| Literature DB >> 35308360 |
Doris Ilicic1, Jason Woodhouse1, Ulf Karsten2, Jonas Zimmermann3, Thomas Wichard4, Maria Liliana Quartino5, Gabriela Laura Campana5,6, Alexandra Livenets1, Silke Van den Wyngaert7, Hans-Peter Grossart1,8.
Abstract
Aquatic ecosystems are frequently overlooked as fungal habitats, although there is increasing evidence that their diversity and ecological importance are greater than previously considered. Aquatic fungi are critical and abundant components of nutrient cycling and food web dynamics, e.g., exerting top-down control on phytoplankton communities and forming symbioses with many marine microorganisms. However, their relevance for microphytobenthic communities is almost unexplored. In the light of global warming, polar regions face extreme changes in abiotic factors with a severe impact on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Therefore, this study aimed to describe, for the first time, fungal diversity in Antarctic benthic habitats along the salinity gradient and to determine the co-occurrence of fungal parasites with their algal hosts, which were dominated by benthic diatoms. Our results reveal that Ascomycota and Chytridiomycota are the most abundant fungal taxa in these habitats. We show that also in Antarctic waters, salinity has a major impact on shaping not just fungal but rather the whole eukaryotic community composition, with a diversity of aquatic fungi increasing as salinity decreases. Moreover, we determined correlations between putative fungal parasites and potential benthic diatom hosts, highlighting the need for further systematic analysis of fungal diversity along with studies on taxonomy and ecological roles of Chytridiomycota.Entities:
Keywords: Antarctica; Carlini Station; Chytridiomycota; Illumina amplicon sequencing; aquatic fungi; phytoplankton host; salinity gradient
Year: 2022 PMID: 35308360 PMCID: PMC8931407 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.805694
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Sampling sites in the Potter Cove area (South Shetland Islands, western Antarctic Peninsula).
Sample points characteristics.
| Sample | Location | Latitude | Longitude | Habitat | Sample type | Depth | Habitat specification |
| B21 | Punta Elefante | 62°14′ 08.0″ S | 58° 38′ 54.5″ W | Brackish | Biofilm | 0 | Meltwater |
| B12 | Casa de bomba | 62°14′ 07.78″ S | 58° 39′ 27.91″ W | Brackish | Sediment | 0 | Meltwater |
| B13 | Casa de bomba | 62°14′ 08.76″ S | 58° 39′ 30.18″ W | Brackish | Sediment | 0 | Meltwater |
| L03 | Peñón I | 62°14′ 16.39″ S | 58° 39′ 44.4″ W | Limnic | Biofilm | 0 | Pond |
| L18 | Punta Stranger | 62°14′ 46.77″ S | 58° 39′ 47.05″ W | Limnic | Biofilm | 0 | Lake |
| L23 | Punta Elefante | 62°14′ 14.6″ S | 58° 40′ 46.45″ W | Limnic | Biofilm | 0 | Lake |
| L02 | Peñón I | 62°14′ 27.15″ S | 58° 40′ 39.23″ W | Limnic | Water | 0 | Pond |
| L32 | Refugio Albatros | 62° 15′ 07.44″ S | 58° 39′ 33.89″ W | Limnic | Water | 0 | Meltwater |
| M26 | Peñón I | 62°14′ 50.22″ S | 58° 40′ 52.18″ W | Marine | Biofilm | 0 | Shore |
| M27 | Peñón I | 62°14′ 50.22″ S | 58° 40′ 52.18″ W | Marine | Biofilm | 2 | Ocean bottom |
| M28 | Peñón de Pesca | 62°14′ 16.5″ S | 58° 42′ 44.2″ W | Marine | Biofilm | 5 | Ocean bottom |
| M37 | Peñón I | 62°14′ 50.01″ S | 58° 40′ 81.13″ W | Marine | Biofilm | 0 | Shore |
| M38 | Refugio Elefante | 62°15′ 22.16″ S | 58° 37′ 50.1″ W | Marine | Biofilm | 0 | Shore |
| M39 | Refugio Elefante | 62°15′ 24.16″ S | 58° 38′ 33.31″ W | Marine | Biofilm | 0 | Shore |
| M14 | A4 | 62°13′ 43.61″ S | 58° 39′ 49.36″ W | Marine | Sediment | 15 | Ocean bottom |
| M15 | A4 | 62°13′ 43.61″ S | 58° 39′ 49.36″ W | Marine | Sediment | 15 | Ocean bottom |
| M23 | A4 | 62°13′ 43.61″ S | 58° 39′ 49.36″ W | Marine | Sediment | 20 | Ocean bottom |
FIGURE 2Distribution of the alpha diversity estimators according to sampled water types in (A) 18S and (B) LSU data. This includes Pielou’s evenness, observed ASV richness and Shannon diversity index.
FIGURE 3NMDS multivariate clustering of communities according to location and sample type. In both (A) EukSSU and (B) FunLSU datasets marine samples separated from limnic (post hoc pairwise t-test, p = 0.003) and brackish samples (post hoc pairwise t-test, p = 0.006) as did biofilm from sediment samples (post hoc pairwise t-test, p = 0.003).
FIGURE 4Community composition in the Antarctic benthic habitats, considering the abundance distribution in composition in sampled water types (A) of the whole fungal community (B) and the phylum Chytridiomycota relative to the total fungal community.
FIGURE 5Ternary plot showing relative abundance of fungal ASVs in LSU data. Each point represents an ASV. The position represents the relative abundance of the ASV with respect to each environment.
FIGURE 6Co-occurrence network analysis. (A) EukSSU3 and FunLSU5 modules (B) EukSSU4 and FunLSU2 module. Blue—Baccilariophyceae; dark green—Chytridiomycota; yellow—other Fungi; brown—Opisthokonta, red—Stramenopiles; light green—Chlorophyta.