Literature DB >> 32104168

Linosporopsis, a new leaf-inhabiting scolecosporous genus in Xylariaceae.

Hermann Voglmayr1,2, Ludwig Beenken3.   

Abstract

Based on molecular phylogenetic and morphological evidence, the new genus Linosporopsis (Xylariales) is established for several species previously classified within Linospora (Diaporthales). Fresh collections of Linospora ischnotheca from dead overwintered leaves of Fagus sylvatica and of L. ochracea from dead overwintered leaves of Malus domestica, Pyrus communis, and Sorbus intermedia were isolated in pure culture, and molecular phylogenetic analyses of a multi-locus matrix of partial nuITS-LSU rDNA, RPB2 and TUB2 sequences as well as morphological investigations revealed that both species are unrelated to the diaporthalean genus Linospora, but belong to Xylariaceae sensu stricto. The new combinations Linosporopsis ischnotheca and L. ochracea are proposed, the species are described and illustrated, and their basionyms lecto- and epitypified. Linospora faginea is synonymized with L. ischnotheca. Based on similar morphology and ecology, Linospora carpini and Linospora magnagutiana from dead leaves of Carpinus betulus and Sorbus torminalis, respectively, are also combined in Linosporopsis. The four accepted species of Linosporopsis are illustrated, a key to species is provided and their ecology is discussed.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1 new name; 4 new combinations; Ascomycota; Diaporthales; Leaf endophytes; Linospora; Molecular phylogeny; Systematics; Xylariales

Year:  2020        PMID: 32104168      PMCID: PMC7008769          DOI: 10.1007/s11557-020-01559-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mycol Prog        ISSN: 1617-416X            Impact factor:   2.847


Introduction

The genus Linospora was established by Fuckel (1870) for five species growing on dead leaves of Salicaeae. He did not designate a generic type, but Clements and Shear (1931) selected Linospora capreae, which grows on Salix caprea, as lectotype. The genus is characterized by long, filiform ascospores arranged in a single fascicle within the ascus, and by reduced black stromata embedded in dead leaf tissue containing usually one (in L. ceuthocarpa up to six) perithecia with laterally inserted ostioles. The black stromata appear in spring and are noticeable as black dots of ca. 0.5–1 mm diam on both sides of the dead, usually bleached leaves. The characteristics of ascomata and asci are clearly diaporthalean, and its classification within Gnomoniaceae (Monod 1983; Barr 1990) has also been corroborated by molecular phylogenetic analyses (Mejía et al. 2008). So far, the about eight accepted species of Linospora inhabit leaves of Salix or Populus spp. (Salicaceae), but morphological evidence suggests the presence of additional undescribed species on Salicaceae (Monod 1983). Soon after its description, additional species with long filiform ascospores and black ascomata or stromata embedded in leaf tissues were added to Linospora. However, critical morphological re-investigations by Monod (1983) revealed that many of these are not diaporthalean and therefore unrelated to the generic type. Five of them, L. carpini from leaves of Carpinus betulus; L. faginea, and L. ischnotheca from leaves of Fagus sylvatica; L. magnagutiana from leaves of Sorbus torminalis and L. ochracea from leaves of various other rosaceous hosts from subtribe Pyrinae, were considered to be synonymous and to belong to the genus Ophiodothella (Phyllachoraceae), but Monod (1983) neither provided a detailed reasoning nor proposed a formal combination. Thus, in the lack of additional detailed studies, the nomenclature, systematic affiliation and taxonomic status of these five species remained unresolved. Recent fresh collections of L. ischnotheca and L. ochracea provided the opportunity to study their morphology in detail and to isolate them in pure culture for sequencing. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of a multi-locus matrix of nuITS-LSU rDNA, RPB2 and TUB2 sequences and morphological studies including type material enabled us to resolve their systematic affiliation, to evaluate their species status and taxonomy, and to propose a revised classification, the results of which we report here.

Materials and methods

Sample sources

All isolates included in this study originated from ascospores of freshly collected specimens. Details of the strains including NCBI GenBank accession numbers of gene sequences used to compute the phylogenetic trees are listed in Table 1. Strain acronyms other than those of official culture collections are used here primarily as strain identifiers throughout the work. Representative isolates have been deposited at the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Centre (CBS-KNAW), Utrecht, The Netherlands. Details of the specimens used for morphological investigations are listed in the Taxonomy section under the respective descriptions. Herbarium acronyms are according to Thiers (2019), and citation of exsiccata follows Triebel and Scholz (2019). Specimens have been deposited in the Fungaria of the Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna (WU) and of the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ZT).
Table 1

Isolates and accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses. Isolates/sequences in bold were isolated/sequenced in the present study

SpeciesSpecimen or strain numberaOriginStatusbGenBank accession numberscReferences
ITSLSURPB2TUB2
Amphirosellinia fushanensisHAST 91111209TaiwanHTGU339496N/AGQ848339GQ495950Hsieh et al. (2010)
Amphirosellinia nigrosporaHAST 91092308TaiwanHTGU322457N/AGQ848340GQ495951Hsieh et al. (2010)
Annulohypoxylon annulatumCBS 140775TexasETKY610418KY610418KY624263KX376353Kuhnert et al. (2017), Wendt et al. (2018)
Annulohypoxylon atroroseumATCC 76081ThailandAJ390397KY610422KY624233DQ840083Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Annulohypoxylon michelianumCBS 119993SpainKX376320KY610423KY624234KX271239Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Annulohypoxylon moriformeCBS 123579MartiniqueKX376321KY610425KY624289KX271261Kuhnert et al. (2017), Wendt et al. (2018)
Annulohypoxylon nitensMFLUCC 12–0823ThailandKJ934991KJ934992KJ934994KJ934993Daranagama et al. (2015)
Annulohypoxylon stygiumMUCL 54601French GuianaKY610409KY610475KY624292KX271263Wendt et al. (2018)
Annulohypoxylon truncatumCBS 140778TexasETKY610419KY610419KY624277KX376352Kuhnert et al. (2017), Wendt et al. (2018)
Anthostomelloides krabiensisMFLUCC 15–0678ThailandHTKX305927KX305928KX305929N/ATibpromma et al. (2017)
Astrocystis concavisporaMFLUCC 14–0174ItalyKP297404KP340545KP340532KP406615Daranagama et al. (2015)
Barrmaelia macrosporaCBS 142768AustriaETKC774566KC774566MF488995MF489014Jaklitsch et al. 2014, Voglmayr et al. (2018)
Barrmaelia moravicaCBS 142769AustriaETMF488987MF488987MF488996MF489015Voglmayr et al. (2018)
Barrmaelia oxyacanthaeCBS 142770AustriaMF488988MF488988MF488997MF489016Voglmayr et al. (2018)
Barrmaelia rappaziiCBS 142771NorwayHTMF488989MF488989MF488998MF489017Voglmayr et al. (2018)
Barrmaelia rhamnicolaCBS 142772FranceETMF488990MF488990MF488999MF489018Voglmayr et al. (2018)
Biscogniauxia arimaWSP 122MexicoITEF026150N/AGQ304736AY951672Hsieh et al. (2005, 2010)
Biscogniauxia atropunctataY.M.J. 128USAJX507799N/AJX507778AY951673Hsieh et al. (2005), Mirabolfathy et al. (2013)
Biscogniauxia marginataMFLUCC 12–0740FranceKJ958407KJ958408KJ958409KJ958406Daranagama et al. (2015)
Biscogniauxia nummulariaMUCL 51395FranceETKY610382KY610427KY624236KX271241Wendt et al. (2018)
Biscogniauxia repandaATCC 62606USAKY610383KY610428KY624237KX271242Wendt et al. (2018)
Camillea obulariaATCC 28093Puerto RicoKY610384KY610429KY624238KX271243Wendt et al. (2018)
Camillea tinctorY.M.J. 363MartiniqueJX507806N/AJX507790JX507795Mirabolfathy et al. (2013)
Clypeosphaeria mamillanaCBS 140735FranceETKT949897KT949897MF489001N/AJaklitsch et al. 2016, Voglmayr et al. (2018)
Collodiscula bambusaeGZU H0102ChinaKP054279KP054280KP276675KP276674Li et al. (2015)
Collodiscula fangjingshanensisGZU H0109ChinaHTKR002590KR002591KR002592KR002589Li et al. (2015)
Collodiscula japonicaCBS 124266ChinaJF440974JF440974KY624273KY624316Jaklitsch and Voglmayr (2012), Wendt et al. (2018)
Creosphaeria sassafrasSTMA 14087ArgentinaKY610411KY610468KY624265KX271258Wendt et al. (2018)
Daldinia andinaCBS 114736EcuadorHTAM749918KY610430KY624239KC977259Bitzer et al. (2008), Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Daldinia bambusicolaCBS 122872ThailandHTKY610385KY610431KY624241AY951688Hsieh et al. (2005), Wendt et al. (2018)
Daldinia caldariorumMUCL 49211FranceAM749934KY610433KY624242KC977282Bitzer et al. (2008), Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Daldinia concentricaCBS 113277GermanyAY616683KY610434KY624243KC977274Triebel et al. (2005), Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Daldinia dennisiiCBS 114741AustraliaHTJX658477KY610435KY624244KC977262Stadler et al. (2014), Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Daldinia eschscholtziiMUCL 45435BeninJX658484KY610437KY624246KC977266Stadler et al. (2014), Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Daldinia loculatoidesCBS 113279UKETAF176982KY610438KY624247KX271246Johannesson et al. (2000), Wendt et al. (2018)
Daldinia macaronesicaCBS 113040SpainPTKY610398KY610477KY624294KX271266Wendt et al. (2018)
Daldinia petriniaeMUCL 49214AustriaETAM749937KY610439KY624248KC977261Bitzer et al. (2008), Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Daldinia placentiformisMUCL 47603MexicoAM749921KY610440KY624249KC977278Bitzer et al. (2008), Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Daldinia pyrenaicaMUCL 53969FranceKY610413KY610413KY624274KY624312Wendt et al. (2018)
Daldinia steglichiiMUCL 43512Papua New GuineaPTKY610399KY610479KY624250KX271269Wendt et al. (2018)
Daldinia theisseniiCBS 113044ArgentinaPTKY610388KY610441KY624251KX271247Wendt et al. (2018)
Daldinia vernicosaCBS 119316GermanyETKY610395KY610442KY624252KC977260Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Diatrype disciformisCBS 197.49NetherlandsN/ADQ470964DQ470915N/AZhang et al. (2006)
Entoleuca mammataJ.D.R. 100FranceGU300072N/AGQ844782GQ470230Hsieh et al. (2010)
Entonaema liquescensATCC 46302USAKY610389KY610443KY624253KX271248Wendt et al. (2018)
Entosordaria perfidiosaCBS 142773AustriaETMF488993MF488993MF489003MF489021Voglmayr et al. (2018)
Entosordaria quercinaCBS 142774GreeceHTMF488994MF488994MF489004MF489022Voglmayr et al. (2018)
Euepixylon sphaeriostomumJ.D.R. 261USAGU292821N/AGQ844774GQ470224Hsieh et al. (2010)
Eutypa lataUCR-EL1USAJGIJGIJGIJGI
Gnomonia gnomonCBS 199.53ItalyAY818956AF408361EU219295EU219148Castlebury et al. (2002), Sogonov et al. (2005, 2008)
Graphostroma platystomumCBS 270.87FranceJX658535DQ836906KY624296HG934108

Zhang et al. (2006), Stadler et al. (2014),

Koukol et al. (2015), Wendt et al. (2018)

Hypocreodendron sanguineumJ.D.R. 169MexicoGU322433N/AGQ844819GQ487710Hsieh et al. (2010)
Hypomontagnella monticulosaMUCL 54604French GuianaETKY610404KY610487KY624305KX271273Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypomontagnella submonticulosaCBS 115280FranceKC968923KY610457KY624226KC977267Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon carneumMUCL 54177FranceKY610400KY610480KY624297KX271270Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon cercidicolaCBS 119009FranceKC968908KY610444KY624254KC977263Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon crocopeplumCBS 119004FranceKC968907KY610445KY624255KC977268Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon fendleriMUCL 54792French GuianaKF234421KY610481KY624298KF300547Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon fragiformeMUCL 51264GermanyETKC477229KM186295KM186296KX271282Stadler et al. (2013), Daranagama et al. (2015), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon fuscumCBS 113049FranceETKY610401KY610482KY624299KX271271Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon griseobrunneumCBS 331.73IndiaHTKY610402KY610483KY624300KC977303Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon haematostromaMUCL 53301MartiniqueETKC968911KY610484KY624301KC977291Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon howeanumMUCL 47599GermanyAM749928KY610448KY624258KC977277Bitzer et al. (2008), Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon hypomiltumMUCL 51845GuadeloupeKY610403KY610449KY624302KX271249Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon investiensCBS 118183MalaysiaKC968925KY610450KY624259KC977270Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon lateripigmentumMUCL 53304MartiniqueHTKC968933KY610486KY624304KC977290Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon lenormandiiCBS 119003EcuadorKC968943KY610452KY624261KC977273Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon musceumMUCL 53765GuadeloupeKC968926KY610488KY624306KC977280Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon ochraceumMUCL 54625MartiniqueETKC968937N/AKY624271KC977300Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon papillatumATCC 58729USAHTKC968919KY610454KY624223KC977258Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon perforatumCBS 115281FranceKY610391KY610455KY624224KX271250Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon petriniaeCBS 114746FranceHTKY610405KY610491KY624279KX271274Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon pilgerianumSTMA 13455MartiniqueKY610412KY610412KY624308KY624315Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon porphyreumCBS 119022FranceKC968921KY610456KY624225KC977264Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon pulicicidumCBS 122622MartiniqueHTJX183075KY610492KY624280JX183072Bills et al. (2012), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon rickiiMUCL 53309MartiniqueETKC968932KY610416KY624281KC977288Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon rubiginosumMUCL 52887GermanyETKC477232KY610469KY624266KY624311Stadler et al. (2013), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon samuelsiiMUCL 51843GuadeloupeETKC968916KY610466KY624269KC977286Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon ticinenseCBS 115271FranceJQ009317KY610471KY624272AY951757Hsieh et al. (2005), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon trugodesMUCL 54794Sri LankaETKF234422KY610493KY624282KF300548Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylon vogesiacumCBS 115273FranceKC968920KY610417KY624283KX271275Kuhnert et al. (2014), Kuhnert et al. (2017), Wendt et al. (2018)
Jackrogersella cohaerensCBS 119126GermanyKY610396KY610497KY624270KY624314Wendt et al. (2018)
Jackrogersella minutellaCBS 119015PortugalKY610381KY610424KY624235KX271240Kuhnert et al. (2017), Wendt et al. (2018)
Jackrogersella multiformisCBS 119016GermanyETKC477234KY610473KY624290KX271262Kuhnert et al. (2014), Kuhnert et al. (2017), Wendt et al. (2018)
Juglanconis juglandinaCBS 133343AustriaKY427149KY427149KY427199KY427234Voglmayr et al., (2017)
Kretzschmaria deustaCBS 163.93GermanyKC477237KY610458KY624227KX271251Stadler et al. (2013), Wendt et al. (2018)
Linospora capreaeCBS 372.69NetherlandsEU199194EU255199EU199152EU219232Mejía et al. (2008)
Linosporopsis ischnothecaLIF1 = CBS 145761SwitzerlandETMN818952MN818952MN820708MN820715This study
Linosporopsis ischnothecaLIF2SwitzerlandMN818953MN818953MN820709MN820716This study
Linosporopsis ischnothecaLIF3SpainMN818954MN818954MN820710MN820717This study
Linosporopsis ochraceaLIO = CBS 145760SwitzerlandMN818955MN818955MN820711MN820718This study
Linosporopsis ochraceaLIO1AustriaMN818956MN818956MN820712MN820719This study
Linosporopsis ochraceaLIO2GermanyMN818957MN818957MN820713MN820720This study
Linosporopsis ochraceaLIO3 = CBS 145999GermanyETMN818958MN818958MN820714MN820721This study
Lopadostoma dryophilumCBS 133213AustriaETKC774570KC774570KC774526MF489023Jaklitsch et al. 2014, Voglmayr et al. (2018)
Lopadostoma turgidumCBS 133207AustriaETKC774618KC774618KC774563MF489024Jaklitsch et al. 2014, Voglmayr et al. (2018)
Melanconis stilbostomaD143PolandKY427156KY427156KY427206KY427241Voglmayr et al., (2017)
Nemania abortivaBISH 467USAHTGU292816N/AGQ844768GQ470219Hsieh et al. (2010)
Nemania beaumontiiHAST 405MartiniqueGU292819N/AGQ844772GQ470222Hsieh et al. (2010)
Nemania bipapillataHAST 90080610TaiwanGU292818N/AGQ844771GQ470221Hsieh et al. (2010)
Nemania maritimaHAST 89120401TaiwanETN/AN/AGQ844775GQ470225Hsieh et al. (2010)
Nemania maritimaSTMA 04019 = J.F. 03075FranceKY610414KY610414N/AN/AWendt et al. (2018)
Nemania primoluteaHAST 91102001TaiwanHTEF026121N/AGQ844767EF025607Hsieh et al. (2010)
Obolarina dryophilaMUCL 49882FranceGQ428316GQ428316KY624284GQ428322Pažoutová et al. (2010), Wendt et al. (2018)
Podosordaria mexicanaWSP 176MexicoGU324762N/AGQ853039GQ844840Hsieh et al. (2010)
Podosordaria muliWSP 167MexicoHTGU324761N/AGQ853038GQ844839Hsieh et al. (2010)
Poronia pileiformisWSP 88113001TaiwanETGU324760N/AGQ853037GQ502720Hsieh et al. (2010)
Poronia punctataCBS 656.78AustraliaHTKT281904KY610496KY624278KX271281Senanayake et al. (2015), Wendt et al. (2018)
Pyrenopolyporus hunteriMUCL 52673Ivory CoastETKY610421KY610472KY624309KU159530Kuhnert et al. (2017), Wendt et al. (2018)
Pyrenopolyporus laminosusMUCL 53305MartiniqueHTKC968934KY610485KY624303KC977292Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Pyrenopolyporus nicaraguensisCBS 117739Burkina FasoAM749922KY610489KY624307KC977272Bitzer et al. (2008), Kuhnert et al. (2014), Wendt et al. (2018)
Rhopalostroma angolenseCBS 126414Ivory CoastKY610420KY610459KY624228KX271277Wendt et al. (2018)
Rosellinia aquilaMUCL 51703FranceKY610392KY610460KY624285KX271253Wendt et al. (2018)
Rosellinia buxiJ.D.R. 99FranceGU300070N/AGQ844780GQ470228Hsieh et al. (2010)
Rosellinia corticiumMUCL 51693FranceKY610393KY610461KY624229KX271254Wendt et al. (2018)
Rosellinia necatrixCBS 349.36ArgentinaAY909001KF719204KY624275KY624310Pelaez et al. (2008), Wendt et al. (2018)
Rostrohypoxylon terebratumCBS 119137ThailandHTDQ631943DQ840069DQ631954DQ840097Tang et al. (2007), Fournier et al. (2010)
Ruwenzoria pseudoannulataMUCL 51394D. R. CongoHTKY610406KY610494KY624286KX271278Wendt et al. (2018)
Sarcoxylon compunctumCBS 359.61South AfricaKT281903KY610462KY624230KX271255Senanayake et al. (2015), Wendt et al. (2018)
Stilbohypoxylon elaeicolaY.M.J. 173French GuianaEF026148N/AGQ844826EF025616Hsieh et al. (2010)
Stilbohypoxylon quisquiliarumY.M.J. 172French GuianaEF026119N/AGQ853020EF025605Hsieh et al. (2010)
Thamnomyces dendroideaCBS 123578French GuianaHTFN428831KY610467KY624232KY624313Stadler et al. (2010), Wendt et al. (2018)
Xylaria acuminatilongissimaHAST 95060506TaiwanHTEU178738N/AGQ853028GQ502711Hsieh et al. (2010)
Xylaria adscendensJ.D.R. 865ThailandGU322432N/AGQ844818GQ487709Hsieh et al. (2010)
Xylaria arbusculaCBS 126415GermanyKY610394KY610463KY624287KX271257Fournier et al. (2011), Wendt et al. (2018)
Xylaria bambusicolaWSP 205TaiwanHTEF026123N/AGQ844802AY951762Hsieh et al. (2010)
Xylaria brunneovinosaHAST 720MartiniqueHTEU179862N/AGQ853023GQ502706Hsieh et al. (2010)
Xylaria curtaHAST 494MartiniqueGU322444N/AGQ844831GQ495937Hsieh et al. (2010)
Xylaria discolorHAST 131023USAETJQ087405N/AJQ087411JQ087414Hsieh et al. (2010)
Xylaria hypoxylonCBS 122620SwedenETKY610407KY610495KY624231KX271279Sir et al. (2016), Wendt et al. (2018)
Xylaria multiplexHAST 580MartiniqueGU300098N/AGQ844814GQ487705Hsieh et al. (2010)
Xylaria polymorphaMUCL 49884FranceKY610408KY610464KY624288KX271280Wendt et al. (2018)

aATCC, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, USA; BISH, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, USA; CBS, Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; GZU H, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China; HAST, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan; J.D.R., Jack D. Rogers, Washington State University, Pullman, USA; J.F., Jacques Fournier, Rimont, France; MFLUCC, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand; MUCL, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; STMA, Marc Stadler, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung, Braunschweig, Germany; UCR, University of California, Riverside, USA; Y.M.J., Yu-Ming Ju, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan; WSP, Washington State University, Pullman, USA

bET, epitype; HT, holotype; IT, isotype; PT, paratype

cN/A, not available; JGI, sequences retrieved from JGI-DOE (http://genome.jgi.doe.gov/)

Isolates and accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses. Isolates/sequences in bold were isolated/sequenced in the present study Zhang et al. (2006), Stadler et al. (2014), Koukol et al. (2015), Wendt et al. (2018) aATCC, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, USA; BISH, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, USA; CBS, Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; GZU H, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China; HAST, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan; J.D.R., Jack D. Rogers, Washington State University, Pullman, USA; J.F., Jacques Fournier, Rimont, France; MFLUCC, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand; MUCL, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; STMA, Marc Stadler, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung, Braunschweig, Germany; UCR, University of California, Riverside, USA; Y.M.J., Yu-Ming Ju, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan; WSP, Washington State University, Pullman, USA bET, epitype; HT, holotype; IT, isotype; PT, paratype cN/A, not available; JGI, sequences retrieved from JGI-DOE (http://genome.jgi.doe.gov/)

Morphology

Microscopic observations were made in tap water except where noted. Methods of microscopy included stereomicroscopy using a Nikon SMZ 1500 equipped with a Nikon DS-U2 digital camera, and Nomarski differential interference contrast (DIC) using a Zeiss Axio Imager.A1 compound microscope equipped with a Zeiss Axiocam 506 color digital camera. Images and data were gathered using the NIS-Elements D v. 3.22.15 or Zeiss ZEN Blue Edition software packages. Measurements are reported as maxima and minima in parentheses and the range representing the mean plus and minus the standard deviation of a number of measurements given in parentheses.

Culture preparation, DNA extraction, PCR, and sequencing

Isolates were prepared from ascospores as described in Jaklitsch (2009) and grown on MEA or on 2% corn meal agar plus 2% w/v dextrose (CMD). Growth of liquid culture and extraction of genomic DNA was performed as reported previously (Voglmayr and Jaklitsch 2011; Jaklitsch et al. 2012) using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAgen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). The following loci were amplified and sequenced: the complete internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1–5.8S–ITS2) and a ca. 0.9-kb fragment of the large subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA (nuLSU rDNA), amplified and sequenced as a single fragment with primers V9G (de Hoog and Gerrits van den Ende 1998) and LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990); a ca. 1.2-kb fragment of the RNA polymerase II subunit 2 (RPB2) gene with primers dRPB2-5f and dRPB2-7r (Voglmayr et al. 2016a); and a ca. 1.6-kb fragment of the beta-tubulin (TUB2) gene with primers T1D and T22D (Voglmayr et al. 2019). PCR products were purified using an enzymatic PCR cleanup (Werle et al. 1994) as described in Voglmayr and Jaklitsch (2008). DNA was cycle-sequenced using the ABI PRISM Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit v. 3.1 (Applied Biosystems,Warrington, UK) and the PCR primers; in addition, primers ITS4 (White et al. 1990), LR2R-A (Voglmayr et al. 2012) and LR3 (Vilgalys & Hester 1990) were used as internal sequencing primers for the ITS-LSU rDNA region, and BtHV2r (Voglmayr et al. 2016b, 2017) and BtHVf (Voglmayr & Mehrabi 2018) for TUB2. Sequencing was performed on an automated DNA sequencer (ABI 3730xl Genetic Analyzer, Applied Biosystems).

Data analysis

The newly generated sequences were aligned to the sequence alignments of Voglmayr et al. (2018), and GenBank sequences of four taxa of Diaporthales (Gnomonia gnomon, Juglanconis juglandina, Linospora capreae, and Melanconis stilbostoma) were added as the outgroup. Some taxa included in the matrix of Voglmayr et al. (2018) which contained poor or incomplete sequence data and which were not relevant for this study were removed from the matrices. The GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in these analyses are given in Table 1. Sequence alignments for phylogenetic analyses were produced with the server version of MAFFT (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/), checked and refined using BioEdit v. 7.2.6 (Hall 1999). The ITS-LSU rDNA, RPB2 and TUB2 matrices were combined for subsequent phylogenetic analyses. After exclusion of ambiguously aligned regions and long gaps, the final combined data matrix contained 4718 characters (622 nucleotides of ITS, 1355 nucleotides of LSU, 1169 nucleotides of RPB2 and 1572 nucleotides of TUB2). Familial classification of Xylariaceae and pylogenetically related families follows Voglmayr et al. (2018) and Wendt et al. (2018). Maximum parsimony (MP) analyses were performed with PAUP v. 4.0a165 (Swofford 2002). All molecular characters were unordered and given equal weight; analyses were performed with gaps treated as missing data; the COLLAPSE command was set to MINBRLEN. MP analysis of the combined multilocus matrix was done using 1000 replicates of heuristic search with random addition of sequences and subsequent TBR branch swapping (MULTREES option in effect, steepest descent option not in effect). Bootstrap analyses with 1000 replicates were performed in the same way, but using 5 rounds of random sequence addition and subsequent branch swapping during each bootstrap replicate. Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were performed with RAxML (Stamatakis 2006) as implemented in raxmlGUI 1.3 (Silvestro and Michalak 2012), using the ML + rapid bootstrap setting and the GTRGAMMA substitution model with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The matrix was partitioned for the different gene regions. For evaluation and discussion of bootstrap support, values below 70% were considered low, between 70 and 90% medium/moderate and above 90% high.

Results

Molecular phylogeny

The combined multilocus matrix used for phylogenetic analyses comprised 4718 characters, of which 2129 were parsimony informative (360 from ITS, 273 from LSU, 658 from RPB2 and 838 from TUB2). Figure 1 shows a simplified phylogram of the best ML tree (lnL = − 131,936.737) obtained by RAxML. Maximum parsimony analyses revealed four MP trees 31,692 steps long, which were identical except for slightly different positions of Daldinia andina and Stilbohypoxylon quisquiliarum (not shown). The backbone of the MP trees was similar to the ML tree, except for a few minor topological differences of unsupported nodes within the Barrmaeliaceae, Graphostromataceae, Hypoxylaceae and Xylariaceae (not shown). Linospora ischnotheca and L. ochracea were revealed as closely related but distinct species with maximum support (Fig. 1). They were placed remotely from Linospora capreae (Diaporthales) in a basal position within Xylariaceae sensu stricto. A sister-group relationship with the highly (100%, ML) to moderately (89%, MP) supported Clypeosphaeria mamillana-Anthostomelloides krabiensis clade (Fig. 1) received high (98%, ML) or low (53%, MP) bootstrap support. The sequences of Linospora ochracea accessions from Malus domestica, Pyrus communis, and Sorbus intermedia were almost identical, confirming conspecificity of the accessions from these hosts.
Fig. 1

Simplified phylogram of the best ML trees (lnL = − 131,936.737) revealed by RAxML from an analysis of the combined ITS–LSU–RPB2–TUB2 matrix of selected Xylariales, showing the position of Linosporopsis (bold). The large Hypoxylaceae clade, which is not treated in detail, is collapsed to provide sufficient space for the other clades of interest. ML and MP bootstrap support above 60% are given at the first and second positions, respectively, above or below the branches

Simplified phylogram of the best ML trees (lnL = − 131,936.737) revealed by RAxML from an analysis of the combined ITS–LSU–RPB2–TUB2 matrix of selected Xylariales, showing the position of Linosporopsis (bold). The large Hypoxylaceae clade, which is not treated in detail, is collapsed to provide sufficient space for the other clades of interest. ML and MP bootstrap support above 60% are given at the first and second positions, respectively, above or below the branches

Taxonomy

Voglmayr & Beenken, gen. nov. MycoBank: MB 833894. Etymology: referring to its similarity to Linospora. Type species: Linosporopsis ischnotheca (Desm.) Voglmayr & Beenken. Mycelium in dead overwintered leaves, strongly bleaching the host tissue. Pseudostromata immersed in dead leaves, reduced, forming a distinct black clypeus-like structure on both sides of the leaf above and below the single perithecium, composed of dark brown, septate hyphae in dead host epidermis cells and forming a textura epidermoidea-intricata. Ascomata perithecial, scattered, solitary, immersed, (sub)globose, with a central apical papilla. Peridium thin, composed of hyaline, thin-walled, pseudoparenchymatous to prosenchymatous cells forming a textura angularis. Hamathecium of unbranched, thin-walled, hyaline, septate, apically tapering paraphyses. Asci unitunicate, long-cylindrical, with a short stipe, with an indistinct, inamyloid or slightly amyloid apical apparatus, containing 8 ascospores in a single fascicle. Ascospores long-filiform, hyaline, smooth, without visible septa, without sheath or appendages. Asexual morph unknown. Notes: Within Xylariales, the genus is distinctive by long filiform ascospores without obvious septa and by single, scattered clypeate perithecia, which are embedded in a reduced pseudostroma immersed in dead, strongly bleached leaf tissue. The often large, bleached patches on the leaves are highly distinctive, especially when the leaves are wet. Unlike the large, amyloid, wedge-shaped apical apparatus of most Xylariaceae sensu stricto, that of Linosporopsis is indistinct and usually unnoticeable, and only occasionally slightly amyloid (observed only in a single accession each of L. ochracea and L. magnagutiana; see notes below). (J. Schröt.) Voglmayr & Beenken, comb. nov. Fig. 2.
Fig. 2

Linosporopsis carpini (W 2019-02783, isotype). a Colonies (bleached patches) on dead overwintered leaf of Carpinus betulus. b Close up of a colony with black clypeus-like uniperitheciate pseudostromata. c–f Uniperitheciate pseudostromata from above (c, d) and in side view (e, f). g Host epidermis cells with dark brown, septate, branched hyphae forming a textura epidermoidea-intricata. h, i Ascus apices. j–l Asci. m Paraphyses. All in 3% KOH. Scale barsa 10 mm; b 400 μm; c 200 μm; d–f 100 μm; g, j–m 10 μm; h, i 5 μm

Linosporopsis carpini (W 2019-02783, isotype). a Colonies (bleached patches) on dead overwintered leaf of Carpinus betulus. b Close up of a colony with black clypeus-like uniperitheciate pseudostromata. c–f Uniperitheciate pseudostromata from above (c, d) and in side view (e, f). g Host epidermis cells with dark brown, septate, branched hyphae forming a textura epidermoidea-intricata. h, i Ascus apices. j–l Asci. m Paraphyses. All in 3% KOH. Scale barsa 10 mm; b 400 μm; c 200 μm; d–f 100 μm; g, j–m 10 μm; h, i 5 μm MycoBank: MB 833896. Basionym. Linospora carpini J. Schröt., Hedwigia 15: 119. 1876. Pseudostromata immersed in dead overwintered leaves, reduced, forming a distinct black clypeus (353–)384–463(–507) μm wide (n = 17) on both sides of the leaf, consisting of a textura epidermoidea-intricata composed of thick-walled, dark brown, septate hyphae 1.5–3 μm wide in dead host epidermis cells. Ascomata perithecial, scattered, solitary, immersed in dead leaf tissue, globose to ellipsoid, with a distinct central apical papilla 70–140(–185) μm wide at the base. Peridium not observed. Paraphyses unbranched, septate, thin-walled, collabent, 107–120 μm long, 3–5 μm wide at the base and gradually tapering to 1–1.2 μm at the tips. Asci (118–)135–160(–165) × (3.5–)3.7–4.5(–5.0) μm (n = 30), unitunicate, long-cylindrical, with a short stipe, with eight ascospores arranged in a single fascicle, with an indistinct inamyloid apical apparatus. Ascospores (120–)136–158(–162) × 0.7–1.1 μm, l/w = (110–)145–201(–230) (n = 30), filiform, with rounded ends, hyaline, without visible septa, without sheath or appendages. No cultures available. No asexual morph observed. Habitat and host range: Dead overwintered leaves of Carpinus betulus. Distribution: Europe; only known from southwestern Germany and northern Italy. Isotypes: Germany, Baden-Württemberg, Rastatt, Apr. 1876, J. Schröter, in Rabenhorst, Fungi Eur. Exs. 2132 (M-0304424, M-0304425, W 2019–02783). Notes: Although no DNA data are yet available, morphology of ascomata, asci and ascospores leave no doubt that the species belongs to Linosporopsis, and considering the high host specificity of the genus, we recognize L. carpini as a distinct species. Apart from the type collection, this species is to our knowledge only known from an additional collection in northern Italy (Veneto, near Conegliano), which was collected in the same year as the type (Saccardo 1877). On the herbarium label of the type collection, it was stated to be common in the forests around Rastatt; however, we are not aware of any recent collections. The type collection has been edited and distributed in numerous copies in Rabenhorst, Fungi Eur. Exs. 2132, but we have investigated in detail only the copy deposited in W, that consists of a single leaf with a few perithecia. To save material, no sections were performed, and only a microscope preparation for documentation and measurements of asci, ascospores, paraphyses and clypeus hyphae was done. Our measurements revealed distinctly longer asci and ascospores than reported in the original description (118–165 μm vs. 70–80 μm in Rabenhorst 1876), which therefore is within the range of the other accepted Linosporopsis species. (Desm.) Voglmayr & Beenken, comb. nov. Fig. 3.
Fig. 3

Linosporopsis ischnotheca. a Colonies (bleached patches) on dead overwintered leaves of Fagus sylvatica with scattered black, clypeus-like uniperitheciate pseudostromata. b–d Close up of colonies with black clypeus-like uniperitheciate pseudostromata. e–g Uniperitheciate pseudostromata from above (e), in side view (f), and in transverse section (g). h Host epidermis cells with dark brown, septate, branched hyphae forming a textura intricata. i Uniperitheciate pseudostroma in transverse section. j Pseudoparenchymatous, hyaline peridium and adjacent host tissue in section. k–o Asci (o immature). p–r Ascus apices. s Paraphysis. All in 3% KOH, except i, j, p, s in water; r in Lugol after KOH pre-treatment (a, e–g, m, n WU 40027; b PC0706583, isotype; c PC0706584, isotype; d PAD, holotype of Linospora magnagutiana subsp. faginea; h K(M) 206638, isotype; i, j, p, s WU 40026; o, q, r K(M) 206636, lectotype). Scale barsa, d 10 mm; b 1 mm; c, e 200 μm; f, g, i 100 μm; h, j–o, s 10 μm, p–r 5 μm

Linosporopsis ischnotheca. a Colonies (bleached patches) on dead overwintered leaves of Fagus sylvatica with scattered black, clypeus-like uniperitheciate pseudostromata. b–d Close up of colonies with black clypeus-like uniperitheciate pseudostromata. e–g Uniperitheciate pseudostromata from above (e), in side view (f), and in transverse section (g). h Host epidermis cells with dark brown, septate, branched hyphae forming a textura intricata. i Uniperitheciate pseudostroma in transverse section. j Pseudoparenchymatous, hyaline peridium and adjacent host tissue in section. k–o Asci (o immature). p–r Ascus apices. s Paraphysis. All in 3% KOH, except i, j, p, s in water; r in Lugol after KOH pre-treatment (a, e–g, m, n WU 40027; b PC0706583, isotype; c PC0706584, isotype; d PAD, holotype of Linospora magnagutiana subsp. faginea; h K(M) 206638, isotype; i, j, p, s WU 40026; o, q, r K(M) 206636, lectotype). Scale barsa, d 10 mm; b 1 mm; c, e 200 μm; f, g, i 100 μm; h, j–o, s 10 μm, p–r 5 μm MycoBank: MB 833895. Basionym. Sphaeria ischnotheca Desm., Annls Sci. Nat., Bot., sér. 3 18: 365. 1852. Synonyms. Linospora faginea Sacc., Michelia 1(no. 4): 405. 1878. Linospora ischnotheca (Desm.) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 2: 356. 1883. Pseudostromata immersed in dead overwintered leaves, forming a distinct black clypeus (107–)145–247(–315) μm wide (n = 88) on both sides of the leaf, consisting of a textura epidermoidea-intricata composed of thick-walled, dark brown, septate hyphae 1.5–3 μm wide in dead host epidermis cells. Ascomata perithecial, scattered, solitary, immersed in dead leaf tissue, globose to ellipsoid, 230–340 μm diam., with a distinct central apical papilla 100–145(–160) μm wide at the base. Peridium (19–)22–32(–38) μm wide (n = 23), hyaline, pseudoparenchymatous, of hyaline isodiametric to elongate cells, marginal peridium cells (4.5–)7–13.5(–17) × (1.5–)2.5–4.5(–6.5) μm (n = 46), basal peridium cells smaller, (3–)4–9 (–10) × 1.5–2.3(–2.7) μm (n = 16). Paraphyses unbranched, septate, thin-walled, collabent, 74–110 μm long, 4.0–7.5 μm wide at the base and gradually tapering to 2–4.5 μm at the tips (n = 20). Asci (94–)122–153(–175) × (2.8–)3.4–4.3(–5.2) μm (n = 98), unitunicate, long-cylindrical, with a short stipe, with eight ascospores arranged in a single fascicle, with an indistinct inamyloid apical apparatus. Ascospores (84–)118–149(–170) × (0.6–)0.8–1.0(–1.3) μm, l/w = (35–)119–175(–205) (n = 55), filiform, with rounded ends, hyaline, without visible septa, without sheath or appendages. Colonies on CMD and MEA white; aerial hyphae abundant. No asexual morph observed. Habitat and host range: Dead overwintered leaves of Fagus sylvatica and F. orientalis; rarely also on Quercus sp. Distribution: Europe; known from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Switzerland. Typification: France, without place, date and collector, on dead leaves of Fagus sylvatica, in Desmazières, Pl. Crypt. N. France, Ed. 1, no. 2098 (K(M) 206636, lectotype of Sphaeria ischnotheca here designated, MBT 390204; PC 0706583, isotype); same collection, in Desmazières, Pl. Crypt. N. France, Ed. 1, no. 1798 (K(M) 206635, PC 0706584, isotypes). Italy, Veneto, Treviso, near Conegliano, spring 1877, C.L. Spegazzini (PAD, holotype of Linospora faginea). Switzerland, Zürich, Thuraue near Flaach, 13 May 2017, L. Beenken (WU 40024, epitype of Sphaeria ischnotheca here designated, MBT 390205; ex epitype culture CBS 145761 = LIF1). Other specimens examined: France, Calvados (14), Caen, on dead leaves of Fagus sylvatica, without date, M.R. Roberge (M-0304427,? syntype). Landes, Lussagnet, 43.763725° N, − 0.223289° E, 140 m, 16 May 2017, A. Gross (ZT Myc 59965). Germany, Bavaria, Freising, Kranzberger Forst, Weltwald, on dead leaves of Fagus orientalis, 30 Apr. 2019, L. Beenken (WU 40033). Spain, Asturias, Gijón, on dead leaves of Fagus sylvatica, 16 Apr. 2015, Enrique Rubio Domínguez ERD 6431 (WU 40027). Ibid., on dead leaves of Fagus sylvatica and Quercus robur, 16 Apr. 2015, Enrique Rubio Domínguez (WU 40026; culture LIF3). Switzerland, Zürich, Ellikon am Rhein, 20 May 2017, L. Beenken (WU 40025, ZT Myc 59966; culture LIF2). Zürich, Winterthur, Eschenberg, 47°28′58″ N, 8°43′ 24″ E, 530 m, 16 May 2015, L. Beenken (ZT Myc 59967). Notes: DNA sequence data and morphology place the species within Xylariaceae, as closest relative of L. ochracea. Desmazières (1851) first included specimens from leaves of Fagus sylvatica in his Sphaeria ochracea, but soon thereafter, he described them as a distinct species, S. ischnotheca (Desmazières 1852). In the protologue, he mentioned that the type collection contained only immature asci without spores, which was confirmed for all syntypes investigated in our study. The type collection was edited and distributed in two sets as Pl. Crypt. N. France, Ed. 1, nos. 1798 and 2098, which is also mentioned in the protologue. Neither locality nor collector are mentioned on the herbarium labels and in the original description of the species, and no original notes of Desmazières are attached to the two copies present in PC. However, the herbarium labels of a specimen in M, probably also a syntype, indicates that it was collected by M.R. Roberge in Caen, i.e. the same place and collector as the type of L. ochracea (see below), which appears plausible considering that material of Fagus was mentioned in the original description of L. ochracea. As the type collection of Sphaeria ischnotheca is immature, we here designate a recent mature collection, for which a culture and DNA sequences are available, as epitype to stabilize the species nomenclature. Linospora faginea, which was also described from dead leaves of Fagus sylvatica, is obviously a synonym of L. ischnotheca; the protologue in Saccardo (1878) fully matches our material. As Saccardo material of PAD is not sent out on loan, we have not been able to investigate the type in detail, but the illustrations of the specimen and label kindly provided by the Erbario dell’Università di Padua show that it agrees with L. ischnotheca (see Fig. 3d). The inamyloid apical apparatus of L. ischnotheca is usually indistinct, and only well-seen in IKI (Fig. 3r) or cotton blue. For beautiful additional illustrations of the Spanish specimen ERD 6431, see also http://www.ascofrance.com/search_forum/35346. (Sacc.) Voglmayr & Beenken, comb. nov. Fig. 4.
Fig. 4

Linosporopsis magnagutiana. a Colonies on dead overwintered bleached leaf of Sorbus torminalis. b Close up of a colony with black clypeus-like uniperitheciate pseudostromata. c–f Uniperitheciate pseudostromata from above (c, d), in side view (e) and in transverse section (f). g Host epidermis cells with dark brown, septate, branched hyphae forming a textura epidermoidea-intricata. h–l Asci with paraphyses (h, j, l). m Paraphysis. n, o Ascus apices with slightly amyloid ring. All in 3% KOH, except k, n, o Lugol after KOH pre-treatment (a–m Thümen, Mycoth. Univ. 1454 (a M s.n., b–m WU s.n.); n, o Saccardo, Mycoth. Ven. 1352 (WU s.n.)). Scale barsa 10 mm; b 1 mm; c–f 100 μm; g–i 10 μm; j–m 5 μm; n, o 2 μm

Linosporopsis magnagutiana. a Colonies on dead overwintered bleached leaf of Sorbus torminalis. b Close up of a colony with black clypeus-like uniperitheciate pseudostromata. c–f Uniperitheciate pseudostromata from above (c, d), in side view (e) and in transverse section (f). g Host epidermis cells with dark brown, septate, branched hyphae forming a textura epidermoidea-intricata. h–l Asci with paraphyses (h, j, l). m Paraphysis. n, o Ascus apices with slightly amyloid ring. All in 3% KOH, except k, n, o Lugol after KOH pre-treatment (a–m Thümen, Mycoth. Univ. 1454 (a M s.n., b–m WU s.n.); n, o Saccardo, Mycoth. Ven. 1352 (WU s.n.)). Scale barsa 10 mm; b 1 mm; c–f 100 μm; g–i 10 μm; j–m 5 μm; n, o 2 μm MycoBank: MB 833897. Basionym. Linospora magnagutiana Sacc., Michelia 1(no. 1): 45. 1877. Pseudostromata immersed in dead overwintered leaves, reduced, forming a distinct black clypeus (109–)126–203(–294) μm wide (n = 42) on both sides of the leaf, consisting of a textura epidermoidea-intricata composed of thick-walled, dark brown, septate hyphae 2–4 μm wide mostly in dead host epidermis cells. Ascomata perithecial, scattered, solitary, immersed in dead leaf tissue, globose to depressed globose, ca. 150–170 μm diam., with a distinct central apical papilla 30–65 μm wide at the base. Paraphyses unbranched, septate, thin-walled, collabent, (73–)81–100(–111) μm long, (3.5–)4–5.5(–6) μm wide at the base and gradually tapering to (1.2–)1.6–2.3(–2.6) μm at the tips (n = 23). Asci (79–)94–121(–137) × (3.5–)4.2–5.3(–6.2) μm (n = 96), unitunicate, long-cylindrical, with a short stipe, with eight ascospores arranged in a single fascicle, with an indistinct inamyloid to slightly amyloid apical apparatus. Ascospores (73–)90–116(–132) × (0.7–)0.8–1(–1.3), l/w = (74–)94–137(–174) (n = 89), with rounded ends, hyaline, without visible septa, without sheath or appendages. No cultures available. No asexual morph observed. Habitat and host range: Dead overwintered leaves of Sorbus torminalis. Distribution: Europe; only known from northern Italy. Holotype: Italy, Veneto, Mantova, Bosco della Fontana, on dead leaves of Sorbus torminalis, Apr. 1873, A. Magnaguti-Rondini (PAD, not seen). Specimens examined: Italy, Veneto, Conegliano, on dead leaves of Sorbus torminalis, summer 1878, C. Spegazzini, in Saccardo, Mycoth. Ven. 1352 (WU s.n.). Same place, May 1878, C. Spegazzini, in Baglietto, Cesati & Notaris, Erb. Critt. Ital. Ser. II 727 (M-0304429, Z Myc 8040). Same place, Apr. 1879, C. Spegazzini, in Thümen, Mycoth. Univ. 1454 (M-0304428, WU s.n., ZT Myc 60357). Notes: Due to the lack of fresh specimens, no cultures and sequence data are available for L. magnagutiana, but its morphology clearly places it in Linosporopsis. Only few historic records from northern Italy, all collected in the 1870ies, are known. We have not been able to investigate the type from PAD, which is not sent out on loan, but two additional authentic collections from the same area were available for study. As the historic material is very brittle, no useable section of the peridium could be prepared. The rosaceous host, Sorbus torminalis, and similar morphology indicates that L. magnagutiana may be conspecific with L. ochracea. However, in one locality (Bayerisches Landesarboretum “Weltwald”), where leaves of Pyrus domestica and Sorbus latifolia were heavily infected by L. ochracea, no Linosporopsis could be found on leaves of directly close-by Sorbus torminalis, indicating that they are distinct. In addition, the asci and ascospores of L. magnagutiana are slightly shorter than those of L. ochracea ((79–)94–121(–137) and (73–)90–116(–132) μm vs. (91–)108–130(–153) and (88–)103–126(–149) (n = 139) μm, respectively), and also its clypei are somewhat smaller ((109–)126–203(–294) vs. (97–)172–276(–355) μm). Therefore, for the time being, we argue for maintaining them as distinct species. (Sacc.) Voglmayr & Beenken, comb. nov. Fig. 5.
Fig. 5

Linosporopsis ochracea. a–c Colonies (bleached patches) on dead overwintered leaves of Pyrus communis (a), Crataegus sp. (left) and Sorbus latifolia (right) (b), and Sorbus intermedia (c), with scattered black, clypeus-like uniperitheciate pseudostromata. d Close up of colony with black clypeus-like uniperitheciate pseudostromata. e–g Uniperitheciate pseudostromata from above (e), in side view (f), and in transverse section (g). h Uniperitheciate pseudostroma in transverse section. i Pseudoparenchymatous, hyaline peridium, adjacent host tissue and lower clypeus in section. j Host epidermis cells with dark brown branched hyphae. k–o Asci. p Ascospore. q Paraphysis. r–t Ascus apices. All in 3% KOH, except h, l, p, q in water; o, t in Lugol after KOH pre-treatment (a, d, g–j, l, p WU 40029; b, f, n, o, r PC 0706581, lectotype; c, e, k, m, q WU 40031, epitype; s PC 0706581; t WU 40028. Scale barsa–c 10 mm; d 500 μm; e–h 100 μm; i, k 20 μm; j, l–q 10 μm; r–t 2 μm

Linosporopsis ochracea. a–c Colonies (bleached patches) on dead overwintered leaves of Pyrus communis (a), Crataegus sp. (left) and Sorbus latifolia (right) (b), and Sorbus intermedia (c), with scattered black, clypeus-like uniperitheciate pseudostromata. d Close up of colony with black clypeus-like uniperitheciate pseudostromata. e–g Uniperitheciate pseudostromata from above (e), in side view (f), and in transverse section (g). h Uniperitheciate pseudostroma in transverse section. i Pseudoparenchymatous, hyaline peridium, adjacent host tissue and lower clypeus in section. j Host epidermis cells with dark brown branched hyphae. k–o Asci. p Ascospore. q Paraphysis. r–t Ascus apices. All in 3% KOH, except h, l, p, q in water; o, t in Lugol after KOH pre-treatment (a, d, g–j, l, p WU 40029; b, f, n, o, r PC 0706581, lectotype; c, e, k, m, q WU 40031, epitype; s PC 0706581; t WU 40028. Scale barsa–c 10 mm; d 500 μm; e–h 100 μm; i, k 20 μm; j, l–q 10 μm; r–t 2 μm MycoBank: MB 833898. Basionym. Linospora ochracea Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 2: 355. 1883. Replaced synonym. Sphaeria ochracea Desm., Annls Sci. Nat., Bot., sér. 3 16: 317. 1851, nom. illegit. Art. 53.1, non Sphaeria ochracea Pers., Syn. meth. fung. (Göttingen) 1: 18. 1801. Pseudostromata immersed in dead overwintered leaves, reduced, forming a distinct black clypeus (97–)172–276(–355) μm wide (n = 143) on both sides of the leaf, consisting of a textura epidermoidea-intricata composed of thick-walled, dark brown, septate hyphae 1.5–3.7 μm wide mostly in dead host epidermis cells. Ascomata perithecial, scattered, solitary, immersed in dead leaf tissue, globose to depressed globose, 180–260 μm diam., with a distinct central apical papilla (45–)60–89(–114) μm wide at the base (n = 88). Peridium (22–)26–37(–41) μm wide (n = 20), hyaline, pseudoparenchymatous, of hyaline isodiametric to elongate cells, marginal peridium cells (6.2–)8.5–14.8(–17.3) × (3.7–)4.8–7.7(–10) μm (n = 25), basal peridium cells smaller, (4–)5–9.5(–11.3) × (1.7–)2.5–4.2(–5) μm (n = 26). Paraphyses unbranched, septate, thin-walled, collabent, 75–160 μm long, 3–6(–9.7) μm wide at the base and gradually tapering to 1–2 μm at the tips (n = 34). Asci (91–)108–130(−153) × (3–)4–5.5(–6.7) μm (n = 205), unitunicate, long-cylindrical, with a short stipe, with eight ascospores arranged in a single fascicle, with an indistinct inamyloid or slightly amyloid apical apparatus. Ascospores (88–)103–126(−149) × (0.8–)0.9–1.3(–1.6) μm, l/w = (62–)87–132(–174) (n = 139), filiform, with rounded ends, hyaline, without visible septa, without sheath or appendages. Colonies on CMD and MEA white; aerial hyphae abundant. No asexual morph observed. Habitat and host range: Dead overwintered leaves of various Rosaceae, subtribus Pyrinae; e.g., Crataegus spp., Cydonia oblonga, Malus domestica, Mespilus germanica, Pyrus spp. and Sorbus spp. Distribution: Europe; known from Austria, France, Germany, Italy and Switzerland. Typification: France, Calvados (14), Caen, Hérouville-Saint-Clair, Parc de Lébisey, on dead leaves of Crataegus monogyna and Sorbus latifolia, May 1850, M.R. Roberge, in Desmazières, Pl. Crypt. N. France, Ed. 1, no. 2099 (PC 0706581, lectotype of Linospora ochracea here designated, MBT 390206; K(M) 206803, K(M) 206804, K(M) 206805, K(M) 206,806, PC 0706579, isotypes). Germany, Bavaria, Freising, Kranzberger Forst, Bayerisches Landesarboretum “Weltwald”, on dead leaves of Sorbus intermedia, 30 Apr. 2019, L. Beenken (WU 40031, epitype of Linospora ochracea here designated, MBT 390207, isoepitype ZT Myc 59968; ex epitype culture CBS 145999 = LIO3). Other specimens examined: Austria, Niederösterreich, Marchegg, at the railroad embankment near the river March, on dead leaf of Malus domestica, 1 May 2019, H. Voglmayr (WU 40032); Oberösterreich, Raab, Wetzlbach, on dead leaves of Pyrus communis, 23 Mar. 2019, H. Voglmayr (WU 40029; culture LIO1). France, Calvados (14), Caen, Hérouville-Saint-Clair, Parc de Lébisey, on dead leaves of Pyrus argentea, Apr. 1851, M.R. Roberge (K(M) 206645, PC 0706580); same collection data, in Desmazières, Pl. Crypt. N. France, Ed. 1, no. 2100 (K(M) 206641, K(M) 206642, K(M) 206644, PC 0706582); same collection data, in Desmazières, Pl. Crypt. N. France, Ed. 2, Ser. 1, no. 1800 (K(M) 206643); same place, collector and host, without date (M-0304431); same place and collector, on dead leaves of Sorbus sp., without date (M-0304430). Germany, Bavaria, Freising, Kranzberger Forst, Weltwald, on dead leaves of Pyrus communis, 30 Apr. 2019, L. Beenken (WU 40030, ZT Myc 59969; culture LIO2). Switzerland, Zürich, Henggart, on dead leaves of Malus domestica, 13 May 2017, L. Beenken (WU 40028, ZT Myc 59970; culture CBS 145760 = LIO). Notes: DNA sequence data and morphology place the species within Xylariaceae, as closest relative of L. ischnotheca. It was first described as Sphaeria ochracea by Desmazières (1851), but the name is illegitimate as it is a younger homonym of Sphaeria ochracea Pers. (1801). Therefore, Linospora ochracea Sacc., originally established as a new combination of Sphaeria ochracea Desm., is to be treated as a replacement name and represents the valid basionym. In the protologue, Desmazières (1851) listed leaves of Crataegus, Cydonia, Mespilus, Sorbus and also Fagus as hosts; however, no collection or specimen data were given. For the specimens on Fagus, Desmazières (1852) subsequently described a distinct species, Sphaeria ischnotheca (see above). As concluded from the original material of Desmazières in PC and K, and from his notes attached to the specimen PC 0706581, the species was based on material collected by M.R. Roberge in Hérouville-Saint-Clair near Caen in May 1850, which Desmazières edited in his Pl. Crypt. N. France, Ed. 1, no. 2099. This exsiccatum contains material from Crataegus monogyna and Sorbus latifolia. From the same locality, Desmazières also distributed material from Pyrus argentea (as Pl. Crypt. N. France, Ed. 1, no. 2100 and Pl. Crypt. N. France, Ed. 2, Ser. 1, no. 1800), under the unpublished name Sphaeria ochracea f. pyrina, which, however, does not qualify for the type, as this host is not listed in the protologue; in addition, it was collected one year later (Apr. 1851) than the type, which may be a reason why this host was not cited in the protologue. Unlike all other accessions of L. ochracea investigated by us, which had an indistinct, inamyloid apical apparatus, the Swiss collection WU 40028 from Malus domestica showed a tiny, wedge-shaped, slightly amyloid apical apparatus after KOH pre-treatment (see Fig. 5t). However, the sequences obtained from this accession fully matched the other collections, indicating a variable iodine reaction that probably depends on the maturity and preservation of the specimen. Key to the species of 1. On leaves of Rosaceae..................................................2 1. On leaves of Fagaceae (Fagus, Quercus) or Betulaceae (Carpinus).........................................................................3 2. On leaves of Sorbus torminalis............L. magnagutiana 2. On leaves of other rosaceous hosts (Crataegus, Cydonia, Malus, Pyrus, Sorbus)......................L. ochracea 3. On leaves of Fagus; occasionally also Quercus .....................................................................L. ischnotheca 3. On leaves of Carpinus ....................................L. carpini

Discussion

The results of our molecular phylogenetic investigations confirmed the conclusions of Monod (1983) that the species treated here are not congeneric with Linospora and do not belong to Diaporthales. However, while he assumed that they belong to Ophiodothella, currently classified within Phyllachoraceae (Phyllachorales), our phylogenetic analysis placed them in a basal clade of Xylariaceae sensu stricto (Xylariales). Based on the presence of an amyloid apical ascus ring, conidia resembling Diatrypaceae and a single nuSSU rNDA sequence, Hanlin et al. (2002) assumed xylarialean affinities of Ophiodothella; however, these conclusions were based on non-type species and need to be verified by re-investigation of the generic type. No type material of the generic type, O. atromaculans (Henn.) Höhn., is extant in B where the material of Hennings is kept (R. Lücking, personal communication). However, even if xylarialean, the following features do not support that Ophiodothella is congeneric with the species treated here: an obligate parasitic lifestyle in living leaves, a tropical to subtropical distribution almost exclusively in the New World, formation of pycnidial or acervular conidiomata, lack of distinct bleaching of the substrate and morphological differences of the ascomata (Hanlin et al. 1992, 2002, 2018). Particularly the generic type, O. atromaculans, deviates significantly from our species by an extended effuse, black stromatic crust (Hennings 1904; Hanlin et al. 1992). Additional genera with solitary clypeate ascomata and filiform ascospores that were previously attributed to Xylariales include Linocarpon and Neolinocarpon; however, these have been shown to belong to Chaetosphaeriales by sequence data (Konta et al. 2017). As no suitable described genus is available within Xylariaceae, we establish the new genus Linosporopsis for them. Sister group relationship of Linosporopsis to the Clypeosphaeria mamillana-Anthostomelloides krabiensis clade is highly supported in the ML analyses, but receives only low support in the MP analyses. Linosporopsis is similar to the latter species in solitary ascomata of similar size that are embedded in a reduced pseudostroma within the host tissue and shares a distinct clypeus and apical papilla with Clypeosphaeria mamillana. However, marked differences to Linosporopsis include ellipsoid to oblong brown ascospores; a large, wedge-shaped, strongly amyloid apical ascus apex; and, in A. krabiensis, the lack of a clypeus and of an apical papilla (Jaklitsch et al. 2016; Tibpromma et al. 2017). Ecologically, there is evidence that Linosporopsis occupies a niche as a leaf endophyte, and there is so far no indication of parasitism. Observations in Austrian and Swiss sites with abundant sporulation of Linosporopsis ochracea on dead overwintered Pyrus and Malus leaves revealed no obvious symptoms on living Pyrus and Malus leaves during the following summer. Evidently, the life cycle of Linosporopsis is connected with that of their hosts, as the short-lived ascospores are only produced briefly after their hosts unfold their new leaves in spring. These young leaves are then infected by the ascospores to complete the life cycle, with the living leaf tissue remaining asymptomatic during the growing season. After leaf abscission, the mycelium continues growth on the fallen leaves during the winter season, causing a distinctive bleaching of the decaying leaves, and finally ascomata and ascospores are produced again in the following spring. The filiform, hyaline ascospores of Linosporopsis are very unusual for Xylariaceae, which mostly have more or less ellipsoid, brown ascospores, and therefore, the placement of Linosporopsis within Xylariaceae sensu stricto is somewhat surprising. However, ascospore morphology has proven not to be a good character for family segregation in the Xylariales, while the asexual morphs seem to agree better with the phylogeny (Ju and Rogers 1996, 2002; Wendt et al. 2018). So far, no asexual morph is known for Linosporopsis. The hyaline, filiform spores are likely an adaptation to colonization and infection of living leaves of trees. While little understood and investigated in detail, there is strong evidence that long, curved spores are effective adaptations to facilitate attachment on vertical or otherwise challenging exposed surfaces and are therefore advantageous for successful germination and establishment on aerial plant parts (Calhim et al. 2018). It is therefore not surprising that filiform ascospores have independently evolved in leaf-inhabiting species of various ascomycete lineages. This also provides an explanation for the morphological similarities to the unrelated diaporthalean genus Linospora, which has a similar ecology.
  25 in total

1.  Phylogenetic placement and taxonomic review of the genus Cryptosporella and its synonyms Ophiovalsa and Winterella (Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales).

Authors:  Luis C Mejía; Lisa A Castlebury; Amy Y Rossman; Mikhail V Sogonov; James F White
Journal:  Mycol Res       Date:  2007-11-19

2.  Leaf-inhabiting genera of the Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales.

Authors:  M V Sogonov; L A Castlebury; A Y Rossman; L C Mejía; J F White
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 16.097

3.  Molecular diagnostics of clinical strains of filamentous Basidiomycetes.

Authors:  G S de Hoog; A H Gerrits van den Ende
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.377

4.  Molecular phylogeny of Hypoxylon and closely related genera.

Authors:  Huei-Mei Hsieh; Yu-Ming Ju; Jack D Rogers
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species.

Authors:  R Vilgalys; M Hester
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Molecular phylogeny and a new Iranian species of Caudospora (Sydowiellaceae, Diaporthales).

Authors:  Hermann Voglmayr; Mehdi Mehrabi
Journal:  Sydowia       Date:  2018-05-02

7.  Hypoxylon pulicicidum sp. nov. (Ascomycota, Xylariales), a pantropical insecticide-producing endophyte.

Authors:  Gerald F Bills; Victor González-Menéndez; Jesús Martín; Gonzalo Platas; Jacques Fournier; Derek Peršoh; Marc Stadler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Asterodiscus and Stigmatodiscus, two new apothecial dothideomycete genera and the new order Stigmatodiscales.

Authors:  Hermann Voglmayr; Alain Gardiennet; Walter M Jaklitsch
Journal:  Fungal Divers       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 20.372

9.  Reassessment of Allantonectria, phylogenetic position of Thyronectroidea, and Thyronectria caraganae sp. nov.

Authors:  Hermann Voglmayr; Olexander Yu Akulov; Walter M Jaklitsch
Journal:  Mycol Prog       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.847

10.  Resolution of morphology-based taxonomic delusions: Acrocordiella, Basiseptospora, Blogiascospora, Clypeosphaeria, Hymenopleella, Lepteutypa, Pseudapiospora, Requienella, Seiridium and Strickeria.

Authors:  W M Jaklitsch; A Gardiennet; H Voglmayr
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 11.051

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multigene Phylogeny Reveals Haploanthostomella elaeidis gen. et sp. nov. and Familial Replacement of Endocalyx (Xylariales, Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota).

Authors:  Sirinapa Konta; Kevin D Hyde; Prapassorn D Eungwanichayapant; Samantha C Karunarathna; Milan C Samarakoon; Jianchu Xu; Lucas A P Dauner; Sasith Tharanga Aluthwattha; Saisamorn Lumyong; Saowaluck Tibpromma
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.