| Literature DB >> 36003939 |
Jade Brandani1, Hannes Peter1, Susheel Bhanu Busi2, Tyler J Kohler1, Stilianos Fodelianakis1, Leila Ezzat1, Grégoire Michoud1, Massimo Bourquin1, Paraskevi Pramateftaki1, Matteo Roncoroni3, Stuart N Lane3, Tom J Battin1.
Abstract
Glacier shrinkage opens new proglacial terrain with pronounced environmental gradients along longitudinal and lateral chronosequences. Despite the environmental harshness of the streams that drain glacier forelands, their benthic biofilms can harbor astonishing biodiversity spanning all domains of life. Here, we studied the spatial dynamics of prokaryotic and eukaryotic photoautotroph diversity within braided glacier-fed streams and tributaries draining lateral terraces predominantly fed by groundwater and snowmelt across three proglacial floodplains in the Swiss Alps. Along the lateral chronosequence, we found that benthic biofilms in tributaries develop higher biomass than those in glacier-fed streams, and that their respective diversity and community composition differed markedly. We also found spatial turnover of bacterial communities in the glacier-fed streams along the longitudinal chronosequence. These patterns along the two chronosequences seem unexpected given the close spatial proximity and connectivity of the various streams, suggesting environmental filtering as an underlying mechanism. Furthermore, our results suggest that photoautotrophic communities shape bacterial communities across the various streams, which is understandable given that algae are the major source of organic matter in proglacial streams. Overall, our findings shed new light on benthic biofilms in proglacial streams now changing at rapid pace owing to climate-induced glacier shrinkage.Entities:
Keywords: 16S and 18S rRNA amplicons; benthic biofilms; climate change; microbial diversity; proglacial floodplains
Year: 2022 PMID: 36003939 PMCID: PMC9393633 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.948165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
FIGURE 1Maps of sampling locations for Valsorey, Otemma, and Val Roseg floodplains with principal component analysis on water samples. Streams were digitized from orthomosaics, with orange and blue lines as TRIB and GFSs, respectively. Round-shaped points identified sites with exclusive sediment sampling, while square-shaped points identified sites with both water and sediment sampling, providing a total of 131 benthic sediment and 40 water sites. Principal Component Analysis for individual floodplains using the water chemistry data collected for both seasons, where different colors represent the stream types (blue: GFS, orange: TRIB). The following acronyms were used to maximize space in the figure: Temp., Temperature; Cond., Conductivity. There is a separation between the GFS and TRIB samples mainly driven by temperature and conductivity.
Floodplain’s characteristics and sampling design.
| Otemma | Val Roseg | Valsorey | |
| Altitude (m, a.s.l) (range) | 2,400–2,600 | 2,090–2,340 | 2,400–2,500 |
| Floodplain length (m) | 1,300 | 1,100 | 1,000 |
| Floodplain width (m) (range) | 50–160 | 50–250 | 30–90 |
| Early–sampling date | 08–10 July | 02–03 July | 24–26 June |
| Early–#sample collected | 50 | 44 | 34 |
| GFS/TRIB | 22/28 | 18/26 | 24/10 |
| Late–sampling date | 21–22 August | 10–11 September | 17–18 September |
| Late–#samples collected | 49 | 50 | 34 |
| GFS/TRIB | 22/27 | 20/30 | 24/10 |
| Total number of samples | 97 | 94 | 68 |
| GFS/TRIB | 42/55 | 38/56 | 48/20 |
Biomass indicators for each glacier floodplain and stream type (mean ± standard deviation).
| Otemma | Val Roseg | Valsorey | |||||||
| GFS | Tributary | GFS | Tributary | GFS | Tributary | ||||
| Chl- | 0.02 ± 0.06 | 0.37 ± 0.59 |
| 0.02 ± 0.05 | 0.66 ± 1.38 |
| 0.00 ± 0.01 | 0.80 ± 1.01 |
|
| Bacterial Abundance [106 cells g–1
| 2.94 ± 1.85 | 30.9 ± 49.3 |
| 3.67 ± 2.86 | 30.0 ± 49.6 |
| 5.38 ± 4.91 | 89.9 ± 63.9 |
|
| Bacterial Carbon Production [10–3 ngC g–1
| 1.85 ± 1.87 | 3.89 ± 3.27 |
| 2.46 ± 1.16 | 4.37 ± 3.06 |
| 1.44 ± 0.92 | 1.76 ± 1.45 | 0.36 |
| Extracellular Polymeric Substance[glucose-equivalent g–1
| 0.63 ± 1.27 | 1.26 ± 1.73 |
| 0.26 ± 0.67 | 1.35 ± 3 |
| 13.5 ± 20 | 22.2 ± 22.9 | 0.14 |
A Welch Two Sample t-test was used to test the significant difference between GFS and TRIB and significant P-values are reported in bold. DM, Dry mass of sediment.
FIGURE 2Alpha Diversity for bacterial (16S) and phototrophic (18S) communities. Boxplots summarized for each glacier floodplain and stream category (A) Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASV) richness, (B) Pielou’s evenness for bacterial communities, (D) 18S rRNA OTUs richness, and (E) Pielou’s evenness for phototrophic communities. Box plots show the median (horizontal line), interquartile range (box height), 1.5× beyond the interquartile range (whiskers), and outliers. A two-sample t-test established a significant difference between tributaries and GFSs for all three floodplains. (C) Bar plots summarized the proportion of (C) bacterial ASVs and (F) phototrophic OTUs exclusively present in GFS, TRIB, and the shared between these two stream types. Input for unweighted bar plots was presence/absence, while abundance-weighted bar plots used ASV abundance.
FIGURE 3Patterns of bacterial community structure in glacier floodplains. Sample ordination is a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity for (A) 18S rRNA (stress value: 0.24) and (B) 16S rRNA (stress value: 0.19). Colors indicate the two-stream types, and symbol shapes specify the three glacier floodplains. Smooth response curves in panel B were obtained from site scores (first NMDS axis) of phototrophic 18S NMDS and indicate that the differences in prokaryotic community similarity between stream types were also associated with changes in phototrophic eukaryotic community similarities.
Co-occurrence network topology indices.
| GFS | TRIB | |
| # Edges | 165 | 205 |
| # Nodes | 113 | 167 |
| % Bacteria | 69% | 64.7% |
| % Phototrophs | 18% | 29.3% |
| % Fungi | 12% | 6.0% |
| Diameter | 2.81 | 9.83 |
| Mean distance | 3.36 | 9.59 |
| # Clusters | 7 | 12 |
| Modularity | 0.72 | 0.78 |
FIGURE 4Co-occurrence Networks between prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. Only the top 10% positive interactions between prokaryotic and eukaryotic (phototrophs + fungi) organisms are displayed. (A) GFS network with n = 92 GFS sites and (B) TRIB network with n = 106 tributary samples. Clusters were computed using the fast-greedy algorithm and all clusters with less than 5 nodes were removed. Colors differentiate bacteria (blue), phototrophs (green), and fungi (red) and number provides information on the nodes’ specific taxonomy.