M Wang1,2, F Liu1, P W Crous3,4, L Cai1,2. 1. State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, PR China. 2. College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China. 3. Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Microbiology, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Species of Nigrospora commonly occur as plant pathogens, endophytes or saprobes, and have been shown to be extremely interesting for the discovery of novel metabolites. The familial placement, as well as phylogenetic relationships among Nigrospora species remain ambiguous. In this study, Nigrospora (= Khusia) is confirmed as a monophyletic genus belonging to Apiosporaceae (Xylariales), based on a phylogeny inferred from LSU sequence data. A multi-locus phylogeny based on ITS, TEF1-α and TUB2, in conjunction with morphological characters, host associations, and ecological data was employed for species delimitation in Nigrospora, as well as identification of 165 recently collected isolates from China, and three from Europe. In total 13 novelties are proposed including 12 new species and 1 new combination. Five species are re-described based on an examination of type specimens and/or fresh collections. New species described in this paper include: N. aurantiaca, N. bambusae, N. camelliae-sinensis, N. chinensis, N. guilinensis, N. hainanensis, N. lacticolonia, N. osmanthi, N. pyriformis, N. rubi, N. vesicularis and N. zimmermanii. Furthermore, N. vietnamensis is transferred to Arthrinium. Our results indicate a high level of species diversity within Nigrospora, with a general lack in host specificity. Taxa that cluster basal in Nigrospora have wide host ranges, whereas those that diverged later tend to have narrow host ranges. The currently available data suggest, therefore, that the general evolutionary direction in the genus Nigrospora is from a wide to a narrow host range.
Species of Nigrospora commonly occur as plant pathogens, endophytes or saprobes, and have been shown to be extremely interesting for the discovery of novel metabolites. The familial placement, as well as phylogenetic relationships among Nigrospora species remain ambiguous. In this study, Nigrospora (= Khusia) is confirmed as a monophyletic genus belonging to Apiosporaceae (Xylariales), based on a phylogeny inferred from LSU sequence data. A multi-locus phylogeny based on ITS, TEF1-α and TUB2, in conjunction with morphological characters, host associations, and ecological data was employed for species delimitation in Nigrospora, as well as identification of 165 recently collected isolates from China, and three from Europe. In total 13 novelties are proposed including 12 new species and 1 new combination. Five species are re-described based on an examination of type specimens and/or fresh collections. New species described in this paper include: N. aurantiaca, N. bambusae, N. camelliae-sinensis, N. chinensis, N. guilinensis, N. hainanensis, N. lacticolonia, N. osmanthi, N. pyriformis, N. rubi, N. vesicularis and N. zimmermanii. Furthermore, N. vietnamensis is transferred to Arthrinium. Our results indicate a high level of species diversity within Nigrospora, with a general lack in host specificity. Taxa that cluster basal in Nigrospora have wide host ranges, whereas those that diverged later tend to have narrow host ranges. The currently available data suggest, therefore, that the general evolutionary direction in the genus Nigrospora is from a wide to a narrow host range.
Entities:
Keywords:
Apiosporaceae; Ascomycota; phylogeny; species delimitation; systematics
Nigrospora is an important genus of fungal ascomycetes with a cosmopolitan distribution and wide host range. Nigrospora species have been isolated as endophytes from leaves and stems of various plants, or as saprobes from detritus, dead larvae or leaf litter (Mason 1927, Wu et al. 2009, Thalavaipandian et al. 2011, Uzor et al. 2015). Nigrospora species have also been commonly recorded as plant pathogens on many important economic crops, fruits and ornamentals. Examples include N. oryzae causing stem blight on Brassica juncea in India (Sharma et al. 2013), N. sphaerica causing leaf blight on Camellia sinensis in China (Liu et al. 2015) and N. musae causing ‘squirter’ disease on bananas (Jones & Stover 2000). In addition, N. sphaerica is an opportunistic pathogen causing onychomycosis in humans (De Hoog et al. 2000, Fan et al. 2009) and corneal ulcer (Kindo et al. 2014).Nigrospora species are also commonly isolated from the indoor environment. Webster (1952) demonstrated that N. sphaerica has a violent spore discharge mechanism, that can forcibly project its spores to a distance of up to 2 cm vertically, and 6.7 cm horizontally. The study by Wu et al. (2004) also showed that Nigrospora spores are one of the more dominant groups in the atmosphere, being associated with dust storms. Moreover, some Nigrospora spores are responsible for a Type I allergic response, seasonal rhinitis (hay fever), asthma or respiratory allergic diseases (Santo-Pietro 2006, Khan & Karuppayil 2012, Saha & Bhattacharya 2015).Nigrospora is regarded as extremely interesting as a source of natural products and because of its potential industrial applications (Chen et al. 2016). Metabolites produced by N. sacchari showed remarkable herbicidal activity in the treatment of intact greenhouse-grown plants (Fukushima et al. 1998), while Phomalactone produced by N. spherica was found to be an active constituent against mosquitoes (Meepagala et al. 2015). Moreover, some extrolites produced by N. sphaerica exhibited antibacterial activities against the growth of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Klebsiella pneumonia cells (Ibrahim et al. 2015).The generic name Nigrospora was first introduced by Zimmerman (1902) for N. panici, which was isolated as an endophyte from leaves of Panicum amphibium in Java, Indonesia. Later, Mason (1927) transferred several black-spored hyphomycetes occurring on monocotyledonous hosts to Nigrospora, including N. oryzae (= Monotospora oryzae), N. sphaerica (= Trichosporum sphaericum), N. arundinacea (= Hadrotrichum arundinaceum) and N. sacchari (= Glenospora sacchari). Mason (1927) further pointed out that the Indonesian fungus, N. javanica (Palm 1918), occurs on maize, rice and wheat, and is a synonym of N. panici. However, type specimens from both taxa have been lost, and thus a direct morphological comparison and molecular analysis is not possible. Nigrospora gallarum (= Basisporium gallarum) and N. gorlenkoana were previously regarded as synonyms of N. oryzae in MycoBank due to their similar conidial morphology. Presently, there are 15 recognised species listed in MycoBank, but the familial placement of the genus remains unresolved. Barnett & Hunter (1998) placed Nigrospora in Dematiaceae (Moniliales) based on its conidial characters, while Kirk et al. (2008) assigned Nigrospora and its Khuskia sexual morph to the Trichosphaeriaceae (Trichosphaeriales).The objectives of the present study were therefore to:1. resolve the higher order phylogenetic placement of Nigrospora;2. infer the phylogenetic and evolutionary relationships of Nigrospora species based on multi-locus DNA sequence data (ITS, TEF1-α, TUB2) analyses; and3. identify 165 Nigrospora strains collected in China and three strains from Europe to species level.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Collection, isolation and herbarium specimens
Diseased and healthy plant tissues were collected from Camellia sinensis, Musa paradisiaca and several other unidentified plant hosts in eight Chinese provinces (Fujian, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hainan, Hubei, Jiangxi, Tibet and Yunnan). Isolates associated with leaf spots were cultured using both single spore and tissue isolation methods. The single spore isolation protocol of Zhang et al. (2013) was adopted by using quarter strength potato dextrose agar (1/4 PDA; 9.75g Difco PDA, 15g Difco agar and 1L distilled water) with antibiotics (Sodium ampicillin and Streptomycin sulfate). Fungal endophytes were isolated by cutting four fragments (2 × 2 mm) per leaf from the apex, base and lateral sides; samples were surface sterilised with 75 % ethanol for 1 min, 5 % NaClO for 30 s; and then rinsed in sterile distilled water for 1 min. Leaf pieces were dried between sterilised paper towels and then plated onto 1/4 PDA.All cultures are preserved in the LC culture collection (personal culture collection of Lei Cai housed in the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences). Type specimens were deposited in the Mycological Herbarium of Microbiology Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (HMAS), with ex-type living cultures deposited in the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) and the Agricultural Culture Collection of China (ACCC). New descriptions and nomenclature were deposited in MycoBank (www.MycoBank.org; Crous et al. 2004).Loan requests of type specimens were sent to 22 herbaria, viz. B, BIOT, BO, BZ, FIPIA, IARI, IPA, K, KRB, LE, LIL, LP, MEL, MELU, PAD, PAS, PDA, PEUFR, RO, UFP, URM, VLA. Four types of Nigrospora species were received from K, i.e. N. oryzae (= Monotospora oryzae, IMI 99832), N. sphaerica (= Trichosporum sphaericum, IMI 103253), N. arundinacea (= Hadrotrichum arundinaceum, K(M) 203264) and Khuskia oryzae (sexual morph of N. oryzae, IMI 79239).
Morphology
Cultures were incubated on PDA for 7 d at 25 °C to measure diagonal growth. To enhance sporulation, 5 mm diam plugs from the margin of actively growing cultures were transferred to the centre of 9 cm diam Petri dishes containing synthetic nutrient-poor agar medium (SNA; Nirenberg 1976) at 28 °C. Morphological descriptions were based on cultures sporulating on SNA. The shape and size of microscopic structures were observed using a light microscope and colonies were assessed according to the colour charts of Rayner (1970). At least 50 conidiogenous cells and conidia were measured to calculate the mean size.
DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing
Fresh fungal mycelia grown on PDA for 7 d at 25 °C were scraped from the colony margin and used for genomic DNA extraction using a modified CTAB protocol as described in Guo et al. (2000). PCR amplification and sequencing of the large subunit (LSU) rDNA using the primer pair LR0R/LR5 and the 5.8S nuclear ribosomal gene with the two flanking transcribed spacers (ITS) using primer pair ITS1/ITS4 was performed (Vilgalys & Hester 1990, White et al. 1990). Part of the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1-α) was amplified and sequenced using primer pair EF1-728F (Carbone & Kohn 1999) and EF-2 (O’Donnell et al. 1998). Bt-2a and Bt-2b (Glass & Donaldson 1995) were used for the Beta-tubulin fragment (TUB2). PCR was performed in a 25 μL reaction containing 18.95 μL double distilled water, 2.5 μL 10 × PCR buffer, 0.3 μL dNTP mix (2.5 mM), 1 μL per primer (10 mM), 1 μL DNA template, 0.25 μL Taq DNA polymerase (Genstar). Amplification conditions for ITS, LSU and TEF1-α followed Crous et al. (2013) and for TUB2, Lee et al. (2004). Purification and sequencing of PCR amplicons were carried out at the SinoGenoMax Company, Beijing. DNA sequences were generated with upper surface and reverse primers to obtain consensus sequences analysed with MEGA v. 6.0 (Tamura et al. 2013).
Phylogenetic analysis
LSU sequences of Nigrospora and similar sequences from related genera obtained from GenBank (Table 1, 2) were analysed to resolve the higher order phylogenetic placement of Nigrospora. Single locus and concatenated gene trees were inferred from ITS, TUB2 and TEF1-α (Table 1) using Bayesian and Maximum-likelihood analyses to help delimit species in Nigrospora. Sequences were aligned using an online version of MAFFT v. 7 (Katoh & Standley 2013). Ambiguous regions were excluded from the analyses and gaps were treated as missing data. A 70 % neighbour-joining (NJ) reciprocal bootstrap method with maximum-likelihood distance was applied to check the congruence of the individual loci in the multi-locus dataset (Mason-Gamer & Kellogg 1996).
Table 1
Strains of the Nigrospora species used in this study with details about host and location, and GenBank accessions of the sequences generated.
Species
Accession numbers1,2
Host
Locality
GenBank accession numbers3
ITS
LSU
TUB2
TEF1-α
N. aurantiaca
CGMCC 3.18130* = LC 7302
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX986064
KX986098
KY019465
KY019295
LC 7034
Musa paradisiaca
China
KX986093
–
KY019598
KY019394
N. bambusae
CGMCC 3.18327* = LC 7114
Bamboo (leaf)
China
KY385307
–
KY385319
KY385313
LC 7244
Bamboo (leaf)
China
KY385306
–
KY385320
KY385314
LC 7245
Bamboo (leaf)
China
KY385305
–
KY385321
KY385315
N. camelliae-sinensis
LC 2710
Castanopsis sp.
China
KX985957
–
KY019484
KY019310
LC 3287
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985975
–
KY019502
KY019323
LC 3496
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985985
–
KY019510
KY019327
CGMCC 3.18125* = LC 3500
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985986
KX986103
KY019460
KY019293
LC 4460
Castanopsis sp.
China
KX986015
–
KY019538
KY019353
LC 6304
Camellia sinensis
China
KX986045
–
KY019566
KY019370
LC 6984
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986080
–
KY019587
KY019387
LC 6684
Camellia sinensis
China
KX986046
–
KY019570
KY019449
LC 6989
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986083
–
KY019590
KY019453
LC 6992
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986084
–
KY019591
KY019389
LC 7018
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986089
–
KY019595
KY019392
LC 7044
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986095
–
KY019600
KY019395
N. chinensis
LC 2696
Lindera aggregata
China
KX985947
–
KY019474
KY019424
LC 3085
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985970
–
KY019497
KY019427
LC 3175
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985972
–
KY019499
KY019428
LC 3275
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985973
–
KY019500
KY019429
LC 3286
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985974
–
KY019501
KY019430
LC 3293
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985977
–
KY019504
KY019431
LC 3400
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985979
–
KY019505
KY019432
LC 3441
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985981
–
KY019507
KY019433
LC 3493
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985984
–
KY019509
KY019434
LC 4364
Aucuba japonica
China
KX986011
–
KY019534
KY019435
LC 4433
Castanopsis sp.
China
KX986013
–
KY019536
KY019436
LC 4463
Unknown host plant
China
KX986016
–
KY019539
KY019437
LC 4554
Unknown host plant
China
KX986018
–
KY019541
KY019439
LC 4555
Unknown host plant
China
KX986019
–
KY019542
KY019440
LC 4558
Unknown host plant
China
KX986020
–
KY019543
KY019441
LC 4565
Itea sp.
China
KX986021
–
KY019544
KY019442
CGMCC 3.18127* = LC 4575
Machilus breviflora
China
KX986023
KX986107
KY019462
KY019422
LC 4593
Machilus duthiei
China
KX986024
–
KY019546
KY019443
LC 4619
Osmanthus sp.
China
KX986025
–
KY019547
KY019444
LC 4660
Quercus sp.
China
KX986026
–
KY019548
KY019445
LC 4673
Smilax ocreata
China
KX986028
–
KY019550
KY019446
LC 6631
Camellia sinensis
China
KX986043
–
KY019569
KY019448
LC 6851
Unknown host plant
China
KX986049
–
KY019579
KY019450
LC 6972
Musa paradisiaca
China
KX986078
–
KY019585
KY019451
LC 6998
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986086
–
KY019593
KY019391
LC 7026
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986090
–
KY019596
KY019393
N. gorlenkoana
CBS 480.73*
Vitis vinifera
Kazakhstan
KX986048
KX986109
KY019456
KY019420
N. guilinensis
LC 7301
Nelumbo sp. (stem)
China
KX986063
–
KY019608
KY019404
CGMCC 3.18124* = LC 3481
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985983
KX986113
KY019459
KY019292
N. hainanensis
CGMCC 3.18129* = LC 7030
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986091
KX986112
KY019464
KY019415
LC 6979
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986079
–
KY019586
KY019416
LC 7031
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986092
–
KY019597
KY019417
LC 7042
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986094
–
KY019599
KY019418
N . lacticolonia
CGMCC 3.18123* = LC 3324
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985978
KX986105
KY019458
KY019291
LC 7009
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986087
–
KY019594
KY019454
N. musae
CBS 319.34*
Musa paradisiaca (fruit)
Australia
KX986076
KX986110
KY019455
KY019419
LC 6385
Camellia sinensis
China
KX986042
–
KY019567
KY019371
N. oryzae
LC 6759
Oryza sativa
China
KX986054
–
KY019572
KY019374
LC 6760
Oryza sativa
China
KX986055
–
KY019573
KY019375
LC 6761
Oryza sativa
China
KX986056
–
KY019574
KY019376
LC 6762
Oryza sativa
China
KX986057
–
KY019575
KY019377
LC 6763
Oryza sativa
China
KX986058
–
KY019576
KY019378
LC 6764
Oryza sativa
China
KX986059
–
KY019577
KY019379
LC 6765
Oryza sativa
China
KX986060
–
–
KY019380
LC 6893
Oryza sativa
China
KX986050
–
KY019580
KY019382
LC 7293
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX985931
–
KY019601
KY019396
LC 7297
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX985936
–
KY019605
KY019400
LC 6029
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX985938
–
KY019564
KY019368
LC 7299
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX98606
–
KY019607
KY019402
LC 7300
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX986062
–
–
KY019403
LC 7305
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX986067
–
KY019611
KY019407
LC 7306
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX986068
–
KY019612
KY019408
LC 7307
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX986069
–
KY019613
KY019409
LC 7308
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX986070
–
KY019614
KY019410
LC 7309
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX986071
–
KY019615
KY019411
LC 7310
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX986072
–
KY019616
KY019412
LC 7311
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX986073
–
KY019617
KY019413
LC 6766
Oryza sativa L.
China
KX986074
–
KY019578
KY019381
LC 6566
Oryza sativa L.
China
KX986075
–
KY019568
KY019372
LC 2689
Rhododendron sp.
China
KX985942
–
KY019469
KY019423
LC 2693
Neolitsea sp.
China
KX985944
KX986101
KY019471
KY019299
LC 2695
Rubus reflexus
China
KX985946
–
KY019473
KY019301
LC 2699
Hamamelis mollis
China
KX985949
–
KY019476
KY019303
LC 2702
Rubus sp.
China
KX985950
–
KY019477
KY019304
LC 2704
Rhododendron sp.
China
KX985951
–
KY019478
KY019425
LC 2706
Rhododendron sp.
China
KX985953
–
KY019480
KY019306
LC 2707
Rhododendron simiarum
China
KX985954
–
KY019481
KY019307
LC 2708
Rhododendron sp.
China
KX985955
–
KY019482
KY019308
LC 2709
Rhododendron simiarum
China
KX985956
–
KY019483
KY019309
LC 2712
Castanopsis sp.
China
KX985958
–
KY019485
KY019311
LC 2724
Symplocos zizyphoides
China
KX985959
–
KY019486
KY019312
LC 2744
Symplocos zizyphoides
China
KX985961
–
KY019488
KY019314
LC 2749
Ternstroemia sp.
China
KX985962
–
KY019489
KY019315
LC 2752
Osmanthus sp.
China
KX985963
–
KY019490
KY019316
LC 2972
Tutcheria microcarpa
China
KX985967
–
KY019494
KY019320
LC 2991
Cleyera japonica
China
KX985969
–
KY019496
KY019321
LC 3690
Symplocos zizyphoides
China
KX985987
–
KY019511
KY019328
LC 3695
Osmanthus fragrans
China
KX985988
–
KY019512
KY019329
LC 4260
Rhododendron sp.
China
KX985991
–
KY019515
KY019332
LC 4265
Rhododendron sp.
China
KX985994
–
KY019518
KY019335
LC 4273
Cephalotaxus sinensis
China
KX985995
–
KY019519
KY019336
LC 4275
Rhododendron sp.
China
KX985997
–
KY019521
KY019338
LC 4281
Rhododendron sp.
China
KX985999
–
KY019523
KY019340
LC 4294
Daphniphyllum macropodum
China
KX986002
–
KY019526
KY019343
LC 4295
Daphniphyllum macropodum
China
KX986003
–
KY019527
KY019344
LC 4320
Daphniphyllum oldhamii
China
KX986006
–
KY019530
KY019347
LC 4327
Camellia sp.
China
KX986007
–
KY019531
KY019348
LC 4338
Camellia sp.
China
KX986008
–
KY019532
KY019349
LC 4345
Camellia sp.
China
KX986009
–
KY019533
KY019350
LC 4679
Osmanthus sp.
China
KX986029
–
KY019551
KY019356
LC 4680
Camellia sinensis
China
KX986030
–
KY019552
KY019357
LC 4961
Pittosporum illicioides
China
KX986031
–
KY019553
KY019358
LC 5181
Pentactina rupicola
China
KX986032
–
KY019554
KY019359
LC 5243
Submerged wood
China
KX986033
–
KY019555
KY019360
LC 5964
Submerged wood
China
KX986037
–
KY019559
KY019447
LC 5965
Submerged wood
China
KX986038
–
KY019560
KY019364
LC 5982
Submerged wood
China
KX986040
–
KY019562
KY019366
LC 5999
Submerged wood
China
KX986041
–
KY019563
KY019367
LC 6923
Oryza sativa L.
China
KX986051
–
KY019581
KY019383
LC 6955
Oryza sativa L.
China
KX986052
–
KY019582
KY019384
LC 6957
Oryza sativa L.
China
KX986053
–
KY019583
KY019385
N. osmanthi
CGMCC 3.18126* = LC 4350
Osmanthus sp.
China
KX986010
KX986106
KY019461
KY019421
LC 4487
Hedera nepalensis
China
KX986017
–
KY019540
KY019438
N. pyriformis
CGMCC 3.18122* = LC 2045
Citrus sinensis
China
KX985940
KX986100
KY019457
KY019290
LC 2688
Lindera aggregata
China
KX985941
–
KY019468
KY019297
LC 2690
Rosa sp.
China
KX985943
–
KY019470
KY019298
LC 2694
Rubus reflexus
China
KX985945
–
KY019472
KY019300
LC 3099
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985971
–
KY019498
KY019322
LC 3292
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985976
–
KY019503
KY019324
LC 4669
Castanopsis sp.
China
KX986027
–
KY019549
KY019355
LC 6985
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986081
–
KY019588
KY019388
LC 6988
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986082
–
KY019589
KY019452
N. rubi
CGMCC 3.18326* = LC 2698
Rubus sp.
China
KX985948
KX986102
KY019475
KY019302
N. sphaerica
LC 7294
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX985932
–
KY019602
KY019397
LC 7295
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX985933
–
KY019603
KY019398
LC 7296
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX985934
–
KY019604
KY019399
LC 7312
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX985935
–
KY019618
KY019414
LC 7298
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX985937
KX986097
KY019606
KY019401
LC 7303
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX986065
–
KY019609
KY019405
LC 7304
Nelumbo sp. (leaf)
China
KX986066
–
KY019610
KY019406
LC 2705
Rosa sp.
China
KX985952
–
KY019479
KY019305
LC 2839
Harpullia longipetala
China
KX985964
–
KY019491
KY019317
LC 2840
Harpullia longipetala
China
KX985965
–
KY019492
KY019318
LC 2958
Cleyera japonica
China
KX985966
–
KY019493
KY019319
LC 2983
Camellia sp.
China
KX985968
–
KY019495
KY019426
LC 3420
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985980
–
KY019506
KY019325
LC 3477
Camellia sinensis
China
KX985982
–
KY019508
KY019326
LC 4174
Rhododendron arboreum
China
KX985989
–
KY019513
KY019330
LC 4241
Deutzia sp.
China
KX985990
–
KY019514
KY019331
LC 4263
Rhododendron arboreum
China
KX985992
–
KY019516
KY019333
LC 4264
Rhododendron arboreum
China
KX985993
–
KY019517
KY019334
LC 4274
Rhododendron arboreum
China
KX985996
–
KY019520
KY019337
LC 4278
Rhododendron arboreum
China
KX985998
–
KY019522
KY019339
LC 4291
Rhododendron arboreum
China
KX986000
–
KY019524
KY019341
LC 4293
Rhododendron arboreum
China
KX986001
–
KY019525
KY019342
LC 4303
Rhododendron arboreum
China
KX986004
–
KY019528
KY019345
LC 4307
Rhododendron arboreum
China
KX986005
–
KY019529
KY019346
LC 4372
Rhododendron arboreum
China
KX986012
–
KY019535
KY019351
LC 4447
Unknown host plant
China
KX986014
–
KY019537
KY019352
LC 5901
Submerged wood
China
KX986034
–
KY019556
KY019361
LC 5932
Submerged wood
China
KX986035
–
KY019557
KY019362
LC 5944
Submerged wood
China
KX986036
–
KY019558
KY019363
LC 5966
Submerged wood
China
KX986039
–
KY019561
KY019365
LC 6294
Camellia sinensis
China
KX986044
–
KY019565
KY019369
LC 6969
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986077
–
KY019584
KY019386
LC 6996
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986085
–
KY019592
KY019390
Nigrospora sp. 1
LC 2725
Symplocos zizyphoides
China
KX985960
KX986104
KY019487
KY019313
LC 4566
Lithocarpus sp.
China
KX986022
–
KY019545
KY019354
Nigrospora sp. 2
LC 6704
Camellia sinensis
China
KX986047
KX986108
KY019571
KY019373
N. vesicularis
LC 0322
Unknown host plant
Thailand
KX985939
–
KY019467
KY019296
CGMCC 3.18128* = LC 7010
Musa paradisiaca (leaf)
China
KX986088
KX986099
KY019463
KY019294
N. zimmermanii
CBS 167.26
Unknown
Unknown
KY385308
–
KY385318
KY385312
CBS 290.62*
Saccharum officinarum (leaf)
Ecuador
KY385309
–
KY385317
KY385311
CBS 984.69
Saccharum officinarum (leaf)
Brazil
KY385310
–
KY385322
KY385316
A. vietnamensis
IMI 99670*
Citrus sinensis
Vietnam
KX986096
KX986111
KY019466
–
1 CGMCC = China General Microbiological Culture Collection, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; CBS = Culture Collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; IMI = Culture Collection of CABI Europe UK Centre, Egham, UK; LC = working collection of Lei Cai, housed at the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
GenBank accession numbers of the sequences used for the LSU analyses of Xylariales and Amphisphaeriales.
Taxon name
Culture accession no.
GenBank accessions LSU
Adisciso tricellulare
NBRC 32705
NG 042334
Adisciso yakushimense
MAFF 242774
AB 593721
Amphibambusa bambusicola
MFLUCC 11-0617
KP 744474
Amphisphaeria sorbi
MFLUCC 13-0721
KP 744475
Amphisphaeria umbrina
HKUCC 994
AF 452029
Apiosordaria verruculosa
F152365
AY346258
Apiospora setosa
ATCC 58184
AY 346259
Apiospora tintinnabula
ICMP 6889-96
DQ 810217
Arecophila bambusae
HKUCC 4794
AF 452038
Arthrinium arundinis
CBS 106.12
KF 144927
CBS 114316
KF 144928
Arthrinium aureum
CBS 244.83
KF 144935
Arthrinium hydei
CBS 114990
KF 144936
Arthrinium kogelbergense
CBS 113333
KF 144938
Arthrinium malaysianum
CBS 102053
KF 144942
CBS251.29
KF 144943
Arthrinium marii
CBS 497.90
KF 144947
Arthrinium ovatum
CBS 115042
KF 144950
Arthrinium phaeospermum
CBS 114314
KF 144951
CBS 114318
KF 144954
Arthrinium phragmites
CPC 18900
KF 144956
Arthrinium pseudosinense
CPC 21546
KF 144957
Arthrinium pseudospegazzinii
CBS 102052
KF 144958
Arthrinium pterospermum
CPC 20193
KF 144960
Arthrinium rasikravindrii
CBS 337.61
KF 144961
Arthrinium sacchari
CBS 212.30
KF 144962
CBS 372.67
KF 144964
Arthrinium saccharicola
CBS 191.73
KF 144966
CBS 463.83
KF 144968
Arthrinium xenocordella
CBS 478.86
KF 144970
CBS595.66
KF 144971
Atrotorquata spartii
MFLUCC 13-0444
KP 325443
Bartalinia robillardoides
CBS 122705
KJ 710438
MFLUCC 12-0070
KR 559738
Broomella vitalbae
MFLUCC 13-0798
KP 757749
MFLUCC 14-1000
KP 757750
Cainia anthoxanthis
MFLUCC 15-0539
KR 092777
Cainia graminis
MFLUCC 15-0540
KR 092781
CBS 136.62
AF 431949
Ciferriascosea fluctamurum
MFLUCC 15-0541
KR 092778
Ciferriascosea rectamurum
MFLUCC 15-0542
KR 092776
Ciliochorella castaneae
HHUF 28799
AB 433277
Clypeosphaeria uniseptata
–
AY 083830
HKUCC 6349
DQ 810219
Coniocessia maxima
Co117
GU 553344
Coniocessia nodulisporioides
CBS281.77
AJ 875224
Creosphaeria sassafras
CM AT-018
DQ 840056
Cryptodiaporthe aesculi
AFTOL-ID 1238
DQ 836905
Diatrype disciformis
MFLUCC 15–0538
KR 092784
Diatrype palmicola
MFLUCC 11-0018
KP 744481
Discosia artocreas
NBRC 8975
AB 593705
Discosia neofraxinea
MFLU 15-0375
KR 072672
Discosia pini
MAFF 410149
AB 593708
Discostroma fuscellum
MFLUCC 14-0052
KT 005514
Discostroma tostum
NBRC 32626
AB 593727
Dyrithiopsis lakefuxianensis
HKUCC 7303
AF 452047
Eutypa flavovirens
MFLUCC 13-0625
KR 092774
Hyalotiella rubi
MFLUCC 13-0660
KR 092775
Hyalotiella spartii
MFLUCC 13-0397
KP 757752
Hyponectria buxi
UME 31430
AY 083834
Kretzschmaria deusta
CBS 163.93
KT 281896
Lepteutypa cupressi
IMI 052255
AF 382379
Lopadostoma americanum
HV-2014h LG8
KC 774568
Lopadostoma dryophilum
LG21
KC 774570
Lopadostoma fagi
HV-2014f LF1
KC 774575
Lopadostoma quercicola
HV-2014a LG27
KC 774610
Lopadostoma turgidum
LT2
KC 774618
Monochaetia kansensis
PSHI2004Endo1032
DQ 534037
PSHI2004Endo1030
DQ 534035
Neopestalotiopsis aotearoa
CBS 367.54
KM 116247
Neopestalotiopsis formicarum
CBS 362.72
KM 116248
Ophiodiaporthe cyatheae
YMJ 1364
JX 570891
Pestalotiopsis knightiae
CBS 114138
KM 116227
Pestalotiopsis malayana
CBS 102220
KM 116238
Phlogicylindrium eucalyptorum
CBS 111689
KF 251708
Phlogicylindrium uniforme
CBS 131312
JQ 044445
Podosordaria tulasnei
CBS 128.80
KT 281897
Poronia punctata
CBS 656.78
KT 281900
Pseudomassaria chondrospora
MFLUCC 15-0545
KR 092779
PC1
JF 44098
Pseudomassaria sepincoliformis
CBS 129022
JF 440984
Pseudopestalotiopsis cocos
CBS 272.29
KM 116276
Pseudopestalotiopsis theae
MFLUCC 12-0055
KM 116282
Sarcostroma restionis
CBS 118154
DQ 278924
Sarcoxylon compunctum
CBS 359.61
KT 281898
Seimatosporium cornii
MFLUCC 14-0467
KR 559739
Seimatosporium eucalypti
CPC 156
JN 871209
Seimatosporium ficeae
SGL002
KR 920686
Seimatosporium hypericinum
NBRC 32647
AB 593737
Seimatosporium rhombisporum
MFLUCC 15-0543
KR 092780
Seimatosporium rosae
MFLUCC 14-0621
KT 198727
Seiridium cardinale
CBS 172.56
AF 382376
Seiridium papillatum
CBS 340.97
DQ 414531
Seiridium phylicae
CPC 19965
KC 005809
Seynesia erumpens
SMH 1291
AF 279410
Sordaria fimicola
HKUCC 3714
AF 132330
Truncatella angustata
ICMP 7062
AF 382383
Truncatella hartigii
CBS 118148
DQ 278928
Truncatella laurocerasi
ICMP 11214
AF 382385
Truncatella restionacearum
CMW 18755
DQ 278929
Truncatella spartii
MFLUCC 13-0397
KR 092782
MFLUCC 15-0573
KR 092783
Vialaea mangifia
MFLUCC 12-0808
KF 724975
Vialaea minutella
BRIP 56959
KC 181924
Xylaria polymorpha
MUCL 49884
KT 281899
Xylaria obovata
MFLUCC 13-0115
KR 049089
Zetiasplozna acaciae
CPC 23421
KJ 869206
The best nucleotide substitution model of each locus used for MrBayes v. 3.2.1 (Ronquist et al. 2012), was calculated with jModelTest v. 2.1.4 (Posada 2008). Posterior probabilities (PP) (Zhaxybayeva & Gogarten 2002) were determined by Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling (MCMC) under the estimated model of evolution. Four simultaneous Markov chains were run for 10 M generations and trees were sampled every 1 000 generations. The run was stopped automatically when the average standard deviation of split frequencies fell below 0.01. The first 25 % of trees, which represented the burn-in phase of the analyses, were discarded and the remaining trees were used for calculating PP in the majority rule consensus tree. Maximum-likelihood analyses including 1 000 bootstrap replicates were conducted using RAxML v. 7.2.6 (Stamatakis & Alachiotis 2010). A general time reversible model (GTR) was applied with a gamma-distributed rate variation. Novel sequences generated in this study were deposited in GenBank (Table 1), the final matrices used for phylogenetic analyses in TreeBASE (www.treebase.org; accession number S20829).
Fungus host distribution analysis
To better illustrate the distribution of Nigrospora species on different hosts, a heatmap was plotted using the ‘pheatmap’ package in R (R Development Core Team 2015), on the basis of data from this study and the USDA fungal database (Farr & Rossman 2017).
RESULTS
Phylogeny
The manually adjusted LSU alignment dataset contained 123 sequences from 110 taxa, in which 897 characters including alignment gaps (available in TreeBASE) were used in the phylogenetic analysis. According to the results of jModeltest v. 2.1.4, the GTR+I+G model was chosen for MrBayes. The phylogeny resulting from the analysis of LSU sequence data is shown in Fig. 1. All strains of Nigrospora formed a sister clade, with high statistical support to Arthrinium, indicating that Nigrospora belongs to Apiosporaceae, Xylariales. The two genera, however, are clearly phylogenetically distinct (Fig 1). The ex-type strain of Nigrospora vietnamensis (IMI 99670) is nested within Arthrinium and appeared conspecific to A. malaysianum.
Fig. 1
Phylogenetic tree based on the LSU sequences generated from a Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis. Bootstrap support values (> 70 %) and posterior probabilities (> 0.9) are given at the nodes. The tree is rooted to Sordariomycetidae (Apiosordaria verruculosa F-152365 and Sordaria fimicola HKUCC 3714) and Diaportheomycetidae (Cryptodiaporthe aesculi AFTOL-ID 1238 and Ophiodiaporthe cyatheae YMJ 1364).
The 70 % neighbour-joining (NJ) reciprocal bootstrap method with maximum-likelihood distance confirmed that single gene trees of Nigrospora inferred from ITS, TUB2 and TEF1-α datasets were congruent (results not shown). The concatenated dataset of ITS, TUB2 and TEF1-α contained 62 strains representing each clade of Nigrospora with reference to single locus trees, and Arthrinium malaysianumCBS 102053 as outgroup. A total of 1 581 characters including gaps (available in TreeBASE) were included in this dataset. For the Bayesian analyses, the best-fit models TIM1ef+I+G, TPM2uf+G, TrN+I+G were set for ITS, TUB2 and TEF1-α, respectively. The concatenated gene tree (Fig. 2) is congruent with the single-locus gene trees (ITS, TUB2 and TEF1-α) and comprises 18 species representing clades with high bootstrap and posterior probability supports values.
Fig. 2
Multilocus phylogenetic tree based on the combined ITS, TEF1-α and TUB2 sequences alignment generated from a Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis. Bootstrap support values (> 70 %) and posterior probabilities (> 0.9) are given at the nodes (MLB/PP). The tree is rooted with Arthrinium malaysianum. The novel species are highlighted (* indicates the ex-type cultures).
Fungus host distribution
Nigrospora species appear to be widely distributed on various hosts. Among which, N. sphaerica, N. oryzae and N. chinensis are the three most ubiquitous species. For example, N. sphaerica has been reported from 40 different host genera including Zea, Andropogon and Cymbopogon, while N. oryzae has been reported from 20 different genera including Oryza, Zea and Phyllostachys. Host genera such as Musa and Camellia appear to be amongst the most preferred hosts for Nigrospora, having 10 and 8 Nigrospora species reported on each respective host genus. Eight species, i.e., N. arundinacea, N. canescens, N. gorlenkoana, N. gossypii, N. javanica, N. maydis, N. padwickii, and N. panici, are hitherto only known from one host genus each.
TAXONOMY
Zimm., Centralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenk., 1. Abth. 8: 220. 1902Type species. Nigrospora panici Zimm., Centralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenk., 1. Abth. 8: 220. 1902.Synonym. Khuskia H.J. Huds., Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 46: 358. 1963.Type species. Khuskia oryzae H.J. Huds., Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 46: 358. 1963.Classification — Apiosporaceae, Xylariales, Sordariomycetes.Colonies on PDA at first white with small, shiny black conidia easily visible under a low-power dissecting microscope due to its large size, later becoming brown or black when sporulation is abundant. Mycelia immersed or partly superficial. Stroma absent. Hyphopodia absent. Setae rarely observed. Conidiophores micronematous or semi-macronematous, branched, flexuous, hyaline to brown, smooth, usually reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, discrete, solitary, determinate, subspherical, doliiform, ampulliform, subcylindrical to clavate, hyaline. Conidia solitary, acrogenous, with an equatorial hyaline line or a germ slit in some species, simple, spherical or broadly ellipsoidal or pyriform, compressed dorsiventrally, black, shiny, smooth, aseptate, rarely with a violent discharge mechanism. Ascomata perithecial, formed in clusters of 1–7, uniseriate or in irregular rows, subepidermal, erumpent, globose obovoid, with papillate ostioles; surrounded by blackened host tissue. Asci short-stalked, unitunicate, clavate, with eight biseriate ascospores. Paraphyses thin-walled, septate. Ascospores hyaline, granular, curved, inequilateral, tapering towards base with rounded ends, initially aseptate, at times with a single transverse septum.Notes — The conidiophores of most species of Nigrospora are reduced to conidiogenous cells, each of which normally produces a single conidium. The conidia of Nigrospora are deeply pigmented, with germ slits present in some species. Mason (1927, 1933) revised the taxonomy of Nigrospora, and pointed out that numerous species apparently differ only in spore size, and so far traditional classification has been mainly based on conidial dimensions. In this study, morphological characters were re-evaluated and combined DNA sequence data were analysed to investigate the phylogenetic relationships of Nigrospora species. Furthermore, additional distinguishable characters were employed for distinguishing species, such as conidiogenous cell dimensions, and the presence/absence of vesicles and setae. Sterile cells are often observed in Nigrospora species (Mason 1927, Minter 1985). They are similar to conidia in being deeply pigmented, but are much larger than conidia in dimensions. In addition, sterile cells are formed directly from the hyphae, rather than borne from the conidiogenous cells. Setae are also deeply pigmented and borne from the hyphae, but differ from sterile cells in being longer and narrower, and 1–2-septate.(Cooke & Massee) Potl., Microbiologia, Moscow 21: 224. 1952 — Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Nigrospora arundinacea (from holotype K(M) 203264). a–c. Overview of the type specimen; d. conidia on Arundo conspicua; e–f. conidiogenous cells; g. conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.
Type. England, from Arundo conspicua, 1887, Cooke & Massee (holotype K(M) 203264).Basionym. Hadrotrichum arundinaceum Cooke & Massee, Grevillea 16, no.77: 11. 1887.Hyphae dark brown, smooth, branched, septate. Conidiophores usually reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, discrete, solitary, determinate, pale brown, smooth, subglobose or ampulliform. Conidia globose or subglobose, solitary, black, shiny, smooth, aseptate, 17–21 μm diam (av. = 19.24 ± 0.83).Notes — The conidial size of N. arundinacea was described as 30 μm diam (Cooke 1887). However, we did not find any conidia matching these dimensions on the type specimen loaned from K. Conidia of N. arundinacea were globose or subglobose, 17–21 μm diam and resembled those of N. sphaerica. We failed to find sufficiently distinguishable morphological characters between the two species solely based on the morphology of their type specimens. DNA extraction from the type specimen of N. arundinacea from K was not permitted, thus the relationship between N. arundinacea and N. sphaerica remains unsolved pending further collections and typification.Mei Wang & L. Cai, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB820730; Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Nigrospora aurantiaca (from ex-type strain CGMCC3.18130). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 5 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d–h. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.
Etymology. Named after the orange colony colour on PDA.Type. China, Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Agricultural University, on Nelumbo sp., 21 Sept. 2015, M.F. Hu (HMAS 247065 holotype, ex-type living culture CGMCC3.18130 = LC7302 = JAUCC0677).Hyphae pale brown, smooth, branched, septate, 1.5–5 μm diam. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells dispersed on hyphae, pale brown, monoblastic, discrete, solitary, determinate, doliiform, ovoid or ampulliform, 7.5–13 × 6–8.5 μm (av. = 9.76 ± 1.34 × 7.06 ± 0.56). Conidia solitary, mostly ellipsoidal, black, shiny, smooth, 12–16.5 × 9–15.5 μm (av. = 14.82 ± 0.79 × 11.78 ± 1.07).Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies flat, edge entire, floccose at the centre with grey aerial mycelia, initially orange, becoming black with age in the centre. Colonies reaching 9 cm diam after 7 d at 25 °C. On SNA, colonies flat, spreading, with abundant aerial mycelia, surface dirty white to greyish and reverse light pink with olivaceous grey patches.Additional specimen examined. China, Hainan Province, Chengmai, on leaves of Musa paradisiaca, 25 Dec. 2015, F.J. Liu, living culture LC7034 = WM268.Notes — Two strains representing N. aurantiaca clustered in a well-supported clade (Fig. 2), and closely related to N. vesicularis (99 % identity in ITS; 89 % in TEF1-α; 96 % in TUB2), N. lacticolonia (99 % in ITS; 87 % in TEF1-α; 93 % in TUB2) and N. osmanthi (99 % in ITS; 88 % in TEF1-α; 94 % in TUB2). Nigrospora aurantiaca differs from N. vesicularis in the absence of vesicles surrounding the septum between its conidiogenous cells and conidia, from N. lacticolonia in the colour of the culture (initially orange, becoming black in N. aurantiaca vs remaining creamy white in N. lacticolonia), from N. osmanthi in the larger conidiogenous cells (av. = 9.76 ± 1.34 × 7.06 ± 0.56 in N. aurantiaca vs av. = 8.02 ± 1.5 × 6.04 ± 1.16 in N. osmanthi). In addition, N. aurantiaca is a morphologically distinct species of Nigrospora that produces orange pigment in culture.Mei Wang & L. Cai, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB820800; Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Nigrospora bambusae (from ex-type strain LC7114). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 5 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d–f. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; g. conidia. — Scale bars: d–g = 10 μm.
Etymology. Named after the host from which all strains were isolated, bamboo.Type. China, Guangdong Province, on bamboo leaves, 10 July 2016, D.W. Xiao (HMAS 246696 holotype, ex-type living culture CGMCC3.18327 = LC7114).Hyphae smooth, hyaline to pale brown, branched, septate, 2.5–7 μm diam. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells aggregated in clusters on hyphae, pale brown, globose to subglobose to ampulliform, 5.5–12.5 × 3–9.5 μm (av. = 7.85 ± 1.41 × 6.27 ± 1.31). Conidia solitary, globose or subglobose, black, shiny, smooth, aseptate, 13.5–17.5 × 10–17 μm (av. = 15.99 ± 0.94 × 14.23 ± 1.84).Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies floccose, edge entire, initially white, becoming grey to black with age, reaching 9 cm diam after 7 d at 25 °C, reverse smoke-grey with black patches. On SNA, colonies flat, with some mycelia immersed, surface olivaceous grey and reverse olivaceous grey with black patches due to sporulation.Additional specimens examined. China, Jiangxi Province, on bamboo leaves, 19 July 2016, J.E. Huang, living culture, LC7244 = WM478; ibid., living culture LC7245 = WM479.Notes — Three strains representing N. bambusae clustered in a well-supported clade and related to N. rubi (99 % identity in ITS; 93 % in TEF1-α; 94 % in TUB2). Nigrospora bambusae differs from N. rubi (Fig. 17) in producing slightly larger conidia (13.5–17.5 × 10–17 μm vs 11.5–16.5 μm). In addition, N. bambusae sporulates easier than N. rubi (5 d vs 1 mo on SNA). Nigrospora bambusae occurs on bamboo (Poaceae) while N. rubi occurs on Rubus sp. (Rosaceae).
Fig. 17
Nigrospora rubi (from ex-type strain LC2698). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 5 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d–f. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; g. conidia. — Scale bars: d–f = 10 μm; g = 20 μm.
Mei Wang & L. Cai, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB820731; Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Nigrospora camelliae-sinensis (from ex-type strain CGMCC3.18125). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 4 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d–g. conidiophores and conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; h. conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.
Etymology. Named after the epithet of Camellia sinensis, the host from which most strains were collected in this study.Type. China, Guangxi Province, on Camellia sinensis, Sept. 2013, T.W. Hou (HMAS 247068 holotype, ex-type living culture CGMCC3.18125 = LC3500).Hyphae smooth, hyaline, branched, septate, 1.5–4 μm diam. Conidiophores mostly reduced to conidiogenous cells and aggregated in clusters on hyphae. Conidiogenous cells hyaline to pale brown, globose to ampulliform or clavate (ear-shaped), sometimes appearing as the bulge directly from the mycelia without septa, 6–11 × 4.5–8.5 μm (av. = 7.85 ± 1.43 × 5.95 ± 0.78). Conidia solitary, spherical or slightly ellipsoidal, black, shiny, smooth, aseptate, spherical, 13–18 μm diam (av. = 15.57 ± 1.19), ellipsoidal, 12–18 × 9–14.5 μm (av. = 14.24 ± 1.43 × 10.84 ± 1.21).Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies flat, edge entire. Colonies initially white, becoming grey due to sporulation, reaching 9 cm diam in 8 d at 25 °C. On SNA, colonies flat, growing slowly, spreading, mycelia partially immersed, surface white to greyish and reverse grey olivaceous without patches, sporulating profusely.Additional specimens examined. China, Guangxi Province, Guilin, on Camellia sinensis, Sept. 2013, T.W. Hou, living culture LC3496; Hainan Province, on the leaf of Musa paradisiaca, 21 Sept. 2015, F.J. Liu, living culture LC6984 = WM218; ibid., LC6989 = WM223; ibid., LC6992 = WM226; ibid., LC7018 = WM252; ibid., LC7044 = WM278; Jiangxi Province, on Camellia sinensis, 24 Apr. 2013, F. Liu, living culture LC3287; on Castanopsis sp., 6 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC2710; ibid., LC4460; Yunnan Province, on Camellia sinensis, 21 April 2015, F. Liu, living culture LC6304 = LF1311.Notes — Five strains representing N. camelliae-sinensis clustered in a well-supported clade (Fig. 2), sister to N. pyriformis (99 % identity in ITS; 99 % identity in TUB2; 96 % identity in TEF1-α). Morphologically, N. camelliae-sinensis differs from N. pyriformis (Fig. 16) in its smaller conidiogenous cells (6–11 × 4.5–8.5 μm vs 7.5–26 × 3.5–8.5 μm) and conidial shape. Nigrospora camelliae-sinensis is comparable to N. lacticolonia (Fig. 11) in conidial size, but its conidiogenous cells are scattered rather than aggregated as in N. lacticolonia.
Fig. 16
Nigrospora pyriformis (from ex-type strain CGMCC3.18122). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 5 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d–f. conidiophores and conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; g–i. conidia. — Scale bars: d–f, i = 20 μm; g–h = 10 μm.
Fig. 11
Nigrospora lacticolonia (from ex-type strain CGMCC3.18123). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 6 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d–f. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; g. conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.
Mei Wang & L. Cai, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB820732; Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Nigrospora chinensis (from ex-type strain CGMCC3.18127). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 5 d after inoculation on PDA medium culture; c. colony on SNA; d–f. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; g–h. sterile cells; i–j. conidia. — Scale bars: d–h = 10 μm; i–j = 20 μm.
Etymology. Named after the country where this species was first collected, China.Type. China, Jiangxi Province, on Machilus breviflora, 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao (HMAS 247069 holotype, ex-type living culture CGMCC3.18127 = LC4575).Hyphae hyaline, smooth, branched, septate, 2–5 μm diam. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, discrete, solitary, determinate, ampulliform, or subspherical, hyaline, 5–9.5 × 4–7 μm (av. = 7.59 ± 1.29 × 5.7 ± 0.72). Sterile cells terminal on hyphae, pale to dark brown, elongated ellipsoidal to clavate, 23–40.5 × 5.5–12.5 μm, or somewhat curved or irregularly angled or lobed. Conidia solitary, globose or subglobose, black, shiny, smooth, aseptate, 10–14 μm diam (av. = 12.19 ± 1.07); ellipsoidal, 10–14.5 × 7.5–11 μm (av. = 11.78 ± 0.75 × 9.18 ± 0.61).Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies floccose, undulate. Colonies growing quickly, initially white, becoming black with age, reaching 9 cm diam in 6 d at 25 °C. On SNA, with sparse aerial mycelia, surface dirty white to greyish, and reverse iron-grey with dark patches but sporulating poorly.Additional specimens examined. China, Guangxi Province, on Camellia sinensis, 7 Sept. 2013, Y. Zhang, living culture LC3441; ibid., living culture LC3493; Hainan Province, on Musa paradisiaca, 25 Dec. 2015, F.J. Liu, living culture LC 6972 = WM206; Jiangxi Province, on Lindera aggregate, 6 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC2696; on Camellia sinensis, 24 Apr. 2013, F. Liu, living culture LC3085; ibid., living culture LC3175; ibid., living culture LC3275; ibid., living culture LC3286; ibid., living culture LC3293; ibid., living culture LC3400; on Aucuba japonica, 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4364; on Castanopsis sp., 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4433; on Itea sp., 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4565; on Machilus duthiei, 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4593; on Osmanthus sp., 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4619; on Quercus sp., 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4660; on Smilax ocreata, 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4673; Yunnan Province, on Camellia sinensis, 19 Apr. 2015, F. Liu, living culture LC6631 = LF1276; Tibet, 14 June 2015, Q. Chen, living culture LC6851 = WM085.Notes — Strains of N. chinensis constitutes a distinct clade on concatenated gene trees with a high support value and basal to all other Nigrospora species (Fig. 2). Morphologically it is similar to N. gallarum, reported from dead larvae of Lipara lucens from France (Mason 1927). However, N. chinensis differs from N. gallarum in producing longer sterile cells (23–40.5 μm vs max. 18 μm).Novobr., Novosti Sist. Nizsh. Rast. 9: 180. 1972 — Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Nigrospora gorlenkoana (from ex-isotype strain CBS 480.73). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 6 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d–g. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; h–i. conidia. — Scale bars: d–h = 10 μm; i = 20 μm.
Type. Kazakhstan, Alma-Ata region, from Vitis vinifera, leaf and fruit, 1972, T.I. Novobranova (isotype CBS H-7430, ex-isotype living culture CBS 480.73 = ATCC 24718 = IMI 174726 = VKMF-1761).Hyphae smooth, hyaline, branched, septate, 1.5–4.5 μm diam. Conidiophores micronematous or semi-macronematous, flexuous or straight, pale brown, smooth, 2–6 μm thick. Conidiogenous cells pale brown, monoblastic, discrete, solitary, determinate, doliiform to ampulliform, 7–13.5 × 4–9 μm (av. = 10.09 ± 1.94 × 5.98 ± 1.11). Conidia sparse, solitary, globose or subglobose, pale brown to black, discrete on aerial mycelia, 11.5–17 μm diam (av. = 14.79 ± 1.21), shiny, smooth, with equatorial slit.Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies flat, woolly, spreading, initially white, becoming greyish with age. Colonies reaching 9 cm in 6 d at 25 °C. On SNA, colonies flat, with sparse mycelia and growing poorly, reverse with no patches, sporulating poorly.Notes — Nigrospora gorlenkoana is currently listed as a synonym of N. oryzae in MycoBank. However, we could not find any literature in support of this synonymy. Our multi-locus molecular phylogeny herein also depicts that these two species cannot be considered as conspecific. These two species are also morphologically distinct. The conidiophores of N. gorlenkoana are discrete, solitary, rather than aggregated in clusters as in N. oryzae, and the conidial colour of N. gorlenkoana is paler brown than that of N. oryzae. Equatorial slits are present in some conidia of N. gorlenkoana, but absent in N. oryzae. However, the affinities of the ex-type of N. gorlenkoana are still unresolved as it is an independent taxon and its relationships to N. hainanensis as well as N. musae lack support (Fig. 2).Mei Wang & L. Cai, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB820733; Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Nigrospora guilinensis (from ex-type strain CGMCC3.18124). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 9 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d–e. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; f. conidia. — Scale bars: d–e = 10 μm; f = 20 μm.
Etymology. Referring to the location where the holotype was collected, Guilin.Type. China, Guangxi Province, on Camellia sinensis, 7 Sept. 2013, T.W. Hou (HMAS 247072 holotype, ex-type living culture CGMCC3.18124 = LC3481).Hyphae smooth, hyaline to pale brown, branched, septate, 1.5–4 μm diam. Conidiophores usually reduced to conidiogenous cells, aggregated in clusters on hyphae. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, determinate, hyaline, smooth, doliiform to clavate to ampulliform, in clusters on aerial mycelia, 6–11 × 4–7.5 μm (av. = 8.73 ± 1.33 × 6.01 ± 0.64). Conidia solitary, black, shiny, smooth, aseptate, spherical, 11.5–15 μm diam (av. = 12.91 ± 0.7), ellipsoidal, 10.5–14 × 8–12 μm (av. = 12.46 ± 0.62 × 9.69 ± 0.71).Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies woolly, cottony, margin irregular. Colonies growing slowly, dirty white to greyish and producing red pigment after 3 wk. Colonies reaching 9 cm after 14 d at 25 °C. Reverse dirty white to light pink with black patches due to pigment. On SNA, colonies flat, growing slowly, mycelia partially immersed in the medium, surface dirty white to grey and reverse pale brown with black patches.Additional specimen examined. China, Jiangxi Province, on the stem of Nelumbo sp., 21 Sept. 2015, M.F. Hu, culture LC7301 = JAUCC0673.Notes — Two strains representing N. guilinensis clustered in a well-supported clade (Fig. 2), which appeared closely related to N. vesicularis (98 % identity in ITS; 84 % in TEF1-α; 92 % in TUB2), N. aurantiaca (98 % in ITS; 83 % in TEF1-α; 91 % in TUB2), N. osmanthi (98 % in ITS; 86 % in TEF1-α; 91% in TUB2) and N. lacticolonia (98 % in ITS; 84 % in TEF1-α; 91 % in TUB2). Nigrospora guilinensis is morphologically distinct from these four species. It differs from N. vesicularis (Fig. 20) in the absence of a vesicle, from N. aurantiaca (Fig. 4) in producing different pigment in culture (red pigment in N. guilinensis vs orange pigment in N. aurantiaca ), from N. osmanthi (Fig. 15) in the arrangement of conidiogenous cells (aggregated in clusters in N. guilinensis vs scattered in N. osmanthi) and from N. lacticolonia (Fig. 11) in the smaller ellipsoidal conidia (10.5–14 × 8–12 μm vs 13.5–17.5 × 10.5–13.5 μm).
Fig. 20
Nigrospora vesicularis (from ex-type strain CGMCC3.18128). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 5 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d–h. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; i. conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.
Fig. 15
Nigrospora osmanthi (from ex-type strain CGMCC3.18126). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 8 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d–g. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; h. conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.
Mei Wang & L. Cai, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB820734; Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Nigrospora hainanensis (from ex-type strain CGMCC3.18129). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 5 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d–e. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; f–g. setae; h. conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.
Etymology. Named after the province in China where the type was collected, Hainan.Type. China, Hainan Province, on a leaf of Musa paradisiaca, 21 Sept. 2015, F.J. Liu (HMAS 247064 holotype, ex-type living culture CGMCC3.18129 = LC7030).Hyphae smooth, hyaline to pale brown, branched, septate, 2–6 μm diam. Conidiophores usually reduced to conidiogenous cells, which are dispersed on hyphae. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, discrete, solitary, determinate, hyaline, smooth, globose or ampulliform, 6.5–12.5 × 4.5–9.5 μm (av. = 8.89 ± 1.28 × 6.85 ± 0.94). Conidia sphaerical or ellipsoidal, solitary, black, shiny, smooth, aseptate, spherical, 12.5–17.5 μm diam (av. = 15.39 ± 1.04), ellipsoidal 13.5–19 × 9–16.5 μm (av. = 15.98 ± 0.98 × 12.11 ± 1.25). Setae straight to irregularly curved, black, smooth, subcylindrical, tapering in apical cell to subobtuse or obtuse apex, base truncate, up to 60 μm long, 5–12 μm diam.Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies floccose, margin circular, growing rapidly, initially white, becoming black with age, reaching 9 cm diam in 5 d at 25 °C. On SNA, colonies spreading, not flat, mycelia partially immersed in the medium, cottony, surface grey to black and reverse with dark grey patches at the edge and black in the middle due to abundant sporulation.Additional specimens examined. China, Hainan Province, on the leaf of Musa paradisiaca, 21 Sept. 2015, F.J. Liu, living culture, LC6979 = WM213; ibid., living culture LC7031 = WM265; ibid., living culture LC7042 = WM276.Notes — All strains of N. hainanensis were isolated from Musa paradisiaca from Hainan, China, and they clustered in a well-supported clade (Fig. 2), appearing closely related to N. gorlenkoana (99 % identity in ITS; 84 % in TEF1-α; 95 % in TUB2). These two species could be morphologically differentiated from each other based on conidial colour, which is darker in N. hainanensis. Morphologically, N. hainanensis also resembles N. guilinensis (Fig. 9), but differs in the arrangement of conidiogenous cells (dispersed on aerial mycelia, discrete, solitary, unbranched in N. hainanensis vs clustered on aerial mycelia, or forming black sporodochial conidiomata in N. guilinensis) and setae (present in N. hainanensis vs absent in N. guilinensis). Another two Nigrospora species, i.e., N. musae and N. canescens have also been reported from Musa spp. Nigrospora hainanensis differs in producing smaller conidia (spherical, 12.5–17.5 μm diam in N. hainanensis vs globose or subglobose, 15–19.5 μm in N. musae, and subglobose, 19 × 17 μm in N. canescens) and the presence of setae.Mei Wang & L. Cai, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB820735; Fig. 11Etymology. Named after the creamy white colony colour on PDA and SNA.Type. China, Jiangxi Province, on Camellia sinensis, 24 Apr. 2013, F. Liu (HMAS 247070 holotype, ex-type living culture CGMCC 3.18123 = LC3324).Hyphae smooth, hyaline, branched, septate, 1.5–4 μm diam. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells aggregated in clusters on hyphae, pale brown, finely verruculose, globose to clavate to doliiform, 6.5–11.5 × 5.5–9 μm (av. = 8.29 ± 1.11 × 6.82 ± 0.73). Conidia solitary, spherical or slightly ellipsoidal, black, shiny, smooth, aseptate, spherical 11.5–16.5 μm diam (av. = 14.36 ± 1.04), ellipsoidal 13.5–17.5 × 10.5–13.5 μm (av. = 15.21 ± 0.75 × 11.72 ± 0.66).Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies floccose, entire edge, surface and reverse creamy white, with dark brown patches in the reverse, reaching 9 cm diam in 6 d at 25 °C. On SNA, colonies flat, surface and reverse remains white and black patches in the reverse, with moderate aerial mycelia, growing very quickly, but sporulating after 2 wk.Additional specimen examined. China, Hainan Province, on Musa paradisiaca, 25 Dec. 2015, F.J. Liu, living culture LC7009 = WM243.Notes — Two strains representing N. lacticolonia clustered in a well-supported clade which is closely related to N. osmanthi (100 % identity in ITS; 91 % in TEF1-α; 98 % in TUB2), but they could be distinguished from one another based on the morphology of their conidiogenous cells (Fig. 11, 17).McLennan & Hoëtte, Aust. Inst. Sci. Industr. Res. Bull. 75: 15. 1933 — Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Nigrospora musae (from ex-type strain CBS 319.34). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 7 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d. conidiophores; e–g. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; h. conidia. — Scale bars: d = 20 μm; e–h = 10 μm.
Type. Australia, from the fruit of Musa sapientum, 1933, E. McLennan (ex-type culture CBS 319.34 = MUCL 8368).Hyphae pale brown, smooth, branched, septate, 2–6 μm diam. Conidiophores aggregated in black sporodochia, micronematous or semi-macronematous, flexuous or straight, pale brown, smooth, much branched, 3.5–8 μm diam, some conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells aggregated, pale brown, monoblastic, subglobose to ampulliform, 6.5–14 × 6–9 μm (av. = 9.16 ± 1.49 × 7.45 ± 0.74); hyaline vesicles (Fig. 12, arrowed) delimiting the conidia from conidiogenous cells. Conidia sparse, solitary, globose or subglobose, black, shiny, smooth, 15–19.5 (mostly 16–18 μm) (av. = 17.01 ± 0.84).Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies woolly, margin circular. Colonies initially white, becoming dark grey with age, most mycelia immersed, and the reverse were olive-citrine, reaching 9 cm diam in 7 d at 25 °C. On SNA, colonies flat, the aerial mycelia growing sparsely, most mycelia immersed, reverse olivaceous grey with black patches, with abundantly sporulation.Additional specimen examined. China, Guizhou Province, on Camellia sinensis, 21 July 2014, Z.F. Zhang, living culture, LC6385 = LF1013.Notes — Nigrospora musae was originally described from fruit of Musa sapientum in Australia (McLennan & Hoëtte 1933), but the ex-type strain (CBS 319.34) appeared to be sterile. We therefore re-described it based on a freshly collected strain LC6385 (similarity: 99 % identity in ITS; 99 % in TEF1-α; 99 % in TUB2) from Camellia sinensis. The description of N. musae was emended in this study, adding the presence of hyaline vesicles. Nigrospora canescens, originally reported from leaves of Musa sapientum (McLennan & Hoëtte 1933), was never isolated from the fruits and was endophytic in banana. Moreover, N. canescens sporulates more quickly and abundantly than N. musae in culture.(Berk. & Broome) Petch, J. Indian Bot. Soc. 4: 24. 1924 — Fig. 13, 14
Fig. 13
Nigrospora oryzae (from slide of holotype K(M) 99832). a–b. Overview of the type specimen; c–e. conidiophores; f. conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.
Fig. 14
Nigrospora oryzae (LC7293). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 7 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d. conidiophores; e–f. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; g. conidia. — Scale bars: d–e = 20 μm; f–g = 10 μm.
Basionym. Monotospora oryzae Berk. & Broome, J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 14: 99. 1873.Synonym. Khuskia oryzae H.J. Huds., Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 46: 358. 1963.Type. Sri Lanka, Jaffra, H.S.O. Russell, Esq. Government Agent of the Northern Provinces, from rice leaves, 1873, Berk. & Broome (IMI 99832, slide of holotype).Hyphae branched, septate, smooth, hyaline, 2–6 μm diam, becoming brown closer to the conidiogenous region. Conidiophores aggregated in black sporodochia, micronematous or semi-macronematous, multiseptate, extensively branched, flexuous or straight, pale brown, smooth, 3–7 μm diam; sometimes reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells aggregating in clusters on hyphae, monoblastic, determinate, ampulliform or subspherical, hyaline, 4–13 × 3–8.5 μm (av. = 8.26 ± 1.03 × 6.45 ± 0.76). Conidia formed abundantly, solitary, globose or subglobose, black, shiny, smooth, aseptate, 12.5–16 (mostly 12–14) μm diam (av. = 14.26 ± 0.79, n = 50). Perithecia formed in clusters of 1–7, uniseriate or in irregular rows, up to 2 mm long, subepidermal, erumpent, globose, obovoid, up to 250 μm diam, with papillate ostioles; perithecial clusters surrounded by a blackened area of host tissue. Asci 8-spored, biseriate, short-stalked, unitunicate, clavate, 55–75 × 8.5–12 μm. Paraphyses thin-walled, septate. Ascospores hyaline, granular, curved, inequilateral, 16–21 × 5–7 μm, tapering to the base with rounded ends, initially aseptate but on discharge from the ascus and on germination ascospores may develop a single transverse septum.Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies woolly, floccose, margin circular, growing rapidly, white to grey to black with age, reaching 9 cm diam in 5 d at 25 °C. On SNA, colonies flat, with abundant aerial mycelia, surface and reverse dark brown to black without patches, sporulating quickly and abundantly.Additional specimens examined. China, Fujiang Province, on Pittosporum illicioides, 8 Nov. 2012, Q. Chen, living culture LC4961; Hubei Province, on Citrus reticulate, 25 Sept. 2015, X. Zhou, living culture LC 6893 = WM127; on Oryza sativa, 25 Sept. 2015, X. Zhou, living culture LC 6923 = WM157; ibid., living culture LC 6955 = WM189; ibid., living culture LC 6957 = WM191; ibid., living culture LC 6759 = HBN3-18; ibid., living culture LC 6760 = HBN4-11; ibid., living culture LC 6763 = HBN4-23; ibid., living culture LC 6766 = JXN1-4; Jiangxi Province, on Nelumbo sp., 21 Sept. 2014, M.F. Hu, living culture, LC6029; ibid., living culture LC7299 = JAUCC0669; ibid., living culture LC7300 = JAUCC0672; ibid., living culture LC7305 = JAUCC0708; ibid., living culture LC7306 = JAUCC0709; ibid., living culture LC7308 = JAUCC0713; ibid., living culture LC7309 = JAUCC0757; ibid., living culture LC7310 = JAUCC0758; ibid., living culture LC7311 = JAUCC0767; 15 Sept. 2014, X.X. Zhan, living culture LC7293 = JAUCC0004; ibid., living culture LC7297 = JAUCC00027; on Rhododendron sp., 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture, LC4260; on Osmanthus sp., 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture, LC4679; ibid., living culture LC2689; on Cephalotaxus sinensis, 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4273; on Rhododendron sp., 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4275; on submerged wood, 21 Sept. 2014, M.F. Hu, living culture LC5964; ibid., living culture LC5982; ibid., living culture LC5999; on Neolitsea sp., 6 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC2693; on Rubus reflexus, 6 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC2695; on Hamamelis mollis, 3 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC2699; on Rubus sp., 2 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC2702; on Rhododendron sp., 2 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC2704; ibid., living culture LC2706; ibid., living culture LC2707; ibid., living culture LC2708; ibid., living culture LC2709; on Castanopsis sp., 6 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC2712; on Ternstroemia sp., 3 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC2749; on Osmanthus sp., 4 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC2752; on Symplocos zizyphoides, 2 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC3690; on Daphniphyllum macropodum, 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4294; ibid., living culture LC4295; on Daphniphyllum oldhamii, 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4320, on Camellia sp., living culture LC4327; ibid., living culture LC4345; ibid., living culture LC4680; Qinghai Province, on Pentactina rupicola, 2 Sept. 2013, Q. Chen, living culture LC5181; Sichuan Province, on Tutcheria microcarpa, 5 Oct. 2012, D.M. Hu, living culture LC2972, on Cleyera japonica, 5 Oct. 2012, F. Liu, living culture LC2991.Notes — The type of N. oryzae is preserved in K as two slides, and only partial morphological characters could be observed (Fig. 13), e.g., branched conidiophores, black and globose/subglobose conidia, 12.5–16 μm diam. Although we could not obtain sequences from the type specimen or culture for comparisons, all strains from the original host (rice) isolated in this study clustered in one single clade, sister to N. zimmermanii (Fig. 2), and their morphological characteristics were in good accordance with N. oryzae. Therefore, we regard this clade as N. oryzae.Mei Wang & L. Cai, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB820736; Fig. 15Etymology. Named after the host genus from which the holotype was collected, Osmanthus.Type. China, Jiangxi Province, on Osmanthus sp., 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao (HMAS 247066 holotype, ex-type living culture CGMCC3.18126 = LC4350).Hyphae branched, septate, hyaline to pale brown, 2.5–4.5 μm diam. Conidiophores mostly reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, discrete, solitary, determinate, at first hyaline, subspherical, then turning to pale brown, ampulliform to cylindrical, 5.5–12 × 4–8.5 μm (av. = 8.02 ± 1.5 × 6.04 ± 1.16). Conidia solitary, globose or subglobose, black, shiny, smooth, sometimes formed directly from the mycelia, aseptate, 13.5–16.5 μm diam (av. = 14.87 ± 0.63).Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies flat, floccose, lobate. Colonies growing slowly, initially white, becoming black with age, reaching 9 cm diam in 10 d at 25 °C. On SNA, colonies flat, surface greyish to grey olivaceous with dark grey patches and reverse dark brown with black patches, mycelia sparse on the surface with delayed sporulation.Additional specimen examined. China, Jiangxi Province, on Hedera nepalensis, 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4487.Notes — Two strains representing N. osmanthi clustered in a well-supported clade which is closely related to N. lacticolonia (Fig. 2), but they could be distinguished from one another based on the morphology of their conidiogenous cells (Fig. 11, 17). Morphologically, N. osmanthi also resembles N. oryzae in its conidial size, but differs in its conidiophores that are reduced to conidiogenous cells in N. osmanthi, but branched and clustered in N. oryzae. Nigrospora osmanthi differs from another morphologically similar species, N. gallarum, by the absence of sterile cells.Mei Wang & L. Cai, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB820737; Fig. 16Etymology. Named after the presence of pyriform conidia.Type. China, Jiangxi Province, Citrus reticulata, 11 Mar. 2012, X.M. Tan (HMAS 247067 holotype, ex-type culture CGMCC3.18122 = LC2045).Hyphae smooth, hyaline, branched, septate, 2–6 μm diam. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, discrete, solitary, determinate, ampulliform or subcylindrical, pale brown, 7.5–26 × 3.5–8.5 μm (av. = 13.38 ± 4.81 × 6.31 ± 1.46). Conidia initially pale brown, become black with age, dimorphic, globose to subglobose, black, shiny, smooth, aseptate, 12.5–16.5 μm diam (av. = 15.41 ± 0.77); or pyriform, black, shiny, smooth, aseptate, 17.5–27.5 × 10–18.5 μm (av. = 19.97 ± 4.95 × 11.77 ± 2.53).Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies woolly, floccose, margin circular. Colonies initially white, becoming black with age, reaching 9 cm diam in 7 d at 25 °C. On SNA, colonies flat, spreading, with moderate aerial mycelia, reverse black due to sporulation.Additional specimens examined. China, Hainan Province, on leaves of Musa paradisiaca, 21 Sept. 2015, F.J. Liu, living culture LC6985 = WM219; ibid., LC6988 = WM222; Jiangxi Province, on Camellia sinensis, 24 Apr. 2013, F. Liu, living culture LC3099; ibid., LC3292; on Lindera aggregata, 6 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC2688; on Rubus reflexus, 6 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC2694; on Castanopsis sp., 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4669; on Rosa sp., 2 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC2690.Notes — Five strains representing N. pyriformis clustered in a well-supported clade (Fig. 2), and appeared as a sister clade to N. camelliae-sinensis (99 % identity in ITS; 96 % in TEF1-α; 99 % in TUB2). Morphologically, N. pyriformis is unique in Nigrospora by producing pyriform conidia.Mei Wang & L. Cai, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB820801; Fig. 17Etymology. Named after the host genus on which the holotype was collected, Rubus.Type. China, Jiangxi Province, on Rubus sp., 6 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou (HMAS 246699 holotype, ex-type living culture CGMCC3.18326 = LC2698).Hyphae smooth, hyaline, branched, septate, 2–6 μm diam. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells aggregated in clusters on hyphae, pale brown, subglobose to ampulliform to lageniform, 6.5–14 × 5–9 μm (av. = 9.94 ± 1.71 × 7.16 ± 0.8). Conidia solitary, spherical or subglobose, black, shiny, smooth, aseptate, (11.5–)13–15(–16.5) μm diam (av. = 14.23 ± 0.97).Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies floccose, entire edge, initially white, becoming black with age, reaching 9 cm diam in 6 d at 25 °C, reverse smoke-grey in patches. On SNA, colonies flat, with moderate aerial mycelia, surface dirty white, growing very quickly, but with delayed sporulation. Surface and reverse pale luteous to sienna with greyish patches.Notes — See notes of N. bambusae.(Sacc.) E.W. Mason, Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 12: 158. 1927 — Fig. 18, 19
Fig. 18
Nigrospora sphaerica (from slide of holotype K(M) 103253). a–b. Overview of the type specimen; c. conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.
Fig. 19
Nigrospora sphaerica (from strain LC2840). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 6 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d–g. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; h–i. conidia. — Scale bars: d, h–i = 20 μm; e–g = 10 μm.
Type. USA, Newfield, N.J., from Zea mays, 1822, P.A. Saccardo (slide of holotype, IMI 103253).Basionym. Trichosporum sphaericum Sacc., Michelia 2 (no. 8): 579. 1882.Hyphae smooth, hyaline, branched, septate, 3–8 μm diam. Conidiophores micronematous or semi-macronematous, multiseptate, extensively branched, flexuous or straight, hyaline to pale brown, smooth, 4–8 μm thick; hyaline vesicles (Fig. 19, arrowed) usually surrounding the septum to delimit the conidia and their conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells pale brown, monoblastic, determinate, subspherical, 6–12 μm diam (av. = 7.97 ± 0.99). Conidia are formed abundantly, solitary, globose or subglobose, black, shiny, smooth, aseptate, 16–21 (mostly 16–19) μm diam (av. = 18.22 ± 1.0).Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies floccose, margin circular. Colonies initially white, becoming black with age, reaching 9 cm diam in 6 d at 25 °C. On SNA, colonies flat, spreading, with abundant aerial mycelia, surface greyish and reverse olivaceous grey without patches, sporulating profusely.Additional specimens examined. China, Hainan Province, on Musa paradisiacal, 24 Dec. 2015, F.J. Liu, living culture LC7026 = WM260; ibid., living culture LC6969 = WM 203; ibid., living culture LC6996 = WM 230; ibid., living culture LC 6998 = WM 232; Jiangxi Province, on Nelumbo sp., 25 Feb. 2014, X.X. Zhan, living culture LC7294 = JAUCC0005; ibid., living culture LC7295 = JAUCC0006; ibid., living culture LC7296 = JAUCC0007; ibid., living culture LC7312 = JAUCC0009; ibid., living culture LC7298 = JAUCC00030; on Nelumbo sp., 21 Sept. 2015, M.F. Hu, living culture JAUCC0705; ibid., living culture LC7304 = JAUCC0706; on submerged wood, 24 Aug. 2014, X.T. Wu, living culture LC5944, ibid., living culture LC5966; ibid., living culture LC5901; ibid., living culture LC5932; on Rosa sp., 2 Sept. 2013, N. Zhou, living culture LC2705; on Camellia sinensis, 7 Sept. 2013, Y. Zhang, living culture LC 3420; ibid., living culture LC3477; on Rhododendron sp., 5 Sept. 2014, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4174; ibid., living culture LC4263; ibid., living culture LC4264; ibid., living culture LC4274; ibid., living culture LC4278; ibid., living culture LC4291; ibid., living culture LC4303; ibid., living culture LC4307; ibid., living culture LC4372; on Daphniphyllum macropodum, 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4293; on Deutzia sp., 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4241; unknown host, 5 Sept. 2013, Y.H. Gao, living culture LC4447; Sichuang Province, on Cleyera japonica, 5 Oct. 2012, F. Liu, living culture LC2958; on Camellia sp., 5 Oct. 2013, F. Liu, living culture LC2983; Yunnan Province, on Camellia sinensis, 16 Apr. 2015, F. Liu, living culture LC6294 = LF1301; on Harpullia longipetala, 15 Sept. 2011, F. Liu, living culture LC2839; ibid., living culture LC2840.Notes — We examined the type specimen of N. sphaerica from K, and the conidia were revealed to be globose or subglobose, 16–19(–21) μm diam. The conidial size of all strains in the clade of N. sphaerica (Fig. 2) are consistent with that of the type specimen, and the vesicle structures presented in all of these strains. Although no sequence data were available from the type specimen for comparison, we concluded that these strains represented N. sphaerica. In addition, the ITS sequence of N. sphaerica isolate QY-6 (KP731976) causing leaf blight on Camellia sinensis, also clustered in this clade (Liu et al. 2015). However, this isolate was not added into the multi-locus phylogenetic analysis in this study as all loci could not be successfully amplified.Mei Wang & L. Cai, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB820738; Fig. 20Etymology. Vesicularis, referring to the vesicle, a structure surrounding the septum, delimiting the conidium from its conidiogenous cell.Type. China, Hainan province, on Musa paradisiaca, 25 Dec. 2015, F.J. Liu (HMAS 247071 holotype, ex-type living culture CGMCC 3.18128 = LC7010 = WM244).Hyphae smooth, hyaline, branched, septate, 1.5–4 μm diam. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, discrete, solitary, determinate, scattered, hyaline to pale brown, smooth, doliiform to ampulliform, 7–12.5 × 6–9 μm (av. = 9.13 ± 1.12 × 7.04 ± 0.75). Hyaline vesicles (Fig. 20, arrowed) usually surrounding the septum to delimit the conidia from their conidiogenous cells. Conidia sparse, solitary, globose, subglobose, black, shiny, smooth, aseptate, 12.5–16.5 μm diam (av. = 14.8 ± 0.76, n = 50); or ellipsoidal, 12.5–16.5 × 9–15 μm (av. = 14.7 ± 0.7 × 11.63 ± 1.09).Culture characteristics — On PDA, colonies floccose, entire edge. Colony surface white to greyish and pale luteous reverse, reaching 9 cm diam in 6 d at 25 °C. On SNA, colonies flat, surface dirty white and reverse dirty white to greyish without patches, with abundant aerial mycelia, but with delayed and sparse sporulation.Additional specimen examined. Thailand, Chiang Rai, endophyte of unknown host plant, s.d., D.S. Manamgoda, living culture LC0322.Notes — Two strains representing N. vesicularis clustered in a well-supported clade, and appeared closely related to N. aurantiaca (99 % identity in ITS; 89 % in TEF1-α; 96 % in TUB2), N. lacticolonia (99 % in ITS; 87 % in TEF1-α; 93 % in TUB2) and N. osmanthi (99 % in ITS; 88 % in TEF1-α; 93 % in TUB2). Nigrospora vesicularis differs from N. aurantiaca, N. lacticolonia and N. osmanthi by the presence of vesicles surrounding the septum between its conidiogenous cells and conidia. In addition, conidia of N. vesicularis (globose, 12.5–16.5 μm; ellipsoidal, 12.5–16.5 × 9–15 μm) are much smaller than those of other Nigrospora species which produce vesicles, e.g., N. panici (25–30 × 22–25 μm), N. sphaerica (16–21 μm diam) and N. musae (15–19.5 μm diam).Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB820739; Fig. 21
Fig. 21
Nigrospora zimmermanii (from ex-type strain CBS 290.62). a. Sporulating colony on MEA medium; b–g. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia on SNA. — Scale bars = 10 μm.
Etymology. Named for Albrecht Wilhelm Phillip Zimmerman (1860–1931), who introduced the genus Nigrospora.Type. Ecuador, Ingenio Valdez, on leaf of Saccharum officinarum, 1962, J.L. Bezerra (CBS H-23018 holotype, ex-type living culture CBS 290.62 = IMI 129007).Hyphae hyaline, smooth, branched, septate, 2–3.5 μm diam. Conidiophores solitary or aggregated in sporodochia, subcylindrical, hyaline to pale brown, smooth, 0–2-septate, branched or not, with terminal conidiogenous cells, 10–50 × 3–7 μm. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, discrete, determinate, smooth, hyaline to pale brown, ampulliform, 10–20 × 5–7 μm. Conidia solitary, spherical or ellipsoid, dark brown, granular, smooth, (11–)14–16(–18) × (14–)15–16(–18) μm (av. = 15 × 15.5).Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA floccose, margin circular, regular, reaching 9 cm diam in 7 d at 25 °C, surface and reverse olivaceous grey. On SNA, spreading, flat, with immersed mycelia and sparse aerial hyphae.Additional specimens examined. Brazil, Salvador, Bahia, on leaf of Saccharum officinarum, Oct. 1969, C. Ram, CBS H-15168, living culture CBS 984.69 = DSM 3392. – Unknown location, C. van Overeem, living culture CBS 167.26.Notes — Three strains representing N. zimmermanii clustered in a well-supported clade, and closely to N. oryzae (97 % identity in ITS; 82 % in TEF1-α; 89 % in TUB2). Nigrospora zimmermanii differs from N. oryzae by its larger conidiogenous cells (10–20 × 5–7 μm vs 4.0–13.0 × 3.0–8.5 μm) and different shaped, larger conidia ((11–)14–16(–18) × (14–)15–16(–18) μm vs 12–14(–16) μm diam).
SPECIES EXCLUDED FROM NIGROSPORA
(Hol.-Jech.), Mei Wang & L. Cai, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB820740; Fig. 22
Fig. 22
Arthrinium vietnamensis (from ex-type strain IMI 99670). a–b. Upper surface and reverse overview of culture 6 d after inoculation on PDA medium; c. colony on SNA; d–g. conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia; h. globose conidia in surface view. — Scale bars = 10 μm.
Basionym. Nigrospora vietnamensis Hol.-Jech., Česká Mykol. 17: 19. 1963.Synonym. Arthrinium malaysianum Crous in Crous &J.Z. Groenew., IMA Fungus 144: 2013.Descriptions — See Jechová (1963) and Crous et al. (2013).Specimen examined. Vietnam, on decayed fruit of Citrus sinensis, 1960, deposited in CABI in 1963, V. Jechova, ex-type living culture IMI 99670.Notes — Arthrinium is morphologically similar to the genus Nigrospora in many aspects, such as the deeply pigmented conidia with a germ slit, presence of setae, abnormal conidia and violent spore discharge mechanism (Minter 1985, Webster 1952, 1966). The most peculiar difference between these two genera is that only one conidium is produced on each conidiogenous cell in Nigrospora, while the conidia of Arthrinium are usually produced in clusters, and two or more conidia are produced on each conidiogenous cell (Minter 1985, Crous et al. 2013).The ex-type strain of N. vietnamensis (IMI 99670) produces aggregated, brown and globose conidia, about 5–6 μm diam in surface view, 3–4 μm diam in side view, and the conidia are much smaller and paler-coloured than that of other species of Nigrospora. In the LSU tree (Fig. 1), strain IMI 99670 is nested within the Arthrinium clade, and cluster together with A. malaysianum. Other analyses based on ITS phylogeny (results not shown) also demonstrated that the ex-type strain of N. vietnamensis and A. malaysianum are conspecific. Morphological data available herein also support that these two species should be conspecific. Therefore, a new combination Arthrinium vietnamensis is proposed because Nigrospora vietnamensis is the older name.
DISCUSSION
In this study Nigrospora was confirmed as belonging to the family Apiosporaceae (Xylariales, Sordariomycetes). Based on the newly accepted unitary nomenclature (Hawksworth et al. 2011), the sexual morph, Khusia, is accepted as synonym of Nigrospora. In previous studies, species of Nigrospora were primarily delimited via a comparison of morphological characters, especially conidial dimensions (Mason 1927, 1933). However, as we have shown here, conidial sizes frequently overlap among morphologically similar, but phylogenetically distinct species of Nigrospora. For instance, conidia of N. musae (15–)16–18(–19.5 μm) and N. sphaerica 16–19(–21) μm are similar, but the two species are phylogenetically distinct (Fig. 2). Overlapping morphologies are commonly observed among Nigrospora species, such as N. osmanthi and N. camelliaesinensis, as well as N. lacticolonia and N. vesicularis, resulting in ambiguity in the traditional taxonomic treatments of this genus. The phylogenetic investigations among Nigrospora species in this study significantly stabilise the taxonomy of the genus, as well as provide a classification framework for future species discovery. It also underlines the fact that in future studies species of Nigrospora would best be distinguished based on a combination of morphological and molecular data, rather than one without the other.This study contributed to an increase in the number of known species in Nigrospora from 15 to 27, with the descriptions of five previously known species (i.e., N. arundinacea, N. gorlenkoana, N. musae, N. oryzae and N. sphaerica) emended with additional characters (conidiogenous cells, sterile cells and the presence of vesicles and setae) through careful examination of type specimens or fresh collections. New species were characterised employing morphological and molecular characters, as well as information of host associations and ecological distributions. Another two distinct clades (Fig. 2) representing two distinct phylogenetic species are not named and described because they remained sterile in culture in spite of all attempts to induce sporulation.Type specimens of a few known species in Nigrospora have not been available for molecular study, which to some extent impeded the full resolution of species relationships. For example, the conidial dimensions of N. gossypii (12–13.6 μm diam) was inseparable from that of N. oryzae (12.5–16 μm diam). Jaczewski (1929), however, treated them as distinct species based on the fact that the latter had only been recorded on monocotyledons, and was not known from Russia and Central Asia. The type of the genus, N. panici, was reported from Panicum amphibium from Java (Zimmerman 1902) and its holotype has been lost. Unfortunately, to date we have been unable to find a suitable specimen to neotypify this species. Nevertheless, Nigrospora (= Khusia) has been shown to be a monophyletic genus in the Apiosporaceae.Overall the data presented here revealed that, for the most part, species of Nigrospora do not display evidence of host or geographical limitation (Palmateer et al. 2003, Wu et al. 2014, Eken et al. 2016). Comparing the heatmap (Fig. 23) with the phylogeny (Fig. 1, 2), it is noteworthy that the top three most ubiquitous Nigrospora species (i.e., N. sphaerica, N. oryzae, N. chinensis), all belong to early divergent species in the genus (Fig. 2). On the other hand, species hitherto only known from a single host genus include N. arundinacea, N. bambusae, N. canescens, N. gorlenkoana, N. gossypii, N. hainanensis, N. javanica, N. padwickii and N. rubi (Fig. 23). Among these, N. bambusae, N. gorlenkoana, N. hainanensis and N. rubi have available DNA sequences and thus have been analysed for their phylogenetic relationships. Interestingly, these four species clustered in the upper part of the tree (Fig. 2), which unambiguously belong to the recently evolved taxa in the genus. This is a strong indication that the general evolutionary trend in Nigrospora is from species with a wide to a narrow host range. The latter generally refers to species that are considered to be plant pathogens, and that are more important to agriculture and forestry management.
Fig. 23
Heat-map showing the fungal distribution on host (genus level).
Authors: Fredrik Ronquist; Maxim Teslenko; Paul van der Mark; Daniel L Ayres; Aaron Darling; Sebastian Höhna; Bret Larget; Liang Liu; Marc A Suchard; John P Huelsenbeck Journal: Syst Biol Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 15.683
Authors: P W Crous; U Braun; G C Hunter; M J Wingfield; G J M Verkley; H-D Shin; C Nakashima; J Z Groenewald Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2013-06-30 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: Q Chen; M Bakhshi; Y Balci; K D Broders; R Cheewangkoon; S F Chen; X L Fan; D Gramaje; F Halleen; M Horta Jung; N Jiang; T Jung; T Májek; S Marincowitz; I Milenković; L Mostert; C Nakashima; I Nurul Faziha; M Pan; M Raza; B Scanu; C F J Spies; L Suhaizan; H Suzuki; C M Tian; M Tomšovský; J R Úrbez-Torres; W Wang; B D Wingfield; M J Wingfield; Q Yang; X Yang; R Zare; P Zhao; J Z Groenewald; L Cai; P W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 25.731
Authors: Ashok K Sharma; Sam Davison; Barbora Pafco; Jonathan B Clayton; Jessica M Rothman; Matthew R McLennan; Marie Cibot; Terence Fuh; Roman Vodicka; Carolyn Jost Robinson; Klara Petrzelkova; Andres Gomez Journal: NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 8.462
Authors: Sun Lul Kwon; Myung Soo Park; Seokyoon Jang; Young Min Lee; Young Mok Heo; Joo-Hyun Hong; Hanbyul Lee; Yeongseon Jang; Ji-Hyun Park; Changmu Kim; Gyu-Hyeok Kim; Young Woon Lim; Jae-Jin Kim Journal: IMA Fungus Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.515
Authors: Sirinapa Konta; Kevin D Hyde; Prapassorn D Eungwanichayapant; Samantha C Karunarathna; Milan C Samarakoon; Jianchu Xu; Lucas A P Dauner; Sasith Tharanga Aluthwattha; Saisamorn Lumyong; Saowaluck Tibpromma Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2021-05-26
Authors: Rahil Said Al-Badi; Thamodini Gaya Karunasinghe; Abdullah Mohammed Al-Sadi; Issa Hashil Al-Mahmooli; Rethinasamy Velazhahan Journal: Pol J Microbiol Date: 2020