| Literature DB >> 34074785 |
Isabell Klawonn1, Silke Van den Wyngaert2, Alma E Parada3, Nestor Arandia-Gorostidi3, Martin J Whitehouse4, Hans-Peter Grossart2,5, Anne E Dekas1.
Abstract
Microbial interactions in aquatic environments profoundly affect global biogeochemical cycles, but the role of microparasites has been largely overlooked. Using a model pathosystem, we studied hitherto cryptic interactions between microparasitic fungi (Entities:
Keywords: carbon fluxes; eukaryotic microparasites; phytoplankton–fungi–bacteria interactions
Year: 2021 PMID: 34074785 PMCID: PMC8201943 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2102225118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Cell types in the model pathosystem. (A) Schematic life cycle (asexual) of parasitic chytrids. During phytoplankton blooms, chytrids replicate quickly by asexual reproduction. Free-living, motile zoospores settle onto a phytoplankton cell, encyst, and expand into the host’s interior via rhizoids. New zoospores are produced in each sporangium and eventually discharged into the water to seek out a new host, leaving behind a dead phytoplankton cell. (B–F) Fluorescence microscopy images of the diatom Asterionella, the parasitic chytrid Rhizophydiales, and bacterial cells. B–E show Asterionella and Asterionella-associated cells, and F shows free-living bacteria (turquoise = DAPI-stained bacteria, pink = CF319a-hybridized cells [i.e., Bacteroidetes]). Chitinous cell walls of the chytrid Rhizophydiales in C were stained with WGA (conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488). (White scale bars, 10 µm.) (G) Description of the various cell types. A higher-quality figure is available on Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14614155).
Fig. 2.Bacterial abundances and community compositions. (A) Abundances of diatom-associated and free-living bacteria. Diatom-associated bacteria were counted on individual Asterionella cells of different health/infection status. The letters a through e denote significantly different groups (Kruskal–Wallis, P < 0.05). For free-living bacteria, the significant difference is given as P value (Mann–Whitney test). The numbers of replicates N (Asterionella cells or fields of view) are displayed. The vertical lines represent medians and the black circles represent means. (B) Relative abundances of major bacterial classes counted as FISH-identified cells (ALF968—Alphaproteobacteria, BONE23A—Gammaproteobacteria, and CF319a—Bacteroidia). The data shown in A and B are listed in . (C) Bacterial community composition (16S rRNA gene based [i.e., DNA]) and potential activity (16S rRNA based [i.e., RNA]) shown as the relative abundance of ASV counts. Genus taxonomy is given, except for the order Sphingobacteriales (family env.OPS17) and the families Comamonadaceae and Oxalobacteraceae, which did not have assigned genera (N/A). Statistical differences between the overall ASV composition in the noninfected versus chytrid-infected treatment are indicated as P values (derived from permutational ANOVA comparing weighted UniFrac distance metrics, asterisks indicate statistically significant differences, P < 0.05). The arrows mark taxa with higher or lower ASV counts in the noninfected versus chytrid-infected treatment (P < 0.01). The taxa details are listed in . (A–C) The data are shown for bacteria sampled 6 d after chytrid inoculation (27% infection prevalence). Sequencing data from day 0 and 2 are shown in .
Fig. 3.SIMS images. (A) Asterionella colony with a fungal sporangium analyzed on the IMS 1280 (90 × 90 µm raster). (B–D) Single Asterionella cell, Asterionella-associated and free-living bacteria, and (E) zoospores analyzed on the NanoSIMS (25 × 25 µm raster). B and C display the same field of view, first, imaged after 90-s presputtering to analyze diatom-associated bacteria (B) and second, after 20-min presputtering to analyze Asterionella and its associated sporangium (C). Free-living bacteria in D correspond to the ones shown in Fig. 1. The filled arrows mark DAPI-stained cells, and the no-filled arrows mark CF319a-hybridized cells (Bacteroidetes). The abbreviations are defined in Fig. 1. (White scale bars, 5 µm [Bottom].)
Fig. 4.Cell-specific isotope atom% excess in various cell types in the infected treatment (A), as well as in diatom-associated and free-living bacteria in both treatments (B and C). Significant differences are shown as letters (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.05, ran separately for 13C and 15N and separately for cells shown in A–C). The significant differences of FISH-identified bacteria between both treatments are additionally indicated as n.s. (not significant); *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 (Mann–Whitney test). N denotes the number of analyzed cells.
Fig. 5.Correlation between isotope ratios ([A] 13C and [B] 15N atom% excess) measured for host cells (diatom or fungi) and their directly associated cells (fungi or bacteria). Each data point represents the mean ratio of one host cell and its multiple associates (n = 1 to 34). The results of linear regression are shown. The slopes were significantly different from zero at P < 0.05 (**P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001).
Fig. 6.Partitioning of photosynthetic C in single-cell populations (A) and whole cell communities (B). (A) Mean 13C atom% excess (±SE) of various cell populations and the DOC pool. The number of replicate cells (or incubation flasks for DOC) is given for each bar. The C transfer efficiency was calculated as the percent of 13C enrichment in a given cell type (i.e., sporangia, bacteria, or the DOC pool) relative to the 13C enrichment in its source cell (i.e., diatoms or sporangia). (B) Distribution of photosynthetically derived C extrapolated for a naturally grown Asterionella population during an infection prevalence of up to 54% over 50 d (stacked areas). The lines show Asterionella abundances and infection prevalences (both derived from ref. 47).
Fig. 7.Scheme of C transfer pathways within planktonic food webs. The fungal shunt (solid, turquoise arrows) diverts phytoplankton-derived C to chytrid sporangia and their free-swimming zoospores, promoting C transfer to higher trophic levels and bypassing the microbial loop (schematically shown as dashed ellipse) and viral shunt. The fungal shunt together with the subsequent consumption of zoospores by micro- and mesozooplankton are described as the mycoloop. The solid arrows indicate pathways investigated in this study. For simplicity purposes, the scheme does not embrace the full complexity of C transfer pathways between the shown plankton groups.