| Literature DB >> 34073138 |
Angela Abruzzo1, Carola Parolin1, Elisa Corazza1, Barbara Giordani1, Massimiliano Pio di Cagno2, Teresa Cerchiara1, Federica Bigucci1, Beatrice Vitali1, Barbara Luppi1.
Abstract
One of the most widely used strategies to improve drug diffusion through the skin is the use of permeation enhancers. The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of two biosurfactants (BS), produced by Lactobacillus crispatus BC1 and Lactobacillus gasseri BC9, on the skin permeation profile of hydrocortisone (HC, model drug). HC aqueous solubility and in vitro diffusion studies through porcine skin were performed in the presence of BC1-BS and BC9-BS at concentrations below and above critical micellar concentrations (CMC). Moreover, skin hydration tests and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis were performed to further investigate BS interaction with the outermost layer of the skin. Both BS increased HC solubility, especially at concentrations above their CMC. At concentrations below the CMC, drug permeation through the skin was improved, as the result of a dual effect: a) the formation of a superficial lipophilic environment, as confirmed by the reduction in skin hydration and b) the interaction between BS and the stratum corneum (SC), as demonstrated by the DSC curves. From the obtained data, it appears that BC1-BS and BC9-BS could represent new promising green excipients for drug permeation enhancement through the skin.Entities:
Keywords: Lactobacillus; biosurfactants; drug solubility; hydrocortisone; skin permeation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34073138 PMCID: PMC8228446 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13060820
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Surface tension values versus (a) BC1-BS, (b) BC9-BS, and (c) Tween 80 concentrations (mg/mL). Data are plotted as mean values of surface tension (dyne/cm) ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 2Solubility of HC at 25 °C as a function of surfactant concentration below (1/2-fold lower that their CMC) and above (2-fold and 10-fold higher than their CMC) the CMC. Data are expressed as means ± SD, n = 3. Significance indicated by * = p < 0.05 compared to HC solubility without surfactants, by # = p < 0.05 compared to HC solubility in the presence of same concentration of BC1-BS, and by † = p < 0.05 compared to the HC solubility in the presence of the same concentration of Tween 80.
Figure 3Skin hydration values (Corneometer unit) after treatment with surfactants at a concentration below and above the CMC. Data are expressed as means ± SD, n = 3. Significance indicated by * = p < 0.05 compared to the control.
Figure 4Permeation profiles through porcine skin of HC in the absence and presence of different concentrations of surfactant: (a) concentrations below CMC (1/2-fold lower than CMC); (b) concentrations above CMC (10-fold higher than CMC). Data are expressed as means ± SD, n = 5. Significance indicated by * = p < 0.05 compared to the control.
Figure 5HC permeability coefficients (Kp) in the absence and presence of various surfactant concentrations. Data are expressed as means ± SD, n = 5. Significance indicated by * = p < 0.05 compared to Kp of HC.
Figure 6DSC curves of the SC obtained from porcine skin treated with BC1-BS and BC9-BS at a concentration below their CMC.