningitis, and septicemia, due to E. coli strains are frequent threats in human and veterinary medicine [1]. Enteric forms caused by diarrhoeagenic E. coli strains are often observed too. These forms are related to different E. coli pathotypes acting with different mechanisms in relation to their virulence traits. In particular, enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), and its subgroup of enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) are the pathotypes most frequently involved in enteric disorders of humans and other animals [2].

EPEC strains produce intimin, an adherence factor encoded by the eae gene found at the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE), embedded on a large chromosomal pathogenicity island (PAI) [3]. These strains are able to adhere to enterocytes inducing microvilli loss and consequent diarrhea [4].

STEC are characterized by the production of two types of Shiga toxins (Stx1 and Stx2), encoded by lambdoid bacteriophages, which are maintained in lysogeny in the bacterial chromosome [5]. Stx1 and Stx2, that include several subtypes, are known as two of the most potent bacterial toxins; they exhibit differences in cytotoxicity to various cell types, bind dissimilarly to receptor analogs or mimics, induce differential chemokine responses, and have several distinctive structural characteristics. Their action in the intestinal tract are very important being toxic to colonic, ileal epithelial, and endothelial cells. Stx1 is 98% homologous to the Stx produced by Shigella dysenteriae type 1, while Stx2 is about 60% homologous with Stx1 and is antigenically different [6,7].

EHEC are STEC strains have intimin and hemolysin, among their virulence factors. Hemolysin, encoded by hly gene, contributes to the pathogenesis by different mechanisms, such as hemolysis, the induction of pro-inflammatory reactions, and epithelial and endothelial cells damages [8]. STEC and EHEC cause different clinical manifestations in humans, including asymptomatic carriage, bloody or severe diarrhea, and systemic diseases, such as hemorrhagic colitis (HC) and the life-threatening hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS), which is the main cause of acute renal failure in children [9]. Infections in humans occur mainly through the consumption of food products and water contaminated with feces containing STEC strains. Domestic animals, mainly livestock, are the main source of these pathogenic bacteria [10]. They play an important role in the epidemiology of these colibacillosis because they are usually asymptomatic, thus their infections are not diagnosed, and consequent prophylaxis measures are not carried out.

Domestic ruminants may act as a source of pathogenic E. coli for wildlife too. In particular, they can contaminate, with their feces, pasture areas shared by wild animals. Deer are known as asymptomatic carriers of STEC strains because, similar to cattle, sheep, and goats, they lack vascular receptors for the Shiga toxins [11,12]. Other investigations have shown the spreading of STEC and other pathogenic E. coli strains among wild birds [13] and mammals [3]. Foxes have been supposed to be involved in the epidemiology of these infections too [3,14]; however, data about the spreading pathogenic E. coli in red foxes are generally scanty and lacking if referred to Italian areas.

This is a retrospective study carried out on collected DNA from feces of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), with the aim to investigate the occurrence of E. coli genes coding the virulence factors intimin, hemolysin, and Shiga toxins in order to verify the potential role of red foxes as a source of STEC, EHEC, and EPEC strains.

2. Materials and Methods

Molecular analyses were carried out on a total of 109 DNA samples previously extracted from fecal specimens collected from red foxes. The animals were regularly hunted during 2016–2018 in central Italy and feces were collected for other investigations. No data about age and gender of the animals were available; furthermore, no gross lesions were observed during necropsies when feces were collected.

DNA was extracted from about 25 mg of each fecal sample with the commercial kit Tissue Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Fisher Molecular Biology, Trevose, PA, USA), following the manufacturers’ guidelines, and stored at −20 °C. Single PCR protocols were performed to detect the following genes: stx1 encoding Shiga toxins 1, stx2 encoding Shiga toxins 2, eaeA encoding intimin, hlyA encoding hemolysin. Target genes, primers, and PCR conditions, previously described by Paton and Paton [15] (1998), are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Primers, investigated virulence genes, and expected amplicons of the PCR assays.

Target Gene	Primers	Amplicon (bp)	PCR Conditions
stx1	stx1F (5′-ATAAATCGCCATTCGTTGACTAC-3′) stx1R (5′-GAACGCCCACTGAGATCATC-3′)	180	35 cycles: denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 60 °C for 2 min, extension at 72 °C for 1 min
stx2	stx2F (5′-GGCACTGTCTGAAACTGCTCC-3′) stx2R (5′-TCGCCAGTTATCTGACATTCTG-3′)	255
eaeA	eaeAF (5′-GACCCGGCACAAGCATAAGC-3′) eaeAR (5′-CCACCTGCAGCAACAAGAGG-3′)	384
hlyA	hlyAF (5′-GCATCATCAAGCGTACGTTCC-3′) hlyAR (5′-AATGAGCCAAGCTGGTTAAGCT-3′)	534

PCR amplifications were performed in a volume of 50 μL consisting of 25 μL of EconoTaq PLUS 2× Master Mix (Lucigen Corporation, Middleton, WI, USA), 0.5 μM of each primer, 3 μL of DNA and distilled water to reach the final volume, using the automated thermal cycler Gene-Amp PCR System 2700 (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA).

For each amplification, sterile water instead of DNA was included as negative control and Quantitative Genomic DNA from O157:H7 E. coli (ATCC® 43895DQ TM) as positive control. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel at 100 V for 45 min using PCR Sizer 100 bp DNA Ladder (Norgen Biotek, Thorold, ON, Canada) as DNA marker.

3. Results and Discussion

Among the 109 analyzed fecal samples, 31 (28.4%) were positive for at least one investigated virulence gene. In details, eaeA gene was detected in 21 (19.2%) samples, hlyA in 10 (9.1%), stx1 in 6 (5.5%) and stx2 in 4 (3.6%). Nine DNA samples tested positive for two or three virulence genes: five (4.6%) samples were positive for eaeA and hlyA genes, two (1.8%) for eaeA and stx1, one (0.9%) for hlyA and stx1, one (0.9%) for eaeA, hlyA and stx2 (Table 2).

Table 2

DNA samples resulted positive for one or more virulence genes.

Virulence Genes	Possible Pathotype	N. Positive Samples (%)
eaeA	EPEC	13 (11.9)
hlyA	nc	3 (2.7)
stx1	STEC	3 (2.7)
stx2	STEC	3 (2.7)
eaeA + hlyA	EPEC	5 (4.6)
eaeA + stx1	EHEC	2 (1.8)
hlyA + stx1	STEC	1 (0.9)
eaeA + hlyA + stx2	EHEC	1 (0.9)

The detection of genes encoding intimin, hemolysin, and Shiga-toxins of E. coli in DNA extracted from feces of red foxes suggests that these animals are involved in the epidemiology of infections caused by pathogenic E. coli strains. This is a retrospective study carried out on DNA samples previously collected and stored in our laboratories. Consequently, it was not possible to isolate E. coli and determine if each fox harbored one or more bacterial strains.

Twenty-two samples had only one virulence gene, thus it is supposable that the 22 foxes harbored only one pathogen E. coli strain. In particular, 13 red foxes, in which eaeA gene was detected, probably harbored EPEC strains, and 6, in which stx1 and stx2 genes were found, probably had STEC strains. In feces of three red foxes, only hlyA gene was detected, thus it was not possible to relate this finding to a potential pathotype. Five samples had both eaeA and hlya genes, thus it could be supposed that the five foxes harbored EPEC strains; similarly one sample was positive for both hlyA and stx1, thus the corresponding fox could have a STEC strain in its intestinal tract. Two fecal samples had both eaeA and stx1 genes; the two foxes could harbor EHEC strains if both genes belonged to the same E. coli isolate, but it cannot be excluded that they carried one EPEC and one STEC. Moreover, the sample positive for eaeA, hlyA, and stx2 genes could correspond to a single EHEC strain or to different E coli isolates.

Among the obtained results, the detection of stx1 or stx2 genes, in a total of 10 (9.1%) animals, is the most relevant finding, because it suggests that STEC strains are circulating among red foxes. Data about pathogenic E. coli in foxes are very limited, thus our results are difficult to compare to other epidemiological scenario. However, the detected prevalence was quite similar to the value (8%) found in red foxes in Portugal [3]. A previous study carried out in northwestern Spain found a lower prevalence, in fact it recovered STEC in 5 (1.9%) among the 260 tested red foxes; moreover, 3 strains were classified as EHEC harboring eaeA gene, too [14].

The comparison of these investigations with others regarding the circulation of different E. coli pathotypes in wildlife highlights that red foxes are not reservoirs of pathogenic strains, mainly STEC and EHEC, as relevant as wild ungulates. In fact, STEC was found with a prevalence of 19.9%, 21.65% and 37% in red deer (Cervus elaphus) in northern Italy [16], Poland [17], and Portugal [3], respectively. Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) were largely involved in the spreading of this pathotype too, with prevalence of 24.63% in Poland [17] and 72.6% in Germany [18]. Furthermore, STEC and attaching and effacing (AE)-STEC were identified in 13.83% of fallow deer (Dama dama) in Poland [19]. High percentages of wild boars (Sus scrofa) harboring STEC were also detected, with values ranging between 8% in Spain [20] and 28.29% in Poland [21].

Even though red foxes harbor STEC and other pathogenic E. coli less frequently than other wild animals species, they may represent a severe threat because in the last years they have a large spread in several European countries, including Italy, often invading human settlements in rural and urban areas. In this case, foxes harboring pathogenic E. coli can excrete the bacteria in environment shared by humans and their pets and consequently become a source of infection for them.

4. Conclusions

Red foxes seem to be involved in the epidemiology of pathogenic E. coli, including STEC strains. Further studies are necessary to better characterize E. coli harbored in the intestinal tract of red foxes also to verify the pathogenicity of these strains for them. However, even if asymptomatic, foxes may contaminate different environment and consequently represent a serious risk of infection for other wild animals, as well as domestic animals and humans.

In addition, E. coli are known to be able to carry virulence genes and share genetic information with its own and other bacterial species via horizontal gene transfer. Wild animals have been supposed to act as reservoirs of these virulence genes that aid pathogenesis but also as potential melting pots for novel gene combinations that could be more harmful to humans [22]. Therefore, investigations to verify the spreading of pathogenic E. coli in wildlife is pivotal in a One Health perspective.